My offer still stands.
For those of you who can stand mp3 format:
I am offering to post and concert I have in mp3 format on this site.
All you have to do is email me at habalushy@queenzone.com and request up to 3 concerts. Please no more than 3.
Please request at least one of the following: date (at least month and year) and/or city. Please don't ask for the best sounding concert from 1978 because I don't remeber which sounds best.
ALL OF MY CONCERTS I POST WILL BE IN MP3 (between 112-260kb/s)
My offer stands.
(I will post any Queen, Brian May, Roger Taylor, The Cross, Q+PR and other Queen related bootlegs that I have)
Thread
Posts in chronological order
How about, Wembley 11th July 1986?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]habalushy wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
Please don't ask for the best sounding concert from 1978 because I don't remeber which sounds best.[/QUOTE]
If you're providing a service for people, then the least you can do is answer their questions.
Please don't ask for the best sounding concert from 1978 because I don't remeber which sounds best.[/QUOTE]
If you're providing a service for people, then the least you can do is answer their questions.
Don't be a nagging turd please,just let him post whatever he wants,you don't like mp3,so fuck off!
PS:Zurich '86 or Paris '84 would be nice.
PS:Zurich '86 or Paris '84 would be nice.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]L-R-TIGER1994 wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Don't be a nagging turd please,just let him post whatever he wants,you don't like mp3,so fuck off![/QUOTE]
Nagging? If you read my post, it had nothing to with what he was posting. I was giving him a suggestion so that he could be of better service of people.
You're just bitter because I disagree with you over something. Get over it, please. The name calling is immature and unnecessary.
Nagging? If you read my post, it had nothing to with what he was posting. I was giving him a suggestion so that he could be of better service of people.
You're just bitter because I disagree with you over something. Get over it, please. The name calling is immature and unnecessary.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]L-R-TIGER1994 wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Don't be a nagging turd please,just let him post whatever he wants,you don't like mp3,so fuck off![/QUOTE]
Nagging? If you read my post, it had nothing to with what he was posting. I was giving him a suggestion so that he could be of better service of people.
You're just bitter because I disagree with you over something. Get over it, please. The name calling is immature and unnecessary.
[/QUOTE]
Amen!
Nagging? If you read my post, it had nothing to with what he was posting. I was giving him a suggestion so that he could be of better service of people.
You're just bitter because I disagree with you over something. Get over it, please. The name calling is immature and unnecessary.
[/QUOTE]
Amen!
The least GH could have done is help habalushy by providing a list of concert ratings.
My top 100 list of Queen concerts was mostly substantiated by compiling the ratings of 7 different people (Tatterdemalion, Harry, Trancer, Mr Scully, Hangman, Tilo Magnet and Guitar Hero), and summarizes the ratings of the 7 people into 3 columns:
"x" - Number of people who rated the concert EX- or better.
"+" - Number of people who rated the concert VG+ or better.
