A thread for Brenski to accuse people of being Gerry.

What do you expect me to do? Everything is closed, there is nowhere to go, nothing to do, streets are empty etc.

But thanks for chiming in. I honestly thought you guys would support me in my efforts to stop Brenski clogging all the threads with his insane accusations, but no, you have to give me a hard time by picking on the smallest things.

Apparently now the fact that I'm posting too much is a problem. Next you'll make a problem out of the fact that I use too many vowels, or something like that. Brenski on the other hand is free to post his insane, incoherent, dishonest bullshit as much as he likes.

Also it's very rich for a Marxist to call someone a Moron.

[QUOTE] [b]Freddie Jupiter wrote:[/b]


Apparently now the fact that I'm posting too much is a problem. Next you'll make a problem out of the fact that I use too many vowels, or something like that. Brenski on the other hand is free to post his insane, incoherent, dishonest bullshit as much as he likes. [/QUOTE]

I'm not having a whinge because you post too much, I'm having a whinge because this forum is just full of these sorts of threads and comments. Every fucken thread ends up being the same shit with people having a go at each other. It's fucked and it's gone beyond pathetic.

This thread is clearly titled. It's for Brenski to accuse people of being Gerry. If you think that you won't find it interesting, don't click on it. Simples.

Also the amount of shit I'm getting from you guys makes me think that you actually enjoy Brenski straying off topic in near it every thread and clogging everything with his accusations of who is Gerry and who,is runner.

Not me, though. I like it when people stay on topic.

You clearly have issues reading. The problem is not the frequency at which you post, but the nature of what you post - anything that'll let you spew the same, tired, whiny complaints about Brian May and break a lance for an idealized Freddie Mercury. It's the same thing over and over and over and over. Just like gerry, by the way.

As for your rather silly attempt at a personal attack - do you know who that guy in the picture captioned "Marxism" is? That's Groucho Marx. I'm a Marx Brothers fan, simple as that. I don't give a damn about your views on political Marxism one way or another - I just don't get the impression that your opinion on any subject has much value, based on your posts. But if you think I'm a moron because of your misinterpretation of an obvious pun, you've really just proven my point about you.

This thread is in QUEEN - SERIOUS DISCUSSION, so the thread should be about Queen, NOT about other people you dislike.
Please post this sh*t in the PERSONAL forum.

[QUOTE] [b]Freddie Jupiter wrote:[/b]
This thread is clearly titled. It's for Brenski to accuse people of being Gerry. If you think that you won't find it interesting, don't click on it. Simples.
Also the amount of shit I'm getting from you guys makes me think that you actually enjoy Brenski straying off topic in near it every thread and clogging everything with his accusations of who is Gerry and who,is runner. Not me, though. I like it when people stay on topic. [/QUOTE]

i'm annoyed with myself - for replying again (after promising i wouldn't) - but you have to keep mentioning my name...dragging me back into it - almost as if you want an argument. yes, that could be it.

not a bit of it.
i'm chatting in other topics where neither you nor Gerry are and we're staying "on topic". common denominator is/are you/Gerry.

grow the fuck up. bwah bwah bwah! Brenski upset me, i need to start a personal thread to get him back - that'll show him. you really are one absolute cucking funt.

if you really wanted to stay on topic, it's easy enough. but as TQ says - you're just a Freddie Sychophant who's here to row with anyone who has any differing viewpoint / those who are okay with seeing other band members in a good light.

you can't help it - and abide it less so that anyone could dare to see your idol though your own spettacolo colorato di rosa,
Freddie was a musical genius, but regardless of the epitome of everything good you cite him to be, he was flawed. deeply flawed. an (at times) spiteful, drunk, cokehead - who's dead now because he was such a promiscuous idiot - taking risks with others' lives in the process.

when i think of Freddie these days, i think of the great music he made, and then reproach him for the music we never got to hear - because he was such a hedonistic, self-indulgent c*nt.

if you're not here to argue and spout shit - prove it. just stop.

@ thomas Quinn, Next time before I post something I shall make sure that the content is ok with you. Once you have approved of the content I will go ahead and post it.

Brenski meanwhile is free to post his incoherent, nonsensical, intellectually dishonest bullshit as much as he likes and doesn't have to seek anybody's permission. More than that he strays off topic all the time clogging threads with his unhealthy obsession with some guy called Gerry.

Seems fair -- not.

As for my criticisms of Brian May, that's a good thing. The guy has very poor self awareness and needs people to call him out on his poor behaviour instead of always being told that he's right by sycophants such as yourself and Brenski -- even when he's blatantly breaking the law and assaulting people.

If you have a problem with that take it up with Brian, as he did it to himself. Nobody forced him to become the Axl Rose of Queen.

[QUOTE] [b]thomasquinn 32989 wrote:[/b]

I don't give a damn about your views on political Marxism one way or another - I just don't get the impression that your opinion on any subject has much value, based on your posts.[/QUOTE]

A gentleman, as ever.

But I'm afraid there will be no progress made here, either because the subject you are speaking with is at least 50 IQ points below yours, or they are a troll whose function here isn't to provide civil dialogue. Or possibly both.

@The Real Wizard, The subject he's speaking to has an iq in the top 0.1 percentile.

If you're so smart how come you don't know that an ad hominem is a logical fallacy and as soon as you make one you automatically disqualify yourself from the discussion and you lose the argument?

[QUOTE] [b]Freddie Jupiter wrote:[/b]
@The Real Wizard, The subject he's speaking to has an iq in the top 0.1 percentile.
If you're so smart how come you don't know that an ad hominem is a logical fallacy and as soon as you make one you automatically disqualify yourself from the discussion and you lose the argument? [/QUOTE]

do you even read the rubbish you type?
you use the ad hominem argument on one, while actually creating - and being the main participator in a thread targeting another.

for someone who claims to be in the top 0.1 percentile, the only question remaining is "top 0.1 percentile, of what?"
- cabbages?

Please point to where I have used an ad hominem.

[QUOTE] [b]Freddie Jupiter wrote:[/b]

Please point to where I have used an ad hominem. [/QUOTE]

even someone "not in the top 0.1 percentile" can see i never said any such thing. you appear to possess the polar opposite of the intelligence levels of which you claim.

i'm pointing to your hypocrisy of using the ad hominem argument in a thread YOU created to specifically attack another.

"glass houses" and "stones".

now, if you don't mind - i'm trying to avoid conversing directly with you - as i'm not fluent in "Cabbage".

Please point to where I have used an ad hominem, and show me the thread that I have made to attack another.