another vote for you queen fans out there
roger taylor from queen (july 26 1949)
nick mason from pink floyd (january 27 1944)
little known facts
roger taylor always uses single drum kits
nick mason always uses double drum kits
why is that please help me out
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Nick's playing is too tight, there is not enough feeling in it. On the other hand, Roger's playing is more loose and he put a lot of himself in it. Roger CAN groove :)
rick is the "playboy-drummer" and not a real virtuouso. roger has (had) much more power).
if asked about dark side, the only thing gilmour would have likd to be better was the drums!
my vote goes for rog!
if asked about dark side, the only thing gilmour would have likd to be better was the drums!
my vote goes for rog!
Rog for me as he plays with much more feel .
nicks a great drummer make no mistake but a bit too 'mechanized' at times with no improvisation at all
nicks a great drummer make no mistake but a bit too 'mechanized' at times with no improvisation at all
*ahem* "Nick's Boogie"? "Interstellar Overdrive"?
I like the 80s stuff like the WWRY vid. Plent of cameras on Roger and his movement behind the drumkit is superb. Also on Staying Power at Milton Keynes. Roger is a far more technical drummer. With a lot more Grrrrrroooovvveeeeeee.
Roger Taylor!
ROGER!!!!!!!
I think both are great, sometimes too underrated drummers, but I'd have to go with Roger. I know next to nothing about drumming, but he plays with an emotion that you don't always hear in Pink Floyd songs.
Nick isn't "mechanical" or technical at all. If anything HE was the one that was too "loose" and improvisational. Nick has even stated that "There was more pressure on me to make the drumming more accurate and less flowery" for the Wish You Were Here Album. Nick had some trouble on the Wall as well, he went so far as to work out a way to read music for the drums and Pink Floyd needed to bring in a studio drummer to record on one of the tracks. I think if Nick was the technical drummer he would have been able to work through any complexities that he might have come across. Roger had great timing and was very proficient in the drumming department and he was pretty loose too. I think its safe to say that Roger was a superior drummer overall.
You also have to take into consideration that Pink Floyd and Queen are 2 totally different styles of music. Nick played "less" because that's what Roger Waters wanted alot of times. But if you listen to the "Animals" album, you'll hear Nick give a little more than usual. Queen's music is alot more rockin' and needed Roger to "go off" more. Don't get me wrong, I'm not knocking Roger. He is an excellent drummer, but I don't think its fair to say Nick wasn't. Personally, I don't think Roger's style would have worked on Dark Side of the Moon at all!!
Roger after all I'm not a Pink Floyd fan
I'll be a Queen fan always
I'll be a Queen fan always
Roger, coz he's in Queen
Lets see... this is a Queen noticeboard, therefore the conclusion is kind of foregone.
Why not visit an Elvis Presley website and ask who was the better singer - Freddie Mercury or Elvis Presley?
Again, I think the conclusion would be quite predictable also!
Why not visit an Elvis Presley website and ask who was the better singer - Freddie Mercury or Elvis Presley?
Again, I think the conclusion would be quite predictable also!
Who is the best drummer? Buddy Rich, hands down. I think drummers like Bonham and Peart come in behind, but it's pretty far behind. No-one can touch Rich.
Now...who is the better drummer, Roger Taylor or Nick Mason? I love Roger, and Floyd's drumming never really impressed me. I think I'll have to side with Taylor on this one.
Now...who is the better drummer, Roger Taylor or Nick Mason? I love Roger, and Floyd's drumming never really impressed me. I think I'll have to side with Taylor on this one.