[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Lester Burnham wrote: [/QUOTENAME]All we're asking is for you to show some proof from Brian or JSS, and you can't even do that. Should we just take your word for it? We've never even "saw" you before!
(lol)[/QUOTE]
Actually you have. lol. Maybe take a look at many of photos on here and other sites. lol. And another thing, i don't think anyone has formerly 'ASKED' me for proof!?
Thread
Posts in chronological order
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Crezchi wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Lester Burnham wrote: [/QUOTENAME]All we're asking is for you to show some proof from Brian or JSS, and you can't even do that. Should we just take your word for it? We've never even "saw" you before!
(lol)[/QUOTE]
Actually you have. lol. Maybe take a look at many of photos on here and other sites. lol. And another thing, i don't think anyone has formerly 'ASKED' me for proof!? [/QUOTE]
Yeah, there's no Brian or Roger on Barcelona. Just because Brian was in Queen everything don't have to run through the Queen system and I'm sure he saw no reason to involve Freddie. But no one is providing conclusive evidence. Yeah it was an idea that germinated (is that even a word lol ) by Ford ad folks but then post cit brian as saying he wrote a version for himself and Ford and tha the song was written in 1990. It's incredibly possible that he could have let Freddie sing a version of it even though it was for him. Before you guys keep beating on on that czect guy consider that too much love will kll yu was written for Bran originally. Why would Freddie do version in 1988? It's really simlar situaions I think.
A major difference is we have the fredde version of that but no shred of proof and a lot circumstantial evidence against a Freddie version of Driven by You.
(lol)[/QUOTE]
Actually you have. lol. Maybe take a look at many of photos on here and other sites. lol. And another thing, i don't think anyone has formerly 'ASKED' me for proof!? [/QUOTE]
Yeah, there's no Brian or Roger on Barcelona. Just because Brian was in Queen everything don't have to run through the Queen system and I'm sure he saw no reason to involve Freddie. But no one is providing conclusive evidence. Yeah it was an idea that germinated (is that even a word lol ) by Ford ad folks but then post cit brian as saying he wrote a version for himself and Ford and tha the song was written in 1990. It's incredibly possible that he could have let Freddie sing a version of it even though it was for him. Before you guys keep beating on on that czect guy consider that too much love will kll yu was written for Bran originally. Why would Freddie do version in 1988? It's really simlar situaions I think.
A major difference is we have the fredde version of that but no shred of proof and a lot circumstantial evidence against a Freddie version of Driven by You.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Crezchi wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Lester Burnham wrote: [/QUOTENAME]All we're asking is for you to show some proof from Brian or JSS, and you can't even do that. Should we just take your word for it? We've never even "saw" you before!
(lol)[/QUOTE]
Actually you have. lol. Maybe take a look at many of photos on here and other sites. lol. And another thing, i don't think anyone has formerly 'ASKED' me for proof!? [/QUOTE]
I would lol ask you lol for proof lol but I have a feeling lol it'd be a waste lol of my time lol. I trust my own research and jeroen.
LOL!!!
(lol)[/QUOTE]
Actually you have. lol. Maybe take a look at many of photos on here and other sites. lol. And another thing, i don't think anyone has formerly 'ASKED' me for proof!? [/QUOTE]
I would lol ask you lol for proof lol but I have a feeling lol it'd be a waste lol of my time lol. I trust my own research and jeroen.
LOL!!!
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Lester Burnham wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Crezchi wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Lester Burnham wrote: [/QUOTENAME]All we're asking is for you to show some proof from Brian or JSS, and you can't even do that. Should we just take your word for it? We've never even "saw" you before!
(lol)[/QUOTE]
Actually you have. lol. Maybe take a look at many of photos on here and other sites. lol. And another thing, i don't think anyone has formerly 'ASKED' me for proof!? [/QUOTE]
I would lol ask you lol for proof lol but I have a feeling lol it'd be a waste lol of my time lol. I trust my own research and jeroen.
LOL!!![/QUOTE]
LOL LOLOLOLOL LOL
LOL LOL LOL LOL
Ugh I was going to make some ASCII art with the word LOL but it's not working properly. Oh well!
(lol)[/QUOTE]
Actually you have. lol. Maybe take a look at many of photos on here and other sites. lol. And another thing, i don't think anyone has formerly 'ASKED' me for proof!? [/QUOTE]
I would lol ask you lol for proof lol but I have a feeling lol it'd be a waste lol of my time lol. I trust my own research and jeroen.
LOL!!![/QUOTE]
LOL LOLOLOLOL LOL
LOL LOL LOL LOL
Ugh I was going to make some ASCII art with the word LOL but it's not working properly. Oh well!
