[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]young_strat_man wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Look Gregory. Stop your childish, good for nothing, moronic rants on QZ! You want everyone on your side, or there will be HELL to pay! Correct?? Ok...
HEIL HITLER! MEIN FUHRER![/QUOTE]
I'm sure if your beloved Nazi's came back to power you'd be the first to go up against the wall. Your attitude is disgusting, as is everyone pretending to be in charge of this board while condoning your Nazi propaganda.
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Good evening to you DONNA13. It's Greg's mum Mrs Brooks here.
*******
Dear Mrs. Brooks,
Thank you for doing such a good job raising Greg. We all appreciate the hard work you put into that challenging job. I hope you visit us again soon.
Love,
Donna
*******
DEAREST DONNA,
WOULD YOU LIKE TO JOIN MY SON, GREG, AND I FOR TEA THIS COMING SUNDAY EVENING?
WE WILL BE PARTAKING OF CUCUMBER AND SALMON SANDWICHES, JELLY AND ICE CREAM, AND IT WILL BE SPLENDID. YOU WILL BE MOST WELCOME.
ANYONE WHO HAS NICE THINGS TO SAY ABOUT MY LOVELY BOY GREG, IS CLEARLY A VERY INTELLIGENT PERSON WITH ASTUTE JUDGEMENT OF CHARACTER, AND I'D LOVE YOU TO COME TO MY HOME (A LITTLE COTTAGE) AND HAVE A LOVELY TIME. I'LL MAKE RASPBERRY TRIFLE TOO. ARE YOU ALLERGIC TO NUTS?
AND... BY THE WAY... THOSE ON QZ WHO HAVE BEEN VILE AND INSULTING AND GENERALLY BEASTLY TO MY GREG, SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF THEMSELVES... ESPECIALLY THE STRAT_MAN... WHO LOOKS TO BE A PROPER LITTLE TURD... OOOOH, PLEASE EXCUSE ME. THAT WORD JUST SLIPPED OUT. I 'DON'T USUSALLY USE THAT KIND OF LANGUAGE, BUT I THINK YOU'LL AGREE THAT YOUNG_TWAT_MAN (AS GREG CALLS HIM) IS CERTAINLY IN A SIMILIAR INTELLECTUAL LEAGUE AS A HUMAN TURD.
ANYWAY, WE LOOK FORWARD TO SEEING YOU DEAR DONNA13. PLEASE FEEL FREEE TO BRING A CHUM. AND BE PROMPT FOR 6.15 BECAUSE I MUSTN'T MISS ANTIQUES ROADSHOW, DEAR.
SORRY TO WRITE IN BIG LETTERS, DEARS... I'M A BIT DEAF.
I SAID, I'M A BIT DEAF.
LOVE TO YOU ALL, AND GOD BLESS ALL BUT THAT YSM WEIRDO.
MRS BROOKS
*******
Dear Mrs. Brooks,
Thank you for doing such a good job raising Greg. We all appreciate the hard work you put into that challenging job. I hope you visit us again soon.
Love,
Donna
*******
DEAREST DONNA,
WOULD YOU LIKE TO JOIN MY SON, GREG, AND I FOR TEA THIS COMING SUNDAY EVENING?
WE WILL BE PARTAKING OF CUCUMBER AND SALMON SANDWICHES, JELLY AND ICE CREAM, AND IT WILL BE SPLENDID. YOU WILL BE MOST WELCOME.
ANYONE WHO HAS NICE THINGS TO SAY ABOUT MY LOVELY BOY GREG, IS CLEARLY A VERY INTELLIGENT PERSON WITH ASTUTE JUDGEMENT OF CHARACTER, AND I'D LOVE YOU TO COME TO MY HOME (A LITTLE COTTAGE) AND HAVE A LOVELY TIME. I'LL MAKE RASPBERRY TRIFLE TOO. ARE YOU ALLERGIC TO NUTS?
AND... BY THE WAY... THOSE ON QZ WHO HAVE BEEN VILE AND INSULTING AND GENERALLY BEASTLY TO MY GREG, SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF THEMSELVES... ESPECIALLY THE STRAT_MAN... WHO LOOKS TO BE A PROPER LITTLE TURD... OOOOH, PLEASE EXCUSE ME. THAT WORD JUST SLIPPED OUT. I 'DON'T USUSALLY USE THAT KIND OF LANGUAGE, BUT I THINK YOU'LL AGREE THAT YOUNG_TWAT_MAN (AS GREG CALLS HIM) IS CERTAINLY IN A SIMILIAR INTELLECTUAL LEAGUE AS A HUMAN TURD.