"#" - Number of people who rated the concert (Most concerts were not rated by all 7 people).
...
x + # Concert
7 7 7 1973-09-13 AA++ London
4 5 5 1974-03-31 AA++ London
0 4 5 1973-11-17 AA++ Liverpool
0 3 6 1974-04-28 AA++ Portland
0 2 4 1973-11-27 AA++ Birmingham
0 0 4 1973-11-29 AA++ Bristol
3 4 4 1975-03-07 AA++ Milwaukee
2 6 7 1975-05-01 AA++ Tokyo
1 5 7 1975-04-19 AA++ Tokyo
1 4 6 1975-03-29 AA++ Santa Monica
1 4 6 1975-04-29 AA++ Shizuoka
7 7 7 1975-12-24 AA++ London
5 6 7 1976-03-29 AA++ Osaka (night)
5 6 6 1976-03-31 AA++ Tokyo
4 5 6 1976-03-29 AA++ Osaka (day)
4 4 5 1976-04-01 & 04 AA++ Tokyo (2 show combo)
1 3 7 1976-09-18 AA++ London
1 2 6 1975-11-26 AA++ Manchester
5 6 7 1977-06-06 AA++ London
4 6 6 1977-05-12 AA++ Copenhagen
4 4 6 1977-03-13 AA++ Seattle
2 6 7 1977-05-30 AA++ Glasgow
6 6 7 1977-12-11 AA++ Houston
5 5 7 1978-04-13 AA++ Copenhagen
3 4 5 1978-04-30 AA++ Zurich
2 5 6 1978-04-23 AA++ Paris
2 4 7 1978-04-12 AA++ Stockholm
1 4 5 1978-04-28 AA++ Berlin
1 2 6 1977-12-01 AA++ New York
7 7 7 1979-04-20 AA++ Osaka
6 6 6 1978-12-07 AA++ Chicago
6 6 7 1979-12-26 AA++ London
5 6 7 1978-12-01 AA++ Montreal
4 6 7 1979-04-14 AA++ Tokyo
4 5 6 1979-04-19 AA++ Osaka
2 5 6 1979-02-01 AA++ Cologne (partial)
2 5 6 1979-02-02 AA++ Frankfort
2 4 6 1978-12-03 AA Toronto
1 2 7 1979-02-28 AA++ Paris
0 5 7 1979-05-06 AA++ Sapporo
0 1 6 1979-12-04 AA++ Newcastle
6 7 7 1980-09-10 AA++ Milwaukee
6 6 7 1980-12-08 AA++ London
6 6 6 1981-02-13 AA++ Tokyo
5 6 7 1980-09-19 AA++ Chicago
5 5 6 1981-02-28 AA++ Buenos Aires
3 6 6 1980-11-29 AA++ Essen
3 5 7 1981-03-20 AA++ Sao Paulo
3 4 6 1981-03-01 AA Buenos Aires
2 6 7 1980-07-14 AA Oakland
2 4 6 1981-02-17 AA++ Tokyo
2 3 5 1980-12-13 AA Brussels
2 3 5 1980-12-14 AA++ Frankfort
0 1 5 1981-09-27 AA++ Caracas
7 7 7 1982-06-01 AA++ Edinburgh
6 6 7 1982-05-13 AA++ Vienna
5 7 7 1982-05-12 AA++ Vienna
5 6 6 1982-10-19 AA++ Fukuoka
5 6 7 1982-10-24 AA++ Osaka
5 6 7 1982-10-26 AA++ Nagoya
4 6 7 1982-04-16 BB Zurich
4 5 6 1982-07-28 AA++ New York
4 5 6 1982-10-29 AA++ Sapporo
4 4 6 1982-08-13 AA++ Chicago
3 6 6 1982-05-03 BB Paris
3 6 7 1982-05-29 AA++ Leeds
3 5 6 1982-04-28 AA++ Frankfort
3 5 6 1982-07-21 AA++ Montreal
3 3 6 1982-09-07 AA++ Oakland
2 6 7 1982-05-01 AA++ Dortmund
2 5 6 1982-07-23 AA++ Boston
0 4 6 1982-08-09 AA++ New Jersey
7 7 7 1984-09-29 AA++ Vienna
6 6 6 1984-09-14 AA++ Milan
6 6 6 1985-05-09 AA++ Tokyo
5 6 6 1984-09-02 AA++ Birmingham
5 5 6 1984-09-15 AA++ Milan
5 5 6 1985-05-15 AA++ Osaka
4 4 4 1984-09-30 AA++ Vienna
4 4 6 1985-04-19 AA++ Melbourne
3 5 6 1984-08-31 AA++ Birmingham
3 5 6 1984-09-21 AA++ Brussels
2 5 7 1984-09-04 AA++ London
2 4 5 1984-09-01 AA++ Birmingham
2 4 5 1984-09-08 AA++ London
2 4 5 1984-09-18 AA++ Paris
2 3 6 1985-04-26 AA++ Sydney
1 2 5 1984-09-20 AA++ Leiden
6 6 7 1986-06-21 AA++ Mannheim
6 6 6 1986-06-26 AA++ Berlin
6 6 6 1986-07-21 AA++ Vienna
6 6 6 1986-07-22 AA++ Vienna
5 7 7 1986-08-01 AA++ Barcelona
4 6 6 1986-07-09 AA++ New Castle
4 5 6 1986-06-07 AA++ Stockholm
3 6 7 1986-08-09 AA++ Knebworth
3 5 7 1986-06-14 AA++ Paris
3 5 6 1986-08-03 AA++ Madrid
2 6 7 1986-07-11 AA London
1 5 6 1986-06-11 AA++ Leiden
My top 100 list of Queen concerts was mostly substantiated by compiling the ratings of 7 different people (Tatterdemalion, Harry, Trancer, Mr Scully, Hangman, Tilo Magnet and Guitar Hero), and summarizes the ratings of the 7 people into 3 columns:
"x" - Number of people who rated the concert EX- or better.
