Hey the left ball or what ever has brought a bit of fun to this board even though he's a fake. Hey Martin I agree about the 46664 thing what would it take to ask Spike, Jamie etc to help in a small gig even for 30 mins.
Thread
Posts in chronological order
It's bound to be part of the boxed sets anyway (which Brian tells me will be released sometime in 2006 - six in total, one released every two months), but the Queen II demos are fantastic.
Brian told me that the album did not turn into what they originally set it out to be - the demos are a lot less metally, although they did always plan to have a storybook of songs.
There were 13 songs originally (6 on the white side, and 7 on the black), but one song was dropped off each side because of constraints.
Fantastic. It has a very live feel to it.
WHY DON'T YOU DIG A HOLE, JUMP IN IT AND LET YOUR GAY FRIEND FILL THE HOLE ASSHOLE
WHY DON'T YOU DIG A HOLE, JUMP IN IT AND LET YOUR GAY FRIEND FILL THE HOLE ASSHOLE
Spoken like a true fan, you homophobic fuckwit.
<>
And Horatio.
Queen II is the only album I haven't heard all the way through yet (I am ashamed). I'd like this to be true and if it is, rock on!
Anywho, I am skeleton.
Why is this such a big deal? I thought as Queen fans we'd all get along better than this. If these songs do exist, that's great. If they don't, I'm sure there'll be lots more in these boxsets that we haven't heard. In 1999, if I had heard that there were so many unreleased recordings from Freddie's solo career, I probably wouldn't have believed it, but that boxset was great and offered much more than I expected. Let's just see what happens. I'm sure many of you know more about Queen than I do, but I'm glad. Not knowing everything leaves room for surprises. :)
That's a good point of view :) What fun would that be if we knew everything? We need surprises - and we STILL need them, so let's better have some from time to time rather than all at once and then nothing at all!
I sometimes manage to find about some 'new' Taylor songs and I know how much happiness it is. I am happy I find sth from time to time.
But also we have that forum to exchange our thoughts, so we can talk what we think is true.
But when it gets too excited it's not that good, because we can completely disagree and be unpleasant to each other and that we shouldn't want to happen ;)
I sometimes manage to find about some 'new' Taylor songs and I know how much happiness it is. I am happy I find sth from time to time.
But also we have that forum to exchange our thoughts, so we can talk what we think is true.
But when it gets too excited it's not that good, because we can completely disagree and be unpleasant to each other and that we shouldn't want to happen ;)
I dare to drudge up this old thread. Don't stone me guys, please. ANyway interesting read. About this Left Testicle guy, anyone think it's possible that he was Greg Brooks? Seems to be a similarity in their tone and didn't Greg say he first met Queen in 1989? Maybe his info isn't bullocks...though Brian going back in his personal archive and digging up White Queen just to have something to put on it to make the deadline is pretty convincing evidence that they didnt have so much stuff that they had to remove finished songs from the album.
I had completely forgotten about this thread. Interesting what can happen in a few years.
Anyway, now that a few Queen II 'convention' demos have leaked, other than minor alterations - it seems that the drastically different versions as purported by the testicle - seem more unlikely than ever.
Anyway, now that a few Queen II 'convention' demos have leaked, other than minor alterations - it seems that the drastically different versions as purported by the testicle - seem more unlikely than ever.
About this Left Testicle guy, anyone think it's possible that he was Greg Brooks? Seems to be a similarity in their tone.
Yes, having just read numerous posts by the character, I think think it's safe to say it's the same person who has posted as GB and The Queen Archivist. Most of it is taking the piss and the fact he wasn't believed would probably explain a few things.
For fuck's sake.
As I said in the Wikipedia post, (which presumaby inspired the dredging up of this post) this guy is just a garden-variety Wind Up Merchant.
Just search for all his posts and you'll see. He started off making *almost* believable posts saying he was in contact with Bri and had various bits of insider info. The posts got more and more outlandish until they reached the point where the poster was obviously outing himself as a WUM.
Check this one out for example:
http://tinyurl.com/zwhcz
"I think think it's safe to say it's the same person who has posted as GB...".
- So safe you'd put your house on it?
As I remember, Freddie's Left Testicle actually provided some nice debate and amusement at a time when the board sorely needed it.
As I said in the Wikipedia post, (which presumaby inspired the dredging up of this post) this guy is just a garden-variety Wind Up Merchant.
Just search for all his posts and you'll see. He started off making *almost* believable posts saying he was in contact with Bri and had various bits of insider info. The posts got more and more outlandish until they reached the point where the poster was obviously outing himself as a WUM.
Check this one out for example:
http://tinyurl.com/zwhcz
"I think think it's safe to say it's the same person who has posted as GB...".
- So safe you'd put your house on it?
As I remember, Freddie's Left Testicle actually provided some nice debate and amusement at a time when the board sorely needed it.
It needs some right now as well...
Hmmm This sounds like sci-fi demos in my ears...
That would be cool if he was telling the truth though, I'm just surprised no one asked him to post the songs.
Very interesting. The left testicle does seem to be Greg.
The plot thickens...
The plot thickens...
Very interesting. The left testicle does seem to be Greg.
The plot thickens...
So why the disinformation?