Makka
This is great. Many thanks to all involved for sharing this. And yeah, enthusiastic crowd!
Thread
Posts in chronological order
dysan
Thanks Wizard. I love these Hot Space shows and I love Rock It as an opener. Electrifying.
pmatsynot
Thank you RW and everyone else involved for this share
Faroukqch
CD COVERS :)
https://mega.nz/#!L7w2HCSa!wY2YDk94JNwHUU3UoQxtHmQmnBx5FlHxNobnK37fClo
https://mega.nz/#!L7w2HCSa!wY2YDk94JNwHUU3UoQxtHmQmnBx5FlHxNobnK37fClo
la_ultra_zona
Thank you Bob and KRW_CO!
aristide1
Thank you for conveying to queenzone this new tape, but it seems that the interest for new audience recordings is somehow fading.
However there is a general demand for official archive releases, although the real request of fans is respect, which unfortunately Brian May is not able to provide it.
Queen legacy was badly managed, while Brian was struggling with solo career, doctoral degree in astrophysics, Queen+ circus, stereoscopic diableries and humankind welfare, all in a pathetic attempt to prove that he is much more than a guitar player in a rock band.
However there is a general demand for official archive releases, although the real request of fans is respect, which unfortunately Brian May is not able to provide it.
Queen legacy was badly managed, while Brian was struggling with solo career, doctoral degree in astrophysics, Queen+ circus, stereoscopic diableries and humankind welfare, all in a pathetic attempt to prove that he is much more than a guitar player in a rock band.
The Real Wizard
[QUOTE] [b]aristide1 wrote:[/b]
Thank you for conveying to queenzone this new tape, but it seems that the interest for new audience recordings is somehow fading.[/QUOTE]
Maybe that's the case here (although there's no way of tracking the number of downloads if it isn't a torrent), but on Dime and TTD where this was originally posted it got about 500 downloads.
And the Santa Monica 1976 tape got even more.
Thank you for conveying to queenzone this new tape, but it seems that the interest for new audience recordings is somehow fading.[/QUOTE]
Maybe that's the case here (although there's no way of tracking the number of downloads if it isn't a torrent), but on Dime and TTD where this was originally posted it got about 500 downloads.
And the Santa Monica 1976 tape got even more.
The Real Wizard
[QUOTE] [b]aristide1 wrote:[/b]
However there is a general demand for official archive releases, although the real request of fans is respect, which unfortunately Brian May is not able to provide it.
Queen legacy was badly managed, while Brian was struggling with solo career, doctoral degree in astrophysics, Queen+ circus, stereoscopic diableries and humankind welfare, all in a pathetic attempt to prove that he is much more than a guitar player in a rock band. [/QUOTE]
Well, and he succeeded - they don't exactly hand out PhDs. He earned it.
He didn't work with NASA on the New Horizons mission out of sympathy - he earned that too.
You have peddled your conspiracy nonsense about how you think the scientific community is giving May special treatment due to his musical career, but have failed to substantiate it because it's obviously a pile of horseshit. Give it a rest. You're wrong. Fortunately irrational people like you are part of a tiny minority in your views.
And Brian didn't exactly "struggle" with his solo career - he had a top 10 hit with Driven By You, and every drummer he played with was world class - Cozy Powell, Eric Singer, Steve Ferrone, and Taylor Hawkins. Guys like that don't donate their time to struggling musicians.
This "respect" you speak of is about far more than which archival they release (of which Queen have released plenty). But look at the bigger picture instead of through your myopic superfan/superhater lense - Queen were the biggest band in the world in 2019, and sold more records in the western hemisphere than any other artist. The next generation of kids now know who they are. That is remarkable considering Queen basically haven't existed for nearly 30 years. If you think one of your favourite bands being given a second lease on life in the eyes of the public is somehow a problem, then you really need to give your head a shake.
I doubt you've created anything yourself of any value to anyone. If you did, you probably wouldn't have time to talk smack about the accomplishments of others. News flash - whether or not you like it, Brian May remains one of the most respected people in the business.
If all this still doesn't make sense to you and all you can enjoy is an audience tape from 1982, then great, enjoy your audience tape from 1982. I only hope the bitterness and discontent within yourself eventually gets sorted out, and not just so that you stop polluting this forum with it.
However there is a general demand for official archive releases, although the real request of fans is respect, which unfortunately Brian May is not able to provide it.
Queen legacy was badly managed, while Brian was struggling with solo career, doctoral degree in astrophysics, Queen+ circus, stereoscopic diableries and humankind welfare, all in a pathetic attempt to prove that he is much more than a guitar player in a rock band. [/QUOTE]
Well, and he succeeded - they don't exactly hand out PhDs. He earned it.
