Aids Drug AZT killed Freddie

[QUOTE] [b]brENsKi wrote:[/b]

[QUOTE] [b]Mercuryking wrote:[/b]

He may not even have had aids at all , they diagnose him saying he had the aids virus then giving him the fatal drug called AZT [/QUOTE]

...and what (pray tell) "fatal drug" killed all of your braincells? you f**king imbecile[/QUOTE]

It's amazing how people who have no valid argument can only Name Call.. I see it everywhere.. see: “HIV test are NOT HIV tests” Research, Learn something..

[QUOTE] [b]inu-liger wrote:[/b]

Indeed, fuck off and stop resurrecting this ignorant bile.[/QUOTE]

It is quite sad when people do not know how to debate but only know how to degrade or be belligerent. Amazes me but I think the masses see it. Those who call people names really only express a reflection of themselves.. Good Luck to you!

How does HIV turn into 30 different diseases?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RWoJanKCVDw

Open your minds to the truth!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SaA6zLUPfvk

There is no such thing as HIV.. I wish people would research more and speak less of things that they know nothing about..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3J7vHLXCphA

Go away, Treasure Moment

Freddie killed Freddie and took many with him. If he became infected in late 1970s, as some claim, and given that he was slutting himself in that time period to about 1984 he must have stood on top of a pyramid and infected hundreds, who then in turn infected many more.

To enjoybeing: All that open mindedness requires is consideration of an idea/proposal without rejecting it outright before any considerations or evaluations are made. What conspiracy nuts don't seem to be able to grasp is that having an open mind does not mean accepting any new idea as true as soon as it is presented, like they mostly do. Oh but of course the conspiracy theories presented on this thread are true - there's videos that say it on YouTube! Just like there's videos on YouTube (and internet blogs) that claim there's such things as humanoid reptilians, or the moon is a hologram, or that Sandy Hook or the Woolwich massacre were false flags or that Stonehenge was built in 1954... (the list goes on)... "How to Make Money Creating Conspiracy Theories" http://gcrhoads64.hubpages.com/hub/How-to-Create-a-Conspiarcy-Theory-and-Make-Money That site MercuryKing posted mentions and quotes Kary Mullis. Let's see (a quick look on Wiki will give you an idea of what he's about - and if you doubt Wiki, then treat yourself to a little more investigation, you'll find it's correct)... "Mullis has been criticized in The New York Times for promoting ideas in areas in which he has no expertise.[6] He has promoted AIDS denialism,[7][8][9][10][11][12] climate change denial[7] and his belief in astrology.[6][7] Mullis has drawn controversy for his association with prominent AIDS denialist Peter Duesberg,[8] claiming that AIDS is an arbitrary diagnosis only used when HIV antibodies are found in a patient's blood.[9] The medical and scientific consensus is that Duesberg's hypothesis is pseudoscience, HIV having been conclusively proven to be the cause of AIDS[26][27] . Extraterrestrial life Mullis reported an encounter with a glowing green raccoon at his cabin in the woods of northern California around midnight one night in 1985.[35]" Fascinating. I guess by his logic "in areas in which he has no expertise" that also makes astrology the real deal too, right? Well, it appears not. Astrology Debunked - Sagan, Dawkins, Nye, Randi, Tyson... (There's plenty more info on that than just a YouTube video too - and a little bit of critical thinking wouldn't go amiss). And what scientific journals is that site talking about exactly? Legit ones? Would you be able to tell the difference? Can you evaluate scientific journals? Here's some help for you... http://sciencebasedlife.wordpress.com/resources-2/what-is-a-good-study-guidelines-for-evaluating-scientific-studies/ http://www.skepticalraptor.com/skepticalraptorblog.php/judging-quality-science-sources/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method http://norvig.com/experiment-design.html http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/interpreting-the-medical-literature/ http://scienceornot.net/science-red-flags/ http://scienceornot.net/hallmarks-of-science/ http://scienceornot.net/2012/10/23/single-study-syndrome-clutching-at-convenient-confirmation/ http://violentmetaphors.com/2013/08/25/how-to-read-and-understand-a-scientific-paper-2/ http://www.nature.com/news/policy-twenty-tips-for-interpreting-scientific-claims-1.14183 http://debunkingdenialism.com/2013/12/21/how-to-spot-a-pseudoscientific-paper/ http://tdaynard.com/2014/01/13/how-can-you-tell-what-good-science-really-says/ A few places where you'll find scientific literature.... http://www.cochrane.org/ “an international network of more than 31,000 dedicated people from over 120 countries. We work together to help healthcare practitioners, policy-makers, patients, their advocates and carers, make well-informed decisions about health care, by preparing, updating, and promoting the accessibility of Cochrane Reviews – over 5,000 so far, published online in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, part of The Cochrane Library. We also prepare the largest collection of records of randomised controlled trials in the world, called CENTRAL, published as part of The Cochrane Library.” http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ “comprises more than 23 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. Citations may include links to full-text content from PubMed Central and publisher web sites.” http://www.jstor.org/ “is a digital library of more than 1,500 academic journals, books, and primary sources. JSTOR helps people discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content through a powerful research and teaching platform, and preserves this content for future generations.” http://www.plos.org/ "a nonprofit publisher and advocacy organization founded to accelerate progress in science and medicine by leading a transformation in research communication.” Or a good place to ask science questions is http://www.reddit.com/r/askscience Here's a list of fake research journal publishers... https://sites.google.com/site/fakeresearchjournalpublishers/ And here's a video on critical thinking skills... Now, if you really want to "open your mind to the truth", I suggest you start attempting to get nearer to it by educating yourself a little bit, instead of peddling bullshit that only the ill-informed or gullible would fall for.