ANYWAY, WE LOOK FORWARD TO SEEING YOU DEAR DONNA13. PLEASE FEEL FREEE TO BRING A CHUM. AND BE PROMPT FOR 6.15 BECAUSE I MUSTN'T MISS ANTIQUES ROADSHOW, DEAR.
SORRY TO WRITE IN BIG LETTERS, DEARS... I'M A BIT DEAF.
I SAID, I'M A BIT DEAF.
LOVE TO YOU ALL, AND GOD BLESS ALL BUT THAT YSM WEIRDO.
MRS BROOKS
DEAREST DONNA,
WOULD YOU LIKE TO JOIN MY SON, GREG, AND I FOR TEA THIS COMING SUNDAY EVENING?
- I would love to. I really really cannot think of anything I would rather do, and therefore it is so sad for me to tell you that I have to stay here in Virginia and give my dogs a bath on Sunday evening. You see, the vet is coming next week and I don't want her to think I'm a bad owner. Besides my previous (soapy and wet) commitment, I have recently let my passport expire (oooh - a bad thing to do, I think). I will have to write to the State Dept. about that little problem as soon as possible.
WE WILL BE PARTAKING OF CUCUMBER AND SALMON SANDWICHES, JELLY AND ICE CREAM, AND IT WILL BE SPLENDID. YOU WILL BE MOST WELCOME.
-Mmmm. That does sound yummy, Mrs. Brooks.
ANYONE WHO HAS NICE THINGS TO SAY ABOUT MY LOVELY BOY GREG, IS CLEARLY A VERY INTELLIGENT PERSON WITH ASTUTE JUDGEMENT OF CHARACTER, AND I'D LOVE YOU TO COME TO MY HOME (A LITTLE COTTAGE) AND HAVE A LOVELY TIME. I'LL MAKE RASPBERRY TRIFLE TOO. ARE YOU ALLERGIC TO NUTS?
- No, I'm not allergic to nuts (thank you for asking), however, my judgement of character can be slightly off sometimes - but sometimes it can be really "spot on" - then off, then on. But you know how that can be. I just rely on my intuition most of the time ... and I am thankful for a little divine intervention on occasion (whether or not I ask for it, and I usually don't ask for it). I'm sure you know what I mean, Mrs. Brooks. Oh, and I hope to see your cottage another time. It must be very beautiful.
AND... BY THE WAY... THOSE ON QZ WHO HAVE BEEN VILE AND INSULTING AND GENERALLY BEASTLY TO MY GREG, SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF THEMSELVES... ESPECIALLY THE STRAT_MAN... WHO LOOKS TO BE A PROPER LITTLE TURD... OOOOH, PLEASE EXCUSE ME. THAT WORD JUST SLIPPED OUT. I 'DON'T USUSALLY USE THAT KIND OF LANGUAGE, BUT I THINK YOU'LL AGREE THAT YOUNG_TWAT_MAN (AS GREG CALLS HIM) IS CERTAINLY IN A SIMILIAR INTELLECTUAL LEAGUE AS A HUMAN TURD.
- Bless you, dear. Would you like some smelling salts?
ANYWAY, WE LOOK FORWARD TO SEEING YOU DEAR DONNA13. PLEASE FEEL FREEE TO BRING A CHUM. AND BE PROMPT FOR 6.15 BECAUSE I MUSTN'T MISS ANTIQUES ROADSHOW, DEAR.
- I'm terribly sorry I can't make it this time, but I do hope you will invite me again. Enjoy your antiques show! Maybe Greg can bring you your ice cream in front of the TV and you can put your feet up! (Or do they not do that in a proper British household?)
SORRY TO WRITE IN BIG LETTERS, DEARS... I'M A BIT DEAF.
I SAID, I'M A BIT DEAF.
- Yes.
LOVE TO YOU ALL, AND GOD BLESS ALL BUT THAT YSM WEIRDO.
MRS BROOKS
- Thank you so much Mrs. Brooks. It was lovely to hear from you again. Take care.
