[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Lester Burnham wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Music Man wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I think I posted that afterwards. I'm kind of confused at what you mean.[/QUOTE]
I think I've gone cross-eyed. Forget I said anything.[/QUOTE]
9 9
L
___
Thread
Posts in chronological order
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Music Man wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Show any jury with more than three braincells the pictures of Ron and Nicole lying on the ground with blood gushing out of them and that asshole would have been at the chair before anyone could blink, whether the fucking glove fit or not.[/QUOTE]
Okay, I read the thread. More like I gave it a cursory glance. Either way, don't you think this is what we call "biasing the jury?" You know, having the jury base their decision not upon evidence, but manipulative tricks of prosecuting attorneys?[/QUOTE]
Hmm, let's see what the defense did. The defense had 0 evidence and so spent the entire time prejudicing the jury by making the LAPD out to be racists.
Okay, I read the thread. More like I gave it a cursory glance. Either way, don't you think this is what we call "biasing the jury?" You know, having the jury base their decision not upon evidence, but manipulative tricks of prosecuting attorneys?[/QUOTE]
Hmm, let's see what the defense did. The defense had 0 evidence and so spent the entire time prejudicing the jury by making the LAPD out to be racists.
Hey, this is not the O.J thread.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Music Man wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Show any jury with more than three braincells the pictures of Ron and Nicole lying on the ground with blood gushing out of them and that asshole would have been at the chair before anyone could blink, whether the fucking glove fit or not.[/QUOTE]
Okay, I read the thread. More like I gave it a cursory glance. Either way, don't you think this is what we call "biasing the jury?" You know, having the jury base their decision not upon evidence, but manipulative tricks of prosecuting attorneys?[/QUOTE]
Hmm, let's see what the defense did. The defense had 0 evidence and so spent the entire time prejudicing the jury by making the LAPD out to be racists. [/QUOTE]
Then you should blame the prosecution for not calling the right objections.
Okay, I read the thread. More like I gave it a cursory glance. Either way, don't you think this is what we call "biasing the jury?" You know, having the jury base their decision not upon evidence, but manipulative tricks of prosecuting attorneys?[/QUOTE]
Hmm, let's see what the defense did. The defense had 0 evidence and so spent the entire time prejudicing the jury by making the LAPD out to be racists. [/QUOTE]
Then you should blame the prosecution for not calling the right objections.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Music Man wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Music Man wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Show any jury with more than three braincells the pictures of Ron and Nicole lying on the ground with blood gushing out of them and that asshole would have been at the chair before anyone could blink, whether the fucking glove fit or not.[/QUOTE]
Okay, I read the thread. More like I gave it a cursory glance. Either way, don't you think this is what we call "biasing the jury?" You know, having the jury base their decision not upon evidence, but manipulative tricks of prosecuting attorneys?[/QUOTE]
Hmm, let's see what the defense did. The defense had 0 evidence and so spent the entire time prejudicing the jury by making the LAPD out to be racists. [/QUOTE]
Then you should blame the prosecution for not calling the right objections.[/QUOTE]
It's more the judge's fault for letting all of the defense's BS in. In the civil trial, they had a no-B.S. judge and he didn't let any of the defense's B.S. go through. A 12-zip vote for liability.
Okay, I read the thread. More like I gave it a cursory glance. Either way, don't you think this is what we call "biasing the jury?" You know, having the jury base their decision not upon evidence, but manipulative tricks of prosecuting attorneys?[/QUOTE]
Hmm, let's see what the defense did. The defense had 0 evidence and so spent the entire time prejudicing the jury by making the LAPD out to be racists. [/QUOTE]
Then you should blame the prosecution for not calling the right objections.[/QUOTE]
It's more the judge's fault for letting all of the defense's BS in. In the civil trial, they had a no-B.S. judge and he didn't let any of the defense's B.S. go through. A 12-zip vote for liability.
I honestly don't see what the point in complaining about a decision made over a decade ago will accomplish, especially on a board that has fuck-all to do with OJ Simpson. I might as well complain about why Rhett Butler said "Frankly my dear, I don't give a damn" to Scarlet O'Hara and bitch about what an insensitive bastard he is.
