You keep on about Bijou as a being great,but in reality it's no more than a throw away Hendrix inspired piece of crap.Save Me,i agree is a great song,but isn't this from 1980?As i've said,Queen were very much on the slide many years before Freddie died,and what's currently doing the rounds on stage at present,isn't fit to lick the boots of Queen 1974-77.If you truely believe otherwise,you must be seriously deluded.I'd would still be interested in your views regarding new material.Do you think they'll have the nerve to release anything studio wise?I would really love an album from the guys that could challenge QueenII,or maybe A Night At The Opera.I suppose they could trawl through the outtakes,and maybe get Paul to screech over the top of the backing tracks,but maybe that wouldn't really work,although i'm sure you would love it.I wonder if they can top the sales figures from their last wonderful Champions Of The World release.Didn't it just scrape into the top 20 for all of a week,and then fall like a pile of hot shit straight into the rubbish bin of rock history?I think your anger towards me,and others in this forum proves to me that you know we're right,and history will bare that out.Go and listen to the first 5 albums,then stick on Paul R and Queen,you'll get the biggest laugh of your life.I think Queen 25% have started a brand new trend here,i don't see why we can't have a Beatles reunion without John and George.Then maybe a Jimi Hendrix tour with Mitch Mitchell,then Elvis complete with backing band,but no Elvis!This would be great as Queen have already proven,and there are plenty of tiny minded morons like you to fund it.
Thread
Posts in chronological order
I'ts hysterical how you call others tiny-minded.
One of the most blatant cases of the pot calling the kettle black I've ever seen.
One of the most blatant cases of the pot calling the kettle black I've ever seen.
What I don't get about this conversation is, who cares?
So, some of us don't like the performance/name/idea of Queen + Paul Rogers and some of us do. Yeah. Okay. So... now what? Some of us will willingly buy their tickets, albums and DVD's, and some of us won't.
I don't like rap music, so I won't buy it. Doesn't mean that because I don't like it, it shouldn't/won't exist. There's a market for it - regardless of my personal opinions about that. Just as there is a market for Queen + Paul Rogers - regardless of some of the opinions here.
Like it or not.
Buy it or not.
Obsess about it or move on.
It's all about opinions and choice. Nothing more, nothing less.
So, some of us don't like the performance/name/idea of Queen + Paul Rogers and some of us do. Yeah. Okay. So... now what? Some of us will willingly buy their tickets, albums and DVD's, and some of us won't.
I don't like rap music, so I won't buy it. Doesn't mean that because I don't like it, it shouldn't/won't exist. There's a market for it - regardless of my personal opinions about that. Just as there is a market for Queen + Paul Rogers - regardless of some of the opinions here.
Like it or not.
Buy it or not.
Obsess about it or move on.
It's all about opinions and choice. Nothing more, nothing less.
Love it or leave it
Did Mr. Paul Rodgers hurt his leg? He do not seem to be gimp? (gimp is person with bad leg?)
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]magicalfreddiemercury wrote: [/QUOTENAME]What I don't get about this conversation is, who cares?
So, some of us don't like the performance/name/idea of Queen + Paul Rogers and some of us do. Yeah. Okay. So... now what? Some of us will willingly buy their tickets, albums and DVD's, and some of us won't.
I don't like rap music, so I won't buy it. Doesn't mean that because I don't like it, it shouldn't/won't exist. There's a market for it - regardless of my personal opinions about that. Just as there is a market for Queen + Paul Rogers - regardless of some of the opinions here.
Like it or not.
Buy it or not.
Obsess about it or move on.
It's all about opinions and choice. Nothing more, nothing less.[/QUOTE]
That what i keep saying everyone need to start getting over themselves the only GIMPS are the one's who keep going on about it. If you don’t like it don’t listen to it yes we ALL know its not Queen its 50% of Queen doing what their have every right to do its a shame the other 50% is either dead or retired. Its called moving on some people should try it Brian and Roger renewed my faith in Queen and have bought a new breed of fans into the fold
So, some of us don't like the performance/name/idea of Queen + Paul Rogers and some of us do. Yeah. Okay. So... now what? Some of us will willingly buy their tickets, albums and DVD's, and some of us won't.
I don't like rap music, so I won't buy it. Doesn't mean that because I don't like it, it shouldn't/won't exist. There's a market for it - regardless of my personal opinions about that. Just as there is a market for Queen + Paul Rogers - regardless of some of the opinions here.
Like it or not.
Buy it or not.
Obsess about it or move on.
It's all about opinions and choice. Nothing more, nothing less.[/QUOTE]
That what i keep saying everyone need to start getting over themselves the only GIMPS are the one's who keep going on about it. If you don’t like it don’t listen to it yes we ALL know its not Queen its 50% of Queen doing what their have every right to do its a shame the other 50% is either dead or retired. Its called moving on some people should try it Brian and Roger renewed my faith in Queen and have bought a new breed of fans into the fold
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Ravenetta wrote: [/QUOTENAME]you guys still respond to this guy?[/QUOTE]
Guilty.