"+" - Number of people who rated the concert VG+ or better.
"#" - Number of people who rated the concert (Most concerts were not rated by all 7 people).
...
x + # Concert
7 7 7 1973-09-13 AA++ London
4 5 5 1974-03-31 AA++ London
0 4 5 1973-11-17 AA++ Liverpool
0 3 6 1974-04-28 AA++ Portland
0 2 4 1973-11-27 AA++ Birmingham
0 0 4 1973-11-29 AA++ Bristol
3 4 4 1975-03-07 AA++ Milwaukee
2 6 7 1975-05-01 AA++ Tokyo
1 5 7 1975-04-19 AA++ Tokyo
1 4 6 1975-03-29 AA++ Santa Monica
1 4 6 1975-04-29 AA++ Shizuoka
7 7 7 1975-12-24 AA++ London
5 6 7 1976-03-29 AA++ Osaka (night)
5 6 6 1976-03-31 AA++ Tokyo
4 5 6 1976-03-29 AA++ Osaka (day)
4 4 5 1976-04-01 & 04 AA++ Tokyo (2 show combo)
1 3 7 1976-09-18 AA++ London
1 2 6 1975-11-26 AA++ Manchester
5 6 7 1977-06-06 AA++ London
4 6 6 1977-05-12 AA++ Copenhagen
4 4 6 1977-03-13 AA++ Seattle
2 6 7 1977-05-30 AA++ Glasgow
6 6 7 1977-12-11 AA++ Houston
5 5 7 1978-04-13 AA++ Copenhagen
3 4 5 1978-04-30 AA++ Zurich
2 5 6 1978-04-23 AA++ Paris
2 4 7 1978-04-12 AA++ Stockholm
1 4 5 1978-04-28 AA++ Berlin
1 2 6 1977-12-01 AA++ New York
7 7 7 1979-04-20 AA++ Osaka
6 6 6 1978-12-07 AA++ Chicago
6 6 7 1979-12-26 AA++ London
5 6 7 1978-12-01 AA++ Montreal
4 6 7 1979-04-14 AA++ Tokyo
4 5 6 1979-04-19 AA++ Osaka
2 5 6 1979-02-01 AA++ Cologne (partial)
2 5 6 1979-02-02 AA++ Frankfort
2 4 6 1978-12-03 AA Toronto
1 2 7 1979-02-28 AA++ Paris
0 5 7 1979-05-06 AA++ Sapporo
0 1 6 1979-12-04 AA++ Newcastle
6 7 7 1980-09-10 AA++ Milwaukee
6 6 7 1980-12-08 AA++ London
6 6 6 1981-02-13 AA++ Tokyo
5 6 7 1980-09-19 AA++ Chicago
5 5 6 1981-02-28 AA++ Buenos Aires
3 6 6 1980-11-29 AA++ Essen
3 5 7 1981-03-20 AA++ Sao Paulo
3 4 6 1981-03-01 AA Buenos Aires
2 6 7 1980-07-14 AA Oakland
2 4 6 1981-02-17 AA++ Tokyo
2 3 5 1980-12-13 AA Brussels
2 3 5 1980-12-14 AA++ Frankfort
0 1 5 1981-09-27 AA++ Caracas
7 7 7 1982-06-01 AA++ Edinburgh
6 6 7 1982-05-13 AA++ Vienna
5 7 7 1982-05-12 AA++ Vienna
5 6 6 1982-10-19 AA++ Fukuoka
5 6 7 1982-10-24 AA++ Osaka
5 6 7 1982-10-26 AA++ Nagoya
4 6 7 1982-04-16 BB Zurich
4 5 6 1982-07-28 AA++ New York
4 5 6 1982-10-29 AA++ Sapporo
4 4 6 1982-08-13 AA++ Chicago
3 6 6 1982-05-03 BB Paris
3 6 7 1982-05-29 AA++ Leeds
3 5 6 1982-04-28 AA++ Frankfort
3 5 6 1982-07-21 AA++ Montreal
3 3 6 1982-09-07 AA++ Oakland
2 6 7 1982-05-01 AA++ Dortmund
2 5 6 1982-07-23 AA++ Boston
0 4 6 1982-08-09 AA++ New Jersey
7 7 7 1984-09-29 AA++ Vienna
6 6 6 1984-09-14 AA++ Milan
6 6 6 1985-05-09 AA++ Tokyo
5 6 6 1984-09-02 AA++ Birmingham
5 5 6 1984-09-15 AA++ Milan
5 5 6 1985-05-15 AA++ Osaka
4 4 4 1984-09-30 AA++ Vienna
4 4 6 1985-04-19 AA++ Melbourne
3 5 6 1984-08-31 AA++ Birmingham
3 5 6 1984-09-21 AA++ Brussels
2 5 7 1984-09-04 AA++ London
2 4 5 1984-09-01 AA++ Birmingham
2 4 5 1984-09-08 AA++ London
2 4 5 1984-09-18 AA++ Paris
2 3 6 1985-04-26 AA++ Sydney
1 2 5 1984-09-20 AA++ Leiden
6 6 7 1986-06-21 AA++ Mannheim
6 6 6 1986-06-26 AA++ Berlin
6 6 6 1986-07-21 AA++ Vienna
6 6 6 1986-07-22 AA++ Vienna
5 7 7 1986-08-01 AA++ Barcelona
4 6 6 1986-07-09 AA++ New Castle
4 5 6 1986-06-07 AA++ Stockholm
3 6 7 1986-08-09 AA++ Knebworth
3 5 7 1986-06-14 AA++ Paris
3 5 6 1986-08-03 AA++ Madrid
2 6 7 1986-07-11 AA London
