Mr Bad Guy - Special edition

Dr Magus wrote:

I'm looking forward to hearing Mr Bad Guy again.

Listen to the original. It has more power and sounds fresher than this flat product just released

Dr Magus wrote:

I'm looking forward to hearing Mr Bad Guy again.

Ignore the troll, above. He's as clueless as ever. The original sounds flat compared to the new version.

Please imagine a man - a chronically disabled and downsyndromed man - hilariously plummeting down a concrete staircase in his rickety wheelchair; his dented, disabled head thrashing side to side as he groans "UHHHH NUUUUR!"

richrich wrote:

Please imagine a man - a chronically disabled and downsyndromed man - hilariously plummeting down a concrete staircase in his rickety wheelchair; his dented, disabled head thrashing side to side as he groans "UHHHH NUUUUR!"

Maybe you should sacrifice your superb literary imagery for the sake of clarity, because most of us are assuming you are talking about Day dop. "RUNN ERR!"

And there was me thinking that class had left this place.

aristide1 wrote:

richrich wrote:

Please imagine a man - a chronically disabled and downsyndromed man - hilariously plummeting down a concrete staircase in his rickety wheelchair; his dented, disabled head thrashing side to side as he groans "UHHHH NUUUUR!"

Maybe you should sacrifice your superb literary imagery for the sake of clarity, because most of us are assuming you are talking about Day dop. "RUNN ERR!"

Despite this tactic of yours being pointed out previously, aristide1, you're once again pretending you speak on behalf of everyone else.

You don't.

Your assumption is nothing more than a brain fart. In fact, when it comes to opinion on the new mix, your'e in the minority here. On that basis alone, I'd say the odds of you being right there are zilch.

Perhaps you already know that, and you're outright trolling, which is the kind of unhealthy behaviour regularly displayed by Runner_70.

Either way, it doesn't look good for you.

aristide1 wrote:

richrich wrote:

Please imagine a man - a chronically disabled and downsyndromed man - hilariously plummeting down a concrete staircase in his rickety wheelchair; his dented, disabled head thrashing side to side as he groans "UHHHH NUUUUR!"

Maybe you should sacrifice your superb literary imagery for the sake of clarity, because most of us are assuming you are talking about Day dop. "RUNN ERR!"

he surely does

runner_70 wrote:

aristide1 wrote:

richrich wrote:

Please imagine a man - a chronically disabled and downsyndromed man - hilariously plummeting down a concrete staircase in his rickety wheelchair; his dented, disabled head thrashing side to side as he groans "UHHHH NUUUUR!"

Maybe you should sacrifice your superb literary imagery for the sake of clarity, because most of us are assuming you are talking about Day dop. "RUNN ERR!"

he surely does

I can see that English is not your forte, but "he surely does" what?

"He surely does"... "sacrifice your superb literary imagery for the sake of clarity"?
"He surely does"... "[assume] you are talking about Day dop"?

"He surely does" makes no sense whatsoever in regards to the comment you replied to.

What's funny is the fact that this looney opened a thread and said that I spent too much time on QZ. You write sth on here and 5 seconds later there is another drivel posting from this clown. Funny stuff actually. He surely has a lot of time in between listening to his flat MBG remix cd on heavy rotation

runner_70 wrote:

What's funny is the fact that this looney opened a thread and said that I spent too much time on QZ. You write sth on here and 5 seconds later there is another drivel posting from this clown. Funny stuff actually. He surely has a lot time in between listening to his flat MBG remix cd on heavy rotation

Somehow it's eluded you that unlike you, I have not spent day after day on here, year after year. So your comparison is as ridiculous as every else you come out with.

Day dop wrote:

aristide1 wrote:

richrich wrote:

Please imagine a man - a chronically disabled and downsyndromed man - hilariously plummeting down a concrete staircase in his rickety wheelchair; his dented, disabled head thrashing side to side as he groans "UHHHH NUUUUR!"

Maybe you should sacrifice your superb literary imagery for the sake of clarity, because most of us are assuming you are talking about Day dop. "RUNN ERR!"

Despite this tactic of yours being pointed out previously, aristide1, you're once again pretending you speak on behalf of everyone else.