He didn't work with NASA on the New Horizons mission out of sympathy - he earned that too.
You have peddled your conspiracy nonsense about how you think the scientific community is giving May special treatment due to his musical career, but have failed to substantiate it because it's obviously a pile of horseshit. Give it a rest. You're wrong. Fortunately irrational people like you are part of a tiny minority in your views.
And Brian didn't exactly "struggle" with his solo career - he had a top 10 hit with Driven By You, and every drummer he played with was world class - Cozy Powell, Eric Singer, Steve Ferrone, and Taylor Hawkins. Guys like that don't donate their time to struggling musicians.
This "respect" you speak of is about far more than which archival they release (of which Queen have released plenty). But look at the bigger picture instead of through your myopic superfan/superhater lense - Queen were the biggest band in the world in 2019, and sold more records in the western hemisphere than any other artist. The next generation of kids now know who they are. That is remarkable considering Queen basically haven't existed for nearly 30 years. If you think one of your favourite bands being given a second lease on life in the eyes of the public is somehow a problem, then you really need to give your head a shake.
I doubt you've created anything yourself of any value to anyone. If you did, you probably wouldn't have time to talk smack about the accomplishments of others. News flash - whether or not you like it, Brian May remains one of the most respected people in the business.
If all this still doesn't make sense to you and all you can enjoy is an audience tape from 1982, then great, enjoy your audience tape from 1982. I only hope the bitterness and discontent within yourself eventually gets sorted out, and not just so that you stop polluting this forum with it.
xmaurox79
http://queenonstage.com/mywebpage/cdr_hotspacethespectrum_breakdown770.htm
Seems like Breakdown released this on CD last october. Is it the same source?
Seems like Breakdown released this on CD last october. Is it the same source?
aristide1
Traffic of influence doesn't mean only to illegally get a piece of land from the city council.
Receiving a doctoral degree from a university based on a 40 years old "almost finished" paper is the same thing, at least morally if not legally.
How about millions of people who "almost finished" their studies in different stages decades ago, are they easily allowed to graduate?
If only selected few are accepted, then we talk about influence paddling.
Not to mention that a full doctorate is reserved for those having a career in the field, not for science fans like Brian.
Someone who really is as humble as he pretends to be would have been more than happy with a honorary degree.
Speaking of career, it's really touching how you try to present Brian's solo career as a successful one. Clearly you like him a lot.
What's not so clear is why I am not allowed to express my disappointment because I supposedly don't create something of any value.
I'm not a hobo living on a park bench, and you're certainly not a law enforcement agent authorised to check my papers.
Receiving a doctoral degree from a university based on a 40 years old "almost finished" paper is the same thing, at least morally if not legally.
How about millions of people who "almost finished" their studies in different stages decades ago, are they easily allowed to graduate?
If only selected few are accepted, then we talk about influence paddling.
Not to mention that a full doctorate is reserved for those having a career in the field, not for science fans like Brian.
Someone who really is as humble as he pretends to be would have been more than happy with a honorary degree.
Speaking of career, it's really touching how you try to present Brian's solo career as a successful one. Clearly you like him a lot.
What's not so clear is why I am not allowed to express my disappointment because I supposedly don't create something of any value.
I'm not a hobo living on a park bench, and you're certainly not a law enforcement agent authorised to check my papers.
Holly2003
[QUOTE] [b]aristide1 wrote:[/b]
Traffic of influence doesn't mean only to illegally get a piece of land from the city council.
Receiving a doctoral degree from a university based on a 40 years old "almost finished" paper is the same thing, at least morally if not legally.
How about millions of people who "almost finished" their studies in different stages decades ago, are they easily allowed to graduate?
If only selected few are accepted, then we talk about influence paddling.
Not to mention that a full doctorate is reserved for those having a career in the field, not for science fans like Brian.
Someone who really is as humble as he pretends to be would have been more than happy with a honorary degree.
[/QUOTE]
Absolute nonsense from start to finish, as I've explained to you before.
Traffic of influence doesn't mean only to illegally get a piece of land from the city council.
Receiving a doctoral degree from a university based on a 40 years old "almost finished" paper is the same thing, at least morally if not legally.
How about millions of people who "almost finished" their studies in different stages decades ago, are they easily allowed to graduate?
If only selected few are accepted, then we talk about influence paddling.
Not to mention that a full doctorate is reserved for those having a career in the field, not for science fans like Brian.
Someone who really is as humble as he pretends to be would have been more than happy with a honorary degree.
[/QUOTE]
Absolute nonsense from start to finish, as I've explained to you before.
aristide1
Until you provide the name of another person who started a doctorate in the early 70s, sold cars or whatever else for 40 years, then was allowed to resume it and finally obtained a full doctoral degree, I am also living under the impression that you are talking absolute nonsense from start to finish, as I've explained to you before.
