After looking back at the posts on this thread I realized something.
Both Clinton and Cheney had their most embarassing moments after shooting someone in the face.
Thread
Posts in chronological order
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]jcrawford79 wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Haystacks Calhoun wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Nice language....
Why does everything like this have to go in the gutter? [/QUOTE]
If by "in the gutter", you are referring to the fact that I used the word "asshole" in my post, this thread first went to the gutter around 7 posts into it when the f-bomb was dropped, and not by me. And there was no name-calling in my post. And if I misunderstood your post or it wasn't directed towards me, allow me to apologize in advance.[/QUOTE]
I am referring to the same group of people here who cannot have a politically tinged debate without dropping f-bombs, etc....
We all know who they are. They should either post something reasonable without losing their minds, or keep their yappers shut.
Why does everything like this have to go in the gutter? [/QUOTE]
If by "in the gutter", you are referring to the fact that I used the word "asshole" in my post, this thread first went to the gutter around 7 posts into it when the f-bomb was dropped, and not by me. And there was no name-calling in my post. And if I misunderstood your post or it wasn't directed towards me, allow me to apologize in advance.[/QUOTE]
I am referring to the same group of people here who cannot have a politically tinged debate without dropping f-bombs, etc....
We all know who they are. They should either post something reasonable without losing their minds, or keep their yappers shut.
Its not that guns should be illegal, its that they should be less available.
and for FreddiesGhettoTrench, there are many ways to defend yourself without a gun or, without a weapon for that matter- but why cant you defend yourself with a screwdriver or car key?
and for FreddiesGhettoTrench, there are many ways to defend yourself without a gun or, without a weapon for that matter- but why cant you defend yourself with a screwdriver or car key?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Queen Of Wrestling<h6>Jamie's Bitch</h6> wrote: [/QUOTENAME]and they better not get that stupid "conceal carry" law passed. Why not just invite someone to shoot you?[/QUOTE]
Oh yeah, so in other words, women shouldn't have any right to protect themselves from being raped, and what about potential gay-bashing victims? (www.pinkpistols.org) If Matthew Shepard had had a gun on his person, that tragedy would NOT have occurred.
It would have been:
McK: We're not gay, and you're gonna get jacked.
Shep: Well, I AM gay, and you're gonna get shot. (pulls .22) [/QUOTE]
Or - we could encourage people to accept gays as being human beings just like anyone else, and in the end, neither the prejudice nor the retaliation will be necessary. Right?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Mr.Jingles wrote: [/QUOTENAME]After looking back at the posts on this thread I realized something.
Both Clinton and Cheney had their most embarassing moments after shooting someone in the face.[/QUOTE]
Hahahahahaha!!!
Oh yeah, so in other words, women shouldn't have any right to protect themselves from being raped, and what about potential gay-bashing victims? (www.pinkpistols.org) If Matthew Shepard had had a gun on his person, that tragedy would NOT have occurred.
It would have been:
McK: We're not gay, and you're gonna get jacked.
Shep: Well, I AM gay, and you're gonna get shot. (pulls .22) [/QUOTE]
Or - we could encourage people to accept gays as being human beings just like anyone else, and in the end, neither the prejudice nor the retaliation will be necessary. Right?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Mr.Jingles wrote: [/QUOTENAME]After looking back at the posts on this thread I realized something.
Both Clinton and Cheney had their most embarassing moments after shooting someone in the face.[/QUOTE]
Hahahahahaha!!!
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Queen Of Wrestling<h6>Jamie's Bitch</h6> wrote: [/QUOTENAME]and they better not get that stupid "conceal carry" law passed. Why not just invite someone to shoot you?[/QUOTE]
Oh yeah, so in other words, women shouldn't have any right to protect themselves from being raped, and what about potential gay-bashing victims? (www.pinkpistols.org) If Matthew Shepard had had a gun on his person, that tragedy would NOT have occurred.
It would have been:
McK: We're not gay, and you're gonna get jacked.
Shep: Well, I AM gay, and you're gonna get shot. (pulls .22) [/QUOTE]
Uh, if Matthew Shepard had a gun, we might have just had a tragedy in the other direction.
Oh yeah, so in other words, women shouldn't have any right to protect themselves from being raped, and what about potential gay-bashing victims? (www.pinkpistols.org) If Matthew Shepard had had a gun on his person, that tragedy would NOT have occurred.
It would have been:
McK: We're not gay, and you're gonna get jacked.
