THOSE GOING TO LATEST GIGS SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF THEMSELVES

G

gmedwards 12 February 2005 19:45 · Member since August 2004

yaaaawwwwwwwnnnnnnnnn.........

can't we have just one thread for wankers who want to whine about the tour? we're bored of it.

W

wesi72 12 February 2005 19:54 · Member since January 2005

Bryans Permed Poodle wrote:
You are correct but there is a difference these different lineup's created new material and new era's Brian/Roger/Paul are only covering OLD ground. Queen hits sung by a singer although not bad is going to find it impossible to reach the notes Freddie could in some Queen songs

Perhaps if they made Paul Rodgers a full member of Queen and they recorded new albums/material with him I would find it easier to accept him. I just feel the OLD Queen should be laid to rest.

If Paul cannot reach the notes they won't play the song, or they'll alter the key - they won't put out "bad" stuff. In any case, listening to Free, Paul has a bloody good voice with a good range...even Freddie didn't sing the high stuff on tour all the time (listen to live at Wembley), and I'm sure there are plenty of the hits Paul can sing well. I'm sure people will go home happy.

In the second paragraph you say Paul should become a member of Queen. If they recorded an album (as Queen) and then went on tour (as Queen) are you saying this would be easier to accept than the current situation?

Cheers,
Andrew

J

jasen101 12 February 2005 20:48 · Member since March 2002

Go fuck yourself, arsehole.

W

wesi72 12 February 2005 21:13 · Member since January 2005

Is that directed at anyone in particular? ;-)

Cheers
Andrew

1

1quen_fan 12 February 2005 21:18 · Member since December 2004

Are you just posting this to get people mad?

J

jasen101 12 February 2005 23:02 · Member since March 2002

directed at the starter of this topic.

V

valentine 13 February 2005 06:21 · Member since February 2005

Hitman wrote:
Libor for president!

Start the campaign, you'll get my vote!

B

brENsKi 13 February 2005 10:08 · Member since June 2003

Libor2 wrote:

The reality is, that they use name Queen (+Paul Rotgers) and I don't see any reason, why they wouldn't use it. It's their "brand name" not your, BPP.
.

well said fella !!! tell the dumb tw*t to go fight another pointless crusade

although you are wrong on one point - the adverts in the national press (music papers included) say "queen" not "queen + paul rodgers" - so perhaps Brian and Roger are voicing their legal right to the name

U

Unknown 13 February 2005 10:23

Bryans Permed Poodle wrote:
I am a real fan. Went to both Wembley shows in 86. Own every single Album, Single, DVD Queen have ever made.

I am ashamed at myself at having to enter this argument, but I have to point out that even if you went to all the shows Queen performed, and had every album AND single, it does not automatically mean you are a "real" fan.

P

puzzled86 13 February 2005 10:35 · Member since January 2005

I don't understand why on earth you people call yourself queen fans if you can't stand the fact that Brian and Roger are trying to move on with their lives. You should really be calling yourself Freddie fans and nothing else. What a bunch of POSERS!!!!!!!!!!!

G

gmedwards 13 February 2005 10:46 · Member since August 2004

what really pisses me off is these people who have already decided that the tour will be shit, or a disgrace , or whatever before they have even given it a chance. all we have heard so far are three songs from the hall of fame, without of great deal of preparation...they're starting rehearsals on monday for the tour - they're taking it seriously and so it'll be far better that the hall of fame stuff. if you go to a show, and then come and say "it was shite" the fine -at least there's first hand experience to back it up. Give Brian and Roger and the guys a friggin' chance.

Z

Zander05 13 February 2005 10:48 · Member since July 2001

I'm a Freddie fan. But I'm also a Pro-Queen + Paul Rodgers guy. I know full well that Paul is not half as good as Freddie. But he is willing to try and Brian and Roger want to perform as a band again. It won't be the same without Deaky but at least we younger fans finally have a chance to see them live.

H

HitMan81 13 February 2005 13:04 · Member since January 2005

So, what some 'fans' are saying Queen isn't Queen without Freddie.

Then what about songs like 'Modern Times Rock n Roll', 'The Loser in the End', 'She Makes Me', 'I'm In Love With My Car', etc. ???
Freddie doesn't sing any vocals in these songs, but they ARE Queen songs... So Queen CAN be Queen without Freddie!

K

kerfuffle87 13 February 2005 13:22 · Member since January 2005

<font color=#FF399> Linda Of The Valley wrote:
Oh, such a GREAT topic here, I mean, we've never discussed this and it's just so...so ORIGONAL!! Man, I love this thread...I can't believe I've never thought of it that way....

1) Get a life
2) Get over yourself
3) Go fuck off
4) Kill yourself

I'm not gonna repeat what I've said in millions of threads before this.

lmao :p

B

bryans permed poodle 15069 13 February 2005 15:36 · Member since November 2004

Can't see it Paul Rogers has got too many other commitments ie Bad Company, Free etc.

I am a Queen and Freddie fan but I want them to be remembered at their peak. Every dog has it's day Queen have had theirs it ended the day Freddie died. I'm sure John Deacon feels the same.

Come on guys what Post Freddie Queen stuff has been any good ?.

Did "will rock you" by Queen + Five turn you on ? NO it was crap and cheapened the name Queen. Looking back Brian knew it was a mistake.

Did you like Robbie stepping into Freddie's shoes
on "Champions" ? No that was crap too.

Posts in chronological order