Love,
Donna
WOULD YOU LIKE TO JOIN MY SON, GREG, AND I FOR TEA THIS COMING SUNDAY EVENING?
- I would love to. I really really cannot think of anything I would rather do, and therefore it is so sad for me to tell you that I have to stay here in Virginia and give my dogs a bath on Sunday evening. You see, the vet is coming next week and I don't want her to think I'm a bad owner. Besides my previous (soapy and wet) commitment, I have recently let my passport expire (oooh - a bad thing to do, I think). I will have to write to the State Dept. about that little problem as soon as possible.
WE WILL BE PARTAKING OF CUCUMBER AND SALMON SANDWICHES, JELLY AND ICE CREAM, AND IT WILL BE SPLENDID. YOU WILL BE MOST WELCOME.
-Mmmm. That does sound yummy, Mrs. Brooks.
ANYONE WHO HAS NICE THINGS TO SAY ABOUT MY LOVELY BOY GREG, IS CLEARLY A VERY INTELLIGENT PERSON WITH ASTUTE JUDGEMENT OF CHARACTER, AND I'D LOVE YOU TO COME TO MY HOME (A LITTLE COTTAGE) AND HAVE A LOVELY TIME. I'LL MAKE RASPBERRY TRIFLE TOO. ARE YOU ALLERGIC TO NUTS?
- No, I'm not allergic to nuts (thank you for asking), however, my judgement of character can be slightly off sometimes - but sometimes it can be really "spot on" - then off, then on. But you know how that can be. I just rely on my intuition most of the time ... and I am thankful for a little divine intervention on occasion (whether or not I ask for it, and I usually don't ask for it). I'm sure you know what I mean, Mrs. Brooks. Oh, and I hope to see your cottage another time. It must be very beautiful.
AND... BY THE WAY... THOSE ON QZ WHO HAVE BEEN VILE AND INSULTING AND GENERALLY BEASTLY TO MY GREG, SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF THEMSELVES... ESPECIALLY THE STRAT_MAN... WHO LOOKS TO BE A PROPER LITTLE TURD... OOOOH, PLEASE EXCUSE ME. THAT WORD JUST SLIPPED OUT. I 'DON'T USUSALLY USE THAT KIND OF LANGUAGE, BUT I THINK YOU'LL AGREE THAT YOUNG_TWAT_MAN (AS GREG CALLS HIM) IS CERTAINLY IN A SIMILIAR INTELLECTUAL LEAGUE AS A HUMAN TURD.
- Bless you, dear. Would you like some smelling salts?
ANYWAY, WE LOOK FORWARD TO SEEING YOU DEAR DONNA13. PLEASE FEEL FREEE TO BRING A CHUM. AND BE PROMPT FOR 6.15 BECAUSE I MUSTN'T MISS ANTIQUES ROADSHOW, DEAR.
- I'm terribly sorry I can't make it this time, but I do hope you will invite me again. Enjoy your antiques show! Maybe Greg can bring you your ice cream in front of the TV and you can put your feet up! (Or do they not do that in a proper British household?)
SORRY TO WRITE IN BIG LETTERS, DEARS... I'M A BIT DEAF.
I SAID, I'M A BIT DEAF.
- Yes.
LOVE TO YOU ALL, AND GOD BLESS ALL BUT THAT YSM WEIRDO.
MRS BROOKS
- Thank you so much Mrs. Brooks. It was lovely to hear from you again. Take care.
Love,
Donna
This is getting pathetic. Do we really have to raise a person's status up at this place.
John and Greg both did good things and perhaps bad things, they are both human beings with their opinion about things.
There is no reason to build up a propaganda to each side to make the person more loveable at this website.
John and Greg both did good things and perhaps bad things, they are both human beings with their opinion about things.
There is no reason to build up a propaganda to each side to make the person more loveable at this website.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]The Asassinator wrote: [/QUOTENAME]This is getting pathetic. Do we really have to raise a person's status up at this place.
John and Greg both did good things and perhaps bad things, they are both human beings with their opinion about things.
There is no reason to build up a propaganda to each side to make the person more loveable at this website.[/QUOTE]
I agree. And I think we can all agree that both John and Greg are already loveable enough!!! So, maybe they (and we) can now get back to a more loveable conversation about Queen.