1 5 6 1986-06-11 AA++ Leiden
I wont comment those ratings too much, but they could be used as a general guideline.
However, offering concerts and service without knowing the quality or bothering to investigate this, that is just plain ¤#%".
However, offering concerts and service without knowing the quality or bothering to investigate this, that is just plain ¤#%".
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Mike Van wrote: [/QUOTENAME]The least GH could have done is help habalushy by providing a list of concert ratings.[/QUOTE]
...which I would have gladly done had I been asked. In fact, based on his post, it seems as if he has little interest in the overall quality of his recordings, never mind the lossy vs. lossless debate.
You're really making all this way too personal. You look desperate. It's pathetic.
By the way, that list of yours really isn't conclusive, because it assumes that all seven people listened to the exact same recording, which for many shows won't be the case. For example, at least one of the seven people could have had an old version of Chicago 80 that was only VG quality. The master recording really hadn't circulated much back when you compiled your data.
...which I would have gladly done had I been asked. In fact, based on his post, it seems as if he has little interest in the overall quality of his recordings, never mind the lossy vs. lossless debate.
You're really making all this way too personal. You look desperate. It's pathetic.
By the way, that list of yours really isn't conclusive, because it assumes that all seven people listened to the exact same recording, which for many shows won't be the case. For example, at least one of the seven people could have had an old version of Chicago 80 that was only VG quality. The master recording really hadn't circulated much back when you compiled your data.
Yeah......& i bet they were for lossless versions as well!
GH -
I do not understand how you can ride habalushy for not immediately knowing the sound quality of a concert, when all three of your recent flac shares do not list a sound quality rating (EX, Ex-, VG+, VG, VG- etc).
I would suggest that you start listing the sound quality ratings of your recordings in your uploads. Lineage and lossless is all fine and dandy, but having an Ex- recording in mp3 is better than having a 1st generation lossless recording in VG+.
Also, I realize my top 100 list is far from perfect, but I think it is a good starting point and provides a range of viewpoints of several people rather than just one person.
For example, I thought Harry's website was best for concert ratings. However, occasionally he would rate a concert higher or lower than other people did. I think having a compliation of several people opinions provides a slightly more reliable rating.
Of course, I would not mind seeing what others have done to rate concerts (without solely relying on their own opinion or one person's opinion). Any links?
I do not understand how you can ride habalushy for not immediately knowing the sound quality of a concert, when all three of your recent flac shares do not list a sound quality rating (EX, Ex-, VG+, VG, VG- etc).
