Cringe cos Adam & Queen have live album & Dvd out October 2nd.

[QUOTE] [b]Benross wrote:[/b]

Vocal Harmony Fact this new album has only been released because they cannot tour and have lost millions of pounds.
A few people have already pointed that out on here if you cared to read there posts instead of having a pop at me just because you dislike me.
Fact Queen are in trouble they are too clueless to write new music without John & Freddie and now live in a world of there greatest hits for a living.
If you cannot stand the truth then i suggest you buy this new shit album and sit and listen to it with your nephew and wonder how on earth did Queen sink this fucking low![/QUOTE]

They haven't lost millions of pounds, the tour has been postponed it has already sold out. So you're wrong.

Queen are not in trouble. They choose to take the path they have and have made it a great success. They choose not to record, that is up to them, not you. Go back to interviews from the late 70's. They admit that recording often led to disagreements and falling out, but they all enjoyed playing live. Have you thought they are in a position to do what they want and if they haven't got the record company breathing down their necks for new product then why should they.

You haven't heard this forthcoming album, so calling it shit shows your willingness to voice an unfounded opinion. I'm sure my nephew will enjoy the album. He has a wider musical pallet than you.

"How did Queen sink so fucking low" they didn't you did.

Vh If you accept everything Queen throw at you then your more thicker than i give you credit for.
They already have sunk as low as they can possibly get by even employing madam Lambert that in itself is the pits.
No respectful band would even look at Lambert only a desperate one like half a Queen band.
Your the sucker if you think Queen still rock.

Gerry Is called a stepford for never criticizing Freddie, but It's ok for those same Queenzoners too never criticize Brian and Roger for any decision they make. There Is a word for that.

[QUOTE] [b]mike hunt wrote:[/b]Gerry Is called a stepford for never criticizing Freddie, but It's ok for those same Queenzoners too never criticize Brian and Roger for any decision they make. There Is a word for that.[/QUOTE]
i think you need to do some research around here before making sweeping statements like that.
most of those people you refer to have criticised plenty of Queen-post-1991 choices.
the difference being that while we maybe don't like some/many of these (QAL included) we respect their right to do as they please. Gerry (on the other hand) doe not respect their right to do as they please.

Brenski I certainly do not respect your comments because you are the equivalent of Vladimir Putin dictating and making sure
you get your own way and yes you are 100% a bully.
Sad thing is not many idiots on here realise it !

[QUOTE][color=Sienna] [b]Benross wrote:[/b] [i]Brenski I certainly do not respect your comments because you are the equivalent of Vladimir Putin dictating and making sure you get your own way and yes you are 100% a bully. Sad thing is not many idiots on here realise it ![/i][/color][/QUOTE] ...says the homophobe who falsely accused me of homophobic comments. your innate inability to understand basic English - coupled with the inherent disadvantage of you being a simpleton severely limits your interaction with humanity at large.

Brenski If there is one simple mentally ill person on here it is you.
You are deranged and old washed up piece of nothing.
Go and blow your fucking trumpet somewhere else because i am not listening to your sad excuse for comments on here anymore.
You think you can run me down when you want well ive got news for you wrinkly old twat you fucking well cant.

[QUOTE] [color=Sienna][b]Benross wrote:[/b] [i]...i am not listening to your sad excuse for comments on here anymore..[/i][/color][/QUOTE] you never were. you were (sort of) reading them (as best you can).
and you will continue to do so, because that's what you do. if you mean it then don;t read this...and don;t reply.

I am not doing what you want punk, so stop playing prison officer that is over and your on the scrap heap.
Your a nobody pretending to be king of the jungle which is laughable.
For somebody who thinks this site is rubbish you and few others have returned!

[QUOTE] [color=Sienna][b]Benross wrote 24 Aug 20, 16:21:[/b] [i]...i am not listening to your sad excuse for comments on here anymore..[/i][/color][/QUOTE] [QUOTE] [b]brENsKi wrote: [/b]you never were. you were (sort of) reading them (as best you can). and you will continue to do so, because that's what you do. if you mean it then don;t read this...and don;t reply.[/QUOTE] [QUOTE][color=Sienna] [b]Benross wrote: 24 Aug 20, 17:21 [/b] [i]I am not doing what you want punk, so stop playing prison officer that is over and your on the scrap heap. Your a nobody pretending to be king of the jungle which is laughable.[/i][/color][/QUOTE]

[QUOTE] [b]Benross wrote:[/b]

Brenski I certainly do not respect your comments because you are the equivalent of Vladimir Putin dictating and making sure
you get your own way and yes you are 100% a bully.
Sad thing is not many idiots on here realise it ![/QUOTE]

So what about the idiots who agree with you. Are they still idiots or are you the idiot.

@Vocal Harmony : Sorry you are bitter when people agree with me but there are many on here who are just plain stupid causing trouble on here for me
because they are jealous that my answers are to the point and make sense.
They hate to read the truth.
After saying that do you not think Brenski has his head up his arse every time?
He is one big headed twat with a bad attitude towards many on here.
You are no better.