John and Greg both did good things and perhaps bad things, they are both human beings with their opinion about things.
There is no reason to build up a propaganda to each side to make the person more loveable at this website.[/QUOTE]
I agree. And I think we can all agree that both John and Greg are already loveable enough!!! So, maybe they (and we) can now get back to a more loveable conversation about Queen.
Nice one Donna. You have a great sense of humour - something so inexplicably lacking on this site.
Good on ya.
GB (and his deaf mum)
Good on ya.
GB (and his deaf mum)
Jony...
no, we've never met
I'm actually a QOL regular. did you know that JSS even comes there, bringing his unwanted message of pure arrogance and hate?
it's at that point that I became curious and decided to have a look around here.
I'm mesmerized by all this arrogance. how can you cope with all this shit?
believe me, I have been on the recieving end of much much flack on QOL. I know the drill. these guys just love to fight and feel important because they have just slagged off the Queen archivist. they must have small dicks I guess
hell, I'm sure they would even slag off brian if he would post here. would make them feel so important.
well guess what, unfortunately for them I noticed. they will all soon know why I recieve much flack on QOL
GB: I COULD NOT AGREE WITH YOU MORE.
WELL SAID INDEED.
*******
To (Sensei) ALE... I hope you saw my reply to you on another thread... you sound like a very fine chap.
Page 3 of the thread called - MY QUEEN LIVE BOOK.... AGAIN, AND OTHER ISSUE
Regards
no, we've never met
I'm actually a QOL regular. did you know that JSS even comes there, bringing his unwanted message of pure arrogance and hate?
it's at that point that I became curious and decided to have a look around here.
I'm mesmerized by all this arrogance. how can you cope with all this shit?
believe me, I have been on the recieving end of much much flack on QOL. I know the drill. these guys just love to fight and feel important because they have just slagged off the Queen archivist. they must have small dicks I guess
hell, I'm sure they would even slag off brian if he would post here. would make them feel so important.
well guess what, unfortunately for them I noticed. they will all soon know why I recieve much flack on QOL
GB: I COULD NOT AGREE WITH YOU MORE.
WELL SAID INDEED.
*******
To (Sensei) ALE... I hope you saw my reply to you on another thread... you sound like a very fine chap.
Page 3 of the thread called - MY QUEEN LIVE BOOK.... AGAIN, AND OTHER ISSUE
Regards
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Queen Archivist wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Nice one Donna. You have a great sense of humour - something so inexplicably lacking on this site.
Good on ya.
GB (and his deaf mum)[/QUOTE]
Shouldn't you go to bed now, Greg? (I mean, since you are getting over the flu). What is it - apples and pears? I don't get the apples part. Oh, well. Good night, Greg.
Good on ya.
GB (and his deaf mum)[/QUOTE]
Shouldn't you go to bed now, Greg? (I mean, since you are getting over the flu). What is it - apples and pears? I don't get the apples part. Oh, well. Good night, Greg.
Cockney rhyming slang - it's kind of a fun little thing (yes, I'm American, but I read British books, and I look out for these things).
For instance...
I've got to go to the Gary.
Gary means "Gary Glitter". What does "glitter" rhyme with? Exactly.
For instance...
I've got to go to the Gary.
Gary means "Gary Glitter". What does "glitter" rhyme with? Exactly.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Queen Archivist wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I'm actually a QOL regular. did you know that JSS even comes there, bringing his unwanted message of pure arrogance and hate?
[/QUOTE]
Greg: On one hand you claim to be a victim of anti-Queenzone sentiment. You claim that there should be moderation in Queenzone, and you also expect freedom to be treated with respect, but,
on the other hand you have done everything to try and belittle me at every opportunity.
You begin numerous anti-threads in my name, you tried to belittle the frequency of my postings - before it was pointed out that you too had posted just as often. Finally, you even (incorrectly) had a pop at my literacy skills.
Can I point out that I do not spread HATE either here or Queenonline. (Besides Queenonline is so heavilly moderated I would think it would be impossible for any negative message to survive in any form).
I accept you may disagree with me, and that I may not top your Christmas card list - but hate - no.
Please play fair, as you can not expect to receive on one hand, that which you do not preach on the other.
My best wishes etc...
