[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Micrówave wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME]By handing a POW (Saddam Hussein) [/QUOTE]
Dude, get your facts straight. Saddam was no POW.
We had Hitler surrounded and he shot himself. Was he a POW too?[/QUOTE]
Saddam had been arrested by US forces. That makes him a POW. Hitler wasn't arrested. So he wasn't a POW. It's not my problem if you don't know what a word means, find a fucking dictionary.[/QUOTE]
As far as I'm concerned POWs actually go into the battlefields to fight wars.
Saddam Hussein was nothing but another pussy just like Bush. Neither one is capable of actually putting their lives on the line to fight the wars they start.
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Apparently TQ thinks he was a war hero.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Micrówave wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Apparently TQ thinks he was a war hero.
[/QUOTE]
I don't think POW and War Hero are synonymous, at all. You're not really given the hero treatment if you're a prisoner, are you? (Unless a successful novel/movie is made about you).
[/QUOTE]
I don't think POW and War Hero are synonymous, at all. You're not really given the hero treatment if you're a prisoner, are you? (Unless a successful novel/movie is made about you).
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Micrówave wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Apparently TQ thinks he was a war hero.
[/QUOTE]
That just proves what your thinking is worth: squat.
I hate Saddam, I hate Bush just as much, and I hate injustice even more, which is what Saddam got. Even the most injust person should get justice. It's a RIGHT.
[/QUOTE]
That just proves what your thinking is worth: squat.
I hate Saddam, I hate Bush just as much, and I hate injustice even more, which is what Saddam got. Even the most injust person should get justice. It's a RIGHT.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Micrówave wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Apparently TQ thinks he was a war hero.
[/QUOTE]
That just proves what your thinking is worth: squat.
I hate Saddam, I hate Bush just as much, and I hate injustice even more, which is what Saddam got. Even the most injust person should get justice. It's a RIGHT.[/QUOTE]
How can you hate someone just as much as you hate a tyrannt? Talk about being ignorant.
[/QUOTE]
That just proves what your thinking is worth: squat.
I hate Saddam, I hate Bush just as much, and I hate injustice even more, which is what Saddam got. Even the most injust person should get justice. It's a RIGHT.[/QUOTE]
How can you hate someone just as much as you hate a tyrannt? Talk about being ignorant.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=black>Khashoggi<h6>St. Hyper wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Micrówave wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Apparently TQ thinks he was a war hero.
[/QUOTE]
That just proves what your thinking is worth: squat.
I hate Saddam, I hate Bush just as much, and I hate injustice even more, which is what Saddam got. Even the most injust person should get justice. It's a RIGHT.[/QUOTE]
How can you hate someone just as much as you hate a tyrannt? Talk about being ignorant.[/QUOTE]
Both of them are tyrants. Where have you been? Time's most recent poll has shown that Saddam and Bin Laden are even less impopular than Bush in the US! A tiny minority still agrees with his policy. Still, he keeps going. Is that democracy, then?
[/QUOTE]
That just proves what your thinking is worth: squat.
I hate Saddam, I hate Bush just as much, and I hate injustice even more, which is what Saddam got. Even the most injust person should get justice. It's a RIGHT.[/QUOTE]
How can you hate someone just as much as you hate a tyrannt? Talk about being ignorant.[/QUOTE]
Both of them are tyrants. Where have you been? Time's most recent poll has shown that Saddam and Bin Laden are even less impopular than Bush in the US! A tiny minority still agrees with his policy. Still, he keeps going. Is that democracy, then?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Micrówave wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Apparently TQ thinks he was a war hero.
[/QUOTE]
That just proves what your thinking is worth: squat.
I hate Saddam, I hate Bush just as much, and I hate injustice even more, which is what Saddam got. Even the most injust person should get justice. It's a RIGHT.[/QUOTE]
No it's not a RIGHT, unless you live in a country where you have that RIGHT. Iraqis didn't. Did the millions of people killed by Saddam have any RIGHTS not to die, you dimtwit?
[/QUOTE]
That just proves what your thinking is worth: squat.
I hate Saddam, I hate Bush just as much, and I hate injustice even more, which is what Saddam got. Even the most injust person should get justice. It's a RIGHT.[/QUOTE]
No it's not a RIGHT, unless you live in a country where you have that RIGHT. Iraqis didn't. Did the millions of people killed by Saddam have any RIGHTS not to die, you dimtwit?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Micrówave wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Micrówave wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Apparently TQ thinks he was a war hero.
[/QUOTE]
That just proves what your thinking is worth: squat.
I hate Saddam, I hate Bush just as much, and I hate injustice even more, which is what Saddam got. Even the most injust person should get justice. It's a RIGHT.[/QUOTE]
No it's not a RIGHT, unless you live in a country where you have that RIGHT. Iraqis didn't. Did the millions of people killed by Saddam have any RIGHTS not to die, you dimtwit?
