Do you think these 5 added 02 dates

The Real Wizard wrote:

BQT8. wrote:

No i do not follow Adam Lambert & Queen because i believe it is abhorrent and as far as Paul Rodgers goes i did find him a better performer to watch
but it still was not Queen by miles and miles.

Whether or not you follow the band is irrelevant, and your personal views as per what is Queen and what is not Queen are irrelevant. The point is you are holding a double standard to justify your love for one version of a band and hatred for another. Anyone with an eighth grade education is able to see it, but you are unable.

One is a band the second abysmal version ist not even a band. It is the Maylor show with a twat on vocals and a noname on bass standing in the shadows. A "Band" is active and recording. This is a tribute act not a band. Live with it smartass

@Real Wanker : Live with your eighth grade education but i know when something is right and something is wrong and believe me Queen + Adam Lambert is a gimmick in the worst possible taste.
You may accept this shit but i do not because my musical standards are higher than yours.

runner_70 wrote:

The Real Wizard wrote:

BQT8. wrote:

No i do not follow Adam Lambert & Queen because i believe it is abhorrent and as far as Paul Rodgers goes i did find him a better performer to watch
but it still was not Queen by miles and miles.

Whether or not you follow the band is irrelevant, and your personal views as per what is Queen and what is not Queen are irrelevant. The point is you are holding a double standard to justify your love for one version of a band and hatred for another. Anyone with an eighth grade education is able to see it, but you are unable.

One is a band the second abysmal version ist not even a band. It is the Maylor show with a twat on vocals and a noname on bass standing in the shadows. A "Band" is active and recording. This is a tribute act not a band. Live with it smartass

Please do give us your view of King Crimson, a band who haven't released any new material since 2003 (I believe) have undergone a number of lineup changes but continue to tour

@vocal harmony I don't give a fig about King Crimson, they never had the greatest vocalist ever and just your run of the mill group.
Queen had an extraordinary front man and everyone agrees he is the greatest front man ever ! Now Queen has gone from having Freddie (the greatest special front man ) to a karaoke clown AL who looks like a camp Bono on acid and sings Queens music in a clinical boring style of singing, that aint rock n roll.

^^^ Camp Bono - hmm, not only do I not see any resemblance whatsover between Adam and Bono but camp Bono, struggling to imagine that one, what a weird analogy, but whatever.

BQT8. wrote:

. . . I don't give a fig about King Crimson. . . . . just your run of the mill group. . . . .

This says so much about your lack of musical understanding and knowledge.

Not really i just do not listen to shit my dear.

Vocal harmony wrote:

BQT8. wrote:

. . . I don't give a fig about King Crimson. . . . . just your run of the mill group. . . . .

This says so much about your lack of musical understanding and knowledge.

And this qualifies my last statement. So good of you to do that for me.

@vocal harmony Better groups out there than King Crimson, brilliant bands like Sweet, Twisted Sister, Toto, Foreigner, Status Quo, Boston. You need to wise up girl.

Twisted Sister better than King Crimson? ROFLMAO!

@Holly2003 Twisted Sister are a massive Rock N Roll band and were quite influenced by Queen especially the Queen2 album,
King Crimson fizzled out into obscurity sorry pet.

BQT8. wrote:

@Holly2003 Twisted Sister are a massive Rock N Roll band and were quite influenced by Queen especially the Queen2 album,
King Crimson fizzled out into obscurity sorry pet.

Don't be silly. There is nothing in Twisted Sister's very limited musical vocabulary that comes close to approaching the brilliance of Queen II.

Double post

Vocal harmony wrote:

BQT8. wrote:

@Holly2003 Twisted Sister are a massive Rock N Roll band and were quite influenced by Queen especially the Queen2 album,
King Crimson fizzled out into obscurity sorry pet.

Please step away from your drug of choice,,it appears to be effecting your ability to think in a coherent manner.

In fact, you go on about Adam Lamberts dress sense and use of makeup then mention Twisted Sister, are you for real. On the subject of King Crimson, no matter which lineup of the band you're thinking of their abilities as musicians would sweep Twisted Sister and Queen and a lot of others under the carpet.

BQT8. wrote:

@vocal harmony Better groups out there than King Crimson, brilliant bands like Sweet, Twisted Sister, Toto, Foreigner, Status Quo, Boston. You need to wise up girl.

I needed to save this for posterity. It may well be one of the absolute stupidest things ever posted on the internet.

One hit wonder Twisted Sister better than King Crimson? Jesus fucking christ.

Better in what way? They sell more records? They have shorter songs? You could have qualified the statement somehow, but you are no better than a ten year old saying they think GI Joes are better than Legos.

Of course you could have said you *prefer* those bands, and that would've been the end of it. Different strokes and all that. But your tiny pea sized brain is unable to differentiate between personal taste and empirical truth. To unequivocally state those bands are all better than King Crimson and thus discount their influence on generations of musicians (and the evolution of music itself) on account of your own personal tastes further proves how little you know about music, not to mention your ability to converse with people on a basic level. It says nothing about King Crimson and everything about you.

You are way out of your league on a high school debating team, never mind real life.

Just stop.