Queen crest Queenzone

Aids Drug AZT killed Freddie

107 posts Page 2 of 8
Thread

Posts in chronological order

· Member since
Don't feed the trolls
· Member since
********************************

marvinp01 wrote: This is absolutely ridiculous! Why can't dimwits like you just leave his death in peace? Have you no respect?  Freddie Mercury died for a reason thats it! Leave it alone please! *************************************

What *reason* did he die for? lol Are you insinuating conspiracy, too? or do you think he was Jesus, circa 1991?
· Member since
=============================================

GratefulFan wrote: Mercury SingerOfLife wrote:

The smartest reply so far. Not saying you believe in it but you would at least be open to the idea, that goes way beyond the rest of the sheeple here at queenzone.  Like being open minded to things and not just calling someone  a looney. People are so ignorant and just buy everything the world says to them.
=========================

And conspiracy fans are often so fundamentally lacking in adequate reason that they buy virtually every anti-establishment theory they trip over.  So open minded that their brains fall out.

AZT was all they had when Freddie was ill.  It was (and is) toxic, but it was less toxic than advanced HIV.  HIV could also develop resistance to it more readily in those years, and so it's efficacy was eventually limited.  It's still a key part of the cocktail on which people are now living long and near normal lives today, just at much lower doses and in combination with other retrovirals and compounds that reduce resistance.
=============================================

well put!
· Member since
I have this brilliant mental image of Amir dying from AIDS.  It's a bit like the Scientologists that die (quick deaths) from cancer because they don't think it exists; or rather, that chemotherapy and other treatments are a lot of hokey, so they use their Hubbard-endorsed ways of dealing with the illness ... and they die hilariously quickly :D

I have this sort of faint hope that something similar will happen to this malignant moron.
· Member since
Check out these videos

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=buoGGsch5mM&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qY9ia-R9so0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7kiNtz2LXhE&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htj6_7pLH78&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d37fJYO2Q1A&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=js-3ZXhgM8A&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mAnjD0tFsRE&feature=related
"The Beatles were the first but Queen were the best"
· Member since
GratefulFan wrote:

And conspiracy fans are often so fundamentally lacking in adequate reason that they buy virtually every anti-establishment theory they trip over.  So open minded that their brains fall out.

===================

Very well put, in the case of many - but certainly not all.

Government lies, media lies, and big pharma lies - all in the interest of money and power.  The question remains, how far do they go?

We can't be labeling every single person who goes against conventional thinking and official reports as a nut.  That's equally short-sighted as believing in every conspiracy simply for the sake of rebelling.
Queenzone is overrun with trolls and circling the drain - join us here instead: http://queenforum.net
· Member since
Sir GH: You are really underestimating freddie here. You dont see just how powerful he really was and still is. The man was truely a super one of a kind with HUGE impact on this world whether you agree or not its a true fact that he influenced many with his music and presence. They knew that people like that couldnt exist. While music didnt go totally crap directly after he died , it certainly did after awhile and i think its mainly cause of the loss of that beautiful mans presence.

I think they killed him on purpose.
http://www.youtube.com/user/Tranqvillia
· Member since
You also think that the only thing stopping your band from being huge is the Illuminati, so I'm sure people can do the math on this for themselves.  Your AZT theory is just as fucking stupid as the rest you've posted.  Congratulations on your consistency.
· Member since
Mercury SingerOfLife wrote:

You are really underestimating freddie here. You dont see just how powerful he really was and still is.

==============================

This is coming from a guy who once argued that Freddie is the greatest musician ever without even knowing who Steve Perry is.  You are just an over-zealous Queen fan, full stop.

Reality check (not that you have any sense of what reality is):  Freddie was arguably rock's greatest frontman, but he was not a revolutionary force like The Beatles or Michael Jackson.

When literally everyone consistently thinks you're nuts, maybe they might have a point.  Read GratefulFan's post once again... very carefully.  She's one of the wisest people on here, and I don't think I've ever seen her be unequivocally wrong.