And red-faced.
Edited 1/17 -
And yet, I seem to keep coming back...
Guilty.
And red-faced.
Edited 1/17 -
And yet, I seem to keep coming back...
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Ravenetta wrote: [/QUOTENAME]you guys still respond to this guy?[/QUOTE]
Of course, my father had the honor of meeting Paul during a BC concert and now his son is defending Paul's honor from dumbasses with no life.
Of course, my father had the honor of meeting Paul during a BC concert and now his son is defending Paul's honor from dumbasses with no life.
"You keep on about Bijou as a being great"
Because it is.
"but in reality it's no more than a throw away Hendrix inspired piece of crap."
Hendrix is great. It's not throwaway. It's great.
"Save Me,i agree is a great song,but isn't this from 1980?"
Yeah, but didn't you say their weak period was 1980-1991? So Save Me falls under that (along with a shitload of other good songs) so I can only reach the conclusion that you're a dunderhead of some kind.
"As i've said,Queen were very much on the slide many years before Freddie died"
... no they WEREN'T! For fucks sake, let's trot out another one - Was It All Worth It. That song is freakin' work of genius! Next thing, you'll be telling me Sex Pistols are good musicians.
"and what's currently doing the rounds on stage at present,isn't fit to lick the boots of Queen 1974-77."
What has boot licking got to do with anything? You're taking laudanum aren't you!
"If you truely believe otherwise,you must be seriously deluded."
... or, I just like Queen. If you hate Queen so much, why are you even here?
"I'd would still be interested in your views regarding new material."
If you could read, you'd already know my views. Above I said 'it'll certainly be interesting' or something.
"Do you think they'll have the nerve to release anything studio wise?"
They had nerve to ignore fuckwits like you and organise a high-profile tour, so yeah - I think they've plenty of nerve.
"I would really love an album from the guys that could challenge QueenII,or maybe A Night At The Opera."
To be honest... I don't see Roger writing anything great, but Brian has always made good songs (or at least, average songs with really good bits strewn throughout them). I didn't really like The Call as a whole, but there's some amazing little gems in it.
"I suppose they could trawl through the outtakes,and maybe get Paul to screech over the top of the backing tracks,but maybe that wouldn't really work,although i'm sure you would love it."
... no, no I wouldn't. Again, you really haven't the slightest clue do you?
"I wonder if they can top the sales figures from their last wonderful Champions Of The World release.Didn't it just scrape into the top 20 for all of a week,and then fall like a pile of hot shit straight into the rubbish bin of rock history?"
To think, of 50 million sperm, you were the fastest... I suppose it's a mercy the other ones just gave up.
"I think your anger towards me,and others in this forum proves to me that you know we're right"
Uh... I'll go out on a limb here and say maybe you're not. Each member of this band got technically better, pushed their own limits further and further right until they stopped in 1991, and yet you're insisting they reached their peak in 1980. Who's "we" anyway? So a cocksucker posts "I agree with everything you say". Big fucking whoop. I'm sure Bush enjoys that kind of blind-follow-the-sheep behaviour, but I freakin' don't.
"and history will bare that out."
Unfortunately... history won't care at all. Oh that's right, you didn't listen to any of the music from 1980-1991 so you won't get that.
But anyway - your argument won't be remembered at all. If any of this Q+PR stuff is remembered, it will be seen as a bit of fun. Nothing too serious.
"Go and listen to the first 5 albums,then stick on Paul R and Queen,you'll get the biggest laugh of your life."
I already HAD the biggest laugh of my life when I started reading your crap. You have no conception of the benefits of live music and experimentation with different musicians. Lemme guess, the '68 comeback special was a waste of time too?
"I think Queen 25% have started a brand new trend here,i don't see why we can't have a Beatles reunion without John and George."
... again with this
Because it is.
"but in reality it's no more than a throw away Hendrix inspired piece of crap."
Hendrix is great. It's not throwaway. It's great.
"Save Me,i agree is a great song,but isn't this from 1980?"
Yeah, but didn't you say their weak period was 1980-1991? So Save Me falls under that (along with a shitload of other good songs) so I can only reach the conclusion that you're a dunderhead of some kind.
"As i've said,Queen were very much on the slide many years before Freddie died"
... no they WEREN'T! For fucks sake, let's trot out another one - Was It All Worth It. That song is freakin' work of genius! Next thing, you'll be telling me Sex Pistols are good musicians.
"and what's currently doing the rounds on stage at present,isn't fit to lick the boots of Queen 1974-77."
What has boot licking got to do with anything? You're taking laudanum aren't you!
"If you truely believe otherwise,you must be seriously deluded."
... or, I just like Queen. If you hate Queen so much, why are you even here?
"I'd would still be interested in your views regarding new material."
If you could read, you'd already know my views. Above I said 'it'll certainly be interesting' or something.
"Do you think they'll have the nerve to release anything studio wise?"
They had nerve to ignore fuckwits like you and organise a high-profile tour, so yeah - I think they've plenty of nerve.
