Jazz 78.....great stuff ! Thanks for sharing.
We've got a Magic tour book, and framed Innuendo poster signed by all four. I doubt 'Innuendo' is worth the $3800+ for a related award someone recently posted.
Unless the accessor is Lisa G's insurance guy;-)
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Those sound like really nice items. The tour programs I have are the Spring tour of 77. And Spring tour 78. The covers are kind of showing age but the signatures are still sharp and the colors still vibrant. So with the 78 program I assume these signatures were done around April or May of 78.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Lord Fickle wrote: [/QUOTENAME]How would you tell the date? Well, I suppose if someone had a signed copy of Innuendo, it would be unlikely that this was from 1973! :) I think there are ways to authenticate autographs, but the question really was would there be any difference in value, according to the age of the autographs.[/QUOTE]
Sorry, I credited you with the intelligence to figure out which way round that would work.
I'll rephrase in the light of newer information.
"How can you tell if a signed copy of Queen II was signed in 1975 or 1985?"
I do know that they developed, but they also would have scribbled a lot. We need Scully's wisdom.
Sorry, I credited you with the intelligence to figure out which way round that would work.
I'll rephrase in the light of newer information.
"How can you tell if a signed copy of Queen II was signed in 1975 or 1985?"
I do know that they developed, but they also would have scribbled a lot. We need Scully's wisdom.
I have an autographed copy of Flash that is on top of my Flash pinball machine. Signed by all four.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Lord Fickle wrote: [/QUOTENAME]How would you tell the date? Well, I suppose if someone had a signed copy of Innuendo, it would be unlikely that this was from 1973! :) I think there are ways to authenticate autographs, but the question really was would there be any difference in value, according to the age of the autographs.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Thanks wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Sorry, I credited you with the intelligence to figure out which way round that would work.[/QUOTE]
Sorry, I credited you with having a sense of humour, hence the ':)' in my post.
Regardless of my intelligence, I'm certainly not a mind reader, so maybe if you had been more specific in the first place, I wouldn't have made a joke out of it. Hell, can't anyone ask a question round here without getting into an argument?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Thanks wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Sorry, I credited you with the intelligence to figure out which way round that would work.[/QUOTE]
Sorry, I credited you with having a sense of humour, hence the ':)' in my post.
Regardless of my intelligence, I'm certainly not a mind reader, so maybe if you had been more specific in the first place, I wouldn't have made a joke out of it. Hell, can't anyone ask a question round here without getting into an argument?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]jchensf wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I have an autographed copy of Flash that is on top of my Flash pinball machine. Signed by all four.
[/QUOTE]
You have a Flash pinball machine? Bastard. ;-)
[/QUOTE]
You have a Flash pinball machine? Bastard. ;-)
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Lord Fickle wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Lord Fickle wrote: [/QUOTENAME]How would you tell the date? Well, I suppose if someone had a signed copy of Innuendo, it would be unlikely that this was from 1973! :) I think there are ways to authenticate autographs, but the question really was would there be any difference in value, according to the age of the autographs.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Thanks wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Sorry, I credited you with the intelligence to figure out which way round that would work.[/QUOTE]
Sorry, I credited you with having a sense of humour, hence the ':)' in my post.
Regardless of my intelligence, I'm certainly not a mind reader, so maybe if you had been more specific in the first place, I wouldn't have made a joke out of it. Hell, can't anyone ask a question round here without getting into an argument?[/QUOTE]
Maybe...what's it to ya?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Thanks wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Sorry, I credited you with the intelligence to figure out which way round that would work.[/QUOTE]
Sorry, I credited you with having a sense of humour, hence the ':)' in my post.
Regardless of my intelligence, I'm certainly not a mind reader, so maybe if you had been more specific in the first place, I wouldn't have made a joke out of it. Hell, can't anyone ask a question round here without getting into an argument?[/QUOTE]
Maybe...what's it to ya?