Am I missing something here? I mean, to be passionate about something is respectable, but there's a fine line between passion and constantly littering an unrelated board to the brink of obsession.
Please, somebody - anybody - shed a little light?
Am I missing something here? I mean, to be passionate about something is respectable, but there's a fine line between passion and constantly littering an unrelated board to the brink of obsession.
Please, somebody - anybody - shed a little light?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Music Man wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Music Man wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Show any jury with more than three braincells the pictures of Ron and Nicole lying on the ground with blood gushing out of them and that asshole would have been at the chair before anyone could blink, whether the fucking glove fit or not.[/QUOTE]
Okay, I read the thread. More like I gave it a cursory glance. Either way, don't you think this is what we call "biasing the jury?" You know, having the jury base their decision not upon evidence, but manipulative tricks of prosecuting attorneys?[/QUOTE]
Hmm, let's see what the defense did. The defense had 0 evidence and so spent the entire time prejudicing the jury by making the LAPD out to be racists. [/QUOTE]
Then you should blame the prosecution for not calling the right objections.[/QUOTE]
It's more the judge's fault for letting all of the defense's BS in. In the civil trial, they had a no-B.S. judge and he didn't let any of the defense's B.S. go through. A 12-zip vote for liability. [/QUOTE]
Or perhaps the first judge was the better one. How could we ever know?
Okay, I read the thread. More like I gave it a cursory glance. Either way, don't you think this is what we call "biasing the jury?" You know, having the jury base their decision not upon evidence, but manipulative tricks of prosecuting attorneys?[/QUOTE]
Hmm, let's see what the defense did. The defense had 0 evidence and so spent the entire time prejudicing the jury by making the LAPD out to be racists. [/QUOTE]
Then you should blame the prosecution for not calling the right objections.[/QUOTE]
It's more the judge's fault for letting all of the defense's BS in. In the civil trial, they had a no-B.S. judge and he didn't let any of the defense's B.S. go through. A 12-zip vote for liability. [/QUOTE]
Or perhaps the first judge was the better one. How could we ever know?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Music Man wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Music Man wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Music Man wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Show any jury with more than three braincells the pictures of Ron and Nicole lying on the ground with blood gushing out of them and that asshole would have been at the chair before anyone could blink, whether the fucking glove fit or not.[/QUOTE]
Okay, I read the thread. More like I gave it a cursory glance. Either way, don't you think this is what we call "biasing the jury?" You know, having the jury base their decision not upon evidence, but manipulative tricks of prosecuting attorneys?[/QUOTE]
Hmm, let's see what the defense did. The defense had 0 evidence and so spent the entire time prejudicing the jury by making the LAPD out to be racists. [/QUOTE]
Then you should blame the prosecution for not calling the right objections.[/QUOTE]
It's more the judge's fault for letting all of the defense's BS in. In the civil trial, they had a no-B.S. judge and he didn't let any of the defense's B.S. go through. A 12-zip vote for liability. [/QUOTE]
Or perhaps the first judge was the better one. How could we ever know?[/QUOTE]
Um, no, not actually. A judge that allows one side to present evidence with 0 basis in reality is not a good judge.
Okay, I read the thread. More like I gave it a cursory glance. Either way, don't you think this is what we call "biasing the jury?" You know, having the jury base their decision not upon evidence, but manipulative tricks of prosecuting attorneys?[/QUOTE]
Hmm, let's see what the defense did. The defense had 0 evidence and so spent the entire time prejudicing the jury by making the LAPD out to be racists. [/QUOTE]
Then you should blame the prosecution for not calling the right objections.[/QUOTE]
It's more the judge's fault for letting all of the defense's BS in. In the civil trial, they had a no-B.S. judge and he didn't let any of the defense's B.S. go through. A 12-zip vote for liability. [/QUOTE]
Or perhaps the first judge was the better one. How could we ever know?[/QUOTE]
Um, no, not actually. A judge that allows one side to present evidence with 0 basis in reality is not a good judge.
Sarajane seems to be the first one to stand up for racist cops. I could see her defending the cops who beat the living shit out of Rodney King.
Oh wait, that's going to turn into another 100 posts! OH SHIT!!!
Oh wait, that's going to turn into another 100 posts! OH SHIT!!!
Why has my thread turned out to be 5 pages long? :O lol.