Shep: Well, I AM gay, and you're gonna get shot. (pulls .22) [/QUOTE]
Uh, if Matthew Shepard had a gun, we might have just had a tragedy in the other direction.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Janet wrote: [/QUOTENAME]The birds Cheney was "hunting" didn't have a chance in hell. Reportedly he shot over 70 pheasants that day, and some mallard ducks as well. It was at an exclusive hunting club where the birds are all pen-reared and then released to be shot by the patrons of this club. What is the challenge of shooting an animal reared in captivity with no way to escape? This club released over 500 pen-reared pheasants for the benefit of Cheney's hunting party. The group killed over 417 birds. That isn't sport, or a challenge. That is just killing for the sake of killing.
Sickening.[/QUOTE]
Agree completely.
Sickening.[/QUOTE]
Agree completely.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Haystacks Calhoun wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]jcrawford79 wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Haystacks Calhoun wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Nice language....
Why does everything like this have to go in the gutter? [/QUOTE]
If by "in the gutter", you are referring to the fact that I used the word "asshole" in my post, this thread first went to the gutter around 7 posts into it when the f-bomb was dropped, and not by me. And there was no name-calling in my post. And if I misunderstood your post or it wasn't directed towards me, allow me to apologize in advance.[/QUOTE]
I am referring to the same group of people here who cannot have a politically tinged debate without dropping f-bombs, etc....
We all know who they are. They should either post something reasonable without losing their minds, or keep their yappers shut.
[/QUOTE]
Again, my apologies for misunderstanding your statement.
Why does everything like this have to go in the gutter? [/QUOTE]
If by "in the gutter", you are referring to the fact that I used the word "asshole" in my post, this thread first went to the gutter around 7 posts into it when the f-bomb was dropped, and not by me. And there was no name-calling in my post. And if I misunderstood your post or it wasn't directed towards me, allow me to apologize in advance.[/QUOTE]
I am referring to the same group of people here who cannot have a politically tinged debate without dropping f-bombs, etc....
We all know who they are. They should either post something reasonable without losing their minds, or keep their yappers shut.
[/QUOTE]
Again, my apologies for misunderstanding your statement.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Music Man wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Queen Of Wrestling<h6>Jamie's Bitch</h6> wrote: [/QUOTENAME]and they better not get that stupid "conceal carry" law passed. Why not just invite someone to shoot you?[/QUOTE]
Oh yeah, so in other words, women shouldn't have any right to protect themselves from being raped, and what about potential gay-bashing victims? (www.pinkpistols.org) If Matthew Shepard had had a gun on his person, that tragedy would NOT have occurred.
It would have been:
McK: We're not gay, and you're gonna get jacked.
Shep: Well, I AM gay, and you're gonna get shot. (pulls .22) [/QUOTE]
Uh, if Matthew Shepard had a gun, we might have just had a tragedy in the other direction.[/QUOTE]
Oh, and the loss of Henderson and McKinney would have really destroyed this nation. [/sarcasm]
Oh yeah, so in other words, women shouldn't have any right to protect themselves from being raped, and what about potential gay-bashing victims? (www.pinkpistols.org) If Matthew Shepard had had a gun on his person, that tragedy would NOT have occurred.
It would have been:
McK: We're not gay, and you're gonna get jacked.
Shep: Well, I AM gay, and you're gonna get shot. (pulls .22) [/QUOTE]
Uh, if Matthew Shepard had a gun, we might have just had a tragedy in the other direction.[/QUOTE]
Oh, and the loss of Henderson and McKinney would have really destroyed this nation. [/sarcasm]
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Mr.Jingles wrote: [/QUOTENAME]After looking back at the posts on this thread I realized something.
Both Clinton and Cheney had their most embarassing moments after shooting someone in the face.[/QUOTE]
You cheeky... :)
LOL- good one...
What is absolutely unbelievable to me is the fact that starting the war and killing many people by a president is fine- but having sex with intern is a crime against humanity and embarassment... amazing...
Both Clinton and Cheney had their most embarassing moments after shooting someone in the face.[/QUOTE]
You cheeky... :)
LOL- good one...
What is absolutely unbelievable to me is the fact that starting the war and killing many people by a president is fine- but having sex with intern is a crime against humanity and embarassment... amazing...
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Mr.Jingles wrote: [/QUOTENAME]After looking back at the posts on this thread I realized something.
