Saint Jiub
dbl post
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Saint Jiub
Adam Lambert’s Sparkle Cows Piss on Queen Fans
http://freedavidcook.wordpress.com/2012/07/19/adam-lamberts-sparkle-cows-piss-on-queen-fans/
http://freedavidcook.wordpress.com/2012/07/19/adam-lamberts-sparkle-cows-piss-on-queen-fans/
Iron Butterfly
[QUOTE] [b]Saint Jiub wrote:[/b]
Adam Lambert’s Sparkle Cows Piss on Queen Fans
http://freedavidcook.wordpress.com/2012/07/19/adam-lamberts-sparkle-cows-piss-on-queen-fans/[/QUOTE]
Appropriate then and now. Some of the Glamberts never change.
I look as it's how some Glamberts get their kicks.
Adam Lambert’s Sparkle Cows Piss on Queen Fans
http://freedavidcook.wordpress.com/2012/07/19/adam-lamberts-sparkle-cows-piss-on-queen-fans/[/QUOTE]
Appropriate then and now. Some of the Glamberts never change.
I look as it's how some Glamberts get their kicks.
matt z
2012.... 7-8 year old blog.
Not without some reasonable points but. ....dang.
8 years ago. How is this topical. Do you all have a fascination with gayness and desire the rough attention of the Glamberts?
Its true about the sometimes shrill (especially then) and the nuisance old ladies that flooded the front rows back then and all the hideous outfits. ..n.but c'mon. This isn't news. It's hardly even topical.
Maybe present a thesis: "why Adam Lambert is poison for Queen legacy" etc or a poll.... but this really had no purpose.
Heck if you're going to post an old blog, maybe slag him of by asking "who wrote this article"?
"What's with all the typos in this article"?
"Does anybody know the date of this article" etc.
At least that'd be ironic.
Anyways. Have a good weekend, folks. Stay free from harm and don't inflict too much out there either.
Not without some reasonable points but. ....dang.
8 years ago. How is this topical. Do you all have a fascination with gayness and desire the rough attention of the Glamberts?
Its true about the sometimes shrill (especially then) and the nuisance old ladies that flooded the front rows back then and all the hideous outfits. ..n.but c'mon. This isn't news. It's hardly even topical.
Maybe present a thesis: "why Adam Lambert is poison for Queen legacy" etc or a poll.... but this really had no purpose.
Heck if you're going to post an old blog, maybe slag him of by asking "who wrote this article"?
"What's with all the typos in this article"?
"Does anybody know the date of this article" etc.
At least that'd be ironic.
Anyways. Have a good weekend, folks. Stay free from harm and don't inflict too much out there either.
Iron Butterfly
[QUOTE] [b]matt z wrote:[/b]
2012.... 7-8 year old blog.
Not without some reasonable points but. ....dang.
8 years ago. How is this topical. Do you all have a fascination with gayness and desire the rough attention of the Glamberts?
Its true about the sometimes shrill (especially then) and the nuisance old ladies that flooded the front rows back then and all the hideous outfits. ..n.but c'mon. This isn't news. It's hardly even topical.
Maybe present a thesis: "why Adam Lambert is poison for Queen legacy" etc or a poll.... but this really had no purpose.
Heck if you're going to post an old blog, maybe slag him of by asking "who wrote this article"?
"What's with all the typos in this article"?
"Does anybody know the date of this article" etc.
At least that'd be ironic.
Anyways. Have a good weekend, folks. Stay free from harm and don't inflict too much out there either. [/QUOTE]
I'm not sure how often you resd here, but it topical considering how the two main Glamberts act here.
2012.... 7-8 year old blog.
Not without some reasonable points but. ....dang.
8 years ago. How is this topical. Do you all have a fascination with gayness and desire the rough attention of the Glamberts?
Its true about the sometimes shrill (especially then) and the nuisance old ladies that flooded the front rows back then and all the hideous outfits. ..n.but c'mon. This isn't news. It's hardly even topical.
