ONLY make a new album if Brian has enough new and good audio of Freddie in the studio.
Thread
Posts in chronological order
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Sheer Pressure wrote: [/QUOTENAME]ONLY make a new album if Brian has enough new and good audio of Freddie in the studio.[/QUOTE]
He said in a interview I have that he or Roger wont be doing that kind of stuff. It's all new material.
He said in a interview I have that he or Roger wont be doing that kind of stuff. It's all new material.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color="#CC66FF">xloveofmylifex wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Zebonka12 wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]it was electric7 wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Lets just say Freddie was alive and 1 other bandmate and they were to go on tour would you mind if it was called Queen then?
[/QUOTE]
That's an easy answer. These people would eat *dogshit* if it went on tour with Freddie.[/QUOTE]
whos dogshit? [/QUOTE]
Ah, I had a feeling I might've not been very clear.
What I mean to say is - a lot of these punks think that Queen = only Freddie. This is patently untrue, and obviously so if you listen to Barcelona or Mr. Bad Guy.
What I meant to say, is that if Freddie came back from the grave Ghostbusters-style, that these mindless drones would see *any* shit with him in it.
[/QUOTE]
That's an easy answer. These people would eat *dogshit* if it went on tour with Freddie.[/QUOTE]
whos dogshit? [/QUOTE]
Ah, I had a feeling I might've not been very clear.
What I mean to say is - a lot of these punks think that Queen = only Freddie. This is patently untrue, and obviously so if you listen to Barcelona or Mr. Bad Guy.
What I meant to say, is that if Freddie came back from the grave Ghostbusters-style, that these mindless drones would see *any* shit with him in it.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Zebonka12 wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color="#CC66FF">xloveofmylifex wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Zebonka12 wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]it was electric7 wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Lets just say Freddie was alive and 1 other bandmate and they were to go on tour would you mind if it was called Queen then?
[/QUOTE]
That's an easy answer. These people would eat *dogshit* if it went on tour with Freddie.[/QUOTE]
whos dogshit? [/QUOTE]
Ah, I had a feeling I might've not been very clear.
What I mean to say is - a lot of these punks think that Queen = only Freddie. This is patently untrue, and obviously so if you listen to Barcelona or Mr. Bad Guy.
What I meant to say, is that if Freddie came back from the grave Ghostbusters-style, that these mindless drones would see *any* shit with him in it.[/QUOTE]
Well, thank you, but I'm one of those 'punks' who happens to think that only 50% of Queen just isn't enough. I'd prefer 100% or nothing.
[/QUOTE]
That's an easy answer. These people would eat *dogshit* if it went on tour with Freddie.[/QUOTE]
whos dogshit? [/QUOTE]
Ah, I had a feeling I might've not been very clear.
What I mean to say is - a lot of these punks think that Queen = only Freddie. This is patently untrue, and obviously so if you listen to Barcelona or Mr. Bad Guy.
What I meant to say, is that if Freddie came back from the grave Ghostbusters-style, that these mindless drones would see *any* shit with him in it.[/QUOTE]
Well, thank you, but I'm one of those 'punks' who happens to think that only 50% of Queen just isn't enough. I'd prefer 100% or nothing.
just when i turned the corner on the whole queen/ paul thing[ i was against it] he says somthing as dumb as sheryl crow wooould be a good replacement........that which gives lite, must endure burning!.jimi
"I'd prefer 100% or nothing."
Yet this is entirely antithetical to the band that you claim to like so much. They were very much in the business of doing new things.
If you want 100%, then shuddup and put one of their records on! No one ever said Paul Rodgers was better or anything, some people just happen to like experimentation. And I happen to agree that if they make an all new album, that there should be no Queen title on it, because unlike the tour, there'd be no 'Queen' music.
