[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]flash00. wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
i agree with you totaly fairy :))))) oh dear where's my little wooden cart lol[/QUOTE]
Sweet as always honey! Oh your cart, you left it here! Better come get it! LOL
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Well they obviously dont know a good thing when they see it,lol!!!!
I´m thinking, those 16.000 copies sold in USA is a very very very poor number of sales....
It seems Queen will never become famous there anymore. As I remember the european multi-platinum "Innuemdo" only reached no. 42 over there....
The problem is: All the Queen fans WANT this new group to be a new Queen or to be succesfull like the real Queen.
But ask people on street! All my friends are saying "That´s not Queen anymore, I´m not interested in this music without Freddie. Freddie was Queen"......
That´s the global opinion of the people!!!!
The Queen fans stuck at this board and want Q+PR to be superstars, but they are really not!
It seems Queen will never become famous there anymore. As I remember the european multi-platinum "Innuemdo" only reached no. 42 over there....
The problem is: All the Queen fans WANT this new group to be a new Queen or to be succesfull like the real Queen.
But ask people on street! All my friends are saying "That´s not Queen anymore, I´m not interested in this music without Freddie. Freddie was Queen"......
That´s the global opinion of the people!!!!
The Queen fans stuck at this board and want Q+PR to be superstars, but they are really not!
Am I the first to mention that I'm surprised the album charted in the US, considering that Queen hasn't toured as any kind of a band since 1982? And that there isn't even a full-scale tour planned yet? With those factors, No. 84 isn't a terrible position at all; I don't even think any of the albums since Made In Heaven made the charts.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Zebonka12 wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Basically - I really think that they should just drop the 'guest singer' gag. I'm going to get shot for saying this, but I really think Brian and Roger are good enough. Paul Rogers is a fine singer, but what is he - backup singer or frontman? And if he's backup, why is he center stage? If he's frontman, why does he hide in the wings on certain songs?
It just doesn't work well enough to me.[/QUOTE]
There is a certain past of your posta I agree with... The one where they should decide whether he's the frontman or a backup singer.
The part where I disagree is "queen" being good enough without him. Bri and Rog are embarrassing to listen to, and all the while they were on I kept wondering to myself... "They have a singer. Why doesn't HE song these songs?"
It just doesn't work well enough to me.[/QUOTE]
There is a certain past of your posta I agree with... The one where they should decide whether he's the frontman or a backup singer.
The part where I disagree is "queen" being good enough without him. Bri and Rog are embarrassing to listen to, and all the while they were on I kept wondering to myself... "They have a singer. Why doesn't HE song these songs?"
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]ok.computer wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
Alas, a country who allows tosh like white-boy poodle-haired, rockabilly trash like "Have a Nice Day" to debut at No 2 deserves to have its soft underbelly of social injustice well and truly exposed, indeed ripped open, with hurricane force.
[/QUOTE]
Hellz yeah.
Alas, a country who allows tosh like white-boy poodle-haired, rockabilly trash like "Have a Nice Day" to debut at No 2 deserves to have its soft underbelly of social injustice well and truly exposed, indeed ripped open, with hurricane force.
[/QUOTE]
Hellz yeah.
[QUOTE]
Yes - Drama
[/QUOTE]
What? Speaking as one who owns the enitre Yes catalogue including the remastered version of said album, I must say, that's kooky talk.
Yes - Drama
[/QUOTE]
What? Speaking as one who owns the enitre Yes catalogue including the remastered version of said album, I must say, that's kooky talk.
Now down to No 40 in the UK album charts after selling only 50 copies in the last weeks. Tragic.