I mean I know you can vote, but I'm just asking who does lol :)
I do!
Thread
Posts in chronological order
youre fucking out of your mind!
IMPOSSIBLE, BECAUSE QUEEN IS G.O.N.E.
maybe you meant: Who wants BRIAN MAY AND ROGER TAYLOR + PAUL RODGERS to make an album?
it would still sound like shit though
IMPOSSIBLE, BECAUSE QUEEN IS G.O.N.E.
maybe you meant: Who wants BRIAN MAY AND ROGER TAYLOR + PAUL RODGERS to make an album?
it would still sound like shit though
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]thenightcomedown wrote: [/QUOTENAME]youre fucking out of your mind!
IMPOSSIBLE, BECAUSE QUEEN IS G.O.N.E.
maybe you meant: Who wants BRIAN MAY AND ROGER TAYLOR + PAUL RODGERS to make an album?
it would still sound like shit though
[/QUOTE]
How old are you?
IMPOSSIBLE, BECAUSE QUEEN IS G.O.N.E.
maybe you meant: Who wants BRIAN MAY AND ROGER TAYLOR + PAUL RODGERS to make an album?
it would still sound like shit though
[/QUOTE]
How old are you?
:( I did say Queen+Paul Rodgers...
Making an album?
What a joke!
Brian and Roger are destroying the Queen image with this stupid project! They are megalomaniac!
THE GAME IS OVER!(since 1991)
What a joke!
Brian and Roger are destroying the Queen image with this stupid project! They are megalomaniac!
THE GAME IS OVER!(since 1991)
u r so wrong u no!
queen want to move on... life gos on for gods sake!
queen want to move on... life gos on for gods sake!
I do
Cheers
Cheers
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]All I Hear Is Radio Gaga wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I do
Cheers[/QUOTE]
wonderful so did u go to any Queen and paul rodgers concerts? i never but i could of... hyde park i was gonna go with my mate jess....
Cheers[/QUOTE]
wonderful so did u go to any Queen and paul rodgers concerts? i never but i could of... hyde park i was gonna go with my mate jess....
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]lmj wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Making an album?
What a joke!
Brian and Roger are destroying the Queen image with this stupid project! They are megalomaniac!
THE GAME IS OVER!(since 1991)
[/QUOTE]
yeah i agree..
What a joke!
Brian and Roger are destroying the Queen image with this stupid project! They are megalomaniac!
THE GAME IS OVER!(since 1991)
[/QUOTE]
yeah i agree..
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color="#CC66FF">xloveofmylifex wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]All I Hear Is Radio Gaga wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I do
Cheers[/QUOTE]
wonderful so did u go to any Queen and paul rodgers concerts? i never but i could of... hyde park i was gonna go with my mate jess....[/QUOTE]
I did get the chance to see them...first time at the Hollywood Bowl last year and the second time this year at Anaheim...
Cheers
Cheers[/QUOTE]
wonderful so did u go to any Queen and paul rodgers concerts? i never but i could of... hyde park i was gonna go with my mate jess....[/QUOTE]
I did get the chance to see them...first time at the Hollywood Bowl last year and the second time this year at Anaheim...
Cheers
Yes, there's many of us who want them to record some new stuff. We're already discussing this at:
http://www.queenzone.com/queenzone/forumnew/forum_topic_view.aspx?Q_FORUM_ID=9&Q_FORUM_NAME=Queen+%2b+Paul+Rodgers+Tour&TOPIC_SUBJECT=New+album+can+be+earlier+than+we+thought!!&Q=760204&page=1
http://www.queenzone.com/queenzone/forumnew/forum_topic_view.aspx?Q_FORUM_ID=9&Q_FORUM_NAME=Queen+%2b+Paul+Rodgers+Tour&TOPIC_SUBJECT=New+album+can+be+earlier+than+we+thought!!&Q=760204&page=1
Bottom Line:
Queen + Paul Rodgers is not Queen as we know it.
Queen plus Paul Rodgers is NOT better than Queen.
Queen plus PR are just...well....different.