Except maybe in your eyes.. your flawless, all-knowing eyes..
Queenzone is overrun with trolls and circling the drain - join us here instead: http://queenforum.net
· Member since
Sir GH wrote: Mercury SingerOfLife wrote:

You are really underestimating freddie here. You dont see just how powerful he really was and still is.

==============================

This is coming from a guy who once argued that Freddie is the greatest musician ever without even knowing who Steve Perry is.  You are just an over-zealous Queen fan, full stop.

Reality check (not that you have any sense of what reality is):  Freddie was arguably rock's greatest frontman, but he was not a revolutionary force like The Beatles or Michael Jackson.

When literally everyone consistently thinks you're nuts, maybe they might have a point.  Read GratefulFan's post once again... very carefully.  She's one of the wisest people on here, and I don't think I've ever seen her be unequivocally wrong.

Except maybe in your eyes.. your flawless, all-knowing eyes..

saying that michael jackson and the beatles are more important than freddie just shows what your values are at. In fact i bet that goes for the whole queenzone community, bet you all think that beatles and jackson are more important to music than freddie was. BUT you are ALL soo wrong, they are lightyears behind both of them.
http://www.youtube.com/user/Tranqvillia
· Member since
Now I was once told to stop feeding the trolls!
· Member since
As Andy Millman would say " is he having a laugh?"

Amir you have gone completely mad.
· Member since
Mercury SingerOfLife wrote:

saying that michael jackson and the beatles are more important than freddie just shows what your values are at. In fact i bet that goes for the whole queenzone community, bet you all think that beatles and jackson are more important to music than freddie was. BUT you are ALL soo wrong, they are lightyears behind both of them.

==============================

This has nothing to do with values or taste.  Queen are my personal favourite band, but I know where they stand in the grand scheme of things.

The Beatles and MJ both changed the world.  The Beatles completely revolutionized popular culture in the 60s, and Thriller almost single-handedly resurrected the music business after disco.  Both were complete game changers.  Perhaps in South America did Queen have a similar effect, but certainly not anywhere else in the world.

You are the last person anyone should turn to for a lesson in music history.  Keep the laughs coming... you're making a fool of yourself, as usual..
Queenzone is overrun with trolls and circling the drain - join us here instead: http://queenforum.net
· Member since
Sir GH wrote:

Read GratefulFan's post once again... very carefully.  She's one of the wisest people on here, and I don't think I've ever seen her be unequivocally wrong.
==========================

Didn't you once also call TQ one of the wisest people on here?  Hey what'd I ever do to you?! ; )

P.S.  I'm frequently, thoroughly and hopelessly wrong, and my teenager will be happy to tell you so.
· Member since
"bet you all think that beatles and jackson are more important to music than freddie was"

They were.  They are definitely up in the same league - the Beatles for their overall impact on studio recording, live performance, and songwriting itself, Michael Jackson for the whole Thriller thing (you just have no idea how huge that was, whether you liked the album or not ... ) and Queen for their approach to live shows, for having the first notable music video that was used in the way that we see them today...  but really, in actual terms, the Beatles and Michael Jackson made a bigger impact.  I'm not saying I think they're better; if you like Freddie better, then cool!  But more people have been affected by the Beatles.  This goes beyond record sales - it is a cultural fucking anomaly we are talking about; the biggest effing thing going.  

And like I said, none of this should be taken as though we're saying we think other, more influential bands are better than Queen.  We are on a Queen site - you'll probably find most of us prefer Queen to those other bands.  But, we're intelligent enough to pull our heads out of our arses (some of us, anyway) and understand that just because you have a favourite band doesn't mean that the whole world agrees with you.  Have you ever seen skip come in here doing his Kiss routine?  That's you with Queen - and it's all the more insulting when you consider that Queen don't need morons like you, because the music stands up on its own.

It's amusing to see what a narrow minded twat you are though.  This is all stuff I could've told you ten years ago - when I was a spotty teenager who still laughed at Joe Cartoon.  How old are you anyway?