@MisterCosmicc
1 ADD impacts all sorts of things, anything requiring a lot of concentration so not just reading and classwork.
2 The producers on his latest project were all hand picked, he collaborated with people he chose (musicians, writers and producers) and they were there to work with him to produce the songs the way he wanted and it's obvious the lyrics are personal, I never said he wrote them alone but the message is what he wanted to say regardless if he had help with the writing process.
3 How many bands do you know that write music but their singer goes off touring with a different band for much of the year and they sit twiddling their thumbs instead of making an album and then touring it together? I doubt he could find a bunch of musicians who'd be happy with that. Like I said the people he worked with on this project were hand picked by him, there was no label telling him who to work with he chose people he either knew and had worked with before or liked other stuff they'd done and contacted them to collaborate with. All solo artists have to work that way unless they do the whole thing themselves, there's nothing wrong with the way he did this project, it was done the way he wanted and he had control over how they put the songs together so if he's happy with it I don't see any issue personally.
5 Queen songs are sacred to some but others realize the originals aren't going anywhere and are happy for others to put their own interpretation on them, it doesn't take anything away from the original and Adam is not the kind of person who want's to just do things the way they were written, every cover he does he changes that's just who he is so it's pointless to expect him to be different when singing with Brian & Roger, they clearly knew that about him from the start and are happy with what he does.
8 His new EP isn't generic and computerized it's done with live instruments and each song is different so no idea where you get generic from. I like it doesn't mean you have to but that doesn't make it bad either, it's personal taste at the end of the day.
9 If you think Adam just listens to his management you don't know much about him and as I've said his latest music isn't computerized, the reason he went indie is to get away from what the labels and management were telling him to do. He changed management as well as going indie because he wanted a complete fresh start and this project has been done his own way with musicians and producers he wanted to work with which is the reason it's different people on each song. Just because you personally don't like it doesn't make how he did it wrong and regardless what you think of it it's done with musicians in the studio playing live instruments and with Adam having input into how it's done, he didn't just let them do whatever he collaborated as in they jammed together and played around with the songs until they were how he wanted.
10 Maybe you aren't a fan of that type of singing, I love 80's hair metal so I like it and it seems plenty other people do by the response he gets. He's never gonna please everyone but why should he change who he is to please some?
Wanting him to sound true to the original is pointless, Brian & Roger have given him a lot of freedom to interpret the songs the way he wants and since Adam changes any song he ever sings I very much doubt that's gonna change now. Some die hard fans don't like it but others don't mind and I've seen plenty of comments saying they like that he doesn't try to copy the original. Again he can't please everyone so the only thing to do is be himself and some will like it and some won't, luckily I do.
Thread
Posts in chronological order
He seems like an alright guy in interviews.
However, when it comes to his performances...
I don't like his voice whatsoever. His voice is thin, harsh, and grating. And he sounds like shit compared to Freddie Mercury (comparisons are inevitable, being as he's singing songs that Freddie Mercury sang). That said, he sounds like shit regardless, either compared to far lesser singers than Freddie Mercury or without any comparisons whatsoever, due to his grating tone.
His image is cringeworthy. He looks inauthentic, like a third rate version of George Michael. Or like someone attending fancy dress party in a cheap, dodgy outfit.
His solo output is about as mediocre as you can get too.
However, when it comes to his performances...
I don't like his voice whatsoever. His voice is thin, harsh, and grating. And he sounds like shit compared to Freddie Mercury (comparisons are inevitable, being as he's singing songs that Freddie Mercury sang). That said, he sounds like shit regardless, either compared to far lesser singers than Freddie Mercury or without any comparisons whatsoever, due to his grating tone.
His image is cringeworthy. He looks inauthentic, like a third rate version of George Michael. Or like someone attending fancy dress party in a cheap, dodgy outfit.
His solo output is about as mediocre as you can get too.
Day dop wrote:
He seems like an alright guy in interviews.
However, when it comes to his performances...
I don't like his voice whatsoever. His voice is thin, harsh, and grating. And he sounds like shit compared to Freddie Mercury (comparisons are inevitable, being as he's singing songs that Freddie Mercury sang). That said, he sounds like shit regardless, either compared to far lesser singers than Freddie Mercury or without any comparisons whatsoever, due to his grating tone.
His image is cringeworthy. He looks inauthentic, like a third rate version of George Michael. Or like someone attending fancy dress party in a cheap, dodgy outfit.
His solo output is about as mediocre as you can get too.
I hate to say it but you nailed it lol
runner_70 wrote:
Day dop wrote:
He seems like an alright guy in interviews.
However, when it comes to his performances...
I don't like his voice whatsoever. His voice is thin, harsh, and grating. And he sounds like shit compared to Freddie Mercury (comparisons are inevitable, being as he's singing songs that Freddie Mercury sang). That said, he sounds like shit regardless, either compared to far lesser singers than Freddie Mercury or without any comparisons whatsoever, due to his grating tone.
His image is cringeworthy. He looks inauthentic, like a third rate version of George Michael. Or like someone attending fancy dress party in a cheap, dodgy outfit.
His solo output is about as mediocre as you can get too.
I hate to say it but you nailed it lol
One of the many differences between you and me is that although I don't rate Lambert, I don't spend almost every day of the year - year in, year out - obsessing over Adam Lambert and his fans.
You do, and that's extremely fucking pathetic.
Perhaps at some point you become self aware and manage to work through your problems. I doubt that'll happen though.
snifflese wrote:
Yes, I like him. I think he is a good human being.
No he is an arrogant prick. His admiration of Freddie is a pure act. When he is on stage he is the arrogant twat he is
snifflese wrote:
I also think he has one of the best voices in the world right now.
