Its simply cos its not spikes band touring with Paul Rogers is it he's just playing the keyboards for the Queen and Paul Rogers tour
As Spike, Jamie and Roger are all SAS Band members then SAS Band + Paul Rodgers is more accurate.
(They should have added Steve Stroud on bass and they would have had the full set!)
Anyways, they can call themselves what they like - I'll still be there!
Thread
Posts in chronological order
People, people!! CHILL OUT!! For effing sake, I'm a great huge Queen fan but jeez, at the end of the day they are just a band???? I think its time that we just drop the whole should they, shouldn't they thing - it is happening, we can't stop it, we have no right to stop it, people have the right to enjoy it so go, don't go but for GOD'S sake LET IT BE!!!
I have to agree there
You are speaking words of wisdom
let it be
:o)
You are speaking words of wisdom
let it be
:o)
***let it be, let it be let it be-e-e, let it be-e! There will be an answer, let it be. COME ON EVERYONE... let it beeeeee....................
bryans permed poodle, you are a STEE-UPID plonker. For a number of reasons.
1. You can't spell BRIAN properly,
2. you are a stepford fan,
3. You are a numbskull who sucks the joy out of good things,
4. Actually, you're NOT a stepford fan. I'm not sure if you even qualify urself as a fan,
5. You just got yourself put on the stupid twat list of queenzoners,
and,
6. I don't think that you'll have a good name around here, and a lot of people sure seem to not like you, INCLUDING me.
now, I do know that every one is entitled to there own opinion, so here's MINE.
1. You can't spell BRIAN properly,
2. you are a stepford fan,
3. You are a numbskull who sucks the joy out of good things,
4. Actually, you're NOT a stepford fan. I'm not sure if you even qualify urself as a fan,
5. You just got yourself put on the stupid twat list of queenzoners,
and,
6. I don't think that you'll have a good name around here, and a lot of people sure seem to not like you, INCLUDING me.
now, I do know that every one is entitled to there own opinion, so here's MINE.
Sir GH wrote:
"Paul Rodgers has a better live range now than Freddie Mercury did even in his prime. Just listen to the bootlegs and tell me how many times Freddie could sing We Are The Champions like the record. In about 250 shows, I've counted three. Watch the UK Hall Of Fame '04 video and watch an incredible singer do his stuff."
Disagree! You shouldn't forget, that Freddie was singing WATC at the end of the gig, at least after 1 h 40 min his extreme live show, and Paul Rogers sang it as the second song just warmed up, so naturally Paul had more chances to show his best vocal possibilities than Freddie. All potency of Paul we'll see only after full live shows. But anyway, I think Freddie has much more powerful voice than Paul, and if Paul could match up to Freddie, dont you think he had to be more known than now?:}
"Paul Rodgers has a better live range now than Freddie Mercury did even in his prime. Just listen to the bootlegs and tell me how many times Freddie could sing We Are The Champions like the record. In about 250 shows, I've counted three. Watch the UK Hall Of Fame '04 video and watch an incredible singer do his stuff."
Disagree! You shouldn't forget, that Freddie was singing WATC at the end of the gig, at least after 1 h 40 min his extreme live show, and Paul Rogers sang it as the second song just warmed up, so naturally Paul had more chances to show his best vocal possibilities than Freddie. All potency of Paul we'll see only after full live shows. But anyway, I think Freddie has much more powerful voice than Paul, and if Paul could match up to Freddie, dont you think he had to be more known than now?:}
*let it be.. let it be-eee oh come ON now, let it b-ee.... speakin' words of wisdom, let it beeeeeeeee..........*
Sorry - wrong thread.