I think that this discussion is going on wrong topic.
By the way, i found one of the latest pictures of Freddie and another one possibly fake from his funeral?
Thread
Posts in chronological order
The Fake(?) one
The last picture is disturbing, fake or not. Never seen those two before. But, what is the kick you get out of seeing pictures like these? I can't really understand how anyone would love to see his dying body.
Yannickjoker I just can't explain it :)
@ FATTY:
You forgot to mention the part where Shaggy jumped up and his feet did an in-air scramble/scuffle..
but (!) great reveal on when John was unmasked.
Thank you for filling me in on this sort of insider information... this is why i roam the boards.
PS: I think someone mispelled *"Man-goo"
not Mango.
Or maybe i could be wrong.
In either event, it's pretty sickening to think that someone would look for a IN-CREMATION photo... unless of course it was some sort of Eastern Tradition... (like monks carving up their dead to vultures or something)...
pretty twisted mind you've got there...
You forgot to mention the part where Shaggy jumped up and his feet did an in-air scramble/scuffle..
but (!) great reveal on when John was unmasked.
Thank you for filling me in on this sort of insider information... this is why i roam the boards.
PS: I think someone mispelled *"Man-goo"
not Mango.
Or maybe i could be wrong.
In either event, it's pretty sickening to think that someone would look for a IN-CREMATION photo... unless of course it was some sort of Eastern Tradition... (like monks carving up their dead to vultures or something)...
pretty twisted mind you've got there...
jpf wrote:
It's interesting that much of what Peter and Jim had to say in their books overlapped. Where's Mary's book? Maybe
she has something to hide?
OR MAYBE SHE DOESN'T...
It was interesting how both Peter and Jim felt like they were intruding when they
visited Garden Lodge a few times after Freddie's death. It wasn't like Mary was so glad to see them.
SHOULD SHE BE? WHAT'S IT TO YOU (OR ANYONE) WHETHER OR NOT SHE DOES? IT'S NOT LIKE YOU ACTUALLY KNOW ANY OF THEM.
You are correct in that we don't know any of them. The best we can do is judge by what they've said.
OR NOT JUDGE THEM AT ALL
It's interesting that much of what Peter and Jim had to say in their books overlapped. Where's Mary's book? Maybe
she has something to hide?
OR MAYBE SHE DOESN'T...
It was interesting how both Peter and Jim felt like they were intruding when they
visited Garden Lodge a few times after Freddie's death. It wasn't like Mary was so glad to see them.
SHOULD SHE BE? WHAT'S IT TO YOU (OR ANYONE) WHETHER OR NOT SHE DOES? IT'S NOT LIKE YOU ACTUALLY KNOW ANY OF THEM.
You are correct in that we don't know any of them. The best we can do is judge by what they've said.
OR NOT JUDGE THEM AT ALL
GratefulFan wrote:
I disagree. Jim had an obvious bias against Mary in his book. Don't shoot the messenger - I'm just reporting it as it is. He used a biography to feed a feud with someone else, which is often the case with tell-all biographies.
All I did was provide a theory for it which may or may not be true, while others continued to write quasi-biographical judgments about people they've never met as if they're fact. I have no stake in the outcome, as I don't really care about the personal lives of any of these people being discussed.
If we're guilty of any overreaching, you certainly are too.
I disagree. Jim had an obvious bias against Mary in his book. Don't shoot the messenger - I'm just reporting it as it is. He used a biography to feed a feud with someone else, which is often the case with tell-all biographies.
All I did was provide a theory for it which may or may not be true, while others continued to write quasi-biographical judgments about people they've never met as if they're fact. I have no stake in the outcome, as I don't really care about the personal lives of any of these people being discussed.
jpf wrote:
So someone is required to write a book in order to exonerate themselves from the judgments of a select few?
This mentality of "guilty until proven innocent via the written word" makes it no surprise that tabloids sell millions of copies daily.
It's interesting that much of what Peter and Jim had to say in their books overlapped. Where's Mary's book? Maybe she has something to hide?
So someone is required to write a book in order to exonerate themselves from the judgments of a select few?
This mentality of "guilty until proven innocent via the written word" makes it no surprise that tabloids sell millions of copies daily.
