thanks for replying people, he is a get though, i cant stand horrible ignorant people like that, he can sit there and smirk all he wants about the attention thing, this is prob all the attention he gets in life ever. Everyone else on here seems nice and normal just one or two have to spoil it. and for his reading i am not a leech just a busy hard working person who doesnt take things too seriously.
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Whoooooooops.
Topic starter is a very sad, whiny person indeed. If you can't take it, toss off from the forum.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
If you can't take it, toss off from the forum. [/QUOTE]
Or just ignore it and enjoy the rest this forum has to offer.
If you can't take it, toss off from the forum. [/QUOTE]
Or just ignore it and enjoy the rest this forum has to offer.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]magicalfreddiemercury wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
If you can't take it, toss off from the forum. [/QUOTE]
Or just ignore it and enjoy the rest this forum has to offer.
[/QUOTE]
I enjoy telling people what they need to hear. My previous post here was just that.
If you can't take it, toss off from the forum. [/QUOTE]
Or just ignore it and enjoy the rest this forum has to offer.
[/QUOTE]
I enjoy telling people what they need to hear. My previous post here was just that.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]magicalfreddiemercury wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
If you can't take it, toss off from the forum. [/QUOTE]
Or just ignore it and enjoy the rest this forum has to offer.
[/QUOTE]
I enjoy telling people what they need to hear. My previous post here was just that. [/QUOTE]
I wonder if you don't enjoy it too much... though whatever the case, I simply thought I'd add my opinion to the pile, and my previous post here was just that.
If you can't take it, toss off from the forum. [/QUOTE]
Or just ignore it and enjoy the rest this forum has to offer.
[/QUOTE]
I enjoy telling people what they need to hear. My previous post here was just that. [/QUOTE]
I wonder if you don't enjoy it too much... though whatever the case, I simply thought I'd add my opinion to the pile, and my previous post here was just that.
thanks i will ignore him.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]magicalfreddiemercury wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]magicalfreddiemercury wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
If you can't take it, toss off from the forum. [/QUOTE]
Or just ignore it and enjoy the rest this forum has to offer.
[/QUOTE]
I enjoy telling people what they need to hear. My previous post here was just that. [/QUOTE]
I wonder if you don't enjoy it too much... though whatever the case, I simply thought I'd add my opinion to the pile, and my previous post here was just that.
[/QUOTE]
I agree. I fail to understand why people "need" to be told that they deserve death, which is usually where your comments end up.
If you can't take it, toss off from the forum. [/QUOTE]
Or just ignore it and enjoy the rest this forum has to offer.
[/QUOTE]
I enjoy telling people what they need to hear. My previous post here was just that. [/QUOTE]
I wonder if you don't enjoy it too much... though whatever the case, I simply thought I'd add my opinion to the pile, and my previous post here was just that.
[/QUOTE]
I agree. I fail to understand why people "need" to be told that they deserve death, which is usually where your comments end up.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Zeni wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]magicalfreddiemercury wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]magicalfreddiemercury wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
If you can't take it, toss off from the forum. [/QUOTE]
Or just ignore it and enjoy the rest this forum has to offer.
[/QUOTE]
I enjoy telling people what they need to hear. My previous post here was just that. [/QUOTE]
I wonder if you don't enjoy it too much... though whatever the case, I simply thought I'd add my opinion to the pile, and my previous post here was just that.
[/QUOTE]
I agree. I fail to understand why people "need" to be told that they deserve death, which is usually where your comments end up. [/QUOTE]
If you can't read, sure. I'd have thought better of you. Sadly, I was wrong. Oh well, can't win 'em all.
If you can't take it, toss off from the forum. [/QUOTE]
Or just ignore it and enjoy the rest this forum has to offer.
[/QUOTE]
I enjoy telling people what they need to hear. My previous post here was just that. [/QUOTE]
I wonder if you don't enjoy it too much... though whatever the case, I simply thought I'd add my opinion to the pile, and my previous post here was just that.
[/QUOTE]
I agree. I fail to understand why people "need" to be told that they deserve death, which is usually where your comments end up. [/QUOTE]
If you can't read, sure. I'd have thought better of you. Sadly, I was wrong. Oh well, can't win 'em all.
You make no sense, Caspar. But, by all means, please try to isult me some more. Seems that's all you are capable of these days.
Life was so much nicer around QZ when you were too busy in school and before you went on winter break and felt that people "needed" to be told what you think of them. Oh well, can't win them all.
