@Makka Adam Lambert has his own web sites so there is no need for his fans to sabotage another artists web site.
There is no excuse whatsoever.
This is a Queen site dedicated to the four members of Queen . Freddie Brian John & Roger.
No one sabotages this site who is a fan of "Spike" and he also works for Queen so why do we have to put up with drivel from Lambert fans?
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Miracle. wrote:
@Makka Adam Lambert has his own web sites so there is no need for his fans to sabotage another artists web site.
There is no excuse whatsoever.
This is a Queen site dedicated to the four members of Queen . Freddie Brian John & Roger.
No one sabotages this site who is a fan of "Spike" and he also works for Queen so why do we have to put up with drivel from Lambert fans?
You have failed to notice that this is the Q+ section. Originally PR now AL. It was ADDED to THE SITE so that genuin Queen fans could discuss what the band is currently doing. What has happened along the way is an invasion by Lambert hating idiots who can't expect that some people like what they are currently doing and are free to talk about it.
You don't like it, you made that clear when you were Gerry, since then you have proved you can't hold an intelligent informed conversation with anyone, even to the point where some of the people on QZ who don't like Lambert will have nothing to do with you or runner_70.
If you don't get that, it's down to you. Not the other members of this site
@ Vocal Harmony when i want your limp opinions i will ask for them in the meantime mind your business ans carry on hating Freddie.
@ Vocal Harmony I can hold a perfectly good conversation with people that matter but you are not one of those people,
you are fodder and i do not mix well with fodder !
you are fodder and i do not mix well with fodder !
Miracle. wrote:
@ Vocal Harmony I can't hold a perfectly good conversation with anybody. I am clearly one of those people that I describe as
fodder and i do not mix well with normal people !
You know yourself well
Miracle. wrote:
@ Vocal Harmony when i want your limp opinions i will ask for them in the meantime mind your business ans carry on hating Freddie.
I have never said i hate Freddie, again I say to you re post the line where I say that.
@Vocal Harmony since when have you been classed as "normal" ? Far from it i think, you are immature a proper shit stirrer and you think Freddie
is NOT the greatest male vocalist ever! Sad person you are.
is NOT the greatest male vocalist ever! Sad person you are.
Miracle. wrote:
@Vocal Harmony since when have you been classed as "normal" ? Far from it i think, you are immature a proper shit stirrer and you think Freddie
is NOT the greatest male vocalist ever! Sad person you are.
So true ... but Kerry Ellis is superior to Frederick.
This thread is populated by some idiots.
I have never claimed Freddie wasn't great, amazing or what ever.
I do however have realistic views of what is brilliant and what is the best in the world at something. Judging any art form as being the best is never easy or going to provide a conclusive answer. I believe Freddie was the greatest front man ever. Though I also think as front men go in the 80's David Lee Roth came close and possibly in some ways was as good, if you could put up with his lack of singing ability live. As a recording artist in the world of rock/pop Freddie was as good as it got. As a live vocalist on a good night he was clearly the best but being the best was beyond his vocal strength on some nights and during some legs on certain tours.
Someone on here said Freddie was the greatest singer ever. Bocelli, Enrico Caruso, Placido Domingo, Hvorostovsky, Carreres, Boris Christoff. . . . . Maybe Miracle would like to explain where Freddie Mercury fits into that list, being as he is claiming best in the world status. Or maybe he'll just choose to prove his qualification as an idiot by either claiming he's never heard of them or that they are rubbish as that's the view he's taken before when faced with something he can't explain or doesn't agre with.
Miracle if you're going to claim someone is the best singer in the world, at least have a realistic idea of the subject you are talking about!
I have never claimed Freddie wasn't great, amazing or what ever.
I do however have realistic views of what is brilliant and what is the best in the world at something. Judging any art form as being the best is never easy or going to provide a conclusive answer. I believe Freddie was the greatest front man ever. Though I also think as front men go in the 80's David Lee Roth came close and possibly in some ways was as good, if you could put up with his lack of singing ability live. As a recording artist in the world of rock/pop Freddie was as good as it got. As a live vocalist on a good night he was clearly the best but being the best was beyond his vocal strength on some nights and during some legs on certain tours.
Someone on here said Freddie was the greatest singer ever. Bocelli, Enrico Caruso, Placido Domingo, Hvorostovsky, Carreres, Boris Christoff. . . . . Maybe Miracle would like to explain where Freddie Mercury fits into that list, being as he is claiming best in the world status. Or maybe he'll just choose to prove his qualification as an idiot by either claiming he's never heard of them or that they are rubbish as that's the view he's taken before when faced with something he can't explain or doesn't agre with.
Miracle if you're going to claim someone is the best singer in the world, at least have a realistic idea of the subject you are talking about!
Vocal harmony wrote:
This thread is populated by some idiots.
Yup the four loonies drooling over Lameturd the goat
runner_70 its wierd you quoted that line then provided your over used claim about forum members.
It's clear that if you had the intelligence needed you would have at least tried to argue against what I said, even if it was just to show Miracle some support. Or maybe you're not stupid enough to agree with that claim that Freddie was the best singer in the world. .
Either way I can think of two of the four loonies, but I'm struggling to name the other two, in fact after you and Miracle who else is there.
It's clear that if you had the intelligence needed you would have at least tried to argue against what I said, even if it was just to show Miracle some support. Or maybe you're not stupid enough to agree with that claim that Freddie was the best singer in the world. .
Either way I can think of two of the four loonies, but I'm struggling to name the other two, in fact after you and Miracle who else is there.
Vocal harmony wrote:
This thread is populated by some idiots.
Yup - you just arrived on this thread so You are spot on
@Vocal Harmony You are an uneducated Queen fan if that is what you claim to be (a Queen fan.)
Freddie is arguably the greatest rock male singer ever and the world would agree! (apart from you) who thinks Adam is better.)
We at Miracle land see you have no direction at been a supportive Queen fan and you should educate yourself and listen to the late great Freddie Mercury and understand the skill and craft of his voice
it is the greatest voice ever in rock music and has influenced many many artists today in the world of music.
Adam on the other hand has only ever influenced peppa pig !
Freddie is arguably the greatest rock male singer ever and the world would agree! (apart from you) who thinks Adam is better.)
We at Miracle land see you have no direction at been a supportive Queen fan and you should educate yourself and listen to the late great Freddie Mercury and understand the skill and craft of his voice
it is the greatest voice ever in rock music and has influenced many many artists today in the world of music.
Adam on the other hand has only ever influenced peppa pig !
MisterCosmicc wrote:
Haha.