No-only if you like wining powerless girl's voices
snifflese wrote:
I just think he is singing the wrong kind of music
No matter what music he is trying to sing he is always destroying it. Be it Queen or Zeppelin or Cher. Crap bar 5
Day dop wrote:
runner_70 wrote:
Day dop wrote:
He seems like an alright guy in interviews.
However, when it comes to his performances...
I don't like his voice whatsoever. His voice is thin, harsh, and grating. And he sounds like shit compared to Freddie Mercury (comparisons are inevitable, being as he's singing songs that Freddie Mercury sang). That said, he sounds like shit regardless, either compared to far lesser singers than Freddie Mercury or without any comparisons whatsoever, due to his grating tone.
His image is cringeworthy. He looks inauthentic, like a third rate version of George Michael. Or like someone attending fancy dress party in a cheap, dodgy outfit.
His solo output is about as mediocre as you can get too.
I hate to say it but you nailed it lol
One of the many differences between you and me is that although I don't rate Lambert, I don't spend almost every day of the year - year in, year out - obsessing over Adam Lambert and his fans.
You do, and that's extremely fucking pathetic.
Perhaps at some point you become self aware and manage to work through your problems. I doubt that'll happen though.
I have no problems at all. I just hate this tool that's all
runner_70 wrote:
Day dop wrote:
runner_70 wrote:
Day dop wrote:
He seems like an alright guy in interviews.
However, when it comes to his performances...
I don't like his voice whatsoever. His voice is thin, harsh, and grating. And he sounds like shit compared to Freddie Mercury (comparisons are inevitable, being as he's singing songs that Freddie Mercury sang). That said, he sounds like shit regardless, either compared to far lesser singers than Freddie Mercury or without any comparisons whatsoever, due to his grating tone.
His image is cringeworthy. He looks inauthentic, like a third rate version of George Michael. Or like someone attending fancy dress party in a cheap, dodgy outfit.
His solo output is about as mediocre as you can get too.
I hate to say it but you nailed it lol
One of the many differences between you and me is that although I don't rate Lambert, I don't spend almost every day of the year - year in, year out - obsessing over Adam Lambert and his fans.
You do, and that's extremely fucking pathetic.
Perhaps at some point you become self aware and manage to work through your problems. I doubt that'll happen though.
I have no problems at all. I just hate this tool that's all
No one of healthy mind would spend year after year obsessing over a pop singer he doesn't like, and harassing his fans online.
You absolutely do have problems, and you're fucking pathetic. You know it too.
Ah the stalking clown who claims to have the know-all about sound quality lol. Funny shit
Day dop, Adam is a grrreat singer! Have never heard an off key note from him and he MUST be heard LIVE !!!!!
runner_70 wrote:
Ah the stalking clown who claims to have the know-all about sound quality lol. Funny shit
Stalker? That is rich coming from someone who has spent YEARS stalking Adam Lambert fans online.
You truly lack self-awareness, don't you?
And quote the part where I claimed "to have the know-all about sound quality"
Knowing more than you does not equate to knowing all.
And you're not laughing about anything, despite you writing "lol" and "Funny shit". You're extremely miserable, hence you spend your time trolling Lambert fans online. Have you not read the studies on internet trolls such as yourself?
Would you like me to drop some articles here for people to read? (No, you wouldn't, and you'll very likely try to gloss over this).
SweetCaroline wrote:
Day dop, Adam is a grrreat singer! Have never heard an off key note from him and he MUST be heard LIVE !!!!!
I already know your opinion. I disagree. I can't stand his voice.
And I've heard him live. He sounds just as bad as he does on video, except louder.
Day dop wrote:
SweetCaroline wrote:
Day dop, Adam is a grrreat singer! Have never heard an off key note from him and he MUST be heard LIVE !!!!!
I already know your opinion. I disagree. I can't stand his voice.
And I've heard him live. He sounds just as bad as he does on video, except louder.
You don't make it seem appealing, but no worries the hype from SweetCaroline is even less appealing.
Why do you think two great musicians like Brian and Roger are so thrilled to perform over 200 shows worldwide with a guy like Adam if he wasn’t a special vocalist able to handle anything in their iconic Queen catalog?
You might not like his tone because it isn’t exactly like Freddie’s but Adam is a dependable, professional musician who can handle the rigors of back to back shows and has the temperament to cope with whatever comes along the way! He wouldn’t have made it past that first show in Kiev if he didn’t have the right attitude, charisma, sense of humor. His voice is NOT grating. In fact some people complain that it is too smooth for rock n roll. I have always considered him a chameleon who can perform any genre of music just like they have said about Freddie. Both Freddie
and Adam have sung opera as well as rock! How many singers can do that?
Hey, we can’t have Freddie so I believe Ada
is the next best thing!
You might not like his tone because it isn’t exactly like Freddie’s but Adam is a dependable, professional musician who can handle the rigors of back to back shows and has the temperament to cope with whatever comes along the way! He wouldn’t have made it past that first show in Kiev if he didn’t have the right attitude, charisma, sense of humor. His voice is NOT grating. In fact some people complain that it is too smooth for rock n roll. I have always considered him a chameleon who can perform any genre of music just like they have said about Freddie. Both Freddie
and Adam have sung opera as well as rock! How many singers can do that?
Hey, we can’t have Freddie so I believe Ada
is the next best thing!
SweetCaroline wrote:
Day dop, Adam is a grrreat singer! Have never heard an off key note from him and he MUST be heard LIVE !!!!!
I think you have hearing problems. He has sang off key.
Must be heard live you say, because opinion aren't valid even when people have gone to see them live and it doesn't match your views of it being spectacular, magnificent and magical!!!
I expect you to lose your shit at Day dop any second now.
Adam is the next best thing! I hate this damn iPhone!