[/QUOTE]
Greg: On one hand you claim to be a victim of anti-Queenzone sentiment. You claim that there should be moderation in Queenzone, and you also expect freedom to be treated with respect, but,
on the other hand you have done everything to try and belittle me at every opportunity.
You begin numerous anti-threads in my name, you tried to belittle the frequency of my postings - before it was pointed out that you too had posted just as often. Finally, you even (incorrectly) had a pop at my literacy skills.
Can I point out that I do not spread HATE either here or Queenonline. (Besides Queenonline is so heavilly moderated I would think it would be impossible for any negative message to survive in any form).
I accept you may disagree with me, and that I may not top your Christmas card list - but hate - no.
Please play fair, as you can not expect to receive on one hand, that which you do not preach on the other.
My best wishes etc...
John SS. Please go away and leave the threads which I begin alone. All you do is come in a try to bring them down with your same old tired agenda because you perceive me as stealin your thunder.
You are 100% wrong about my presence on QZ, compared to your GIANT and COLOSSAL presence.
You have OVER FOUR THOUSAND thread participations in your name, while mine is less than 200.
4000 v 190 is very clearly NOT equal. What a ridiculous comment. It shows how emberrassed you must be by that vast difference. It further shows the mammoth time you spend here rather than with the wonderful family you tell us you enjoy.
QZ is literally riddled with your comments. THOUSANDS of them absolutely everywhere. i noticed 7 postings in a row, one after the other, yesterday. You just kept going on and on and on. It was relentless. It was seriously RELENTLESS. Over FOUR THOUSAND of them. You are one of the main participants of QZ whereas I only come on every now and then. This last week, while I was laid up in bed, was a rarity. NEVER have I done that before, as all QZ know very well. Whereas you are here EVERY SINGLE DAY OF YOUR LIFE, and I'm not remotely exaggerating.
Stop hijacking threads just to be further negative. We are trying to get to a better place.
Also... my commenting about your punctuation was tongue in cheek, you silly man. Where is your sense of humour?
My spelling is abysmal. I know that. I'm in no poition to seriously criticise - but only to do so in fun. I was joking with you, you miserable git. This is partly why it' such a huge chore trying to get thru to you. It's a futile exercise John.
PLEASE leave my threads alone because you genuinely do irritate the hell out of me, as well as INCREASINGLY several other QZ-ers too, who have said as much, but you ignore them.
You do not understand me. You have a limited sense of humour, and you are resentful and probably jealous, or some such hidden reason, and it really shows.
How about you don't pollute my threads, those which I start, and I will do the same thing by leaving yours alone.
We don't get on. We never will. You are the most irritating man I know. That's not insulting for insulting sake; it's genuinely a fact.
Let's agree to not converse. It's sensible and long overdue.
You are 100% wrong about my presence on QZ, compared to your GIANT and COLOSSAL presence.
You have OVER FOUR THOUSAND thread participations in your name, while mine is less than 200.
4000 v 190 is very clearly NOT equal. What a ridiculous comment. It shows how emberrassed you must be by that vast difference. It further shows the mammoth time you spend here rather than with the wonderful family you tell us you enjoy.
QZ is literally riddled with your comments. THOUSANDS of them absolutely everywhere. i noticed 7 postings in a row, one after the other, yesterday. You just kept going on and on and on. It was relentless. It was seriously RELENTLESS. Over FOUR THOUSAND of them. You are one of the main participants of QZ whereas I only come on every now and then. This last week, while I was laid up in bed, was a rarity. NEVER have I done that before, as all QZ know very well. Whereas you are here EVERY SINGLE DAY OF YOUR LIFE, and I'm not remotely exaggerating.
Stop hijacking threads just to be further negative. We are trying to get to a better place.
Also... my commenting about your punctuation was tongue in cheek, you silly man. Where is your sense of humour?
My spelling is abysmal. I know that. I'm in no poition to seriously criticise - but only to do so in fun. I was joking with you, you miserable git. This is partly why it' such a huge chore trying to get thru to you. It's a futile exercise John.
PLEASE leave my threads alone because you genuinely do irritate the hell out of me, as well as INCREASINGLY several other QZ-ers too, who have said as much, but you ignore them.
You do not understand me. You have a limited sense of humour, and you are resentful and probably jealous, or some such hidden reason, and it really shows.