Both Clinton and Cheney had their most embarassing moments after shooting someone in the face.[/QUOTE]
Oh gross!! ;-D
Both Clinton and Cheney had their most embarassing moments after shooting someone in the face.[/QUOTE]
Oh gross!! ;-D
QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Janet wrote: [/QUOTENAME]The birds Cheney was "hunting" didn't have a chance in hell. Reportedly he shot over 70 pheasants that day, and some mallard ducks as well. It was at an exclusive hunting club where the birds are all pen-reared and then released to be shot by the patrons of this club. What is the challenge of shooting an animal reared in captivity with no way to escape? This club released over 500 pen-reared pheasants for the benefit of Cheney's hunting party. The group killed over 417 birds. That isn't sport, or a challenge. That is just killing for the sake of killing.
Sickening.[/QUOTE]
That is probably the most disgusting thing I have heard....aside from Bush getting a second term.....
Big bad hunter Cheney. What a dumb son-of-a-bitch.
Sickening.[/QUOTE]
That is probably the most disgusting thing I have heard....aside from Bush getting a second term.....
Big bad hunter Cheney. What a dumb son-of-a-bitch.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Janet wrote: [/QUOTENAME]The birds Cheney was "hunting" didn't have a chance in hell. Reportedly he shot over 70 pheasants that day, and some mallard ducks as well. It was at an exclusive hunting club where the birds are all pen-reared and then released to be shot by the patrons of this club. What is the challenge of shooting an animal reared in captivity with no way to escape? This club released over 500 pen-reared pheasants for the benefit of Cheney's hunting party. The group killed over 417 birds. That isn't sport, or a challenge. That is just killing for the sake of killing.
Sickening.[/QUOTE]
Why doesn't the fucking idiot just buy a copy of Deer Hunter for fucks sake? He can probably afford a computer that'll run it nice and good.
Sickening.[/QUOTE]
Why doesn't the fucking idiot just buy a copy of Deer Hunter for fucks sake? He can probably afford a computer that'll run it nice and good.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Queen Of Wrestling<h6>Jamie's Bitch</h6> wrote: [/QUOTENAME]and they better not get that stupid "conceal carry" law passed. Why not just invite someone to shoot you?[/QUOTE]
Oh yeah, so in other words, women shouldn't have any right to protect themselves from being raped, and what about potential gay-bashing victims? (www.pinkpistols.org) If Matthew Shepard had had a gun on his person, that tragedy would NOT have occurred.
It would have been:
McK: We're not gay, and you're gonna get jacked.
Shep: Well, I AM gay, and you're gonna get shot. (pulls .22) [/QUOTE]
Or - we could encourage people to accept gays as being human beings just like anyone else, and in the end, neither the prejudice nor the retaliation will be necessary. Right?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Mr.Jingles wrote: [/QUOTENAME]After looking back at the posts on this thread I realized something.
Both Clinton and Cheney had their most embarassing moments after shooting someone in the face.[/QUOTE]
Hahahahahaha!!!
[/QUOTE]
Let me ask you this, regarding the gays being equal thing.
At Miami University, in Oxford, OH, there is a lawsuit being filed to stop gay partners from being able to receive health benefits from the school. In other words, they are allowing the bf/gf of the employee, provided they are of the same sex, to receive full benefits.
That said, they are not doing the same thing for the hetero couples. The lawsuit states, and I think rightfully so, that if you are going to give the benefit to unmarried couples, you have to do it for ALL unmarried couples, on not at all.
In other words, you cannot discriminate against the straight unmarried couple and NOT give them the same benefits that you are giving GAY unmarried couples.
Of course, liberals are up in arms that someone would actually take this poilicy to court.
I seems simple to me. You cannot give different treatment with regards to benefits to unmarried couples based on orientation.
Oh yeah, so in other words, women shouldn't have any right to protect themselves from being raped, and what about potential gay-bashing victims? (www.pinkpistols.org) If Matthew Shepard had had a gun on his person, that tragedy would NOT have occurred.
It would have been:
McK: We're not gay, and you're gonna get jacked.
Shep: Well, I AM gay, and you're gonna get shot. (pulls .22) [/QUOTE]
Or - we could encourage people to accept gays as being human beings just like anyone else, and in the end, neither the prejudice nor the retaliation will be necessary. Right?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Mr.Jingles wrote: [/QUOTENAME]After looking back at the posts on this thread I realized something.
Both Clinton and Cheney had their most embarassing moments after shooting someone in the face.[/QUOTE]
Hahahahahaha!!!
[/QUOTE]
Let me ask you this, regarding the gays being equal thing.