Honestly, I'm no different to you people in my love for Queen music, I've got a playlist longer than a welfare queue. I just happen to think that doing something *new* for a change will not hurt. Otherwise, where are you? Where have you been since 1991? I'll tell you where you've been - STUCK IN THE EXACT SAME BLOODY PLACE. :D
Yet this is entirely antithetical to the band that you claim to like so much. They were very much in the business of doing new things.
If you want 100%, then shuddup and put one of their records on! No one ever said Paul Rodgers was better or anything, some people just happen to like experimentation. And I happen to agree that if they make an all new album, that there should be no Queen title on it, because unlike the tour, there'd be no 'Queen' music.
Honestly, I'm no different to you people in my love for Queen music, I've got a playlist longer than a welfare queue. I just happen to think that doing something *new* for a change will not hurt. Otherwise, where are you? Where have you been since 1991? I'll tell you where you've been - STUCK IN THE EXACT SAME BLOODY PLACE. :D
Fine, maybe I will "shuddup" and put one of their records on!
So I dislike the use of the name, but what do want from me, really? Sure, you can call me narrowminded or whatever you like, but it's just my opinion really, and I think a lot of people would agree with me.
So I dislike the use of the name, but what do want from me, really? Sure, you can call me narrowminded or whatever you like, but it's just my opinion really, and I think a lot of people would agree with me.
"Fine, maybe I will "shuddup" and put one of their records on!
So I dislike the use of the name, but what do want from me, really? Sure, you can call me narrowminded or whatever you like, but it's just my opinion really, and I think a lot of people would agree with me."
Yeah well a lot of people agreed that the hydrogen filled airships of the early 20th century were safe enough to travel on. KABOOM!
No look, first of all - when I say 'shuddup and put a record on', I say it because that's pretty much what *I* do to get away from this crap. What I really am trying to say is, it really should be about the music, and people need to stop crying because a 5 letter word that's been around a *shitload* longer than the band gets thrown around after some guy died. I mean BOOHOO! The guy that we're supposedly 'respecting' by demanding the name 'Queen' not get used... he'd probably look at this crap and just sigh.
It really isn't worth the bother. I wasn't so much saying 'your opinion sucks, shut up', I really was saying (to myself and to others) just forget it and listen to the music that *got* us here in the first place.
So I dislike the use of the name, but what do want from me, really? Sure, you can call me narrowminded or whatever you like, but it's just my opinion really, and I think a lot of people would agree with me."
Yeah well a lot of people agreed that the hydrogen filled airships of the early 20th century were safe enough to travel on. KABOOM!
No look, first of all - when I say 'shuddup and put a record on', I say it because that's pretty much what *I* do to get away from this crap. What I really am trying to say is, it really should be about the music, and people need to stop crying because a 5 letter word that's been around a *shitload* longer than the band gets thrown around after some guy died. I mean BOOHOO! The guy that we're supposedly 'respecting' by demanding the name 'Queen' not get used... he'd probably look at this crap and just sigh.
It really isn't worth the bother. I wasn't so much saying 'your opinion sucks, shut up', I really was saying (to myself and to others) just forget it and listen to the music that *got* us here in the first place.
Sure, maybe you'd like to think it's all about the music, but for some of us it's not ALL about music. I find it disrespectful to Freddie and John to use the name, for it's not Queen without them. It really isn't, and it shouldn't be that hard to just change the name. Sure, maybe I'm being annoying, but I think it's a really important detail.
I deeply agree with the words of Scott M. .
I would like to hear a new `different` album, it would be far more better than nothing, and a little substitute for the sad early lost of Freddie. I still miss him and his spirit, he was such an great artist.
The original band Queen are the love of my life, since 20 years and I`m very happy that people of the original group try to do some new material.
Instead of doing mainly another musical etc.
It`s different - but not automatically bad.
I saw three concerts in Germany last year and it was always a powerfull experience, with many highlights and (of course) some low points (e.g. too much stuff without Paul as leadsinger and the setlist).
Paul is an awesome musican and seems to be a very nice and polite guy. I think it fit`s.