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Zebonka12 wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Lester Burnham wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Crezchi wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Lester Burnham wrote: [/QUOTENAME]All we're asking is for you to show some proof from Brian or JSS, and you can't even do that. Should we just take your word for it? We've never even "saw" you before!
(lol)[/QUOTE]
Actually you have. lol. Maybe take a look at many of photos on here and other sites. lol. And another thing, i don't think anyone has formerly 'ASKED' me for proof!? [/QUOTE]
I would lol ask you lol for proof lol but I have a feeling lol it'd be a waste lol of my time lol. I trust my own research and jeroen.
LOL!!![/QUOTE]
LOL LOLOLOLOL LOL
LOL LOL LOL LOL
Ugh I was going to make some ASCII art with the word LOL but it's not working properly. Oh well![/QUOTE]
lol
(lol)[/QUOTE]
Actually you have. lol. Maybe take a look at many of photos on here and other sites. lol. And another thing, i don't think anyone has formerly 'ASKED' me for proof!? [/QUOTE]
I would lol ask you lol for proof lol but I have a feeling lol it'd be a waste lol of my time lol. I trust my own research and jeroen.
LOL!!![/QUOTE]
LOL LOLOLOLOL LOL
LOL LOL LOL LOL
Ugh I was going to make some ASCII art with the word LOL but it's not working properly. Oh well![/QUOTE]
lol
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Lester Burnham wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Crezchi wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Lester Burnham wrote: [/QUOTENAME]All we're asking is for you to show some proof from Brian or JSS, and you can't even do that. Should we just take your word for it? We've never even "saw" you before!
(lol)[/QUOTE]
Actually you have. lol. Maybe take a look at many of photos on here and other sites. lol. And another thing, i don't think anyone has formerly 'ASKED' me for proof!? [/QUOTE]
I would lol ask you lol for proof lol but I have a feeling lol it'd be a waste lol of my time lol. I trust my own research and jeroen.
LOL!!![/QUOTE]
That is great! Go on trusting your research and Mr. Geerts. That is all it is anyways, research, isn't it? Good day Sirs.
(lol)[/QUOTE]
Actually you have. lol. Maybe take a look at many of photos on here and other sites. lol. And another thing, i don't think anyone has formerly 'ASKED' me for proof!? [/QUOTE]
I would lol ask you lol for proof lol but I have a feeling lol it'd be a waste lol of my time lol. I trust my own research and jeroen.
LOL!!![/QUOTE]
That is great! Go on trusting your research and Mr. Geerts. That is all it is anyways, research, isn't it? Good day Sirs.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Crezchi wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Lester Burnham wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Crezchi wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Lester Burnham wrote: [/QUOTENAME]All we're asking is for you to show some proof from Brian or JSS, and you can't even do that. Should we just take your word for it? We've never even "saw" you before!
(lol)[/QUOTE]
Actually you have. lol. Maybe take a look at many of photos on here and other sites. lol. And another thing, i don't think anyone has formerly 'ASKED' me for proof!? [/QUOTE]
I would lol ask you lol for proof lol but I have a feeling lol it'd be a waste lol of my time lol. I trust my own research and jeroen.
LOL!!![/QUOTE]
That is great! Go on trusting your research and Mr. Geerts. That is all it is anyways, research, isn't it? Good day Sirs.[/QUOTE]
Tata!
(lol)[/QUOTE]
Actually you have. lol. Maybe take a look at many of photos on here and other sites. lol. And another thing, i don't think anyone has formerly 'ASKED' me for proof!? [/QUOTE]
I would lol ask you lol for proof lol but I have a feeling lol it'd be a waste lol of my time lol. I trust my own research and jeroen.
LOL!!![/QUOTE]
That is great! Go on trusting your research and Mr. Geerts. That is all it is anyways, research, isn't it? Good day Sirs.[/QUOTE]
Tata!
Anyway; back on topic.
The thesis, before Sire Crez took us somewhere else by starting about the time of the actual writing of the song, was that it is pretty unlikely that Freddie ever sang Driven by You and that Ford owns the title...
The latter being stated clearly by Brian on his website last week.
Any more opinions?
(If anyone is still daring enough to present his opinion, that is...)
The thesis, before Sire Crez took us somewhere else by starting about the time of the actual writing of the song, was that it is pretty unlikely that Freddie ever sang Driven by You and that Ford owns the title...
The latter being stated clearly by Brian on his website last week.
Any more opinions?
(If anyone is still daring enough to present his opinion, that is...)
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]jeroen wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
Any more opinions?
(If anyone is still daring enough to present his opinion, that is...)
[/QUOTE]
I think the video for Driven By You is daggy.
Any more opinions?
(If anyone is still daring enough to present his opinion, that is...)
[/QUOTE]
I think the video for Driven By You is daggy.