At Miami University, in Oxford, OH, there is a lawsuit being filed to stop gay partners from being able to receive health benefits from the school. In other words, they are allowing the bf/gf of the employee, provided they are of the same sex, to receive full benefits.
That said, they are not doing the same thing for the hetero couples. The lawsuit states, and I think rightfully so, that if you are going to give the benefit to unmarried couples, you have to do it for ALL unmarried couples, on not at all.
In other words, you cannot discriminate against the straight unmarried couple and NOT give them the same benefits that you are giving GAY unmarried couples.
Of course, liberals are up in arms that someone would actually take this poilicy to court.
I seems simple to me. You cannot give different treatment with regards to benefits to unmarried couples based on orientation.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Music Man wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]FreddiesGhettoTrench wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Queen Of Wrestling<h6>Jamie's Bitch</h6> wrote: [/QUOTENAME]and they better not get that stupid "conceal carry" law passed. Why not just invite someone to shoot you?[/QUOTE]
Oh yeah, so in other words, women shouldn't have any right to protect themselves from being raped, and what about potential gay-bashing victims? (www.pinkpistols.org) If Matthew Shepard had had a gun on his person, that tragedy would NOT have occurred.
It would have been:
McK: We're not gay, and you're gonna get jacked.
Shep: Well, I AM gay, and you're gonna get shot. (pulls .22) [/QUOTE]
Uh, if Matthew Shepard had a gun, we might have just had a tragedy in the other direction.[/QUOTE]
Oh, and the loss of Henderson and McKinney would have really destroyed this nation. [/sarcasm][/QUOTE]
Uh, are you implying that Matthew Shepard's death destroyed the nation? Where the hell was I!?
Anyway, what would have happened if more people had guns? I'm sure situations like this happen all the time, with the exception of homocide. Now the assailants will have guns. And the victims will have guns. What you will witness, and I'm no expert, is a lot more death - on both sides of the coin. It's simple logic.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=000000>Fenderek wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Mr.Jingles wrote: [/QUOTENAME]After looking back at the posts on this thread I realized something.
Both Clinton and Cheney had their most embarassing moments after shooting someone in the face.[/QUOTE]
You cheeky... :)
LOL- good one...
What is absolutely unbelievable to me is the fact that starting the war and killing many people by a president is fine- but having sex with intern is a crime against humanity and embarassment... amazing...[/QUOTE]
You fail to understand that one of the main responsibilities of a government is warfare. The preparation for it, the declaration of it, the engagement of it, and the resolution of it. It's not a very difficult concept.
Anyway, no one said that having sex with an intern is a crime against humanity, but no one can truly deny that it is an embarrassment.
Oh yeah, so in other words, women shouldn't have any right to protect themselves from being raped, and what about potential gay-bashing victims? (www.pinkpistols.org) If Matthew Shepard had had a gun on his person, that tragedy would NOT have occurred.
It would have been:
McK: We're not gay, and you're gonna get jacked.
Shep: Well, I AM gay, and you're gonna get shot. (pulls .22) [/QUOTE]
Uh, if Matthew Shepard had a gun, we might have just had a tragedy in the other direction.[/QUOTE]
Oh, and the loss of Henderson and McKinney would have really destroyed this nation. [/sarcasm][/QUOTE]
Uh, are you implying that Matthew Shepard's death destroyed the nation? Where the hell was I!?
Anyway, what would have happened if more people had guns? I'm sure situations like this happen all the time, with the exception of homocide. Now the assailants will have guns. And the victims will have guns. What you will witness, and I'm no expert, is a lot more death - on both sides of the coin. It's simple logic.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=000000>Fenderek wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Mr.Jingles wrote: [/QUOTENAME]After looking back at the posts on this thread I realized something.
Both Clinton and Cheney had their most embarassing moments after shooting someone in the face.[/QUOTE]
You cheeky... :)
LOL- good one...
What is absolutely unbelievable to me is the fact that starting the war and killing many people by a president is fine- but having sex with intern is a crime against humanity and embarassment... amazing...[/QUOTE]
You fail to understand that one of the main responsibilities of a government is warfare. The preparation for it, the declaration of it, the engagement of it, and the resolution of it. It's not a very difficult concept.
Anyway, no one said that having sex with an intern is a crime against humanity, but no one can truly deny that it is an embarrassment.
Clinton did not catch hell for getting a Hummer from an intern....if he had admitted it, instead of hiding it, it would have been forgotten.
Clinton caught hell for lying under oath.
Clinton caught hell for lying under oath.