[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]jeroen wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]John S Stuart wrote: [/QUOTENAME]This is actually 'Take 4' - NOT 'Take 1'.
GB IQFC convention October 16th 2004, Vlaardingen, Holland: Unreleased Great King Rat (Vocal demo Version). Recorded early 1973. Freddie counts intro, different melody and lyrics and no electric guitars.
GB IQFC convention Prestatyn 2005: Unreleased Great King Rat Early demo: Take 4
[/QUOTE]
I'm afraid not, John.
This one is different to Take 4 - GB QOIFCD Vlaardingen, Holland 2005.
Easily comparable: That one is announced by engineer as take 4, no Freddie counting, LOTS of additional guitars. That one is clearly a guitar-take.
So what this download says; that this is a VOCAL take, makes sence realy.
On this one you can clearly here the basic track is there. Bass, guitar, drums. Freddie's doing vocals and on this take their are clearly in a very early stage. Very different.
Note then that on 'take 4 - the guitar take', the vocals are quite similar to the eventual album version. That's the stage where Brian is overdubbing or doubling his guitar parts and adding 'noise'. Evidently later on in the proces.
[/QUOTE]
where do you take this information? :O i mean where did you got these demos ?
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Greg Brooks (Queen's "ARRchivist") plays these kind of things at the Dutch and UK Queen fanclub conventions.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]jeroen wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]John S Stuart wrote: [/QUOTENAME]This is actually 'Take 4' - NOT 'Take 1'.
GB IQFC convention October 16th 2004, Vlaardingen, Holland: Unreleased Great King Rat (Vocal demo Version). Recorded early 1973. Freddie counts intro, different melody and lyrics and no electric guitars.
GB IQFC convention Prestatyn 2005: Unreleased Great King Rat Early demo: Take 4
[/QUOTE]
I'm afraid not, John.
This one is different to Take 4 - GB IQFC Maassluis, Holland 2005.
Easily comparable: That one is announced by engineer as take 4, no Freddie counting, LOTS of additional guitars. That one is clearly a guitar-take.
So what this download says; that this is a VOCAL take, makes sence realy.
On this one you can clearly here the basic track is there. Bass, guitar, drums. Freddie's doing vocals and on this take their are clearly in a very early stage. Very different.
Note then that on 'take 4 - the guitar take', the vocals are quite similar to the eventual album version. That's the stage where Brian is overdubbing or doubling his guitar parts and adding 'noise'. Evidently later on in the proces.
[/QUOTE]
Fair point - but as GB has 'aired' only one 'Great King Rat' version or take during his travels - and not two - (this clearly comes from a convention 'broadcast') - and as the version 'aired' was 'announced' as 'Take 4', wherein does the info that this is indeed a different take come from?
Ofcourse, he does visit this site himself - so perhaps he could set the record straight.
GB IQFC convention October 16th 2004, Vlaardingen, Holland: Unreleased Great King Rat (Vocal demo Version). Recorded early 1973. Freddie counts intro, different melody and lyrics and no electric guitars.
GB IQFC convention Prestatyn 2005: Unreleased Great King Rat Early demo: Take 4
[/QUOTE]
I'm afraid not, John.
This one is different to Take 4 - GB IQFC Maassluis, Holland 2005.
Easily comparable: That one is announced by engineer as take 4, no Freddie counting, LOTS of additional guitars. That one is clearly a guitar-take.
So what this download says; that this is a VOCAL take, makes sence realy.
On this one you can clearly here the basic track is there. Bass, guitar, drums. Freddie's doing vocals and on this take their are clearly in a very early stage. Very different.
Note then that on 'take 4 - the guitar take', the vocals are quite similar to the eventual album version. That's the stage where Brian is overdubbing or doubling his guitar parts and adding 'noise'. Evidently later on in the proces.
[/QUOTE]
Fair point - but as GB has 'aired' only one 'Great King Rat' version or take during his travels - and not two - (this clearly comes from a convention 'broadcast') - and as the version 'aired' was 'announced' as 'Take 4', wherein does the info that this is indeed a different take come from?