[/QUOTE]
They had those rights, shit-for-brains, and Saddam violated them. For that, he needed to be brought to justice, not murdered by your nazi regime and its army of would-be dictators.
[/QUOTE]
That just proves what your thinking is worth: squat.
I hate Saddam, I hate Bush just as much, and I hate injustice even more, which is what Saddam got. Even the most injust person should get justice. It's a RIGHT.[/QUOTE]
No it's not a RIGHT, unless you live in a country where you have that RIGHT. Iraqis didn't. Did the millions of people killed by Saddam have any RIGHTS not to die, you dimtwit?
[/QUOTE]
They had those rights, shit-for-brains, and Saddam violated them. For that, he needed to be brought to justice, not murdered by your nazi regime and its army of would-be dictators.
First, main and the most important sign of democracy is the honest and free law-court... Not freedom of speech, freedom of assemblies, free trade etc. IMHO.
TQ, it is you that has poo-poo for brains. I just like antagonizing you and letting yourself sound like an idiot. It was an Iraqi court that tried him, not the Colorado State District Attorney. No US officials were present at his execution. Whom are you calling nazis?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Micrówave wrote: [/QUOTENAME]TQ, it is you that has poo-poo for brains. I just like antagonizing you and letting yourself sound like an idiot. It was an Iraqi court that tried him, not the Colorado State District Attorney. No US officials were present at his execution. Whom are you calling nazis?[/QUOTE]
Your government who handed him over, and thus murdered him.
Your government who handed him over, and thus murdered him.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Micrówave wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Micrówave wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Apparently TQ thinks he was a war hero.
[/QUOTE]
That just proves what your thinking is worth: squat.
I hate Saddam, I hate Bush just as much, and I hate injustice even more, which is what Saddam got. Even the most injust person should get justice. It's a RIGHT.[/QUOTE]
No it's not a RIGHT, unless you live in a country where you have that RIGHT. Iraqis didn't. Did the millions of people killed by Saddam have any RIGHTS not to die, you dimtwit?
[/QUOTE]
Yours is the dopey stance I'm afraid. However histrionic your sparring partner seems at the moment, there's still a point.
I would inquire - exactly at what stage does a violation of a human's rights become 'okay'? It was *definitely* not okay (I think) when Saddam gassed all those Kurds, right? I *definitely* do not think it was okay for those US soldiers to get burned and strung up (and then videotaped).
But how is it right for us to throw around bullshit terms like 'collateral damage', hmm? Is that our right? Are we not violating peoples human right to *not get the shit bombed out of them*?
Tell me how blowing up civilians (on EITHER SIDE) ever achieved anything? It did sweet fuck all in Iraq - the U.S. only caught Saddam because they got very lucky.
I appeal to any sense of humanity you might have, when I ask - when, in your point of view, does it become okay to disregard human rights? Where is this line drawn? Why is it okay for us to do it?
Had Saddam been rightfully dealt with, the end result would likely have been the same.... Hussein dancing at the end of a rope. It would've hurt no one to have done this lawfully and without humiliation or violation of anyones rights. Instead, we had a sham trial, frankly *primitive* people dancing around in a torture chamber and mobile phone cameras where there should not have been.
I guess the thing I have the hardest time understanding is that we're 'punishing' people by hanging them. Is Saddam suffering right now? Hell no! He's dead, and in case you're a micro-cephalic (or under the age of 10), there's no Hell that he's roasting in. We've let him off, when he could be languishing in a tiny prison listening to shitty songs by My Chemical Romance, played in a loop.
[/QUOTE]
That just proves what your thinking is worth: squat.
I hate Saddam, I hate Bush just as much, and I hate injustice even more, which is what Saddam got. Even the most injust person should get justice. It's a RIGHT.[/QUOTE]
No it's not a RIGHT, unless you live in a country where you have that RIGHT. Iraqis didn't. Did the millions of people killed by Saddam have any RIGHTS not to die, you dimtwit?
[/QUOTE]
Yours is the dopey stance I'm afraid. However histrionic your sparring partner seems at the moment, there's still a point.
I would inquire - exactly at what stage does a violation of a human's rights become 'okay'? It was *definitely* not okay (I think) when Saddam gassed all those Kurds, right? I *definitely* do not think it was okay for those US soldiers to get burned and strung up (and then videotaped).
But how is it right for us to throw around bullshit terms like 'collateral damage', hmm? Is that our right? Are we not violating peoples human right to *not get the shit bombed out of them*?
Tell me how blowing up civilians (on EITHER SIDE) ever achieved anything? It did sweet fuck all in Iraq - the U.S. only caught Saddam because they got very lucky.
