Queen crest Queenzone

Who killed John Lennon?

85 posts Page 5 of 6
Thread

Posts in chronological order

Search forum
civilised nations do not execute people.
killing is either wrong or it is right.
we've no ancestral halls, no haughty portraits on our walls, no family monuments at all, unless it's my cousin sheila's stupendous clevage.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Mr.Jingles wrote: [/QUOTENAME]People, why do we even bother arguing with Sarajane?

She's the same person who thinks that putting a woman on a vegetate state out of her misery is a MURDER, but yet she has no problem with someone who starts a war based on lies and wrong information, orders the invasion of a country and causes the death to thousands of innocent civilians, while leaving lots more injured or mutilated.

Does that make sense to any of you?[/QUOTE]

Oh, that's right. Apparently what Saddam was doing was better. Why don't we ask the Shiites and Kurds, not to mention a good bit of the Sunnis, about that?
"Brian May, Freddie will."
Someone once mentioned that you don't fight the enemy by becoming the enemy.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Brandon wrote: [/QUOTENAME]... and now the "best you can offer is Mr. Jingles? HA! He's... just pathetic.[/QUOTE]
that's some crazy stuff goin on right there. I don't want to comment on the Terri Schaivo (sp?) thing, because it's already messed up as it is.

I want to get back to the topic: The murder of John Lennon. They had an E! True Hollywood Story about it, and it documented everything leading up to the murder, including MDC's insane fascination with The Beatles and John Lennon.

He indeed was a crazed fan, but deep down he held within him the urge to kill. Maybe he indeed wanted to kill Yoko, but it's not like he missed the target. He deliberately put five bullets into John Lennon's back. That's no accident.

And, it was earlier that day that MDC got his vinyl copy of Double Fantasy, John's newest album at the time, signed by John himself.

Something was up with that guy, i mean, wanting an autograph, but then killing him later that night. I hope he stays in jail, because once he gets out, he's gonna have to watch his back. If capital punishment won't kill him, the millions and millions of John Lennon fans will...
We can only grow the way the wind blows On a bare and weathered shore We can only bow to the here and now In our elemental war - Rush, "The Way The Wind Blows"
Don't worry. He won't be getting out.
When life hands you lemons, add vodka.
I don't want to read this thread. Why has it been going on so long? I'm assuming we are off the topic of 'who killed John Lennon?' What is it now, if anyone can give me a quick synopsis?
Creativity can always cover for a lack of knowledge.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Show any jury with more than three braincells the pictures of Ron and Nicole lying on the ground with blood gushing out of them and that asshole would have been at the chair before anyone could blink, whether the fucking glove fit or not.[/QUOTE]

Okay, I read the thread. More like I gave it a cursory glance. Either way, don't you think this is what we call "biasing the jury?" You know, having the jury base their decision not upon evidence, but manipulative tricks of prosecuting attorneys?
Creativity can always cover for a lack of knowledge.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Music Man wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I don't want to read this thread. Why has it been going on so long? I'm assuming we are off the topic of 'who killed John Lennon?' What is it now, if anyone can give me a quick synopsis?[/QUOTE]

You already said you read it, but any thread that involves FGT always degenerates into some stupid argument about OJ. It's inevitable.

Best to just roll your eyes and carry on.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Lester Burnham wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Music Man wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I don't want to read this thread. Why has it been going on so long? I'm assuming we are off the topic of 'who killed John Lennon?' What is it now, if anyone can give me a quick synopsis?[/QUOTE]

You already said you read it, but any thread that involves FGT always degenerates into some stupid argument about OJ. It's inevitable.

Best to just roll your eyes and carry on.[/QUOTE]

Did I already read it? Then I must have stopped reading it and let it keep going. Or forgot immediately after reading. Hold on, I feel another witty comment coming on...
Creativity can always cover for a lack of knowledge.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote: [/QUOTENAME]

O.J. did something positive? He caught a fucking ball.[/QUOTE]

No he didn't. He was an RB. A really good one.
Creativity can always cover for a lack of knowledge.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Music Man wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Lester Burnham wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Music Man wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I don't want to read this thread. Why has it been going on so long? I'm assuming we are off the topic of 'who killed John Lennon?' What is it now, if anyone can give me a quick synopsis?[/QUOTE]

You already said you read it, but any thread that involves FGT always degenerates into some stupid argument about OJ. It's inevitable.

Best to just roll your eyes and carry on.[/QUOTE]

Did I already read it? Then I must have stopped reading it and let it keep going. Or forgot immediately after reading. Hold on, I feel another witty comment coming on...[/QUOTE]

I didn't mean that in a sarcastic way, I just meant that you'd already posted that you skimmed the thread, but I thought I would throw in my two cents anyway.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Lester Burnham wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Music Man wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Lester Burnham wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Music Man wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I don't want to read this thread. Why has it been going on so long? I'm assuming we are off the topic of 'who killed John Lennon?' What is it now, if anyone can give me a quick synopsis?[/QUOTE]

You already said you read it, but any thread that involves FGT always degenerates into some stupid argument about OJ. It's inevitable.

Best to just roll your eyes and carry on.[/QUOTE]

Did I already read it? Then I must have stopped reading it and let it keep going. Or forgot immediately after reading. Hold on, I feel another witty comment coming on...[/QUOTE]

I didn't mean that in a sarcastic way, I just meant that you'd already posted that you skimmed the thread, but I thought I would throw in my two cents anyway.[/QUOTE]

I think I posted that afterwards. I'm kind of confused at what you mean.
Creativity can always cover for a lack of knowledge.
Threads started by Sarajane (regardless of the subject) eventually turn into an arguments about:

- The Bush administration
- Iraq/Saddam Hussein
- War On Terror/9-11
- Terri Schiavo/Euthanasia
- OJ Simpson / Mark Fuhrman
- Abortion
- Crime
- Racism

...and that just to mention a few.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Brandon wrote: [/QUOTENAME]... and now the "best you can offer is Mr. Jingles? HA! He's... just pathetic.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Mr.Jingles wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Threads started by Sarajane (regardless of the subject) eventually turn into an arguments about:

- The Bush administration
- Iraq/Saddam Hussein
- War On Terror/9-11
- Terri Schiavo/Euthanasia
- OJ Simpson / Mark Fuhrman
- Abortion
- Crime
- Racism

...and that just to mention a few.[/QUOTE]

Then I think we need more posters like Sarajane in that case. Otherwise this place would be a shithole of boring topics.
Creativity can always cover for a lack of knowledge.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Music Man wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I think I posted that afterwards. I'm kind of confused at what you mean.[/QUOTE]

I think I've gone cross-eyed. Forget I said anything.