Holly2003
[QUOTE] [b]aristide1 wrote:[/b]
Until you provide the name of another person who started a doctorate in the early 70s, sold cars or whatever else for 40 years, then was allowed to resume it and finally obtained a full doctoral degree, I am the one living under the impression that you are talking absolute nonsense from start to finish, as I've explained to you before. [/QUOTE]
I explained to you how doctorates work in the UK but you ignored that info. You therefore seem to be stuck in some mental quicksand. Furthermore, a basic rule of discussion is that if you make an accusation the onus is on YOU to provide proof, which you have failed to do despite my earlier requests.
Until you provide the name of another person who started a doctorate in the early 70s, sold cars or whatever else for 40 years, then was allowed to resume it and finally obtained a full doctoral degree, I am the one living under the impression that you are talking absolute nonsense from start to finish, as I've explained to you before. [/QUOTE]
I explained to you how doctorates work in the UK but you ignored that info. You therefore seem to be stuck in some mental quicksand. Furthermore, a basic rule of discussion is that if you make an accusation the onus is on YOU to provide proof, which you have failed to do despite my earlier requests.
The Real Wizard
[QUOTE] [b]xmaurox79 wrote:[/b]
http://queenonstage.com/mywebpage/cdr_hotspacethespectrum_breakdown770.htm
Seems like Breakdown released this on CD last october. Is it the same source? [/QUOTE]
Yep. The bootleggers are getting quicker and quicker.
http://queenonstage.com/mywebpage/cdr_hotspacethespectrum_breakdown770.htm
Seems like Breakdown released this on CD last october. Is it the same source? [/QUOTE]
Yep. The bootleggers are getting quicker and quicker.
The Real Wizard
[QUOTE] [b]aristide1 wrote:[/b]
How about millions of people who "almost finished" their studies in different stages decades ago, are they easily allowed to graduate?
If only selected few are accepted, then we talk about influence paddling.
Not to mention that a full doctorate is reserved for those having a career in the field, not for science fans like Brian.
Someone who really is as humble as he pretends to be would have been more than happy with a honorary degree.[/QUOTE]
Doctorates can be completed by anyone at any time. The reason why Brian was able to finish his research on interplanetary dust over 30 years after he began it was the simple fact that nobody else had picked up his (at the time) obscure work from where he left off. But by the 2000s more habitable zone planets were being found near other stars and in other galaxies, so his work became relevant again.
What is your basis of claiming his work was "easy" ? He took a year off his life to write that 400-something page thesis (which he was very public about), and then had to defend it to a committee like anyone else, and like most, he did not receive a perfect score.
But of course you knew all that, instead of just spouting your bias and hatred for someone you've never met.
If it were true that only selected few are accepted (which is nonsense), then if a celebrity were chosen, what would convince you that it was a meritocracy based purely on results instead of some other form of influence?
I don't actually care what your answer is, because your biases cloud any semblance of rationality on this topic and countless others.
And finally, your implication that finishing a PhD is "proof" of a lack of humility is just so far-fetched and bat shit crazy beyond any response I (or likely anyone) can offer. You should donate your brain to science, as you are a prime example of Dunning Kruger effect in high gear.
How about millions of people who "almost finished" their studies in different stages decades ago, are they easily allowed to graduate?
If only selected few are accepted, then we talk about influence paddling.
Not to mention that a full doctorate is reserved for those having a career in the field, not for science fans like Brian.
Someone who really is as humble as he pretends to be would have been more than happy with a honorary degree.[/QUOTE]
Doctorates can be completed by anyone at any time. The reason why Brian was able to finish his research on interplanetary dust over 30 years after he began it was the simple fact that nobody else had picked up his (at the time) obscure work from where he left off. But by the 2000s more habitable zone planets were being found near other stars and in other galaxies, so his work became relevant again.
What is your basis of claiming his work was "easy" ? He took a year off his life to write that 400-something page thesis (which he was very public about), and then had to defend it to a committee like anyone else, and like most, he did not receive a perfect score.
But of course you knew all that, instead of just spouting your bias and hatred for someone you've never met.
If it were true that only selected few are accepted (which is nonsense), then if a celebrity were chosen, what would convince you that it was a meritocracy based purely on results instead of some other form of influence?
I don't actually care what your answer is, because your biases cloud any semblance of rationality on this topic and countless others.
And finally, your implication that finishing a PhD is "proof" of a lack of humility is just so far-fetched and bat shit crazy beyond any response I (or likely anyone) can offer. You should donate your brain to science, as you are a prime example of Dunning Kruger effect in high gear.