Holly2003 wrote: jpf wrote:
It's interesting that much of what Peter and Jim had to say in their books overlapped. Where's Mary's book? Maybe
she has something to hide?
OR MAYBE SHE DOESN'T...
It was interesting how both Peter and Jim felt like they were intruding when they
visited Garden Lodge a few times after Freddie's death. It wasn't like Mary was so glad to see them.
SHOULD SHE BE? WHAT'S IT TO YOU (OR ANYONE) WHETHER OR NOT SHE DOES? IT'S NOT LIKE YOU ACTUALLY KNOW ANY OF THEM.
You are correct in that we don't know any of them. The best we can do is judge by what they've said.
OR NOT JUDGE THEM AT ALL
---
She had a lot to hide when Freddie was alive.
She was a bitch. She treated the three of them like shit. The person they shared died.
The person who died would be pissed off with her towards her treatment to not only
his friends, but his real family.
I'll judge them any way I please.
It's interesting that much of what Peter and Jim had to say in their books overlapped. Where's Mary's book? Maybe
she has something to hide?
OR MAYBE SHE DOESN'T...
It was interesting how both Peter and Jim felt like they were intruding when they
visited Garden Lodge a few times after Freddie's death. It wasn't like Mary was so glad to see them.
SHOULD SHE BE? WHAT'S IT TO YOU (OR ANYONE) WHETHER OR NOT SHE DOES? IT'S NOT LIKE YOU ACTUALLY KNOW ANY OF THEM.
You are correct in that we don't know any of them. The best we can do is judge by what they've said.
OR NOT JUDGE THEM AT ALL
---
She had a lot to hide when Freddie was alive.
She was a bitch. She treated the three of them like shit. The person they shared died.
The person who died would be pissed off with her towards her treatment to not only
his friends, but his real family.
I'll judge them any way I please.
Sir GH wrote: jpf wrote:
It's interesting that much of what Peter and Jim had to say in their books overlapped. Where's Mary's book? Maybe she has something to hide?
So someone is required to write a book in order to exonerate themselves from the judgments of a select few?
This mentality of "guilty until proven innocent via the written word" makes it no surprise that tabloids sell millions of copies daily.
---
Peter and Jim's books paint Mary in a different light. Freddie would not be
pleased with Mary's (and Jim Beach's) behavior toward Jim, Peter, and Joe
after his death.
Karma's a bitch. Mary got what she deserved; the rest of her life behind
brick walls, in constant reminder of Freddie. By staying in Garden Lodge
she was never able to move on with her life.
It's interesting that much of what Peter and Jim had to say in their books overlapped. Where's Mary's book? Maybe she has something to hide?
So someone is required to write a book in order to exonerate themselves from the judgments of a select few?
This mentality of "guilty until proven innocent via the written word" makes it no surprise that tabloids sell millions of copies daily.
---
Peter and Jim's books paint Mary in a different light. Freddie would not be
pleased with Mary's (and Jim Beach's) behavior toward Jim, Peter, and Joe
after his death.
Karma's a bitch. Mary got what she deserved; the rest of her life behind
brick walls, in constant reminder of Freddie. By staying in Garden Lodge
she was never able to move on with her life.
> Mary got what she deserved; the rest of her life behind brick walls, in constant reminder of Freddie
Did the will include a "you're not allowed to sell the house" clause? Unless it did, she could move out any time she wanted to.
Freddie's relationship with all these people was obviously incredibly complicated - far more than a couple tell-all books could ever reveal. Anyone is foolish if they think they understand everything. You appear no different than the people who feel like they're experts on Jennifer Aniston and Brad Pitt's lives because they read the tabloids and E! every day.
Did the will include a "you're not allowed to sell the house" clause? Unless it did, she could move out any time she wanted to.
Freddie's relationship with all these people was obviously incredibly complicated - far more than a couple tell-all books could ever reveal. Anyone is foolish if they think they understand everything. You appear no different than the people who feel like they're experts on Jennifer Aniston and Brad Pitt's lives because they read the tabloids and E! every day.