I would suggest that you start listing the sound quality ratings of your recordings in your uploads. Lineage and lossless is all fine and dandy, but having an Ex- recording in mp3 is better than having a 1st generation lossless recording in VG+.
Also, I realize my top 100 list is far from perfect, but I think it is a good starting point and provides a range of viewpoints of several people rather than just one person.
For example, I thought Harry's website was best for concert ratings. However, occasionally he would rate a concert higher or lower than other people did. I think having a compliation of several people opinions provides a slightly more reliable rating.
Of course, I would not mind seeing what others have done to rate concerts (without solely relying on their own opinion or one person's opinion). Any links?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]habalushy wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
Please don't ask for the best sounding concert from 1978 because I don't remeber which sounds best.[/QUOTE]
If you're providing a service for people, then the least you can do is answer their questions.
[/QUOTE]
it's not a service, it's a favor
I'm being nice, unlike you
Please don't ask for the best sounding concert from 1978 because I don't remeber which sounds best.[/QUOTE]
If you're providing a service for people, then the least you can do is answer their questions.
[/QUOTE]
it's not a service, it's a favor
I'm being nice, unlike you
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Mike Van wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I do not understand how you can ride habalushy for not immediately knowing the sound quality of a concert, when all three of your recent flac shares do not list a sound quality rating[/QUOTE]
You're right, I didn't note the sound quality of Osaka 76, but I said Vienna 78 was VG+, and that the Chicago shows were excellent. But that's completely isolated from my comments towards habalushy. He was talking about his mp3 collection, not FLACs that were shared here by me. Don't change the subject.
[QUOTE]Of course, I would not mind seeing what others have done to rate concerts (without solely relying on their own opinion or one person's opinion). Any links?[/QUOTE]
I'd suggest going to the traders forum (www.queentraders.com), click on the member list, and find some websites from there.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]habalushy wrote: [/QUOTENAME]it's not a service, it's a favor
I'm being nice, unlike you[/QUOTE]
Service, favour, whatever. Suppose it's someone who has very few concert recordings. Maybe they might want the best-sounding one from a tour, rather than a random date that might be bad sound quality. I think it's pretty appalling that you said you wouldn't check sound quality for people. That's not the kind of comment that will make people feel comfortable emailing you to share a concert with them.
You're right, I didn't note the sound quality of Osaka 76, but I said Vienna 78 was VG+, and that the Chicago shows were excellent. But that's completely isolated from my comments towards habalushy. He was talking about his mp3 collection, not FLACs that were shared here by me. Don't change the subject.
[QUOTE]Of course, I would not mind seeing what others have done to rate concerts (without solely relying on their own opinion or one person's opinion). Any links?[/QUOTE]
I'd suggest going to the traders forum (www.queentraders.com), click on the member list, and find some websites from there.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]habalushy wrote: [/QUOTENAME]it's not a service, it's a favor
I'm being nice, unlike you[/QUOTE]
Service, favour, whatever. Suppose it's someone who has very few concert recordings. Maybe they might want the best-sounding one from a tour, rather than a random date that might be bad sound quality. I think it's pretty appalling that you said you wouldn't check sound quality for people. That's not the kind of comment that will make people feel comfortable emailing you to share a concert with them.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
Service, favour, whatever. Suppose it's someone who has very few concert recordings. Maybe they might want the best-sounding one from a tour, rather than a random date that might be bad sound quality. I think it's pretty appalling that you said you wouldn't check sound quality for people. That's not the kind of comment that will make people feel comfortable emailing you to share a concert with them.[/QUOTE]
then they can look up the soundquality of concerts on queenbootlegs.tripod.com and ask for one of the better ones.
Service, favour, whatever. Suppose it's someone who has very few concert recordings. Maybe they might want the best-sounding one from a tour, rather than a random date that might be bad sound quality. I think it's pretty appalling that you said you wouldn't check sound quality for people. That's not the kind of comment that will make people feel comfortable emailing you to share a concert with them.[/QUOTE]
then they can look up the soundquality of concerts on queenbootlegs.tripod.com and ask for one of the better ones.
anyone got NJ 2005 or NY March 2006?
MP3 or video?
MP3 or video?