PauloPanucci
The Queen II get famou because of two musics... "Seven seas of rhye" and "ogre battle" i think!!!!!! It's the two better musics in the albem.... Al musics of the album are good!!!!!!!!!!!
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Queenfan1995
thanks for the answers
lalaalalaa
[QUOTE]
[b]therhyeman wrote: [/b]
Queen 2 would probably be the most perfect Queen album, if it didn't contain The Loser In The End - surely one of Queen's worst tracks. It just totally ruins the flow of the album, and I always miss it out to keep the overall mood going?
I've always wondered whether the rest of the band, plus Roy Thomas Baker, privately agreed with this? Can't help feeling they must have!! They really should have said "it's a B-side, Rog" and let Brian write another classic to finish the side.
Still, perhaps all great albums have their "Within You Without You" moment ? [img=/images/smiley/msn/regular_smile.gif][/img]
Tim
[/QUOTE]
I love the Loser In The End. I agree it's the weakest track but I like it a lot.
[b]therhyeman wrote: [/b]
Queen 2 would probably be the most perfect Queen album, if it didn't contain The Loser In The End - surely one of Queen's worst tracks. It just totally ruins the flow of the album, and I always miss it out to keep the overall mood going?
I've always wondered whether the rest of the band, plus Roy Thomas Baker, privately agreed with this? Can't help feeling they must have!! They really should have said "it's a B-side, Rog" and let Brian write another classic to finish the side.
Still, perhaps all great albums have their "Within You Without You" moment ? [img=/images/smiley/msn/regular_smile.gif][/img]
Tim
[/QUOTE]
I love the Loser In The End. I agree it's the weakest track but I like it a lot.
lalaalalaa
[QUOTE]
[b]Vali wrote: [/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]goa wrote: [/b]
One doubt: [b]Why[/b] The March of The Black Queen was never played live complete...I mean, it only appears in "those" meddleys???
[/QUOTE]
Well .... I´d say this is one of their most ellaborated songs in terms of orchestrations, choruses, change of tempos .... quite difficult to recreate live .... except for the part they actually did ! [/QUOTE]
That must be why Jeff Scott Soto didn't perform it at the 2003 Queen convention.
[b]Vali wrote: [/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]goa wrote: [/b]
One doubt: [b]Why[/b] The March of The Black Queen was never played live complete...I mean, it only appears in "those" meddleys???
[/QUOTE]
Well .... I´d say this is one of their most ellaborated songs in terms of orchestrations, choruses, change of tempos .... quite difficult to recreate live .... except for the part they actually did ! [/QUOTE]
That must be why Jeff Scott Soto didn't perform it at the 2003 Queen convention.
Queenfan1995
i mean that if loser in the end not was on the album it hadnt been as goodas it is
ParisNair
The Album had a concept which included emotion and most distinctively fantasy. The Album contained neat piano flourishes and operatic vocal work from Freddie Mercury, guitar virtuosity from Brian May, powerful, deep drumming from Roger Taylor, the deep bass of John Deacon and Queen's powerful, majestic and operatic backing vocals which include the falsetto from Roger Taylor, Choir Vocal sound and most significantly the operatic vocals throughout the album including the Epic March of the Black Queen. The album could be quoted as a combination of early Pink Floyd, Black Sabbath, The Who from 1966 - 1973 and Elton John.
ParisNair
[QUOTE]
[b]ParisNair wrote: [/b]
The Album had a concept which included emotion and most distinctively fantasy. The Album contained neat piano flourishes and operatic vocal work from Freddie Mercury, guitar virtuosity from Brian May, powerful, deep drumming from Roger Taylor, the deep bass of John Deacon and Queen's powerful, majestic and operatic backing vocals which include the falsetto from Roger Taylor, Choir Vocal sound and most significantly the operatic vocals throughout the album including the Epic March of the Black Queen. The album could be quoted as a combination of early Pink Floyd, Black Sabbath, The Who from 1966 - 1973 and Elton John.[/QUOTE]
This is taken from Wikipedia on the article about Rock Operas.
