[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Bri-Anns Permed Poodle wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Paul Rodgers has always been a nobody compared to our Freddie.[/QUOTE]
Is this even worth arguing about anymore?
Thread
Posts in chronological order
I usually like dogs, but I start to hate poodles :-)
>> Leave the name Queen alone
Why ? Is it a registered trademark of yours or something similar ?
>>Paul Rodgers has always been a nobody compared to our Freddie.
If you mean this seriously, you are either an idiot or you know nothing about rock music.
>>You lot make me sick
That's what I wanted to tell you.
>>No respect for the dead.
What do you mean with THAT crap ? Did we piss on somebody's grave or did we do some satanistic ritual ?
In your "logic" the best way how to show respect for the dead is to show no respect to his followers. Weird logic.
>> Freddie Haters!!!
Who told you we have something against Freddie ?
Or are you so stupid that you don't understand that liking QPR doesn't mean disliking Queen ? Or said differently : if I like apples, that means that I hate oranges ?
>> Leave the name Queen alone
Why ? Is it a registered trademark of yours or something similar ?
>>Paul Rodgers has always been a nobody compared to our Freddie.
If you mean this seriously, you are either an idiot or you know nothing about rock music.
>>You lot make me sick
That's what I wanted to tell you.
>>No respect for the dead.
What do you mean with THAT crap ? Did we piss on somebody's grave or did we do some satanistic ritual ?
In your "logic" the best way how to show respect for the dead is to show no respect to his followers. Weird logic.
>> Freddie Haters!!!
Who told you we have something against Freddie ?
Or are you so stupid that you don't understand that liking QPR doesn't mean disliking Queen ? Or said differently : if I like apples, that means that I hate oranges ?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]pittrek wrote: [/QUOTENAME]if I like apples, that means that I hate oranges ?[/QUOTE]
Wait a minute... you mean... I'm allowed to like both?
Wait a minute... you mean... I'm allowed to like both?
i think they should chang there name becaus queen paule rogers thing is to long and has no ring to it they could at least shorten it to QPR
even though thats a team in the english premier league
even though thats a team in the english premier league
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]pittrek wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Neologix : take a photo of your beloved Freddie and go fuck yourself, dirty asshole. [/QUOTE]
fuck you, dont talk bad about freddie you piece of shit! you are his urine!
I also disagree with them wanting to continue with the name Queen and they WILL fail, just wait and see. Alot of Queen fans wont buy this album.
If they want to play music do it with another name because you arent fooling the real queen fans.
have some respect for freddie, john and your legacy and leave it at that, all you are doing now is ruining it.
fuck you, dont talk bad about freddie you piece of shit! you are his urine!
I also disagree with them wanting to continue with the name Queen and they WILL fail, just wait and see. Alot of Queen fans wont buy this album.
If they want to play music do it with another name because you arent fooling the real queen fans.
have some respect for freddie, john and your legacy and leave it at that, all you are doing now is ruining it.
OMG Arent we all a whole bunch of Treasure Moments on this thread.
Brian and Roger could call themselves what they want.They are not under any obligations.They got John's blessing as i'm sure they probably would have got Freddie's.They've got the best damn Rock singer in the planet in Paul Rodgers
Paul will never replace Freddie.But then i dont want him to.I want Paul to be Paul.
I'm already looking forward to the tour because i will be going to see three absolutely fabulously talented musicians playing together as a band
Brian and Roger could call themselves what they want.They are not under any obligations.They got John's blessing as i'm sure they probably would have got Freddie's.They've got the best damn Rock singer in the planet in Paul Rodgers
Paul will never replace Freddie.But then i dont want him to.I want Paul to be Paul.
I'm already looking forward to the tour because i will be going to see three absolutely fabulously talented musicians playing together as a band
Hey Neowhatever...
The band is mine now. We're calling it Q+PR. Deal with it.
Keep it up, and the new album will be called Paul Rodgers + Queen.
While you're probably busy watching The Matrix again, maybe you can put in Return Of The Champions for about 15 minutes. I think my performance will pretty much blow your pants off, if they aren't already from watching The Matrix.
Now, piss off. I've got to re-write a couple of these Roger tracks so they make sense.
Thanks for visiting my website.
The band is mine now. We're calling it Q+PR. Deal with it.
Keep it up, and the new album will be called Paul Rodgers + Queen.
While you're probably busy watching The Matrix again, maybe you can put in Return Of The Champions for about 15 minutes. I think my performance will pretty much blow your pants off, if they aren't already from watching The Matrix.
