WE NEED YOU NOW MORE THAN EVER!

Zebonka12 wrote:

Amadeus you are totally ignoring the point that people are making here. It's a worthy one, please try to listen:

If there was a genuine attack on Queenzone, I would fully expect someone to stand up for it, and rightly so. But there was no such thing. It was just me (SPOCK) making one complaint that such a picture would be handed around, when it was obviously not taken with Freddie's permission.

You can quite easily say 'this wouldn't have happened if Spock didn't post in the first place' but it's flat untrue. You are just a lost little kid looking for a reason to have a totally meaningless argument and it's a spent force.

And there you are again with the 'us' bit. The 'they're attacking US' thing. Anyone with half a brain would look at my original post and note that it's not an attack. I was just miffed about one tiny thing about a huge site. The fact that you've fished it up all this time later shows how bored you are. I hope you got the reaction you were after.

Yes, but, before I read that post that you put on MIH, there was no connection that I could see (besides the Queen fact, ofcourse) of any relation between MIH and QZ.

You mentioned how "horrid" QZ was in the thread title. In the title, you mentioned nothing of any photo, and the majority of people just view the title, not the actual post.

What was the point of bringin' up horrid pictures of Freddie, when most people wouldn't want to see them? If they wanted to, they could have looked into it themselves.

-

About me appointing my self a representative of QZ - I didn't think QZ needed any sort of person to stand up for it, speak for it, ect., until I saw the post from Spock. I know it was made in November of 2004 as you have said over and over, but what does that have to do? QZ is still a Queen forum, and has been well before November 2004.

-

You keep mentioning my signiture - what does it have to do with anything?

In regards to your signature (since I have to spell it out for you), you have created this entire thread and upheaval *something* over a silly thing no one really cares about *nothing*.

In the future, please try to read correctly and analyze things on your own. This is accomplished if you read ALL of what people say, not just the bits you can dig deeper into and create a big mess.

So just drop it, and walk away. Enough is enough.

Hmm... thought this was about the thread, not my signiture...

"Yes, but, before I read that post that you put on MIH, there was no connection that I could see (besides the Queen fact, ofcourse) of any relation between MIH and QZ."

What on earth do you mean by that? Of course they are related, whether or not you disregard the Queen bit. As we've seen, there are peoples that frequent both places under different names.

"You mentioned how "horrid" QZ was in the thread title."

Yep. Then I got onto the meat and potatoes of what I was talking about - the nasty photo.

"In the title, you mentioned nothing of any photo, and the majority of people just view the title, not the actual post."

Listen, I can't account for the majority of people (including you) being total idiots.

"What was the point of bringin' up horrid pictures of Freddie, when most people wouldn't want to see them? If they wanted to, they could have looked into it themselves."

I was wondering aloud to a bunch of people I trust more than I trust you, why there was no quality control on a site as big as Queenzone. I figured if it was the big Queen site that everyone says it is, that it wouldn't be a cesspool replete with bullcrap forums and paparazzi pics. I learned my lesson there!

Here's my old post:

"In their pictures section there's some 'orrid pictures of Freddie (one labelled August 1991 - you'll all understand what that entails).

Can't they sort of say, after a certain point in his life, that they shouldn't put pictures up of him? It's not nice."

All I was saying (and you can't just say 'boo hoo, the title was nasty and offended me' without at least reading the content of the post itself - it's stupid) is that I was surprised that a site like this would let something like that slip. Besides, the pic in question is already up at BBC, why have it here too?

And finally - yes, I do repeat the fact that it's from Nov. 2004. Because it is, and it seems very very odd that one would wish to go fishing for trouble and come up with something so outdated and inoffensive.

Anyway, I hope this is over. I am very bored with it.

This site would be better if pricks on here stop going on about this Rodgers geezer. Freddie was Queen and Queen died in 1991 fullstop. Brian and Roger should now retire in honour of their lead singer or form a folk band with Chesney Hawkes.

PLEASE STOP TALKING ABOUT QUEEN AS THEY ARE AN ONGOING BAND.

Dickheads.

Wrong thread mate. You're an idiot.

I'm going to bow out of this (or at least try to) and I leave _amadeus_ with this:

If my thread had a misleading title, then doesn't yours too? I mean - WE NEED YOU NOW MORE THAN EVER! sounds really important. When I saw what it was you were linking to, I laughed really hard. Haha.

And if you hadn't posted it, you couldn't have cared less...

You're not even making sense any more. It's a good thing this thread has finally died.

"And if you hadn't posted it, you couldn't have cared less... "

I think I'll just save myself some time : Apology Accepted, Amadeus.

I never apologized?

I don't have to apologize to anyone, all I did was simply comment on YOUR post.

I don't really wanna argue anymore, so lets just stop, ok?

Lets just say that no one has this advantage.

:D

Advantage? Ok listen - if there was one, it'd be with me. But only barely, because if I really wanted moral ascendancy I'd have shut my mouth three days ago.

Besides advantages weren't the focus - I don't argue to WIN, I argue because I thought something unfair was said. As you say, it's over.

I think I need this debate like I need a hole in the head so I'm stoppin'.