[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color=gold>SMI<font color=1>TTY wrote: [/QUOTENAME]TQ, you're a nutjob. That's all I wish to say.[/QUOTE]
Good for you. Feeling better now?
Thread
Posts in chronological order
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color=gold>SMI<font color=1>TTY wrote: [/QUOTENAME]TQ, you're a nutjob. That's all I wish to say.[/QUOTE]
Good for you. Feeling better now?[/QUOTE]
Yes, thank you. And you?
Good for you. Feeling better now?[/QUOTE]
Yes, thank you. And you?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color=gold>SMI<font color=1>TTY wrote: [/QUOTENAME]TQ, you're a nutjob. That's all I wish to say.[/QUOTE]
I'll second that...
I'll second that...
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color=gold>SMI<font color=1>TTY wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color=gold>SMI<font color=1>TTY wrote: [/QUOTENAME]TQ, you're a nutjob. That's all I wish to say.[/QUOTE]
Good for you. Feeling better now?[/QUOTE]
Yes, thank you. And you?[/QUOTE]
I do not need a forum to feel anything about myself. That's what my personality and life are for.
Good for you. Feeling better now?[/QUOTE]
Yes, thank you. And you?[/QUOTE]
I do not need a forum to feel anything about myself. That's what my personality and life are for.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME]By handing a POW (Saddam Hussein) over to a nation where he was to be executed, the US has violated the 3rd Geneva Convention.
For this there is no excuse. President George W. Bush and the supreme commander of US Armed Forces in Iraq are now both officially war criminals.
Anyone now defending Bush' practices is no better than a holocaust-denier.[/QUOTE]
For Christ's sake, the people of his own country put him on trial and it was "their" decision to hang Saddam Hussein. And by the way, Saddam Hussein is a "war criminal." He deserved what he got. He was a tyrant; nothing more, nothing less. Now the question is: Are you a supporter of Saddam Hussein? Because if you are, you're no better than a member of the KKK or a nazi for that matter.
For this there is no excuse. President George W. Bush and the supreme commander of US Armed Forces in Iraq are now both officially war criminals.
Anyone now defending Bush' practices is no better than a holocaust-denier.[/QUOTE]
For Christ's sake, the people of his own country put him on trial and it was "their" decision to hang Saddam Hussein. And by the way, Saddam Hussein is a "war criminal." He deserved what he got. He was a tyrant; nothing more, nothing less. Now the question is: Are you a supporter of Saddam Hussein? Because if you are, you're no better than a member of the KKK or a nazi for that matter.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=#DC143C>Saint Hyperness wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME]By handing a POW (Saddam Hussein) over to a nation where he was to be executed, the US has violated the 3rd Geneva Convention.
For this there is no excuse. President George W. Bush and the supreme commander of US Armed Forces in Iraq are now both officially war criminals.
Anyone now defending Bush' practices is no better than a holocaust-denier.[/QUOTE]
For Christ's sake, the people of his own country put him on trial and it was "their" decision to hang Saddam Hussein. And by the way, Saddam Hussein is a "war criminal." He deserved what he got. He was a tyrant; nothing more, nothing less. Now the question is: Are you a supporter of Saddam Hussein? Because if you are, you're no better than a member of the KKK or a nazi for that matter.[/QUOTE]
My my. You are extremely dumb, aren't you?
1) The trial was set up, conducted and rigged by political dissidents who opposed Saddam. They were and are as criminal as he is.
2) The death penalty is internationally condemned by all civilized countries (naturally, the US has it, therefore)
3) The US extradited Saddam to a country where he was sentenced to death. Saddam was a POW. Extraditing a POW to a country where he is sentenced to death is A WAR CRIME. Do you grasp that?
4) I'm a Trotskyist. Do you honestly think I would support Saddam? You have a serious problem in making the distinction between opposing two evils and rejecting one in favour of the other. In case you are too daft to even read right, I am the former category.
Why do I even waste my time on people this ignorant?
