A pile of shite.
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Its better than Paul Rodgers singing though
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]thenightcomedown wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Its better than Paul Rodgers singing though[/QUOTE]
Joe Elliot better than Paul Rodgers??
Thats a f**king joke.
Honestly..... I would kiss the holy ground beneath the sky of our lord to come into a contact with a frontman like Freddie or Paul Rogers.
Honestly..... if Joe Elliot showed up for a audition, I probably would not let him in the band. To me, the man has no vocal power whatsoever.
Freddie could rise over top of any drums or guitar.... Joe Elliot get buried underneath everything unless its a acoustic ballad.
In my honest opinion Roger Taylor is a far superior vocalist to Joe Elliot from Leppard.
Elliot is not in Mercury or Rodgers league.
Joe Elliot better than Paul Rodgers??
Thats a f**king joke.
Honestly..... I would kiss the holy ground beneath the sky of our lord to come into a contact with a frontman like Freddie or Paul Rogers.
Honestly..... if Joe Elliot showed up for a audition, I probably would not let him in the band. To me, the man has no vocal power whatsoever.
Freddie could rise over top of any drums or guitar.... Joe Elliot get buried underneath everything unless its a acoustic ballad.
In my honest opinion Roger Taylor is a far superior vocalist to Joe Elliot from Leppard.
Elliot is not in Mercury or Rodgers league.
I personally think Paul is one of the best singers of his genre. And he looks like Chuck Norris!! Ha!
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]thenightcomedown wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Its better than Paul Rodgers singing though[/QUOTE]
Wow, how original.
Wow, how original.
Stink, I couldn't get it to work for some reason. Oh well, judging by the comments that might not have been a bad thing after all.
brian only loves it cause the email also praised wwry the smoking ban in public and mentioned how his music lifted a spirit from the throes of depression....
so it became comment of the century
so it became comment of the century
I think it sounds really interesting, you should broaden ur horizens, i dont see what is wrong with it. If ur gonna complain about covers complain about the bloody crazy frog!!!!
OMG yes Paul Rodgers so does look like Chuck Norris, cos i was watchin Way Of The Dragon the other day and i was like OMG he is the spitting image of Paul Rodgers!
I think Paul would sing a much better theme song for his own TV show... it'd be like "Walker: Texas Ranger" Q+PR style... Roger would be the bad guy that gets his ass kicked at the end, and
Brian could be the kid that's getting bullied at school and learns karate from Paul.
Brian could be the kid that's getting bullied at school and learns karate from Paul.
[QUOTE]
Joe Elliot better than Paul Rodgers??
Thats a f**king joke.
[/QUOTE]
And worst of all, it's not even Elliot singing it. It's some whiny bitch called something Savage...the bass player or somesuch, who is just awful
Joe Elliot better than Paul Rodgers??
Thats a f**king joke.
[/QUOTE]
And worst of all, it's not even Elliot singing it. It's some whiny bitch called something Savage...the bass player or somesuch, who is just awful
The worst thing about that is the vocals. It sounds like someone has Joe Elliot's balls in their fist squeezing them.
Then again, I haven't heard many Queen covers that I can say I enjoy. I think the vocals and music are just too complex. Even if you get someone that can do a good cover, like say George Michael of STL; he still couldn't cover many other Queen songs. It just happens that STL fits his range. I like Green Day's version they do live of WATC, but I like Green Day a lot, some may not. I doubt if Green Day could do much more of Queen. I admit that I can't stand more than half of what is on the Tribute Concert DVD and VHS. I can't even listen to most of it.
Does anyone else feel this way or am I being a critical bitch?
Then again, I haven't heard many Queen covers that I can say I enjoy. I think the vocals and music are just too complex. Even if you get someone that can do a good cover, like say George Michael of STL; he still couldn't cover many other Queen songs. It just happens that STL fits his range. I like Green Day's version they do live of WATC, but I like Green Day a lot, some may not. I doubt if Green Day could do much more of Queen. I admit that I can't stand more than half of what is on the Tribute Concert DVD and VHS. I can't even listen to most of it.
Does anyone else feel this way or am I being a critical bitch?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Lisser wrote: [/QUOTENAME]The worst thing about that is the vocals. It sounds like someone has Joe Elliot's balls in their fist squeezing them.[/QUOTE]
It's actually 'Sav' that is singing it.
It's actually 'Sav' that is singing it.
I kinda liked it...the vocals were kinda crap though. I wouldnt listen to it again
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]PieterMC wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Lisser wrote: [/QUOTENAME]The worst thing about that is the vocals. It sounds like someone has Joe Elliot's balls in their fist squeezing them.[/QUOTE]
It's actually 'Sav' that is singing it.[/QUOTE]
That makes sense then bc it did not sound like Joe Elliot. Anyhow, I don't care for his vocals.
It's actually 'Sav' that is singing it.[/QUOTE]
That makes sense then bc it did not sound like Joe Elliot. Anyhow, I don't care for his vocals.