Maybe present a thesis: "why Adam Lambert is poison for Queen legacy" etc or a poll.... but this really had no purpose.
Heck if you're going to post an old blog, maybe slag him of by asking "who wrote this article"?
"What's with all the typos in this article"?
"Does anybody know the date of this article" etc.
At least that'd be ironic.
Anyways. Have a good weekend, folks. Stay free from harm and don't inflict too much out there either. [/QUOTE]
I'm not sure how often you resd here, but it topical considering how the two main Glamberts act here.
rockchic65
[QUOTE] [b]matt z wrote:[/b]
2012.... 7-8 year old blog.
Not without some reasonable points but. ....dang.
8 years ago. How is this topical. Do you all have a fascination with gayness and desire the rough attention of the Glamberts?
Its true about the sometimes shrill (especially then) and the nuisance old ladies that flooded the front rows back then and all the hideous outfits. ..n.but c'mon. This isn't news. It's hardly even topical.
Maybe present a thesis: "why Adam Lambert is poison for Queen legacy" etc or a poll.... but this really had no purpose.
Heck if you're going to post an old blog, maybe slag him of by asking "who wrote this article"?
"What's with all the typos in this article"?
"Does anybody know the date of this article" etc.
At least that'd be ironic.
Anyways. Have a good weekend, folks. Stay free from harm and don't inflict too much out there either. [/QUOTE]
It's some random's blog back in 2012 after their very first shows together!!!
2012.... 7-8 year old blog.
Not without some reasonable points but. ....dang.
8 years ago. How is this topical. Do you all have a fascination with gayness and desire the rough attention of the Glamberts?
Its true about the sometimes shrill (especially then) and the nuisance old ladies that flooded the front rows back then and all the hideous outfits. ..n.but c'mon. This isn't news. It's hardly even topical.
Maybe present a thesis: "why Adam Lambert is poison for Queen legacy" etc or a poll.... but this really had no purpose.
Heck if you're going to post an old blog, maybe slag him of by asking "who wrote this article"?
"What's with all the typos in this article"?
"Does anybody know the date of this article" etc.
At least that'd be ironic.
Anyways. Have a good weekend, folks. Stay free from harm and don't inflict too much out there either. [/QUOTE]
It's some random's blog back in 2012 after their very first shows together!!!
MisterCosmicc
Adam does have the crappiest fashion in history.
matt z
Haha^ maybe so.... but have you seen the BM guitars shirt?
Iron Butterfly
[QUOTE] [b]rockchic65 wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]matt z wrote:[/b]
2012.... 7-8 year old blog.
Not without some reasonable points but. ....dang.
8 years ago. How is this topical. Do you all have a fascination with gayness and desire the rough attention of the Glamberts?
Its true about the sometimes shrill (especially then) and the nuisance old ladies that flooded the front rows back then and all the hideous outfits. ..n.but c'mon. This isn't news. It's hardly even topical.
Maybe present a thesis: "why Adam Lambert is poison for Queen legacy" etc or a poll.... but this really had no purpose.
Heck if you're going to post an old blog, maybe slag him of by asking "who wrote this article"?
"What's with all the typos in this article"?
"Does anybody know the date of this article" etc.
At least that'd be ironic.
Anyways. Have a good weekend, folks. Stay free from harm and don't inflict too much out there either. [/QUOTE]
It's some random's blog back in 2012 after their very first shows together!!!
[/QUOTE]
If some Glamberts can post that homophobia is the excuse AL didn't win Idol, surely a blog post from a few years ago can be posted.
[QUOTE] [b]matt z wrote:[/b]
2012.... 7-8 year old blog.
Not without some reasonable points but. ....dang.
8 years ago. How is this topical. Do you all have a fascination with gayness and desire the rough attention of the Glamberts?