"I would really love an album from the guys that could challenge QueenII,or maybe A Night At The Opera."
To be honest... I don't see Roger writing anything great, but Brian has always made good songs (or at least, average songs with really good bits strewn throughout them). I didn't really like The Call as a whole, but there's some amazing little gems in it.
"I suppose they could trawl through the outtakes,and maybe get Paul to screech over the top of the backing tracks,but maybe that wouldn't really work,although i'm sure you would love it."
... no, no I wouldn't. Again, you really haven't the slightest clue do you?
"I wonder if they can top the sales figures from their last wonderful Champions Of The World release.Didn't it just scrape into the top 20 for all of a week,and then fall like a pile of hot shit straight into the rubbish bin of rock history?"
To think, of 50 million sperm, you were the fastest... I suppose it's a mercy the other ones just gave up.
"I think your anger towards me,and others in this forum proves to me that you know we're right"
Uh... I'll go out on a limb here and say maybe you're not. Each member of this band got technically better, pushed their own limits further and further right until they stopped in 1991, and yet you're insisting they reached their peak in 1980. Who's "we" anyway? So a cocksucker posts "I agree with everything you say". Big fucking whoop. I'm sure Bush enjoys that kind of blind-follow-the-sheep behaviour, but I freakin' don't.
"and history will bare that out."
Unfortunately... history won't care at all. Oh that's right, you didn't listen to any of the music from 1980-1991 so you won't get that.
But anyway - your argument won't be remembered at all. If any of this Q+PR stuff is remembered, it will be seen as a bit of fun. Nothing too serious.
"Go and listen to the first 5 albums,then stick on Paul R and Queen,you'll get the biggest laugh of your life."
I already HAD the biggest laugh of my life when I started reading your crap. You have no conception of the benefits of live music and experimentation with different musicians. Lemme guess, the '68 comeback special was a waste of time too?
"I think Queen 25% have started a brand new trend here,i don't see why we can't have a Beatles reunion without John and George."
... again with this
Have you guys noticed that all those people- snow flakey, BPP, mr4thofsomething- no grammar, no sense... it's just ususally one long stream of counscious drivel... Noticed?
You don't mean me do you?? :O
.......gimp?
Gimp
(3) A sex slave or submissive, usually male, as popularlized by the movie Pulp Fiction.
2. man slave especially aroused by bondage
A male BDSM rubber/leather slave. Specificaly, refers to slave in full-body suit - eg, rubber leather enclosure suits, and (this is the key thing) a full head mask.
The Gimp is a man they keep dressed from head to toe in black leather bondage gear. There are zippers, buckles and studs here and there on the body. On his head is a black leather mask with two eye holes and a zipper (closed) for a mouth. They keep him in a hole in the floor big enough for a large dog.
1. A person who is into hardcore leather bondage.
(3) A sex slave or submissive, usually male, as popularlized by the movie Pulp Fiction.
2. man slave especially aroused by bondage
A male BDSM rubber/leather slave. Specificaly, refers to slave in full-body suit - eg, rubber leather enclosure suits, and (this is the key thing) a full head mask.
The Gimp is a man they keep dressed from head to toe in black leather bondage gear. There are zippers, buckles and studs here and there on the body. On his head is a black leather mask with two eye holes and a zipper (closed) for a mouth. They keep him in a hole in the floor big enough for a large dog.
1. A person who is into hardcore leather bondage.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<marquee>Queen Of Wrestling</marquee> wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Gimp
(3) A sex slave or submissive, usually male, as popularlized by the movie Pulp Fiction.
2. man slave especially aroused by bondage
A male BDSM rubber/leather slave. Specificaly, refers to slave in full-body suit - eg, rubber leather enclosure suits, and (this is the key thing) a full head mask.
The Gimp is a man they keep dressed from head to toe in black leather bondage gear. There are zippers, buckles and studs here and there on the body. On his head is a black leather mask with two eye holes and a zipper (closed) for a mouth. They keep him in a hole in the floor big enough for a large dog.
1. A person who is into hardcore leather bondage.
[/QUOTE]
Ahhh thanks for the info. ;)
Until now I thought gimp was the stuff you used to make branceletes out of! lmao
(3) A sex slave or submissive, usually male, as popularlized by the movie Pulp Fiction.
2. man slave especially aroused by bondage
A male BDSM rubber/leather slave. Specificaly, refers to slave in full-body suit - eg, rubber leather enclosure suits, and (this is the key thing) a full head mask.
The Gimp is a man they keep dressed from head to toe in black leather bondage gear. There are zippers, buckles and studs here and there on the body. On his head is a black leather mask with two eye holes and a zipper (closed) for a mouth. They keep him in a hole in the floor big enough for a large dog.
1. A person who is into hardcore leather bondage.
[/QUOTE]
Ahhh thanks for the info. ;)
Until now I thought gimp was the stuff you used to make branceletes out of! lmao
Doesnt exactly describe Paul Rodgers eh?