Ofcourse, he does visit this site himself - so perhaps he could set the record straight.
Ugh... if these recordings continue to be made available publically, then they'll stop playing them at conventions altogether. Why else do you think it has Greg's spoken disclaimer every 15-20 seconds?
But this is a cool version of the song. The song is very undeveloped, as is Freddie as a vocalist overall. Very interesting listen. And it's definitely different from take 4 that was played in 2005. In take 4, the vocal melodies have been figured out, and there is Brian's second (live?) guitar track in addition to the guide track.
But this is a cool version of the song. The song is very undeveloped, as is Freddie as a vocalist overall. Very interesting listen. And it's definitely different from take 4 that was played in 2005. In take 4, the vocal melodies have been figured out, and there is Brian's second (live?) guitar track in addition to the guide track.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]John S Stuart wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Bobby_brown wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
Why did Freddie count to 10?[/QUOTE]
Because he only had five fingers on each hand.
So it was a good thing that he didn't have his hands in his pockets at the time! ;-)[/QUOTE]
This is one of those questions that wasn´t meant for an answer, but i have to admit that the way i writed it seems like i was really waiting for one.
I was just thinking why did Freddie count to ten, because normally musicians tend to count to four!
I assumed that no one new the answer!!
But i enjoyed you theory : ))
Take care
Why did Freddie count to 10?[/QUOTE]
Because he only had five fingers on each hand.
So it was a good thing that he didn't have his hands in his pockets at the time! ;-)[/QUOTE]
This is one of those questions that wasn´t meant for an answer, but i have to admit that the way i writed it seems like i was really waiting for one.
I was just thinking why did Freddie count to ten, because normally musicians tend to count to four!
I assumed that no one new the answer!!
But i enjoyed you theory : ))
Take care
Or even thinking, -I'm putting in a lead up of tape so there's plenty of room for that guitar intro I want.- It was the early days of their stuff.
Peace,
Adam.
Peace,
Adam.
Sorry - indeed my my mistake. I was acting from memory.
From notes, I have:
Great King Rat
1: GB IQFC convention October 16th 2004, Vlaardingen, Holland: Unreleased Great King Rat (Early vocal demo version). Recorded early 1973. Freddie counts intro, different melody and lyrics and no electric guitar.
2: GB IQFC convention Prestatyn 2005: Unreleased Great King Rat (Take 4). Additional electric guitar.
Album Version (5:43)- Queen: EMI CDP 7 462 04 2
De Lane Lea Original Demo 6:02 - In The Beginning: Miko QCD 01
BBC 03.12.1973 (6:01)- Queen At The Beeb: BOJCD 001
Exposed Fake Mono Demo - Exposed MC
Early vocal demo 3:50 - Unreleased:
Take 4 Early demo 3:40 - Unreleased:
Small Odd Ends - Unreleased:
So two different demo 'Great King Rat' versions were aired seperately in 2004 & 2005.
Funny how one can get an idea into their head - but obviously the notes do not make mistakes!
From notes, I have:
Great King Rat
1: GB IQFC convention October 16th 2004, Vlaardingen, Holland: Unreleased Great King Rat (Early vocal demo version). Recorded early 1973. Freddie counts intro, different melody and lyrics and no electric guitar.
2: GB IQFC convention Prestatyn 2005: Unreleased Great King Rat (Take 4). Additional electric guitar.
Album Version (5:43)- Queen: EMI CDP 7 462 04 2
De Lane Lea Original Demo 6:02 - In The Beginning: Miko QCD 01
BBC 03.12.1973 (6:01)- Queen At The Beeb: BOJCD 001
Exposed Fake Mono Demo - Exposed MC
Early vocal demo 3:50 - Unreleased:
Take 4 Early demo 3:40 - Unreleased:
Small Odd Ends - Unreleased:
So two different demo 'Great King Rat' versions were aired seperately in 2004 & 2005.
Funny how one can get an idea into their head - but obviously the notes do not make mistakes!