For this there is no excuse. President George W. Bush and the supreme commander of US Armed Forces in Iraq are now both officially war criminals.
Anyone now defending Bush' practices is no better than a holocaust-denier.[/QUOTE]
For Christ's sake, the people of his own country put him on trial and it was "their" decision to hang Saddam Hussein. And by the way, Saddam Hussein is a "war criminal." He deserved what he got. He was a tyrant; nothing more, nothing less. Now the question is: Are you a supporter of Saddam Hussein? Because if you are, you're no better than a member of the KKK or a nazi for that matter.[/QUOTE]
My my. You are extremely dumb, aren't you?
1) The trial was set up, conducted and rigged by political dissidents who opposed Saddam. They were and are as criminal as he is.
2) The death penalty is internationally condemned by all civilized countries (naturally, the US has it, therefore)
3) The US extradited Saddam to a country where he was sentenced to death. Saddam was a POW. Extraditing a POW to a country where he is sentenced to death is A WAR CRIME. Do you grasp that?
4) I'm a Trotskyist. Do you honestly think I would support Saddam? You have a serious problem in making the distinction between opposing two evils and rejecting one in favour of the other. In case you are too daft to even read right, I am the former category.
Why do I even waste my time on people this ignorant?
I said it once, and I'll say it again. Saddam DESERVED what he got. It is only right that the people of Iraq put him on trial, after all, they were the people who had to live with his tyranny. Bush isn't responsible for what happened to Hussein, it was the Iraqi's decision. Not America's. Get it straight. George W. Bush is not an evil man. You're the ignorant one.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color=666600>Music Man wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color=666600>Music Man wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
You misunderstand something (hey, it's something new this time!) here. It is not a case of repetition, it's a case action->reaction. In the case of certain actions, reactions roughly follow a similar pattern. However, as circumstances and the 'human factor' are never identical, there is no such thing as a mathematical repetition, nor anything close enough to be branded as such. History never repeats itself, people just act like people.[/QUOTE]
I'm not sure if you were correcting me, adding to what I said, or replying directly to CMU...but just so we're on the same page: you did pretty much elaborate on what I said, and our two posts were parallel and said the same thing, yes?[/QUOTE]
I agreed with your content, not with your phrasing. The way you put it, you implied mathematical repetition, not sequential similarity. So yes, I was criticizing YOU. Not for your ideas (that's why it was a new criticism), but for incorrect language.[/QUOTE]
Ah, I apologize for being unclear. What I meant was basically what you said...that history cannot literally be repeated due to inherent circumstantial differences and such. Rather, that human nature remains consistent.[/QUOTE]
Um guys? I believe that all three of us are on the same page here, and are arguing the same point. Why bother with semantics? All three of us know that the other two mean the same thing.
:-) Relax and Happy New Year to you both!
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
You misunderstand something (hey, it's something new this time!) here. It is not a case of repetition, it's a case action->reaction. In the case of certain actions, reactions roughly follow a similar pattern. However, as circumstances and the 'human factor' are never identical, there is no such thing as a mathematical repetition, nor anything close enough to be branded as such. History never repeats itself, people just act like people.[/QUOTE]
I'm not sure if you were correcting me, adding to what I said, or replying directly to CMU...but just so we're on the same page: you did pretty much elaborate on what I said, and our two posts were parallel and said the same thing, yes?[/QUOTE]
I agreed with your content, not with your phrasing. The way you put it, you implied mathematical repetition, not sequential similarity. So yes, I was criticizing YOU. Not for your ideas (that's why it was a new criticism), but for incorrect language.[/QUOTE]
Ah, I apologize for being unclear. What I meant was basically what you said...that history cannot literally be repeated due to inherent circumstantial differences and such. Rather, that human nature remains consistent.[/QUOTE]
Um guys? I believe that all three of us are on the same page here, and are arguing the same point. Why bother with semantics? All three of us know that the other two mean the same thing.
