Thread
Posts in chronological order
Anybody wants to read this pathetic "reviews"?
crap review!!
It seems to me that this texts were written more to insult Queen members rather than to review their albums. Crap RS.
look at jazz
absolutely laughable...it's almost like the critics were jealous or something. RS definately had an anti-queen agenda and probably still do...fuck em...i dont buy their crap mag anyway. It's full of pro-trendy jizz and commercials.
Nice signature, jasen101.
And does A Night At The Opera no longer EXIST or something?
And does A Night At The Opera no longer EXIST or something?
that CHUCK EDDY should be bitchslapped!!
It's good for a laugh. They are even mildly positive about Queen I and The Works... sort of.
they used to do somethin similar with Zeppelin in the 70's, now you can check the reviews and all have change, i hate when RS write somethin about Queen, it's full of ignorance and talk about everythin but the music
Rolling Stone ALWAYS bagged Queen right from the start. They did a shitty piece in 1981 when the band went to South America. Roger was so pissed off he wrote them a letter in protest on an air sickness bag... which they printed. Never pay attention to the reviews. Critics get their albums for free. WE are the ones that count because we buy them.
PLASE READ THE JAZZ REVIEW... THAT GUY HAVE PROBLEMS WITH QUEEN OR SOMETHING... YOU CAN´T WRITE THAT STUFF... READ IT.
Cheers.
P.
Cheers.
P.
Always Rolling Stone are talking Shit about Queen.
I'm curious how the Rolling Stones are judged.
Everything 5 stars *****. LOL!
Stupid magazine!
I'm curious how the Rolling Stones are judged.
Everything 5 stars *****. LOL!
Stupid magazine!
Innuendo en Hot Space the same Stars???!! LOL
Who are those music critics? Probably drunk or Stone(d)
Who are those music critics? Probably drunk or Stone(d)
OMG, that review of Jazz is just ridiculous! It doesn't even make sense!