[QUOTE][color=Sienna] [b]Benross wrote:[/b][i] After saying that do you not think Brenski has his head up his arse every time?
He is one big headed twat with a bad attitude towards many on here. You are no better.[/i][/color][/QUOTE]
not at all. there's no attitude. i've explained to you a thousand times - i will ONLY ever respond with like-for-like. there are four people i (and many others) regularly fall out with: Aristide1 (absent for quite some time) Runner_70 & FreddieJupiter (Both banned) - and YOU - the only person on QZ to receive multiple bans (12 - count them). i don't think it says anything bad about me - or any others who are falling out with those who get banned.

in 16 years here, i've never been warned, moderated or banned. so stop perpetuating your poisonous myths and face facts: you're the common denominator to the vast majority of abusive exchanges on here [sic].

even in this instance, you are disagreeing with vocalharmony, but have to insult me? i have NOTHING to do with your disagreement with him, but you drag me into it. your lack of ability to interact one-to-one is symptomatic of a blind man lashing out in all directions hoping to randomly hit anything at all.

in every single "escalated encounter" with you, you are the one to lob the first brickbat. you post insults as a first response to anyone who dares to disagree with you. have you ever tried disagreeing by presenting reasoned counter-arguments? perhaps if you reined in on the aggression a little, others would have no cause to respond in the same manner?

you won't see this - or accept it, because (quite frankly) this is the nature of the (unsocial) beast that you are.

Brenski Again you are so blinkered in your opinions so lets take fact by fact here.
1. You decided yet again to stick your beak into one of my posts and slag my comments off like you always do then your poisonous mate joins in i.e Vocal Harmony
adding his venom to the mix.
2. Only you on here has ever got me banned as everyone else can seem to deal with my opinions but you have to throw your toys out of the pram and get me banned
spewing your lies to the moderator to justify your frail ego.
3.You only reply to my discussions on here so you can wind me up and get a reaction to which you have as i cannot tolerate wankers like you.
4. You are a very immature adult and it is scary that you and your side kick loony wizard have another web site as both of you are so self opinionated
and hate loosing a discussion so you go on the attack.
5.You still have not learned how to have a fair equal conversation without insulting my posts so why don't you just jog on and get back on your own cheap web site because i find you to be the highest hypocrite of all moaning that this site is shit yet you and others are back on it.

[QUOTE][color=Sienna] [b]Benross wrote:[/b] [i] Brenski Again you are so blinkered in your opinions so lets take fact by fact here.
1. You decided yet again to stick your beak into one of my posts and slag my comments off like you always do [/i][/color][/QUOTE] not true. i posted a picture (which you didn't respond to. then i replied to Mike - and you took umbridge to that reply. try getting your facts right. you jumped in with the first insult at me ([color=Red]Posted: 24 Aug 20, 10:38[/color]) (which is ALWAYS your way) - because you don't know how to converse without aggression.

[QUOTE][color=Sienna] [b]Benross wrote:[/b] [i] 2. Only you on here has ever got me banned as everyone else can seem to deal with my opinions but you have to throw your toys out of the pram and get me banned spewing your lies to the moderator to justify your frail ego. [/i][/color][/QUOTE] untrue. this forum hardly ever bans anyone - you need to cross some serious lines before any ban - [b]ONLY YOU EVER GOT YOU BANNED[/b] - let's face facts: moderators don't issue bans just because of a complaint - the posts/behaviours have to warrant a ban. complaints are likely to be raised often on moderated forums - you'd have to be abysmal to actually get banned on QZ, and a despicable excuse for human life to be banned 12 times here.

[QUOTE][color=Sienna] [b]Benross wrote:[/b] [i] 3.You only reply to my discussions on here so you can wind me up and get a reaction to which you have as i cannot tolerate wankers like you. [/i][/color][/QUOTE] as i said, i didn't try to wind you up. i stated facts - that you are unable to absorb/handle like a human being. i suggest you re-read this thread - you engaged aggressively and i retorted. as i said, i'll only ever reply with like-for-like. don;t like it? don't ramp things up, try moderating your arguments.

[QUOTE][color=Sienna] [b]Benross wrote:[/b] [i] 4. You are a very immature adult and it is scary that you and your side kick loony wizard have another web site as both of you are so self opinionated
and hate loosing a discussion so you go on the attack. [/i][/color][/QUOTE] it's not a site - it's a forum.

[QUOTE][color=Sienna] [b]Benross wrote:[/b] [i] 5.You still have not learned how to have a fair equal conversation without insulting my posts so why don't you just jog on and get back on your own cheap web site because i find you to be the highest hypocrite of all moaning that this site is shit yet you and others are back on it. [/i][/color][/QUOTE] nobody anywhere could have a "fair and equal conversation with you" - it's impossible. because we ALL know that your version of "fair and equal" involves everyone having to accept every piece of ill-informed, rubbish you spout, without question.
it's not a site - it's a forum. same as this.
i've never said this was a shit site (or forum) - i've said that people like you are dragging it down the drain. it used to be excellent - before YOU and other trolls arrived. yet again, you don;t understand - i was here a long time before you and there is no rule that excludes people from being members of more than one forum. however, if you want to play that game...what about your multiple Queen logins? Qzone, Queen Facebook, i think you said you were on QOL too and you'd be on Queen chat too if we hadn't banned you immediately. quit your double-standards BS and try discuss things calmly - for a change.