How about you don't pollute my threads, those which I start, and I will do the same thing by leaving yours alone.
We don't get on. We never will. You are the most irritating man I know. That's not insulting for insulting sake; it's genuinely a fact.
Let's agree to not converse. It's sensible and long overdue.
C'est la vie.
You are a bully, Greg. Just read your post - incredible. Like a school yard bully. I have not seen any other Queenzoners ask John to stay away from ANY threads, you won't succeed in ganging up on him. Next week you'll get bored and find another toy and QZ will return to normal. John Stuart will still be here and he will still share his knowledge and he will still be a respected member of QZ.
Barbara YourValentine...
You like John. You regard him as a friend. I don't. He and I cannot get on. You should keep your personal overview of him away from how you view HIM AND ME. Can't you view it impartially just for one day, one thread?
You know that he and I only wind each other up and that QZ-ers have to read the tedious rubbish he and I exchange. I have suggested he keep out of my stuff, and I do the same for him, and thereby save all the nonsense - best for all concerned... and even you.
If this common sense suggestion appears to you as bullying, you have an uncommon idea of what a bully is.
Would you prefer, YV, he and I to bicker endlessly, and clutter your site with the same old stuff, or instead agree to disagree and go separate ways?
There is no pleasing you YV. You have made my sitution with John, and his with me, YOUR personal mission, but it's not. With respect, it has nothing to do with you. You are poking your nose into a private issue between 2 people, and not even being balanced about it.
I don't want to talk further with John. Life is too short and whether you believe it or not he WILL NOT ever tell it like it is. He only gives an edited version which makes him seem like the victim, and me, or others that oppose his views, as the bully, and you fall for it. You are easily manipulated YV. Please stop to consider this possibility.
I have met with John, spoke to him in person. Have you????? Have you done that Barbara????
I have tried to get along with John, but i smply cannot. It would possibly be in my interest to, but still I cannot.
Furthermore, other QZ-ers see exactly my point. I am NOT alone in this. Others too find him utterly infuriating. You have to recognise this, albeit he is a friend of yours.
My message to him is NOT incredible. It is a common sense solution. You seem to love anything at all that i say, that gives you an option to verbally attack again.
Yes John is a respected member of QZ, and so on. I never questioned that. I just said, asked him, to please not write to me any more, for good reasons.
The ganging up on him thing, IS incredible. All you are doing is exactly what John wants you to do. Like I say, you are being manipulated - even in the way you respond to my comments, shows this.
Barbara... if 12 people all told you this, you would not listen. You are so entrenched with your irritation of me that you have a blind side.
You like John. You regard him as a friend. I don't. He and I cannot get on. You should keep your personal overview of him away from how you view HIM AND ME. Can't you view it impartially just for one day, one thread?
You know that he and I only wind each other up and that QZ-ers have to read the tedious rubbish he and I exchange. I have suggested he keep out of my stuff, and I do the same for him, and thereby save all the nonsense - best for all concerned... and even you.
If this common sense suggestion appears to you as bullying, you have an uncommon idea of what a bully is.
Would you prefer, YV, he and I to bicker endlessly, and clutter your site with the same old stuff, or instead agree to disagree and go separate ways?
There is no pleasing you YV. You have made my sitution with John, and his with me, YOUR personal mission, but it's not. With respect, it has nothing to do with you. You are poking your nose into a private issue between 2 people, and not even being balanced about it.
I don't want to talk further with John. Life is too short and whether you believe it or not he WILL NOT ever tell it like it is. He only gives an edited version which makes him seem like the victim, and me, or others that oppose his views, as the bully, and you fall for it. You are easily manipulated YV. Please stop to consider this possibility.
I have met with John, spoke to him in person. Have you????? Have you done that Barbara????
I have tried to get along with John, but i smply cannot. It would possibly be in my interest to, but still I cannot.
Furthermore, other QZ-ers see exactly my point. I am NOT alone in this. Others too find him utterly infuriating. You have to recognise this, albeit he is a friend of yours.
My message to him is NOT incredible. It is a common sense solution. You seem to love anything at all that i say, that gives you an option to verbally attack again.
Yes John is a respected member of QZ, and so on. I never questioned that. I just said, asked him, to please not write to me any more, for good reasons.