You don't.

Your assumption is nothing more than a brain fart. In fact, when it comes to opinion on the new mix, your'e in the minority here. On that basis alone, I'd say the odds of you being right there are zilch.

Perhaps you already know that, and you're outright trolling, which is the kind of unhealthy behaviour regularly displayed by Runner_70.

Either way, it doesn't look good for you.

Speaking of "regularly displayed unhealthy behaviour", the obsession for yourself made you blind to the fact that I like the new mix.
I just don't like you, so I'm in the majority on both aspects.

It's the 10th time you use the word "tactic", a sign that you're totally fucked up when it comes to deal with others.

aristide1 wrote:
Speaking of "regularly displayed unhealthy behaviour", the obsession for yourself made you blind to the fact that I like the new mix.

I just don't like you, so I'm in the majority on both aspects.

It's the 10th time you use the word "tactic", a sign that you're totally fucked up when it comes to deal with others.

Ffs. If you were self aware, you'd be embarrassed.

I'm not blind to your opinion on the new mix whatsoever.
Unless you think my view that you haven't showed strong feelings either way is "blind". But if that's the case, I'd say that you're stretching it (which isn't unusual for you, going on what I've seen so far).
i wrote, "In fact, when it comes to opinion on the new mix, you're in the minority here", but perhaps should've made it clearer to you by adding "... If you believe people dislike me over that." (look again at what I was refuting). Bear in mind also that I wrote, "when it comes to opinion on the new mix", and not "when it comes to *YOUR* opinion on the new mix".

Regarding your bratty "I just don't like you" comment...
You don't know me. All you know is what I've written here.
In fact, regarding any arguments I've made that have upset you to the degree that it's personal for you, why not go buy yourself some tissues? Because your issues are not my problem.

And no, pointing out your tactic (the tactic in which you misrepresent what "we" or "the majority" think in order to appear you're on the right side of an argument) is not a "a sign that [I'm] totally fucked up when it comes to deal with others" whatsoever. I'm calling it exactly what it is. A tactic.
Get counting. I'm going to be using the word "tactic" plenty more times when addressing your behaviour.

And you not liking me does not equate to you being in the majority about that whatsoever.
Of all the people I listed, name the ones that expressed their dislike towards me. I look forward to you doing that. Once you've done so, then we'll go over how many people commented, and how many expressed an opinion about me (including the "Well said" and "Amen" comments). And then I'll show you dictionary definition of the word "minority", so you'll come to understand that it doesn't mean the same thing as "majority".

Once again, that tactic of yours is very transparent and clearly not working. inconvenient for you, I know.

And regarding this general tactic of yours, after I'd picked up on it previously, you wrote...

"It was clear for "me" not for "us", because I can speak only for myself, you're right on this aspect."

And yet here you are once again, using similar tactics. So why are you doing it again? Are you really that slow to think by this point that it'd going to go unnoticed?

I suspect it's a tactic you've used all your life, but get the following into you thick skull...

1) You do not speak on behalf of everyone else.

2) Pretending that everyone shares the same view as you is a tactic that hasn't worked, nor is it going to work.

You do understand that replying to troll-like / idiot comments doesn't equate to an "obsession", right? The obsessive behaviour I was talking about was Runner_70's, regarding Lambert and his fans, day after day, year after year.

Hence I wrote, "Perhaps you already know that, and you're outright trolling, which is the kind of unhealthy behaviour regularly displayed by Runner_70."

It'd be nice if you stopped derailing this thread with your personal issues, at some point. Preferably, the sooner rather than later :-)

Someone has too much time on his hands. I did not even read this drivel

runner_70 wrote:

Someone has too much time on his hands. I did not even read this drivel

That's rich, coming from someone who spends almost every day on this forum, year after year, obsessing over Lambert and his fans.

As usual, the irony eludes you.

DayDop @ 13 pages on and you are still arguing with everyone on here so it seems you are the one who has the problem and not us!
Go and lie down a do some breathing exercises then if you cannot sleep put Adam Lambert new single on and i guarantee you will be in a deep sleep with in 10 seconds!