To refresh your ideas heres the take number 4 ;)....
http://rapidshare.de/files/34210631/Queen_-_Great_King_Rat__take_4_.wma
http://rapidshare.de/files/34210631/Queen_-_Great_King_Rat__take_4_.wma
Thanx! ROFL! Property of Queen Productions! HAHAHA!
2004.10.16 - Dutch Fan Club Convention.
- 1st Session:
01. Great King Rat (take 1) 3:48 - Freddie Mercury counts-in, different lyrics/vocals, 'vocalised' guitar, goes up to the bridge when Freddie Mercury counts-out.
2005.09 - 20th International Fan Club Convention, Prestatyn - and also:
2005.10 - Dutch Fan Club Convention.
05. Great King Rat (take 4) 3:40 – From QUEEN Sessions, Trident Studios, 1973. Very different, with alternate guitar outtakes and vocal overdubs, cuts halfway through.
- 1st Session:
01. Great King Rat (take 1) 3:48 - Freddie Mercury counts-in, different lyrics/vocals, 'vocalised' guitar, goes up to the bridge when Freddie Mercury counts-out.
2005.09 - 20th International Fan Club Convention, Prestatyn - and also:
2005.10 - Dutch Fan Club Convention.
05. Great King Rat (take 4) 3:40 – From QUEEN Sessions, Trident Studios, 1973. Very different, with alternate guitar outtakes and vocal overdubs, cuts halfway through.
Now this is nice ;-)
I knew there were differences between the sessions GB did in UK and in Holland - but I also always assumed that the played GKR demo's would be the same.
(John, to compare; could you posts what you believe were the tracklists of the sessions?)
Of course it would be even more interesting if we would get to hear the FULL vocal demo! ;-)
Bob - I still think there is no big problem in sharing these recordings. In the early days, convention-recordings would end up on bootlegs that were sold. That's what they are trying to prevent with the 'property'-overdub.
The future? Hmm... there will be no more Dutch conventions anyway... ;-)
Let's hope GB will play something extra to markt his final performance in Holland ;-)
I knew there were differences between the sessions GB did in UK and in Holland - but I also always assumed that the played GKR demo's would be the same.
(John, to compare; could you posts what you believe were the tracklists of the sessions?)
Of course it would be even more interesting if we would get to hear the FULL vocal demo! ;-)
Bob - I still think there is no big problem in sharing these recordings. In the early days, convention-recordings would end up on bootlegs that were sold. That's what they are trying to prevent with the 'property'-overdub.
The future? Hmm... there will be no more Dutch conventions anyway... ;-)
Let's hope GB will play something extra to markt his final performance in Holland ;-)
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]jeroen wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Bob - I still think there is no big problem in sharing these recordings. In the early days, convention-recordings would end up on bootlegs that were sold. That's what they are trying to prevent with the 'property'-overdub.[/QUOTE]
QP threatened that they'd stop playing the songs if the bootlegging continued. Sharing the songs on a forum is pretty much putting the nail on the coffin, if they find out. I'm sure we all recall a certain member of QP posting here now and again...
QP threatened that they'd stop playing the songs if the bootlegging continued. Sharing the songs on a forum is pretty much putting the nail on the coffin, if they find out. I'm sure we all recall a certain member of QP posting here now and again...
both the tracks seems to be corrupted :(
can we have the MP3 versions ?
thank you so much
( WMA is awful, it would be NOT USED at all )
can we have the MP3 versions ?
thank you so much
( WMA is awful, it would be NOT USED at all )
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Rado wrote: [/QUOTENAME]both the tracks seems to be corrupted :(
can we have the MP3 versions ?
thank you so much
( WMA is awful, it would be NOT USED at all )[/QUOTE]
Are you kidding?
Anybody that prefers to listen to mp3's should be shot! ;-)
can we have the MP3 versions ?
thank you so much
( WMA is awful, it would be NOT USED at all )[/QUOTE]
Are you kidding?
Anybody that prefers to listen to mp3's should be shot! ;-)
Thanks for your "incite", "Caspar."