Queen crest Queenzone

Do you think these 5 added 02 dates

108 posts Page 4 of 8
Thread

Posts in chronological order

· Member since
What does being Canadian have to do with anything? I'm Canadian, and proud to be one.
· Member since
[QUOTE] [b]Iron Butterfly wrote:[/b]

What does being Canadian have to do with anything? I'm Canadian, and proud to be one. [/QUOTE]

Why fret about the Canadian comment when it is coming from Gerry? Anything Gerry writes is bullshit and has absolutely no credibility.
Socialism: There's one for you, nineteen for me Should five per cent appear too small Be thankful I don't take it all
· Member since
[QUOTE] [b]Saint Jiub wrote:[/b]

[QUOTE] [b]Iron Butterfly wrote:[/b]

What does being Canadian have to do with anything? I'm Canadian, and proud to be one. [/QUOTE]

Why fret about the Canadian comment when it is coming from Gerry? Anything Gerry writes is bullshit and has absolutely no credibility.

[/QUOTE]

Nah, not fretting. Well at least he didn't bring up Nazi Germany.
· Member since
[QUOTE] [b]BQT8. wrote:[/b]

@Real Wizard I do not like you too matey, you are arrogant selfish and Canadian, bingo three out of three.
Change your user name to "The Real Wanker" because that is what you are.
Pity your mother never had you aborted, you horrible little man.
Fuck off back under your Canadian crevice.[/QUOTE]

Actually Real Wizard is right, they didn't play to any audience of 250 thousand on the Outh American tour. The biggest audience was 130.000 somewhat short of the number both Q+PR and Q+AL have played to.

What I don't understand is your hatred of anyone who isn't left wing and British and is a fan of other artists as well as what you like.
· Member since
[QUOTE] [b]The Real Wizard wrote:[/b]

[QUOTE] [b]BQT8. wrote:[/b]

No i do not follow Adam Lambert & Queen because i believe it is abhorrent and as far as Paul Rodgers goes i did find him a better performer to watch
but it still was not Queen by miles and miles.[/QUOTE]

Whether or not you follow the band is irrelevant, and your personal views as per what is Queen and what is not Queen are irrelevant. The point is you are holding a double standard to justify your love for one version of a band and hatred for another. Anyone with an eighth grade education is able to see it, but you are unable.
[/QUOTE]
One is a band the second abysmal version ist not even a band. It is the Maylor show with a twat on vocals and a noname on bass standing in the shadows. A "Band" is active and recording. This is a tribute act not a band. Live with it smartass
· Member since
[QUOTE] [b]runner_70 wrote:[/b]

[QUOTE] [b]The Real Wizard wrote:[/b]

[QUOTE] [b]BQT8. wrote:[/b]

No i do not follow Adam Lambert & Queen because i believe it is abhorrent and as far as Paul Rodgers goes i did find him a better performer to watch
but it still was not Queen by miles and miles.[/QUOTE]

Whether or not you follow the band is irrelevant, and your personal views as per what is Queen and what is not Queen are irrelevant. The point is you are holding a double standard to justify your love for one version of a band and hatred for another. Anyone with an eighth grade education is able to see it, but you are unable.
[/QUOTE]
One is a band the second abysmal version ist not even a band. It is the Maylor show with a twat on vocals and a noname on bass standing in the shadows. A "Band" is active and recording. This is a tribute act not a band. Live with it smartass
[/QUOTE]

Please do give us your view of King Crimson, a band who haven't released any new material since 2003 (I believe) have undergone a number of lineup changes but continue to tour
· Member since
^^^ Camp Bono - hmm, not only do I not see any resemblance whatsover between Adam and Bono but camp Bono, struggling to imagine that one, what a weird analogy, but whatever.
· Member since
[QUOTE] [b]BQT8. wrote:[/b]

. . . I don't give a fig about King Crimson. . . . . just your run of the mill group. . . . .[/QUOTE]

This says so much about your lack of musical understanding and knowledge.
· Member since
[QUOTE] [b]Vocal harmony wrote:[/b]

[QUOTE] [b]BQT8. wrote:[/b]

. . . I don't give a fig about King Crimson. . . . . just your run of the mill group. . . . .[/QUOTE]

This says so much about your lack of musical understanding and knowledge.[/QUOTE]

And this qualifies my last statement. So good of you to do that for me.
· Member since
Twisted Sister better than King Crimson? ROFLMAO!
"Queen is the only band in the world that can play so heavily that your nose bleeds, then offer a silk handkerchief to clean up with."
· Member since
[QUOTE] [b]BQT8. wrote:[/b]

@Holly2003 Twisted Sister are a massive Rock N Roll band and were quite influenced by Queen especially the Queen2 album,
King Crimson fizzled out into obscurity sorry pet.[/QUOTE]

Don't be silly. There is nothing in Twisted Sister's very limited musical vocabulary that comes close to approaching the brilliance of Queen II.
"Queen is the only band in the world that can play so heavily that your nose bleeds, then offer a silk handkerchief to clean up with."
· Member since
Double post
· Member since
[QUOTE] [b]Vocal harmony wrote:[/b]

[QUOTE] [b]BQT8. wrote:[/b]

@Holly2003 Twisted Sister are a massive Rock N Roll band and were quite influenced by Queen especially the Queen2 album,
King Crimson fizzled out into obscurity sorry pet.[/QUOTE]

Please step away from your drug of choice,,it appears to be effecting your ability to think in a coherent manner.

In fact, you go on about Adam Lamberts dress sense and use of makeup then mention Twisted Sister, are you for real. On the subject of King Crimson, no matter which lineup of the band you're thinking of their abilities as musicians would sweep Twisted Sister and Queen and a lot of others under the carpet.[/QUOTE]
· Member since
[QUOTE] [b]BQT8. wrote:[/b]

@vocal harmony Better groups out there than King Crimson, brilliant bands like Sweet, Twisted Sister, Toto, Foreigner, Status Quo, Boston. You need to wise up girl.[/QUOTE]

I needed to save this for posterity. It may well be one of the absolute stupidest things ever posted on the internet.

One hit wonder Twisted Sister better than King Crimson? Jesus fucking christ.

Better in what way? They sell more records? They have shorter songs? You could have qualified the statement somehow, but you are no better than a ten year old saying they think GI Joes are better than Legos.

Of course you could have said you *prefer* those bands, and that would've been the end of it. Different strokes and all that. But your tiny pea sized brain is unable to differentiate between personal taste and empirical truth. To unequivocally state those bands are all better than King Crimson and thus discount their influence on generations of musicians (and the evolution of music itself) on account of your own personal tastes further proves how little you know about music, not to mention your ability to converse with people on a basic level. It says nothing about King Crimson and everything about you.

You are way out of your league on a high school debating team, never mind real life.

Just stop.
Queenzone is overrun with trolls and circling the drain - join us here instead: http://queenforum.net
· Member since
Hey, what does Twisted Sister and King Crimson have to do with Queen and Adam Lambert?