I appeal to any sense of humanity you might have, when I ask - when, in your point of view, does it become okay to disregard human rights? Where is this line drawn? Why is it okay for us to do it?
Had Saddam been rightfully dealt with, the end result would likely have been the same.... Hussein dancing at the end of a rope. It would've hurt no one to have done this lawfully and without humiliation or violation of anyones rights. Instead, we had a sham trial, frankly *primitive* people dancing around in a torture chamber and mobile phone cameras where there should not have been.
I guess the thing I have the hardest time understanding is that we're 'punishing' people by hanging them. Is Saddam suffering right now? Hell no! He's dead, and in case you're a micro-cephalic (or under the age of 10), there's no Hell that he's roasting in. We've let him off, when he could be languishing in a tiny prison listening to shitty songs by My Chemical Romance, played in a loop.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Micrówave wrote: [/QUOTENAME]TQ, it is you that has poo-poo for brains. I just like antagonizing you and letting yourself sound like an idiot. It was an Iraqi court that tried him, not the Colorado State District Attorney. No US officials were present at his execution. Whom are you calling nazis?[/QUOTE]
Your government who handed him over, and thus murdered him.[/QUOTE]
What in the hell are you smoking?
Your government who handed him over, and thus murdered him.[/QUOTE]
What in the hell are you smoking?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Micrówave wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Micrówave wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Apparently TQ thinks he was a war hero.
[/QUOTE]
That just proves what your thinking is worth: squat.
I hate Saddam, I hate Bush just as much, and I hate injustice even more, which is what Saddam got. Even the most injust person should get justice. It's a RIGHT.[/QUOTE]
No it's not a RIGHT, unless you live in a country where you have that RIGHT. Iraqis didn't. Did the millions of people killed by Saddam have any RIGHTS not to die, you dimtwit?
[/QUOTE]
They had those rights, shit-for-brains, and Saddam violated them. For that, he needed to be brought to justice, not murdered by your nazi regime and its army of would-be dictators.[/QUOTE]
Go read a history book dumb ass, the United States of America is NOT a nazi regime and certainly does not have an army of would-be dictators.
[/QUOTE]
That just proves what your thinking is worth: squat.
I hate Saddam, I hate Bush just as much, and I hate injustice even more, which is what Saddam got. Even the most injust person should get justice. It's a RIGHT.[/QUOTE]
No it's not a RIGHT, unless you live in a country where you have that RIGHT. Iraqis didn't. Did the millions of people killed by Saddam have any RIGHTS not to die, you dimtwit?
[/QUOTE]
They had those rights, shit-for-brains, and Saddam violated them. For that, he needed to be brought to justice, not murdered by your nazi regime and its army of would-be dictators.[/QUOTE]
Go read a history book dumb ass, the United States of America is NOT a nazi regime and certainly does not have an army of would-be dictators.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=black>Khashoggi<h6>St. Hyper wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Micrówave wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Apparently TQ thinks he was a war hero.
[/QUOTE]
That just proves what your thinking is worth: squat.
I hate Saddam, I hate Bush just as much, and I hate injustice even more, which is what Saddam got. Even the most injust person should get justice. It's a RIGHT.[/QUOTE]
How can you hate someone just as much as you hate a tyrannt? Talk about being ignorant.[/QUOTE]
Both of them are tyrants. Where have you been? Time's most recent poll has shown that Saddam and Bin Laden are even less impopular than Bush in the US! A tiny minority still agrees with his policy. Still, he keeps going. Is that democracy, then?[/QUOTE]
George W. Bush is not a tyrant...if he were a tyrant, he'd be murdering his own people for his own entertainment or planning some world invasion. A tiny minority still agrees with his policy? Well, how do you explain all the republicans in America? That is certainly NOT a small minority! I don't give a damn what a shitty magazine says...since when does anybody believe what they read in a magazine? State your own opinions...not what you read in a magazine.
[/QUOTE]
That just proves what your thinking is worth: squat.
I hate Saddam, I hate Bush just as much, and I hate injustice even more, which is what Saddam got. Even the most injust person should get justice. It's a RIGHT.[/QUOTE]
How can you hate someone just as much as you hate a tyrannt? Talk about being ignorant.[/QUOTE]
Both of them are tyrants. Where have you been? Time's most recent poll has shown that Saddam and Bin Laden are even less impopular than Bush in the US! A tiny minority still agrees with his policy. Still, he keeps going. Is that democracy, then?[/QUOTE]
George W. Bush is not a tyrant...if he were a tyrant, he'd be murdering his own people for his own entertainment or planning some world invasion. A tiny minority still agrees with his policy? Well, how do you explain all the republicans in America? That is certainly NOT a small minority! I don't give a damn what a shitty magazine says...since when does anybody believe what they read in a magazine? State your own opinions...not what you read in a magazine.