[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Music Man wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
Elvis was an 8th degree black belt in American Kenpo Karate[/QUOTE]
See? It's Elvis. MJ will never have that many impersonators?
I had heard previously that MJ was a ninja but I can't confirm or deny that.
Thread
Posts in chronological order
elvis's songs against mjs. i think michaels are better, way better, im not dissing elvis because i like him but mj is better, you all seem a bit biased because mj is seen as a freak lol, not many of u like him
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson">ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME] <font color=FF0099>Linda Of The Valley wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Elvis.
I much prefer him too [/QUOTE]
Most people with functioning ears would, when confronted with the choice MJ/Elvis.[/QUOTE]
Than an awful lot haven't got functionating ears.
These must be the same people who voted Bush.
I much prefer him too [/QUOTE]
Most people with functioning ears would, when confronted with the choice MJ/Elvis.[/QUOTE]
Than an awful lot haven't got functionating ears.
These must be the same people who voted Bush.
Elvis is a fabricated act just like members of N*SYNC or Backstreet Boys.
If you think about it the guy couldn't write his own music, hardly knew how to play the guitar, didn't have such a brilliant voice, and was overhyped by the media. The only part where the guy deserved props was that he was a good performer, but other than that he was totally overated.
The Beatles by far deserve to get the title of "Kings of Rock n' Roll", instead of Elvis.
Now back to Jacko, he started losing his 'King Of Pop' crown back when he first started calling himself 'The King Of Pop'. Since then, MJ's musical career has gone downhill and now has hit rock bottom.
If you think about it the guy couldn't write his own music, hardly knew how to play the guitar, didn't have such a brilliant voice, and was overhyped by the media. The only part where the guy deserved props was that he was a good performer, but other than that he was totally overated.
The Beatles by far deserve to get the title of "Kings of Rock n' Roll", instead of Elvis.
Now back to Jacko, he started losing his 'King Of Pop' crown back when he first started calling himself 'The King Of Pop'. Since then, MJ's musical career has gone downhill and now has hit rock bottom.
I think Elvis is clearly the more famous of the two. MJ was great (in his prime) but, in my opinion, Elvis was phenomenal. I think he had the best stage presence and song delivery that popular music has ever seen. Long live the King....
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Mr.Jingles wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Elvis is a fabricated act just like members of N*SYNC or Backstreet Boys.[/QUOTE]
No: Elvis was the first - and that makes the world of difference.
Besides everybody in those days, Frank Sinatra, Dean Martin, Bing Crosby (who still holds the record for the most singles sold world-wide - ever) and Judy Garland all had others write their songs for them.
Infact it was kind of playing to their strengths. Just because someone like Elvis or Pavarotti are great singers - it does not mean they were any good as writers. Conversely, great song writers like Berni Taupin or John Deacon - cannot sing for sh*t.
No: Elvis was the first - and that makes the world of difference.
Besides everybody in those days, Frank Sinatra, Dean Martin, Bing Crosby (who still holds the record for the most singles sold world-wide - ever) and Judy Garland all had others write their songs for them.
Infact it was kind of playing to their strengths. Just because someone like Elvis or Pavarotti are great singers - it does not mean they were any good as writers. Conversely, great song writers like Berni Taupin or John Deacon - cannot sing for sh*t.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Mr.Jingles wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
If you think about it the guy couldn't write his own music.[/QUOTE]
He did write some of his own music.
If you think about it the guy couldn't write his own music.[/QUOTE]
He did write some of his own music.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]jcrawford79 wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Mr.Jingles wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
If you think about it the guy couldn't write his own music.[/QUOTE]
He (Elvis) did write some of his own music.[/QUOTE]
Didn't Elvis write One of the greatest love songs of all time - 'Always On My Mind?'
Or, at least it was a great love song until the Pet Shop boys got hold of it!
If you think about it the guy couldn't write his own music.[/QUOTE]
He (Elvis) did write some of his own music.[/QUOTE]
Didn't Elvis write One of the greatest love songs of all time - 'Always On My Mind?'
Or, at least it was a great love song until the Pet Shop boys got hold of it!
Elvis is the king!
Actually, Elvis didn't write that one. But it doesn't matter, he made the song his through his delivery.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]jcrawford79 wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Mr.Jingles wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
If you think about it the guy couldn't write his own music.[/QUOTE]
He did write some of his own music.[/QUOTE]
A lot of "artists" claim to write their own music, but we all know that even a 3 year old can come up with the lyrics to a song.
The real music writing comes from others.
If you think about it the guy couldn't write his own music.[/QUOTE]
He did write some of his own music.[/QUOTE]
A lot of "artists" claim to write their own music, but we all know that even a 3 year old can come up with the lyrics to a song.
The real music writing comes from others.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Mr.Jingles wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]jcrawford79 wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Mr.Jingles wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
If you think about it the guy couldn't write his own music.[/QUOTE]
He did write some of his own music.[/QUOTE]
A lot of "artists" claim to write their own music, but we all know that even a 3 year old can come up with the lyrics to a song.
The real music writing comes from others.[/QUOTE]
What proof do you have that he didn't write any music? I mean, I could say that about Brian May. Maybe he didn't write anything and just claimed to have. I would think that the true author would've exposed him because he would want the royalties from the song.
If you think about it the guy couldn't write his own music.[/QUOTE]
He did write some of his own music.[/QUOTE]
A lot of "artists" claim to write their own music, but we all know that even a 3 year old can come up with the lyrics to a song.
The real music writing comes from others.[/QUOTE]
What proof do you have that he didn't write any music? I mean, I could say that about Brian May. Maybe he didn't write anything and just claimed to have. I would think that the true author would've exposed him because he would want the royalties from the song.
didnt david bowie help him right "always on my mind"
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME] <font color=FF0099>Linda Of The Valley wrote: [/QUOTENAME]The King of Rock n Roll or the King of Pop
...basically :P
[/QUOTE]
Some people would give that 'King of Pop' title to Robbie Williams, i don't know why.......
...basically :P
[/QUOTE]
Some people would give that 'King of Pop' title to Robbie Williams, i don't know why.......
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=black>Andy<font color=red>38 wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME] <font color=FF0099>Linda Of The Valley wrote: [/QUOTENAME]The King of Rock n Roll or the King of Pop
...basically :P
[/QUOTE]
Some people would give that 'King of Pop' title to Robbie Williams, i don't know why.......[/QUOTE]
"King of Pop" That's Michael Jackson dude.
...basically :P
[/QUOTE]
Some people would give that 'King of Pop' title to Robbie Williams, i don't know why.......[/QUOTE]
"King of Pop" That's Michael Jackson dude.