I`m `reaching out` for a Q+PR album, with a smile on my face!
And that this would not count as a real Queen album is obvious, or ?!
I would like to hear a new `different` album, it would be far more better than nothing, and a little substitute for the sad early lost of Freddie. I still miss him and his spirit, he was such an great artist.
The original band Queen are the love of my life, since 20 years and I`m very happy that people of the original group try to do some new material.
Instead of doing mainly another musical etc.
It`s different - but not automatically bad.
I saw three concerts in Germany last year and it was always a powerfull experience, with many highlights and (of course) some low points (e.g. too much stuff without Paul as leadsinger and the setlist).
Paul is an awesome musican and seems to be a very nice and polite guy. I think it fit`s.
I`m `reaching out` for a Q+PR album, with a smile on my face!
And that this would not count as a real Queen album is obvious, or ?!
"Sure, maybe you'd like to think it's all about the music"
Hahaha, of course I do. HELLO MCFLY - they're a band. If I like a painter it's not because his second name sounds like a kind of pasta, and it's not because of the behind-the-scenes aspects of his work - it's because I like his painting. That's just me though.
"but for some of us it's not ALL about music. I find it disrespectful to Freddie and John to use the name, for it's not Queen without them. It really isn't, and it shouldn't be that hard to just change the name."
Well it depends. If they're making an all-new album, yes - I would like them to change the name purely for reasons of accuracy. On every show they've played since 1986, they've been right to at least include Queen in the title, because they are playing mostly a Queen catalogue.
This new album they go on about however, will not be Queen music. I will welcome a new title.
"Sure, maybe I'm being annoying, but I think it's a really important detail."
No, your head is honestly in the right place. You say these things ostensibly out of respect for Freddie and John and I can't bail you up for that.
I just think the priorities are skewiff, if a simple Name problem is enough to turn you off potentially good music.
Look at the amount of people that cheat themselves out of Q+PR stuff. There's some damn good playing in there, regardless of whether or not one likes Paul Rodgers.
"And that this would not count as a real Queen album is obvious, or ?!"
My point of view is basically, I don't CARE what they call it. I will perhaps think it's wrong to put Queen on it, but it comes down to this - *I* know whether or not it's Queen, right? So it doesn't matter what Brian calls it, or what BPP calls it, or what anyone calls it. The label don't mean shit. I don't need someone to tell me what it is, I can make up my own mind.
Hahaha, of course I do. HELLO MCFLY - they're a band. If I like a painter it's not because his second name sounds like a kind of pasta, and it's not because of the behind-the-scenes aspects of his work - it's because I like his painting. That's just me though.
"but for some of us it's not ALL about music. I find it disrespectful to Freddie and John to use the name, for it's not Queen without them. It really isn't, and it shouldn't be that hard to just change the name."
Well it depends. If they're making an all-new album, yes - I would like them to change the name purely for reasons of accuracy. On every show they've played since 1986, they've been right to at least include Queen in the title, because they are playing mostly a Queen catalogue.
This new album they go on about however, will not be Queen music. I will welcome a new title.
"Sure, maybe I'm being annoying, but I think it's a really important detail."
No, your head is honestly in the right place. You say these things ostensibly out of respect for Freddie and John and I can't bail you up for that.
I just think the priorities are skewiff, if a simple Name problem is enough to turn you off potentially good music.
Look at the amount of people that cheat themselves out of Q+PR stuff. There's some damn good playing in there, regardless of whether or not one likes Paul Rodgers.
"And that this would not count as a real Queen album is obvious, or ?!"
My point of view is basically, I don't CARE what they call it. I will perhaps think it's wrong to put Queen on it, but it comes down to this - *I* know whether or not it's Queen, right? So it doesn't matter what Brian calls it, or what BPP calls it, or what anyone calls it. The label don't mean shit. I don't need someone to tell me what it is, I can make up my own mind.