:-) Relax and Happy New Year to you both!
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color=gold>SMI<font color=1>TTY wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color=gold>SMI<font color=1>TTY wrote: [/QUOTENAME]TQ, you're a nutjob. That's all I wish to say.[/QUOTE]
Good for you. Feeling better now?[/QUOTE]
Yes, thank you. And you?[/QUOTE]
I do not need a forum to feel anything about myself. That's what my personality and life are for.[/QUOTE]
I find that very hard to believe.
Good for you. Feeling better now?[/QUOTE]
Yes, thank you. And you?[/QUOTE]
I do not need a forum to feel anything about myself. That's what my personality and life are for.[/QUOTE]
I find that very hard to believe.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=#DC143C>Saint Hyperness wrote: [/QUOTENAME] George W. Bush is not an evil man. You're the ignorant one.[/QUOTE]
He's not evil, he's just fuckin' stupid. Everybody knows by now that Bush's strings are constantly being pulled by Rove and Cheney.
He's not evil, he's just fuckin' stupid. Everybody knows by now that Bush's strings are constantly being pulled by Rove and Cheney.
His hanging video is pretty fucked up. I don't think I want to see another hanging ever again...
Having said that, at least it was quick!
Having said that, at least it was quick!
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Mr.Jingles wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=#DC143C>Saint Hyperness wrote: [/QUOTENAME] George W. Bush is not an evil man. You're the ignorant one.[/QUOTE]
He's not evil, he's just fuckin' stupid.[/QUOTE]
Aye.
He's not evil, he's just fuckin' stupid.[/QUOTE]
Aye.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Penetration_Guru wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Haystacks Calhounski wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Penetration_Guru wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Haystacks Calhounski wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.
Extremists are bad. On all sides. Including you.
[/QUOTE]
I agree that extremists are bad, but how is he one for pointing out a technical accuracy?[/QUOTE]
Do you not pay attention to what he writes? I say something to disagree with his ultra left rants, and I am branded a fascist.
If that is not extreme, I don't know what is.[/QUOTE]
Yes I can read thanks. You usually can too, but have not noticed that you yourself were not branded a fascist, the regime in which you live is. And the US' ultra right wing (there, I said it) control of the media COULD be said to border on the fascistic.[/QUOTE]
Go back and read again, first page, about 16 posts in....
Extremists are bad. On all sides. Including you.
[/QUOTE]
I agree that extremists are bad, but how is he one for pointing out a technical accuracy?[/QUOTE]
Do you not pay attention to what he writes? I say something to disagree with his ultra left rants, and I am branded a fascist.
If that is not extreme, I don't know what is.[/QUOTE]
Yes I can read thanks. You usually can too, but have not noticed that you yourself were not branded a fascist, the regime in which you live is. And the US' ultra right wing (there, I said it) control of the media COULD be said to border on the fascistic.[/QUOTE]
Go back and read again, first page, about 16 posts in....
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME]By handing a POW (Saddam Hussein) [/QUOTE]
Dude, get your facts straight. Saddam was no POW.
We had Hitler surrounded and he shot himself. Was he a POW too?
Dude, get your facts straight. Saddam was no POW.
We had Hitler surrounded and he shot himself. Was he a POW too?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Micrówave wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME]By handing a POW (Saddam Hussein) [/QUOTE]
Dude, get your facts straight. Saddam was no POW.
We had Hitler surrounded and he shot himself. Was he a POW too?[/QUOTE]
Saddam had been arrested by US forces. That makes him a POW. Hitler wasn't arrested. So he wasn't a POW. It's not my problem if you don't know what a word means, find a fucking dictionary.
Dude, get your facts straight. Saddam was no POW.
We had Hitler surrounded and he shot himself. Was he a POW too?[/QUOTE]
Saddam had been arrested by US forces. That makes him a POW. Hitler wasn't arrested. So he wasn't a POW. It's not my problem if you don't know what a word means, find a fucking dictionary.