[b]ParisNair wrote: [/b]
The Album had a concept which included emotion and most distinctively fantasy. The Album contained neat piano flourishes and operatic vocal work from Freddie Mercury, guitar virtuosity from Brian May, powerful, deep drumming from Roger Taylor, the deep bass of John Deacon and Queen's powerful, majestic and operatic backing vocals which include the falsetto from Roger Taylor, Choir Vocal sound and most significantly the operatic vocals throughout the album including the Epic March of the Black Queen. The album could be quoted as a combination of early Pink Floyd, Black Sabbath, The Who from 1966 - 1973 and Elton John.[/QUOTE]
This is taken from Wikipedia on the article about Rock Operas.
mike hunt
[QUOTE]
[b]therhyeman wrote: [/b]
Queen 2 would probably be the most perfect Queen album, if it didn't contain The Loser In The End - surely one of Queen's worst tracks. It just totally ruins the flow of the album, and I always miss it out to keep the overall mood going?
I've always wondered whether the rest of the band, plus Roy Thomas Baker, privately agreed with this? Can't help feeling they must have!! They really should have said "it's a B-side, Rog" and let Brian write another classic to finish the side.
Still, perhaps all great albums have their "Within You Without You" moment ? [img=/images/smiley/msn/regular_smile.gif][/img]
Tim
[/QUOTE]
sadly your right, it's a perfect album, but loser in the end doesn't fit. The white side should have been finished by a brian song. loser in the end is one of queens worst songs. Someone should have had the courage too tell roger that his song sucked.
[b]therhyeman wrote: [/b]
Queen 2 would probably be the most perfect Queen album, if it didn't contain The Loser In The End - surely one of Queen's worst tracks. It just totally ruins the flow of the album, and I always miss it out to keep the overall mood going?
I've always wondered whether the rest of the band, plus Roy Thomas Baker, privately agreed with this? Can't help feeling they must have!! They really should have said "it's a B-side, Rog" and let Brian write another classic to finish the side.
Still, perhaps all great albums have their "Within You Without You" moment ? [img=/images/smiley/msn/regular_smile.gif][/img]
Tim
[/QUOTE]
sadly your right, it's a perfect album, but loser in the end doesn't fit. The white side should have been finished by a brian song. loser in the end is one of queens worst songs. Someone should have had the courage too tell roger that his song sucked.
vadenuez
I doesn't fit sonically and thematically. This is an album plagued of stories about ogres, queens, epic battles, marches, processions and mythologies then suddenly out of nowhere bursts a pedestrian song about a whiny spoiled teenager slamming the door and saying 'goodbye ma'.
lalaalalaa
[QUOTE]
[b]mike hunt wrote: [/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]therhyeman wrote: [/b]
Queen 2 would probably be the most perfect Queen album, if it didn't contain The Loser In The End - surely one of Queen's worst tracks. It just totally ruins the flow of the album, and I always miss it out to keep the overall mood going?
I've always wondered whether the rest of the band, plus Roy Thomas Baker, privately agreed with this? Can't help feeling they must have!! They really should have said "it's a B-side, Rog" and let Brian write another classic to finish the side.
Still, perhaps all great albums have their "Within You Without You" moment ? [img=/images/smiley/msn/regular_smile.gif][/img]
Tim
[/QUOTE]
sadly your right, it's a perfect album, but loser in the end doesn't fit. The white side should have been finished by a brian song. loser in the end is one of queens worst songs. Someone should have had the courage too tell roger that his song sucked.
[/QUOTE]
The song doesn't suck, IMO. There are plenty of people who like it so nobody should tell Roger the song sucked because it really is just a matter of opinion.
[b]mike hunt wrote: [/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]therhyeman wrote: [/b]
Queen 2 would probably be the most perfect Queen album, if it didn't contain The Loser In The End - surely one of Queen's worst tracks. It just totally ruins the flow of the album, and I always miss it out to keep the overall mood going?
I've always wondered whether the rest of the band, plus Roy Thomas Baker, privately agreed with this? Can't help feeling they must have!! They really should have said "it's a B-side, Rog" and let Brian write another classic to finish the side.
Still, perhaps all great albums have their "Within You Without You" moment ? [img=/images/smiley/msn/regular_smile.gif][/img]
Tim
[/QUOTE]
sadly your right, it's a perfect album, but loser in the end doesn't fit. The white side should have been finished by a brian song. loser in the end is one of queens worst songs. Someone should have had the courage too tell roger that his song sucked.