Sir GH wrote: > Mary got what she deserved; the rest of her life behind brick walls, in constant reminder of Freddie
Did the will include a "you're not allowed to sell the house" clause? Unless it did, she could move out any time she wanted to.
Freddie's relationship with all these people was obviously incredibly complicated - far more than a couple tell-all books could ever reveal. Anyone is foolish if they think they understand everything. You appear no different than the people who feel like they're experts on Jennifer Aniston and Brad Pitt's lives because they read the tabloids and E! every day.
---
Mary could have stayed living in her flat that Freddie purchased for her or she could have
spent some of her inheritance on a new place to live.
You know a lot about the goings on of Jennifer Aniston and Brad Pitt. It's obvious it's you who
reads the tabloids and watches E! every day.
Did the will include a "you're not allowed to sell the house" clause? Unless it did, she could move out any time she wanted to.
Freddie's relationship with all these people was obviously incredibly complicated - far more than a couple tell-all books could ever reveal. Anyone is foolish if they think they understand everything. You appear no different than the people who feel like they're experts on Jennifer Aniston and Brad Pitt's lives because they read the tabloids and E! every day.
---
Mary could have stayed living in her flat that Freddie purchased for her or she could have
spent some of her inheritance on a new place to live.
You know a lot about the goings on of Jennifer Aniston and Brad Pitt. It's obvious it's you who
reads the tabloids and watches E! every day.
jpf wrote: Mary could have stayed living in her flat that Freddie purchased for her or she could have
spent some of her inheritance on a new place to live.
I hope you realize you're now going in against what you said at first. I thought she was a prisoner and karma had done bad to her?
spent some of her inheritance on a new place to live.
I hope you realize you're now going in against what you said at first. I thought she was a prisoner and karma had done bad to her?
YannickJoker wrote: jpf wrote: Mary could have stayed living in her flat that Freddie purchased for her or she could have
spent some of her inheritance on a new place to live.
I hope you realize you're now going in against what you said at first. I thought she was a prisoner and karma had done bad to her?
---
No I didn't. You're a dumbass who can't read.
spent some of her inheritance on a new place to live.
I hope you realize you're now going in against what you said at first. I thought she was a prisoner and karma had done bad to her?
---
No I didn't. You're a dumbass who can't read.
jpf wrote: Holly2003 wrote: jpf wrote:
It's interesting that much of what Peter and Jim had to say in their books overlapped. Where's Mary's book? Maybe
she has something to hide?
OR MAYBE SHE DOESN'T...
It was interesting how both Peter and Jim felt like they were intruding when they
visited Garden Lodge a few times after Freddie's death. It wasn't like Mary was so glad to see them.
SHOULD SHE BE? WHAT'S IT TO YOU (OR ANYONE) WHETHER OR NOT SHE DOES? IT'S NOT LIKE YOU ACTUALLY KNOW ANY OF THEM.
You are correct in that we don't know any of them. The best we can do is judge by what they've said.
OR NOT JUDGE THEM AT ALL
---
She had a lot to hide when Freddie was alive.
She was a bitch. She treated the three of them like shit. The person they shared died.
The person who died would be pissed off with her towards her treatment to not only
his friends, but his real family.
I'll judge them any way I please.
And I'll judge you by your ignorant and childish comments. Fair enough?
It's interesting that much of what Peter and Jim had to say in their books overlapped. Where's Mary's book? Maybe
she has something to hide?
OR MAYBE SHE DOESN'T...
It was interesting how both Peter and Jim felt like they were intruding when they
visited Garden Lodge a few times after Freddie's death. It wasn't like Mary was so glad to see them.
SHOULD SHE BE? WHAT'S IT TO YOU (OR ANYONE) WHETHER OR NOT SHE DOES? IT'S NOT LIKE YOU ACTUALLY KNOW ANY OF THEM.
You are correct in that we don't know any of them. The best we can do is judge by what they've said.
OR NOT JUDGE THEM AT ALL
---
She had a lot to hide when Freddie was alive.
She was a bitch. She treated the three of them like shit. The person they shared died.
The person who died would be pissed off with her towards her treatment to not only
his friends, but his real family.
I'll judge them any way I please.
And I'll judge you by your ignorant and childish comments. Fair enough?