Fried Chicken, thanks for the details. It's very important to me as for a musician. I thought they always recorded each instrument SEPARETLY. Beatles - yes, they recorded all instruments together for a song - it was 60's. I thought Queen could do it this way but only for a trying of the song - for a jam.
The second question - from which instruments they started - what was the order of instruments?
FriedChicken and everybody, I don't know whether anybody created such a topic but after hearing this demo I created the topic about Queen in studio: http://queenzone.com/queenzone/forumnew/forum_topic_view.aspx?Q=750533
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Yes, Fried is right about this one.
Haha... some of you thought that that hissy sound in the background was because of a bad quality MP3, right? Nope, it is indeed 12-string guitar! :-D
To Bob: hmm... haven't thought about it that way. I thought the voice-over was there not primarily to stop people recording it, but more to avoid that people could press them on bootlegs and make money from them...
(As DID happen with the tracks you mention...)
This recording can not be sold - but it is here for all to hear - as it was meant to be, otherwise why would it have been played at the convention in the first place? ;-)
Haha... some of you thought that that hissy sound in the background was because of a bad quality MP3, right? Nope, it is indeed 12-string guitar! :-D
To Bob: hmm... haven't thought about it that way. I thought the voice-over was there not primarily to stop people recording it, but more to avoid that people could press them on bootlegs and make money from them...
(As DID happen with the tracks you mention...)
This recording can not be sold - but it is here for all to hear - as it was meant to be, otherwise why would it have been played at the convention in the first place? ;-)
That dope talking over the top of it is an arse-fucker.
Thank you very much for this, Jeroen!
Dank je wel + cheers M8 ;-)
Dank je wel + cheers M8 ;-)
Thank you very much Jeroen, nice and new track for many of us :)
Cheers!
Cheers!
Thanks a lot for this very interesting demo. Also for uploading it again not on rapidshare. (could this be property of Queen productions by any chance?)
Thanks for this brilliant gem!
Many thanks Jeroen.
gary
gary
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]jeroen wrote: [/QUOTENAME]To Bob: hmm... haven't thought about it that way. I thought the voice-over was there not primarily to stop people recording it, but more to avoid that people could press them on bootlegs and make money from them...
(As DID happen with the tracks you mention...)
This recording can not be sold - but it is here for all to hear - as it was meant to be, otherwise why would it have been played at the convention in the first place? ;-)[/QUOTE]
For all to hear... only those who spend the big bucks to go to a convention! But thanks for clearing up the money thing!
By the way, it's still possible that things were actually recorded one track at a time. This file is just a demo. Each member of the band could have played one at a time along with a ghost track for the final cut.
(As DID happen with the tracks you mention...)
This recording can not be sold - but it is here for all to hear - as it was meant to be, otherwise why would it have been played at the convention in the first place? ;-)[/QUOTE]
For all to hear... only those who spend the big bucks to go to a convention! But thanks for clearing up the money thing!
By the way, it's still possible that things were actually recorded one track at a time. This file is just a demo. Each member of the band could have played one at a time along with a ghost track for the final cut.
Noice!
Kudos, Jeroen!
Kudos, Jeroen!
THANK YOU!!!
I wonder why the guys did not tell GB to sod off...
After all, imagine that you're trying to record a new song and a guy standing nearby starts this irritating "Property of Queen Productions" thing :)
cheers
I wonder why the guys did not tell GB to sod off...
After all, imagine that you're trying to record a new song and a guy standing nearby starts this irritating "Property of Queen Productions" thing :)
cheers
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Kevin Spacey wrote: [/QUOTENAME]THANK YOU!!!
I wonder why the guys did not tell GB to sod off...
After all, imagine that you're trying to record a new song and a guy standing nearby starts this irritating "Property of Queen Productions" thing :)
cheers[/QUOTE]
LOL! :-)))
I can see it:
Pointing:
"That mic? Property of Queen productions!"
"That guitar? Property of Queen Productions!"
"The carpet? ..."
"The Twix bars? Property of Queen productions!"
"Your moustache? ... "
I wonder why the guys did not tell GB to sod off...
After all, imagine that you're trying to record a new song and a guy standing nearby starts this irritating "Property of Queen Productions" thing :)
cheers[/QUOTE]
LOL! :-)))
I can see it:
Pointing:
"That mic? Property of Queen productions!"
"That guitar? Property of Queen Productions!"
"The carpet? ..."
"The Twix bars? Property of Queen productions!"
"Your moustache? ... "
thanks!
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Kevin Spacey wrote: [/QUOTENAME]THANK YOU!!!
I wonder why the guys did not tell GB to sod off...
After all, imagine that you're trying to record a new song and a guy standing nearby starts this irritating "Property of Queen Productions" thing :)
cheers[/QUOTE]
LMAO
I wonder why the guys did not tell GB to sod off...
After all, imagine that you're trying to record a new song and a guy standing nearby starts this irritating "Property of Queen Productions" thing :)
cheers[/QUOTE]
LMAO
Wonderful...Thank You