That cannot be proven. What we cannot know is "what kind of bible" Paul was a scholar of. We do not know which books were rejected at the council of Jamnia in 90 CE, hence we cannot know to what extent Paul would have been a scholar of jewish scriptures.
Paul writes of himself in Phil 3:5, "...as touching the law, a Pharisee...".
Paul was very well versed in what we would call today, the Old Testament. God would have protected his Bible back then, just as He protects the Bible today. God is in total control over everything. Do you think He would control everything else but allow his Word to fall into disarray?
No, God protects his Word, and ensures its authenticity and integrity.
Paul makes very few references to Jewish scripture, anyway. He mostly talks about his spiritual experiences. We cannot know the writings that were rejected. But then, there are of course non-canonical writings, but that's a whole other discussion.
Wrong again. Paul makes plenty of references of OT scripture. He cites again and again verses from the OT that prove Jesus was the Messiah. The book of Romans is Paul's commentary of the Old Testament. There, he explains where and how the Jews went wrong.
There should be no room for speculation.
I have not speculated. I told you very certain what the nature of the error was. It was not God's error, but an error of the English translators.
The bible is a completely human creation for human reasons. There are errors all over the place.
There are no errors in the Original Bible which are the Hebrew and Greek writings.
But mistakes were made in Translations to different languages. Men make mistakes, God never.
One only sees them if their spiritual blinders are not on. You, with your spiritual blinders, are trying to find any possible way to rationalize such errors because you believe God wrote the bible. You fundamentalists will adjust history in any way you can to match your belief system.
Where have I adjusted history? Where have I rationalized? Did you even read my explanation?
You cited a verse where you thought there was an error, and I explained quite clearly that it is not a genuine error but an error in translation.
The problem with you is that you approach the Bible looking for errors, and when you see a verse that looks to be an error, you IMMEDIATELY JUMP TO CONCLUSIONS, saying aHA! Here you go! God is not infallible! Errors exists so therefore, the Bible is not trustworthy.
But any true student of the Bible knows that the Bible is infallible, and has not a single error. We may not initially understand the Bible, but by studying and delving deeper into the Bible, we can eventually see the truth.
But someone of your attitude will NEVER understand the Bible. It will always be a unreliable relic, a book full of errors. It's because that's what you want to see.