John Deacon posting on these forums?

I've got email saying that J.D. indeed posts here on forums with some nickname which is not related to John Deacon name, is this true?

We know Greg Brooks is Queen Archivist...but is John really posting or reading these forums?

He is

Yes, I believe John's user name is "Cabbage" and insists that QUEEN RIP 1991.

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]theCro wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I've got email saying that J.D. indeed posts here on forums with some nickname which is not related to John Deacon name, is this true?

We know Greg Brooks is Queen Archivist...but is John really posting or reading these forums?[/QUOTE]

Who was the email from? Maybe that person could offer you some sort of "proof"...

(Note - I am aware that the email is obviously speculative and unreliable)

I've got email saying that I could use a little "help" in the bedroom.

I don't even HAVE a bedroom!!!

He used to post here several years ago. His nick was The Opposition...

John Deacon does not say that Queen ended in 1991 on the basis that Brian May said that John Deacon said it was fine for them to continue without him. So take that and choke on it for a while...hmmm?

If he does, that´ll be great!! ;)

Nobody knows where John is, there isn´t a recent picture of him, no interviews, etc, why do you believe that this kind of information would get to your ears?

Even if he writes, you must consider that a rumour like that is just that... a rumour!

Unless you know one of his kids, i don´t know why people still believe this kind of "innuendoes".

Take care

Well if John does post/read on these forums, then here's a message for him:

John, if Brian and Roger ever decide to make a another album using more unfinished Queen tracks from the archives, then please participate and make it a "true" Queen album.

We miss you.

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Bobby_brown wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Nobody knows where John is, there isn´t a recent picture of him, no interviews, etc, why do you believe that this kind of information would get to your ears?

Even if he writes, you must consider that a rumour like that is just that... a rumour!

Unless you know one of his kids, i don´t know why people still believe this kind of "innuendoes".

Take care[/QUOTE]maybe you're deacy...who knows

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Hank H. wrote: [/QUOTENAME]He used to post here several years ago. His nick was The Opposition...

[/QUOTE]how do you know that?

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]freddie lives wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Well if John does post/read on these forums, then here's a message for him:

John, if Brian and Roger ever decide to make a another album using more unfinished Queen tracks from the archives, then please participate and make it a "true" Queen album.

We miss you.[/QUOTE]

i agree!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]AlexRocks wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Brian May said that John Deacon said it was fine for them to continue without him. So take that and choke on it for a while...hmmm?[/QUOTE]


You mean people still believe what Brian May says? Not outside here they don't

C'mon. I thought everyone knew he was posting as Johnny Knoxville!