Skip to content
Queen crest Queenzone.org

Queen II - the demo recordings

72 posts Page 2 of 5
Thread

Posts in chronological order

Search forum

Sign in to watch

Watching a topic is how you opt in to reply pushes.

John S Stuart wrote:
Thomas are you guys one and the same?


You're getting desperate now.

John S Stuart wrote:
This is a wind-up. Smell the roses. But I guess this thread sums up this board nicely, on the one hand you have someone like myself (whom you would gladly question) against an unknown with a dubious insulting name in the other.?


I know your nose was put out of joint. Pathetic.

John S Stuart wrote:
While I do make mistakes, (and I believe only the Pope is infallible), I thought I may have cut a bit more clout than this!


I don't know who you are, John, but I seriously doubt you know Queen better than me.

John S Stuart wrote:
And yes, my nose IS out of joint. I really can not believe that anyone on this board would accept that Brian would support someone with a name like "The left testicle of Freddie!"

If you are indeed as genuine as you claim - stand up and be counted - and stop hiding behind such a rediculous and degrading title!


ANYONE who knew the boys would know my username refers to a standing joke throughout the 80s.

I am standing up and being counted.
Brian May, I should say
Maybe a strange thing but maybe Mr. Left Testicle is Mr. May Himself.
omniroy wrote:
Maybe a strange thing but maybe Mr. Left Testicle is Mr. May Himself.


LOL! Not true, I'm afraid!

Certain people are interested in reminding fans that the Queen boxsets are still happening though. So, you could call me a shameless marketing ploy working on behalf of others. You could call me that!
Brian May, I should say
ThomasQuinn wrote:
And that joke is?


It refers to an unfortunate occurence which befell Freddie during the recording of "Soul Brother".
Brian May, I should say
I believe John Stuart. He has a name, an email address, a history as a collector and contributor to the Freddie box and an excellent name in the Queenzone community and far beyond. I trust his word until I am proven wrong by a Queen release - but I doubt this will ever happen.
I do not want any google ads here.
Uh-oh, this discussion is getting on fire and even more interesting...
This is absolutely an interesting topic.

But Mr. Left Testicle could you prove that everything you said is the truth and nothing but the truth. Maybe you could put a snipped of Surrender To The City on the internet.

Maybe I would believe you, because otherwise you have got a really thick thumb.
Only many other zoners definitely don’t believe you.

I hope that you are speaking the truth
Thanks for calling me stupid (weet jij het beter dan) bt maybe you have got an better idea.
John S Stuart wrote:

This is a wind-up. Smell the roses. But I guess this thread sums up this board nicely, on the one hand you have someone like myself (whom you would gladly question) against an unknown with a dubious insulting name in the other.

While I do make mistakes, (and I believe only the Pope is infallible), I thought I may have cut a bit more clout than this!


It would appear that those who believe Left Testy over you, John, are not familiar with your information. You have not posted much in these last few months, so it is easy to see how newer members of QZ might not know who you are.

As YV mentioned, I have no reason to doubt John's information or creditabilty. Testy's just a wind-up artist having fun at the expense of a few posters.
DJ's the man we love the most
"I don't know who you are, John, but I seriously doubt you know Queen better than me".

That is very possible. I never PERSONALLY knew the guys, so I do not put that up for discussion and conceed to your intimate relationship.

I also accept that bits and bobs of "Queen II" demos do exist - but not in the same drastic fashion you claim - ofcourse we could be arguing the same point from different ends. So in a sense, I do not totally disagree there either, and perhaps we argue over rhetoric and semantics.

However, my main contention (and forgive me if this seems insulting) is that without any supporting or creditable evidence, you claim to have re-written the book as far as "Queen II" is concerned, and I thought my "inside information" was pretty solid. Do you blame me for being so incredulous?

I welcome genuine discussion, so why not reveal who you REALLY are, because so far you are flying in the face tradition, with nothing to substantiate your stories, and although I am no human encyclopedia, I am not a "troll" either.
"Listen to them. Children of the night. What music they make."
ThomasQuinn wrote:
omniroy, I did give a better suggestion (in the other topic by the same guy); have Brian mention him (with nickname and saying that he's telling the truth) on his soapbox. He says he'll ask Brian so we'll just have to wait and see.


Ok that's wrigth, we have to wait till Brian confirms this
ANYONE who knew the boys would know my username refers to a standing joke throughout the 80s.

Forgive me for being stupid, but personally I have never heard if this before.

Has anyone else in here ever heard of this?
"Listen to them. Children of the night. What music they make."
and who said queenzone was getting boring?

Seriously, Left Testicle of Freddie has produced no evidence to support his incredible claims, and until he does (which i doubt) I'm with
John S Stuart on this one!
In the mean time I worked myself through the other topic, where Freddie's testicle claims to act as Brian's trader - the Houston tape for a mastertape. Now I wonder why anybody takes this serious in any way, it's just plain nonsense.
I do not want any google ads here.
Now would be the ideal time for certain parties involved to SHUT UP. Just SHUT UP!