Live '89

runner_70 wrote:Fuck off with your badly acted kindness you wanker. YOu already started insults in other threads as well you bunghole

and you claim to not be Gerry? For someone claiming to be an "entirely different being", you seem to speak for him a lot.

Correction amoeba-brain - I have NEVER insulted first. I may disagree with someone, but will only trade insults after some waste of sperm (like yourself) has insulted first.

nothing "badly-acted" about a 3rd genuine peace offering. It's clear "you" don't want peace, but let Gerry (if he isn't you) speak for himself eh?

Brenski: The first thing you said to me on this thread insulting was on page 3 and i quote :
"
Pity your break couldn't have been a little longer, Geraldine...say 10 years!
I never messaged you before that, proving that you are a liar saying i was rude to you first which i certainly was not.
You have a reputation of been a manipulating liar except many people on here do not know the real manipulating you.

..... wrote:Brenski: The first thing you said to me on this thread insulting was on page 3 and i quote :
"Pity your break couldn't have been a little longer, Geraldine...say 10 years!
I never messaged you before that, proving that you are a liar saying i was rude to you first which i certainly was not.
You have a reputation of been a manipulating liar except many people on here do not know the real manipulating you.

Yet again, you demonstrate a lack of ability to follow/comprehend a thread in its timeline. For your benefit: (I've put the dates in so you can see) It wasn't an insult - it was an observation.

This thread had been fine until you appeared at the bottom of page 2:

Posted: 11 Jan 20, 13:36 ..... wrote:[color=red]Freddie said on a radio one interview with the band in 1989 that he was the spanner in the works and he just did not want to tour at all so all the above set lists are trash, because it would never have happened because at that time the band knew Freddie was ill.[/color]

I replied:

Posted: 11 Jan 20, 13:46 brENsKi wrote:[color=green]Everyone knows the whys and wherefores, and that this discussion is hypothetical and therefore rendered academic. The point of the topic is really just a "what if?"
People are getting along nicely, having a reasonable discussion about what they'd have liked to see in a "Miracle Setlist", then you come back and shit all over everything.
Pity your break couldn't have been a little longer, Geraldine...say 10 years![/color]

Your replied:

Posted: 11 Jan 20, 16:26 ..... wrote:[color=red]@Brenski Very childish thread pretending what they want.
If that is all they can do with there spare time then that is a drag don't you think?
Guess what you wont get rid of me on here ex prison idiot i have my opinions and you cannot do a thing about that, amen !
Ha ha ha ha[/color]

- you jumped into a hypothetical thread (look the word up) and called it "trash". YOU were the one to throw the first stone. My reply wasn't an insult, it was an observation that this thread may have carried along nicely without your comment. For the last time, look at the dates, look at the words used. You are the only one to insult.
You insulted the subject matter on page 2 - calling it "trash". Then on page 3 you replied insulting the thread calling it "childish" and insulted my reply calling me an "ex prison idiot"

If you can't even work with basic chronology, then you have bigger problems. Your lobbed the first brickbat here, I have offered 3 peace offerings. This (despite all of above, and everything else) is my fourth and final olive branch.

A refusal at this point - after FOUR offerings, would only confirm you are not interested in getting along.
BTW - a good start would be to retract the "manipulating liar" comment.
Take it or leave it. Let me know. Yes or no?

Just plain proof that bronski BEat started the flamewar. Thanx for confirming. Case closed

runner_70 wrote:Just plain proof that bronski BEat started the flamewar. Thanx for confirming. Case closed

...only for lunatics that don't understand how dates and times work - you fucking bull's pizzle!

You don't do much for your claim that you and Gerry aren't the same person. Why do YOU feel a need to jump in and answer posts directed toward him?

brENsKi wrote:

runner_70 wrote:Just plain proof that bronski BEat started the flamewar. Thanx for confirming. Case closed

...only for lunatics that don't understand how dates and times work - you fucking bull's pizzle!

You don't do much for your claim that you and Gerry aren't the same person. Why do YOU feel a need to jump in and answer posts directed toward him?

Offering "peace" and the next posting is the next assault. Exactly my kind of humour. And plain proof about the mental state of this tool. Fuck off for good - thanx

runner_70 - a spokesthing for Gerry said:Offering "peace" and the next posting is the next assault. Exactly my kind of humour. And plain proof about the mental state of this tool. Fuck off for good - thanx

It's not "the next thing" - First peace offering was 16 Jan 20, 13:38. You made it clear that you're not interested - a while ago. Gerry on the other hand hasn't done so - unless YOU really are Gerry, which is looking increasingly likely.