Now, piss off. I've got to re-write a couple of these Roger tracks so they make sense.
Thanks for visiting my website.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME] Paul Rodgers wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Hey Neowhatever...
The band is mine now. We're calling it Q+PR. Deal with it.
Keep it up, and the new album will be called Paul Rodgers + Queen.
While you're probably busy watching The Matrix again, maybe you can put in Return Of The Champions for about 15 minutes. I think my performance will pretty much blow your pants off, if they aren't already from watching The Matrix.
Now, piss off. I've got to re-write a couple of these Roger tracks so they make sense.
Thanks for visiting my website. [/QUOTE]
^ XD that's hilarious!!!
Well, I am looking forward to the new album. I was a bit skeptical about Q+PR, but I've learned to accept them :)If you guys can't learn to accept them too, then you're not true fans. They are founding members as mentioned before and have rights to go on with their shows and releases. Just let them live!
The band is mine now. We're calling it Q+PR. Deal with it.
Keep it up, and the new album will be called Paul Rodgers + Queen.
While you're probably busy watching The Matrix again, maybe you can put in Return Of The Champions for about 15 minutes. I think my performance will pretty much blow your pants off, if they aren't already from watching The Matrix.
Now, piss off. I've got to re-write a couple of these Roger tracks so they make sense.
Thanks for visiting my website. [/QUOTE]
^ XD that's hilarious!!!
Well, I am looking forward to the new album. I was a bit skeptical about Q+PR, but I've learned to accept them :)If you guys can't learn to accept them too, then you're not true fans. They are founding members as mentioned before and have rights to go on with their shows and releases. Just let them live!
I think there's something about this thread that we're all missing in between these petty arguments ... and that's how hardcore "Mortal Sin" would be for the new Queen+Paul Rodgers album name.
Who cares?
Nobody cares about Queen without Freddie Mercury
The fact that Robbie Williams may be dressing as Fred in the 46664 concert only goes to highlight how Queen are remembered
Nobody cares about Queen without Freddie Mercury
The fact that Robbie Williams may be dressing as Fred in the 46664 concert only goes to highlight how Queen are remembered
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]kenny8 wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Who cares?
Nobody cares about Queen without Freddie Mercury
The fact that Robbie Williams may be dressing as Fred in the 46664 concert only goes to highlight how Queen are remembered[/QUOTE]
at least robbie willims admits that he is nothing compared to freddie, i liked when he said that because its the truth.
Yes, there is no Queen without freddie, its a cover band basically, he was SO important and is totally irreplacable.
Nobody cares about Queen without Freddie Mercury
The fact that Robbie Williams may be dressing as Fred in the 46664 concert only goes to highlight how Queen are remembered[/QUOTE]
at least robbie willims admits that he is nothing compared to freddie, i liked when he said that because its the truth.
Yes, there is no Queen without freddie, its a cover band basically, he was SO important and is totally irreplacable.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]kenny8 wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
The fact that Robbie Williams may be dressing as Fred in the 46664 concert only goes to highlight how Queen are remembered[/QUOTE]
The fact that you seem to have taken that piece of 'news' seriously shows how you're more concerned with repeating your tired rhetoric than with making sense.
On the other hand; I do totally agree with your conception that it's Freddie people remember.
If I say "Queen" to just about anyone I know, Freddie will come up 8 times out of 10. The rest of the time it's Brian, but that's because I yap with guitarists.
The fact that Robbie Williams may be dressing as Fred in the 46664 concert only goes to highlight how Queen are remembered[/QUOTE]
The fact that you seem to have taken that piece of 'news' seriously shows how you're more concerned with repeating your tired rhetoric than with making sense.
On the other hand; I do totally agree with your conception that it's Freddie people remember.
If I say "Queen" to just about anyone I know, Freddie will come up 8 times out of 10. The rest of the time it's Brian, but that's because I yap with guitarists.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]NEOLOGiX wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I heartily agree that Queen shouldn't release a new album without Freddie Mercury... and not only without Freddie Mercury, but also without John Deacon.
I mean, Queen are like an iconic figure for me. How the hell can they decide to release new music without two of their members. That was what was so great about it - the four of them contributed and made songs together. Who the hell is Paul Rodgers anyway? Queen are known for the falmboyant ways of Freddie on stage - I mean that was one of the great things about Queen. What, is this 50-something Rodgers gonna perform like Freddie? Running around with the Union Jack and the microphone stand? The bastard would have a bloody heart attack.