The ganging up on him thing, IS incredible. All you are doing is exactly what John wants you to do. Like I say, you are being manipulated - even in the way you respond to my comments, shows this.
Barbara... if 12 people all told you this, you would not listen. You are so entrenched with your irritation of me that you have a blind side.
YV...
"You won't succeed in ganging up on him."
OK BARB. I WON'T GANG UP ON HIM AGAIN. POOR JOHN... GREG BROOKS GANGING UP ON HIM ALL THE TIME. LUCKY HE HAS YOU TO RESCUE HIM ALL THE TIME IN YOUR BALANCED AND IMPARTIAL WAY. YWAN YAWN.
Next week you'll get bored and find another toy and QZ will return to normal.
HOW EXCITING FOR YOU ALL.
John Stuart will still be here
OH YES, YOU CAN BET ON THAT. YOU CAN BET YOUR HOUSE ON THAT. JOHN WILL BE IN QZ NEXT WEEK, EVERY SINGLE DAY. HE COULD NOT WALK AWAY, EVEN FOR A MONTH, EVEN IF HE WANTED TO. HE NEEDS YOUR APPROVAL TOO MUCH BARB... AND YOU RUSH IN AND GIVE IT, RIGHT ON CUE EVERY TIME.
and he will still share his knowledge
YES BARB. YOU ARE RIGHT. YOU ARE ALWAYS RIGHT AND I AM ALWAYS WRONG. I WISH I COULD UNDERTAND JOHN LIKE YOU OBVIOUSLY DO.
and he will still be a respected member of QZ.
YES BARB. JOHN IS GREATLY RESPECTED. A GREATLY RESPECTED MEMBER OF THE QZ COMMUNITY. JOHN IS VERY MUCH RESPECTED AND I AM NOT. I KNOW. YOU ARE RIGHT.
I MUST WRITE 100 TIMES, JOHN IS A RESPECTED MEMBER OF QZ...
CHANGE YOUR RECORD FROM TIME TO TIME, YV. THINK BEFORE YOU WRITE. BE COMPLETELY IMPARTIAL AND BALANCED, WHETHER YOUR WRITING ABOUT A FRIEND, DISLIKED ARCHIVIST, OR WHOMEVER. AND DON'T BE SO EASILY MANIPULATED LIKE YOU ARE.
"You won't succeed in ganging up on him."
OK BARB. I WON'T GANG UP ON HIM AGAIN. POOR JOHN... GREG BROOKS GANGING UP ON HIM ALL THE TIME. LUCKY HE HAS YOU TO RESCUE HIM ALL THE TIME IN YOUR BALANCED AND IMPARTIAL WAY. YWAN YAWN.
Next week you'll get bored and find another toy and QZ will return to normal.
HOW EXCITING FOR YOU ALL.
John Stuart will still be here
OH YES, YOU CAN BET ON THAT. YOU CAN BET YOUR HOUSE ON THAT. JOHN WILL BE IN QZ NEXT WEEK, EVERY SINGLE DAY. HE COULD NOT WALK AWAY, EVEN FOR A MONTH, EVEN IF HE WANTED TO. HE NEEDS YOUR APPROVAL TOO MUCH BARB... AND YOU RUSH IN AND GIVE IT, RIGHT ON CUE EVERY TIME.
and he will still share his knowledge
YES BARB. YOU ARE RIGHT. YOU ARE ALWAYS RIGHT AND I AM ALWAYS WRONG. I WISH I COULD UNDERTAND JOHN LIKE YOU OBVIOUSLY DO.
and he will still be a respected member of QZ.
YES BARB. JOHN IS GREATLY RESPECTED. A GREATLY RESPECTED MEMBER OF THE QZ COMMUNITY. JOHN IS VERY MUCH RESPECTED AND I AM NOT. I KNOW. YOU ARE RIGHT.
I MUST WRITE 100 TIMES, JOHN IS A RESPECTED MEMBER OF QZ...
CHANGE YOUR RECORD FROM TIME TO TIME, YV. THINK BEFORE YOU WRITE. BE COMPLETELY IMPARTIAL AND BALANCED, WHETHER YOUR WRITING ABOUT A FRIEND, DISLIKED ARCHIVIST, OR WHOMEVER. AND DON'T BE SO EASILY MANIPULATED LIKE YOU ARE.