Some facts here @ runGerry_70 whether you're one and the same or not, you both speak with the same tiny-penis aggression. This is not helped by the prevalence of adult learning difficulties hindering your already shriveled-pea you have posing as a brain!

Now fuck off back to your colouring-in book! - and STOP chewing your crayons.

Brenski Going by your last post you have the aggression going on, and because you are not winning this argument you are getting so annoyed and impatient.
I am not Runner70 because he can handle himself quite nicely.
You seem so disappointed that we are separate people and your little brain is in overdrive hilarious !
Again you use the mental health card to try and offend, which is quite rich coming from you been a prison jail bird lol

I Think he offered his ass in jail a few Times too often. He is clearly passive aggressive and making fun of mental illness and using it as insult. How low can it get

..... wrote:Brenski Going by your last post you have the aggression going on, and because you are not winning this argument you are getting so annoyed and impatient.
I am not Runner70 because he can handle himself quite nicely.
You seem so disappointed that we are separate people and your little brain is in overdrive hilarious !
Again you use the mental health card to try and offend, which is quite rich coming from you been a prison jail bird lol

I haven't used any mental health card - using the "mental health card" is the act of crying prejudice. You're a fucking ignoramus for not even knowing that. Again you use phrases and expressions without any knowledge of what they actually mean. I am doing the exact opposite of what you claim - I am stating here and now, that YOU DO have some adult learning difficulties - proven by the fact that you can't follow a simple conversation in its timeline. Additionally, your use of English, spelling, grammar, and punctuation are sorely lacking for someone who "got an A in English". There's fucking limpets with a better command of English than you!

However, if you're claiming that I made a prejudicial remark, then it shows you're definitely an almost spent force. When losing an argument - always cry prejudice.

Basically, fuckwit - you're both sub-cabbage level intelligence-wise, ie "Thick" in a vernacular you can comprehend. I know it, most people on here [sic] know it, everyone that's ever met you knows it - the only one who doesn't know it, is you, and I suspect deep down you suspect a cabbage would give you a run for your money on any quiz show.
there's moths in your house that pray for visitors to come round, just for an intellectual challenge.

One thing for sure, you are BOTH a complete and utter waste of ejaculate.

..... wrote:

I am not Runner70 because he can handle himself quite nicely.

Does this mean you're saying you can't handle yourself, or that you can't handle yourself nicely?

Just wondering, because that was quite an odd thing to say in defence of yourself.

brENsKi wrote:

..... wrote:Brenski Going by your last post you have the aggression going on, and because you are not winning this argument you are getting so annoyed and impatient.
I am not Runner70 because he can handle himself quite nicely.
You seem so disappointed that we are separate people and your little brain is in overdrive hilarious !
Again you use the mental health card to try and offend, which is quite rich coming from you been a prison jail bird lol

i haven't used any mental health card - I said you both have pea-sized brains. Basically, fuckwit - you're both sub-cabbage level intelligence-wise. "Thick" in vernacular you can comprehend.

One thing for sure, you are BOTH a complete and utter waste of ejaculate.

So the "Peace" is off the table it seems you bellend

Thistle wrote:

..... wrote:
I am not Runner70 because he can handle himself quite nicely.

Does this mean you're saying you can't handle yourself, or that you can't handle yourself nicely?
Just wondering, because that was quite an odd thing to say in defence of yourself.

genius ^ - standing ovation.

runner_70 wrote:So the "Peace" is off the table it seems you bellend

It's come to something when pathetic Gerry and inadequate buffoon runner_70 need help from each other to not even manage a "losing draw" in this contest.

FFS numbnuts and numbnuts2 ; there's only one of me, and I'm not even breaking out of walking pace dealing with your little tantrums.

Mind you, I suppose even the TWO of you combined doesn't quite equate to 30% of a whole person.

Is it true that the pair of you were part of conjoined triplets, and the separation operation gave the third triplet the brain?

brENsKi wrote:

runner_70 wrote:So the "Peace" is off the table it seems you bellend

It's come to something when pathetic Gerry and inadequate buffoon runner_70 need help from each other to not even manage a "losing draw" in this contest.

FFS numbnuts and numbnuts2 ; there's only one of me, and I'm not even breaking out of walking pace dealing with your little tantrums.

Mind you, I suppose even the TWO of you combined doesn't quite equate to 30% of a whole person.

Is it true that the pair of you were part of conjoined triplets, and the separation operation gave the third triplet the brain?

Your insults are getting lame and you bore me
GO back to your cell wanky