Nobody can ever replace Freddie. He himself said it on Live at Wembley '86, Who Wants To Live Forever - "we'll stay together till we bloody well die, I'm sure of it". Well he's dead, and now two of the surviving members are replacing him???? They're in it for the money OBVIOUSLY. They're disgracing the Queen name by making an album with Paul Rodgers. If they want they should just create a new band and make an album with him. Not Queen + Paul Rodgers. That's bullshit.
I think Deacon did the best choice by retiring back in the 1990s.
What I'd like to see is the three of them performing live once more, playing their classic songs, and using a good vocalist... some guy who was big in the 70s like Queen... I dunno, maybe Elton John or Paul McCartney or something.[/QUOTE]
Well, then I suppose it is just a good thing that no one has asked your opinion.
Seriously, doesn't the fact penetrate your skull that there isn't a limited amount of music? If Q+PR release a new album, that doesn't mean an older album stops to exist, you know.
I mean, Queen are like an iconic figure for me. How the hell can they decide to release new music without two of their members. That was what was so great about it - the four of them contributed and made songs together. Who the hell is Paul Rodgers anyway? Queen are known for the falmboyant ways of Freddie on stage - I mean that was one of the great things about Queen. What, is this 50-something Rodgers gonna perform like Freddie? Running around with the Union Jack and the microphone stand? The bastard would have a bloody heart attack.
Nobody can ever replace Freddie. He himself said it on Live at Wembley '86, Who Wants To Live Forever - "we'll stay together till we bloody well die, I'm sure of it". Well he's dead, and now two of the surviving members are replacing him???? They're in it for the money OBVIOUSLY. They're disgracing the Queen name by making an album with Paul Rodgers. If they want they should just create a new band and make an album with him. Not Queen + Paul Rodgers. That's bullshit.
I think Deacon did the best choice by retiring back in the 1990s.
What I'd like to see is the three of them performing live once more, playing their classic songs, and using a good vocalist... some guy who was big in the 70s like Queen... I dunno, maybe Elton John or Paul McCartney or something.[/QUOTE]
Well, then I suppose it is just a good thing that no one has asked your opinion.
Seriously, doesn't the fact penetrate your skull that there isn't a limited amount of music? If Q+PR release a new album, that doesn't mean an older album stops to exist, you know.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Treasure Moment wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]kenny8 wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Who cares?
Nobody cares about Queen without Freddie Mercury
The fact that Robbie Williams may be dressing as Fred in the 46664 concert only goes to highlight how Queen are remembered[/QUOTE]
at least robbie willims admits that he is nothing compared to freddie, i liked when he said that because its the truth.
Yes, there is no Queen without freddie, its a cover band basically, he was SO important and is totally irreplacable.[/QUOTE]
All cover bands tend to share one characteristic: the authors of the songs aren't in them.
Nobody cares about Queen without Freddie Mercury
The fact that Robbie Williams may be dressing as Fred in the 46664 concert only goes to highlight how Queen are remembered[/QUOTE]
at least robbie willims admits that he is nothing compared to freddie, i liked when he said that because its the truth.
Yes, there is no Queen without freddie, its a cover band basically, he was SO important and is totally irreplacable.[/QUOTE]
All cover bands tend to share one characteristic: the authors of the songs aren't in them.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Treasure Moment wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]kenny8 wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Who cares?
Nobody cares about Queen without Freddie Mercury
The fact that Robbie Williams may be dressing as Fred in the 46664 concert only goes to highlight how Queen are remembered[/QUOTE]
at least robbie willims admits that he is nothing compared to freddie, i liked when he said that because its the truth.
Yes, there is no Queen without freddie, its a cover band basically, he was SO important and is totally irreplacable.[/QUOTE]
All cover bands tend to share one characteristic: the authors of the songs aren't in them.[/QUOTE]
yes thats true, im just saying its ridiculous to call the band Queen without freddie, the man was so incredibly awesome and special and it simply cant be Queen without him.
Nobody cares about Queen without Freddie Mercury
The fact that Robbie Williams may be dressing as Fred in the 46664 concert only goes to highlight how Queen are remembered[/QUOTE]
at least robbie willims admits that he is nothing compared to freddie, i liked when he said that because its the truth.
Yes, there is no Queen without freddie, its a cover band basically, he was SO important and is totally irreplacable.[/QUOTE]
All cover bands tend to share one characteristic: the authors of the songs aren't in them.[/QUOTE]
yes thats true, im just saying its ridiculous to call the band Queen without freddie, the man was so incredibly awesome and special and it simply cant be Queen without him.