[QUOTE] [b]Mercuryking wrote:[/b]

He may not even have had aids at all , they diagnose him saying he had the aids virus then giving him the fatal drug called AZT look it up for yourselves. I think those fuckers killed freddie on purpose. [/QUOTE]

Look up - Myth #7: AZT causes AIDS
Fact: AZT and other antiretrovirals helps people with AIDS live longer.

http://www.aidstruth.org/denialism/myths

[QUOTE] [b]Biggest Band On The Planet wrote:[/b]

Check out these videos .... [/QUOTE]


Now read this regarding RT, being as you posted RT videos - especially the bit under "Conspiracy theories" >
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/RT

[QUOTE] [b]Day dop wrote:[/b]

[QUOTE] [b]Mercuryking wrote:[/b]

He may not even have had aids at all , they diagnose him saying he had the aids virus then giving him the fatal drug called AZT look it up for yourselves. I think those fuckers killed freddie on purpose. [/QUOTE]

Look up - Myth #7: AZT causes AIDS
Fact: AZT and other antiretrovirals helps people with AIDS live longer.

http://www.aidstruth.org/denialism/myths
[/QUOTE]

Excellent fact-checking job in your last few posts.

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Unless you're a conspiracy nut, in which case you're almost never persuaded by facts..

[QUOTE] [b]The Real Wizard wrote:[/b]

[QUOTE] [b]Day dop wrote:[/b]

[QUOTE] [b]Mercuryking wrote:[/b]

He may not even have had aids at all , they diagnose him saying he had the aids virus then giving him the fatal drug called AZT look it up for yourselves. I think those fuckers killed freddie on purpose. [/QUOTE]

Look up - Myth #7: AZT causes AIDS
Fact: AZT and other antiretrovirals helps people with AIDS live longer.

http://www.aidstruth.org/denialism/myths
[/QUOTE]

Excellent fact-checking job in your last few posts.

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Unless you're a conspiracy nut, in which case you're almost never persuaded by facts..[/QUOTE]

Totally, they're infuriatingly ignorant. Paranoid conspiracy theorists and facts aren't friends. What's sad about it is that the tin foil hat brigade can recruit casual observers if their weak arguments aren't refuted.

This is kind of amusing - three things that PCTs regularly bleat ...

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Wake_up
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Sheeple
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Do_your_own_research

What's really interesting is looking at who the people are that are peddling conspiracy theories. A lot of the time, it's not just people trying to make an easy buck (plenty of those) or the really bat crap crazy types (idem), but socio-political extremists: religious fanatics, no-government extremists, ultra-nationalists and, occasionally, environmentalists actively exploiting the New Age-crowd to push political goals by means of conspiracy-theory propaganda, yes, psychological warfare. The upsurge in conspiracy theory-material and exposure given to it and the new rise of the 'paranoid conservative' have mostly moved in a similar way the past few decades.

[QUOTE] [b]thomasquinn 32989 wrote:[/b]

What's really interesting is looking at who the people are that are peddling conspiracy theories. A lot of the time, it's not just people trying to make an easy buck (plenty of those) or the really bat crap crazy types (idem), but socio-political extremists: religious fanatics, no-government extremists, ultra-nationalists and, occasionally, environmentalists actively exploiting the New Age-crowd to push political goals by means of conspiracy-theory propaganda, yes, psychological warfare. The upsurge in conspiracy theory-material and exposure given to it and the new rise of the 'paranoid conservative' have mostly moved in a similar way the past few decades.[/QUOTE]

The internet is a great source of misinformation, that's added to all the paranoia a hell of a lot. Plus, the way conspiracy theorists jumped on 911. Since then, I think it's got worse.

[QUOTE] [b]Day dop wrote:[/b]

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Wake_up
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Sheeple
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Do_your_own_research
[/QUOTE]

Rationalwiki is my favourite website, next to cracked.com. The writing is concise, accurate, and often hilarious.

Like this one:

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Cleanse

But unfortunately, pointing wayward minded people to actual facts has been shown via studies to actually be detrimental - it merely reinforces (and often strengthens) their views and confirmation bias.