Its true about the sometimes shrill (especially then) and the nuisance old ladies that flooded the front rows back then and all the hideous outfits. ..n.but c'mon. This isn't news. It's hardly even topical.
Maybe present a thesis: "why Adam Lambert is poison for Queen legacy" etc or a poll.... but this really had no purpose.
Heck if you're going to post an old blog, maybe slag him of by asking "who wrote this article"?
"What's with all the typos in this article"?
"Does anybody know the date of this article" etc.
At least that'd be ironic.
Anyways. Have a good weekend, folks. Stay free from harm and don't inflict too much out there either. [/QUOTE]
It's some random's blog back in 2012 after their very first shows together!!!
[/QUOTE]
If some Glamberts can post that homophobia is the excuse AL didn't win Idol, surely a blog post from a few years ago can be posted.
MisterCosmicc
[QUOTE] [b]matt z wrote:[/b]
Haha^ maybe so.... but have you seen the BM guitars shirt? [/QUOTE]
TRUE! That was pretty shitty... I won’t be making a purchase on that anytime soon!
Haha^ maybe so.... but have you seen the BM guitars shirt? [/QUOTE]
TRUE! That was pretty shitty... I won’t be making a purchase on that anytime soon!
The Fairy King
MisterCosmicc
I heard Adam’s relationship came to an end after he walked into his (ex) boyfriend’s apartment, and the song “Smell Yo Dick” was playing.
rockchic65
[QUOTE] [b]MisterCosmicc wrote:[/b]
I heard Adam’s relationship came to an end after he walked into his (ex) boyfriend’s apartment, and the song “Smell Yo Dick” was playing.[/QUOTE]
Are you sure you're an older Queen fan? Your posts recently would suggest you're around 12 years old at most and that's being generous.
I heard Adam’s relationship came to an end after he walked into his (ex) boyfriend’s apartment, and the song “Smell Yo Dick” was playing.[/QUOTE]
Are you sure you're an older Queen fan? Your posts recently would suggest you're around 12 years old at most and that's being generous.
Nathan H
David Lee Roth has said Adam Lambert's voice is "pretty and pristine": [url]https://metalheadzone.com/van-halens-david-lee-roth-reveals-what-he-thinks-about-adam-lambert/[/url]
Adam Lambert has been performing with Queen for nearly nine years! They are still incredibly popular with many shows selling out or nearly - there is huge demand for them. Before some of you say, people are only going because of Brian and Roger - I don't think many people would go if you couldn't tolerate the singer at a 2 hour concert! I wouldn't for starters. It's time for haters to get over it as there's no signs of slowing down and just respect the decisions Brian and Roger (who both helped create the music they play) have taken.
Adam Lambert has been performing with Queen for nearly nine years! They are still incredibly popular with many shows selling out or nearly - there is huge demand for them. Before some of you say, people are only going because of Brian and Roger - I don't think many people would go if you couldn't tolerate the singer at a 2 hour concert! I wouldn't for starters. It's time for haters to get over it as there's no signs of slowing down and just respect the decisions Brian and Roger (who both helped create the music they play) have taken.
snifflese
I agree with you totally, Music Fan! There are all sorts of voices and Adam's fits the bill for a voice that can credibly sing the whole vast catalog. Some voices only work with the harder rock (PR) and some with the ballads and some not at all with the quirky songs. Adam can sing them all and do justice to everything, even if his voice is most suited to the ballads and the ones with an operatic flair. I like the idea of respecting Brian and Roger, which isn't in much evidence around here most of the time. They also created the music and music is their life. They should not have to give up their career and their passion. It isn't their fault that Freddie isn't here to sing at this point in time. I am sure they do this for love, not for money, as some of you keep pointing out! Way too many comments about Adam's voice for him not be a huge draw for the concerts. The musical work is super, as Brian is still near the top of his game, but no one will listen to a singer they dislike for two hours. People are coming out for Brian, Roger and ADAM even if that idea does not fit the QZ agenda.