By the way, still waiting for your explanation of the "unconstitutionality" of the death penalty. Or would you just prefer to admit you were wrong now and save us all the trouble. It's ok, I'll forgive you.
Life was so much nicer around QZ when you were too busy in school and before you went on winter break and felt that people "needed" to be told what you think of them. Oh well, can't win them all.
By the way, still waiting for your explanation of the "unconstitutionality" of the death penalty. Or would you just prefer to admit you were wrong now and save us all the trouble. It's ok, I'll forgive you.
What about Amendment VIII? Prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment.
A moratorium was instituted in '76 because of this, New York has abolished the death penalty because it was ruled unconstitutional on this count (2004), same for Kansas and California. They do not rule something as 'unconstitutional' for nothing, you know.
A moratorium was instituted in '76 because of this, New York has abolished the death penalty because it was ruled unconstitutional on this count (2004), same for Kansas and California. They do not rule something as 'unconstitutional' for nothing, you know.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Matty And Linda wrote: [/QUOTENAME]thanks for replying people, he is a get though, i cant stand horrible ignorant people like that, he can sit there and smirk all he wants about the attention thing, this is prob all the attention he gets in life ever. Everyone else on here seems nice and normal just one or two have to spoil it. and for his reading i am not a leech just a busy hard working person who doesnt take things too seriously. [/QUOTE]
And we should just GUESS who this is all about?
And we should just GUESS who this is all about?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME]What about Amendment VIII? Prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment.
A moratorium was instituted in '76 because of this, New York has abolished the death penalty because it was ruled unconstitutional on this count (2004), same for Kansas and California. They do not rule something as 'unconstitutional' for nothing, you know.[/QUOTE]
I wish I was as smart as you. You know everything.
A moratorium was instituted in '76 because of this, New York has abolished the death penalty because it was ruled unconstitutional on this count (2004), same for Kansas and California. They do not rule something as 'unconstitutional' for nothing, you know.[/QUOTE]
I wish I was as smart as you. You know everything.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]PieterMC wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME]What about Amendment VIII? Prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment.
A moratorium was instituted in '76 because of this, New York has abolished the death penalty because it was ruled unconstitutional on this count (2004), same for Kansas and California. They do not rule something as 'unconstitutional' for nothing, you know.[/QUOTE]
I wish I was as smart as you. You know everything.[/QUOTE]
Me too!!!!!!! :-P
A moratorium was instituted in '76 because of this, New York has abolished the death penalty because it was ruled unconstitutional on this count (2004), same for Kansas and California. They do not rule something as 'unconstitutional' for nothing, you know.[/QUOTE]
I wish I was as smart as you. You know everything.[/QUOTE]
Me too!!!!!!! :-P
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME]What about Amendment VIII? Prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment.
A moratorium was instituted in '76 because of this, New York has abolished the death penalty because it was ruled unconstitutional on this count (2004), same for Kansas and California. They do not rule something as 'unconstitutional' for nothing, you know.[/QUOTE]
A - That's not what you said the first time. You said "Your constitution guarantees the "Right To Life", as it was expressed in the Declaration Of Independence already, and so violates her own laws by executing people" - that is blatantly wrong. Now you've changed your argument.
B - Amendment V clearly states that no person shall "be deprived of life...without due process of law," which would then allow for the death penalty.
C - While a moratorium on the death penalty did occur, it has since be reinstated by the Supreme Court. The Court can and does change its opinion from time to time.
Also, Kansas, California, and New York all allow the death penalty, so I'm not sure where you heard they did not. A state might rule it "unconstitutional," but that means it goes against their own state constitution and not the federal constitution, which is what your argument is based on.
Better luck next time, Caspar.
A moratorium was instituted in '76 because of this, New York has abolished the death penalty because it was ruled unconstitutional on this count (2004), same for Kansas and California. They do not rule something as 'unconstitutional' for nothing, you know.[/QUOTE]
A - That's not what you said the first time. You said "Your constitution guarantees the "Right To Life", as it was expressed in the Declaration Of Independence already, and so violates her own laws by executing people" - that is blatantly wrong. Now you've changed your argument.
B - Amendment V clearly states that no person shall "be deprived of life...without due process of law," which would then allow for the death penalty.
C - While a moratorium on the death penalty did occur, it has since be reinstated by the Supreme Court. The Court can and does change its opinion from time to time.
Also, Kansas, California, and New York all allow the death penalty, so I'm not sure where you heard they did not. A state might rule it "unconstitutional," but that means it goes against their own state constitution and not the federal constitution, which is what your argument is based on.
Better luck next time, Caspar.