Whatever you may think, The double live Queen+PR and DVD rock.
It's just kick ass rock and roll...
Do I like these Queen songs better with Paul than with Freddie?
Duh?? Of course not.
But, the songs still kick ass...and being a fan of the blues...I LOVE Paul's bluesy touch to these Queen classics.
It's like hearing some of these songs all over again.
And to be honest...isn't different sometimes good??
I mean... if I am listening to Queen at the Bowl 1982...I don't want to pop that out, and listen to Wembley...
I just heard Freddie sing 90% of the same songs.
I can pop in Queen+PR live cd, and while I am hearing some of the same songs....they sound completely different.
Paul's versions aren't better...
Just different.
And face it guys, when Freddie died, I knew we would never have **better** .... but I will take "different" over nothing.
Without Paul Rodgers...we have nothing.
Hell yes, I would love to hear a new Queen+PR album.
My wet dream is that Deacon would join them...even if he never toured again... I'd love to see in the liner notes of the new cd:
Brian May
John Deacon
Roger Taylor
and filling in for the legend Freddie Mercury, we have the magnificent Paul Rodgers on vocals.
I want the "Queen 1991 RIP" folks to remember that in 1991 the oldest surviving member of Queen (Brian) was a mere 44 yrs old.
All he had known was "Queen" since he was 23 yrs old. As sad as it is...Freddie died.
Not Brian. Not John. Not Roger
What the "1991 RIP" fans are basically saying is:
Brian, Roger, John....due to some poor judgements that Freddie made in his personal life, you are officially dead too in 1991."
C'mon guys... thats bullshit.
No one, including Brian, and Roger, think this is the heyday with Freddie....
But for them..and us, its either this or nothing.
Given those option's, I'll take this.
Queen + Paul Rodgers is not Queen as we know it.
Queen plus Paul Rodgers is NOT better than Queen.
Queen plus PR are just...well....different.
Whatever you may think, The double live Queen+PR and DVD rock.
It's just kick ass rock and roll...
Do I like these Queen songs better with Paul than with Freddie?
Duh?? Of course not.
But, the songs still kick ass...and being a fan of the blues...I LOVE Paul's bluesy touch to these Queen classics.
It's like hearing some of these songs all over again.
And to be honest...isn't different sometimes good??
I mean... if I am listening to Queen at the Bowl 1982...I don't want to pop that out, and listen to Wembley...
I just heard Freddie sing 90% of the same songs.
I can pop in Queen+PR live cd, and while I am hearing some of the same songs....they sound completely different.
Paul's versions aren't better...
Just different.
And face it guys, when Freddie died, I knew we would never have **better** .... but I will take "different" over nothing.
Without Paul Rodgers...we have nothing.
Hell yes, I would love to hear a new Queen+PR album.
My wet dream is that Deacon would join them...even if he never toured again... I'd love to see in the liner notes of the new cd:
Brian May
John Deacon
Roger Taylor
and filling in for the legend Freddie Mercury, we have the magnificent Paul Rodgers on vocals.
I want the "Queen 1991 RIP" folks to remember that in 1991 the oldest surviving member of Queen (Brian) was a mere 44 yrs old.
All he had known was "Queen" since he was 23 yrs old. As sad as it is...Freddie died.
Not Brian. Not John. Not Roger
What the "1991 RIP" fans are basically saying is:
Brian, Roger, John....due to some poor judgements that Freddie made in his personal life, you are officially dead too in 1991."
C'mon guys... thats bullshit.
No one, including Brian, and Roger, think this is the heyday with Freddie....
But for them..and us, its either this or nothing.
Given those option's, I'll take this.
That's not Queen + Paul Rodgers, that's Paul + Spike + Danny + Jamie + Two Opportunist Leeches.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Sebastian wrote: [/QUOTENAME]That's not Queen + Paul Rodgers, that's Paul + Spike + Danny + Jamie + Two Opportunist Parasits.[/QUOTE]
What's a Parasit?
Is that similar to a parasite?
What's a Parasit?
Is that similar to a parasite?
perfect Scott, i couldn't have said it better myself.