[/QUOTE]
The song doesn't suck, IMO. There are plenty of people who like it so nobody should tell Roger the song sucked because it really is just a matter of opinion.
Queenfan1995
Queenfan1995
well i did this whit Queen 2 and now it time to write my meaning about one of my favorite albums the clash london calling.
[/QUOTE]this album was realesed in 1979 in uk and 1980 in us.[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]the album is critisided to be the best punk album ever made.[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]the albums texts was extremly strong maybe perfect the texts is about childhood politic war and a very small bit of love.[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]the drumming is very power full and very catchy[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]the guitar is fast and catchy[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]the vocals is pretty good joe strummer sing with anger[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE] mick jones has his pop rnd sounding vocals [/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]paul simmenon sing only on one track[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]the album is not clean punk it has regga rockabilly and a strange type of pop.[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]the album was easy to preform live soo its easy too get live clips of the album.[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE] every song was written by strummer and jones witout some who is markt.[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE][b]london calling[/b].[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]song character 10/10 the titel track has a reaggge bass riff and very catchy drumms and gitar and vocals[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE][b][url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brand_New_Cadillac]B[/url]RAND NEW CADILAC [/b][b]" ([/b][b][url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vince_Taylor]v[/url]. TAYLOR[/b][b])[/b]
[/QUOTE][b]
[/b][/QUOTE][b]song charachter 8/10 a very good cover of one of britans first rocknroll songs.[/b][/QUOTE][b]
[/b][/QUOTE][b]Jimmy Jazz
[/b][/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]song charachter 8/10 a type of jazz ska song with a catchy melody
[/QUOTE][b]
[/b][/QUOTE][b]hareful[/b][/QUOTE][b]
[/b][/QUOTE][b]song charachter 7/10 a very strange track it go fast but its not hard
[/b][/QUOTE][b]
[/b][/QUOTE][b]rudie cant fail [/b][/QUOTE][b] song 8/10 it has elements of reggea soul and ska its a bit funny and its a bit catchy [/b][/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE][b]SPANISH BOMBS[/b][/QUOTE][b]
[/b][/QUOTE][b]song 9/10 a comment of the spanish civil war.[/b][/QUOTE][b]
[/b][/QUOTE][b]tHE RIGHT PROFIL[/b][/QUOTE][b]
[/b][/QUOTE][b]SONG 7/10 A GOOD SONG IT NOT REALLY MUCH TO SAY ABOUT THE TRACK[/b][/QUOTE][b]
[/b][/QUOTE][b]LOST IN THE SUPERMARKED[/b][/QUOTE][b]
[/b][/QUOTE][b]SONG 10/10 A VERY STRONG SONG IT IS ABOUT BAD CHILDHOOD THIS IS THE CLOSED THE CLASH HAS COME A BALLAD[/b][/QUOTE][b]
[/b][/QUOTE][b]CLAMPDOWN [/b][/QUOTE][b]
[/b][/QUOTE][b]SONG 10/10 THHIS IS A VERY STRONG TRACK IT IS HARD AND CATCHY.[/b][/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE][b][url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Guns_of_Brixton]The Guns of Brixton[/url]" ([url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Simonon]Paul Simonon[/url])
[/b][/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]SONG 9.5/10 ITS SUNG BY PAUL SIMONON AND HAS A HEAVIE REGGEA INFLUENS[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]Wrong 'Em Boyo" (Clive Alphonso)
[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]10/10 THIS IS ONE OF MY FAVORITT COVERS[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]DEATH OR GLORY[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]7/10 A OK TRACK[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]KOKA KOLA [/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]10/10 A SONG ABOUT AVARTISNING ITS VERY CATCHY SONG[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]THE CARD CHEAT [/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]8/10 A NICE SONG[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]LOVERS ROCK [/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]4/10 THIS IS THE WEAKEST SONG ON THE ALBUM[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]FOUR HORSMEN [/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]7.5/10 A SONG WHO IS QUITE GOOD[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]IM NOT DOWN [/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]7/10 A RNB SONG ITS A BIT BORING[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]Revolution Rock" (Jackie Edwards, [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danny_Ray]Danny Ray[/url])
[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]7.5/10 A GOOD COVER AND ITS CATCHY[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]STAND BY ME [/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]10/10[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]A VERY CATCHY SONG AND IT IS A POP SONG [/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]this album was realesed in 1979 in uk and 1980 in us.[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]the album is critisided to be the best punk album ever made.[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]the albums texts was extremly strong maybe perfect the texts is about childhood politic war and a very small bit of love.[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]the drumming is very power full and very catchy[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]the guitar is fast and catchy[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]the vocals is pretty good joe strummer sing with anger[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE] mick jones has his pop rnd sounding vocals [/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]paul simmenon sing only on one track[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]the album is not clean punk it has regga rockabilly and a strange type of pop.[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]the album was easy to preform live soo its easy too get live clips of the album.[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE] every song was written by strummer and jones witout some who is markt.[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE][b]london calling[/b].[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]song character 10/10 the titel track has a reaggge bass riff and very catchy drumms and gitar and vocals[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE][b][url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brand_New_Cadillac]B[/url]RAND NEW CADILAC [/b][b]" ([/b][b][url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vince_Taylor]v[/url]. TAYLOR[/b][b])[/b]
[/QUOTE][b]
[/b][/QUOTE][b]song charachter 8/10 a very good cover of one of britans first rocknroll songs.[/b][/QUOTE][b]
[/b][/QUOTE][b]Jimmy Jazz
[/b][/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]song charachter 8/10 a type of jazz ska song with a catchy melody
[/QUOTE][b]
[/b][/QUOTE][b]hareful[/b][/QUOTE][b]
[/b][/QUOTE][b]song charachter 7/10 a very strange track it go fast but its not hard
[/b][/QUOTE][b]
[/b][/QUOTE][b]rudie cant fail [/b][/QUOTE][b] song 8/10 it has elements of reggea soul and ska its a bit funny and its a bit catchy [/b][/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE][b]SPANISH BOMBS[/b][/QUOTE][b]
[/b][/QUOTE][b]song 9/10 a comment of the spanish civil war.[/b][/QUOTE][b]
[/b][/QUOTE][b]tHE RIGHT PROFIL[/b][/QUOTE][b]
[/b][/QUOTE][b]SONG 7/10 A GOOD SONG IT NOT REALLY MUCH TO SAY ABOUT THE TRACK[/b][/QUOTE][b]
[/b][/QUOTE][b]LOST IN THE SUPERMARKED[/b][/QUOTE][b]
[/b][/QUOTE][b]SONG 10/10 A VERY STRONG SONG IT IS ABOUT BAD CHILDHOOD THIS IS THE CLOSED THE CLASH HAS COME A BALLAD[/b][/QUOTE][b]
[/b][/QUOTE][b]CLAMPDOWN [/b][/QUOTE][b]
[/b][/QUOTE][b]SONG 10/10 THHIS IS A VERY STRONG TRACK IT IS HARD AND CATCHY.[/b][/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE][b][url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Guns_of_Brixton]The Guns of Brixton[/url]" ([url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Simonon]Paul Simonon[/url])
[/b][/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]SONG 9.5/10 ITS SUNG BY PAUL SIMONON AND HAS A HEAVIE REGGEA INFLUENS[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]Wrong 'Em Boyo" (Clive Alphonso)
[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]10/10 THIS IS ONE OF MY FAVORITT COVERS[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]DEATH OR GLORY[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]7/10 A OK TRACK[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]KOKA KOLA [/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]10/10 A SONG ABOUT AVARTISNING ITS VERY CATCHY SONG[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]THE CARD CHEAT [/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]8/10 A NICE SONG[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]LOVERS ROCK [/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]4/10 THIS IS THE WEAKEST SONG ON THE ALBUM[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]FOUR HORSMEN [/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]7.5/10 A SONG WHO IS QUITE GOOD[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]IM NOT DOWN [/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]7/10 A RNB SONG ITS A BIT BORING[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]Revolution Rock" (Jackie Edwards, [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danny_Ray]Danny Ray[/url])
[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]7.5/10 A GOOD COVER AND ITS CATCHY[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]STAND BY ME [/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]10/10[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]A VERY CATCHY SONG AND IT IS A POP SONG [/QUOTE]
Queenfan1995
lalaalalaa
Queenfan1995
london calling and Queen 2 is my favorit albums but Queen 2 is best