Hungarian Rhapsody

[QUOTE] [b]Missreclusive wrote:[/b]
lol, what tha heck is wrong with you people?[/QUOTE]
Live at Wembley Stadium : http://www.queenpedia.com/images/6/6f/Wembley86dvd.jpg
Live at the Bowl : http://www.queenpedia.com/images/2/23/Bowlfiredvd.jpg
Queen Rock Montreal : http://www.queenpedia.com/images/a/af/Montdvdsingle.jpg
Hungarian Rhapsody poster : http://i81.photobucket.com/albums/j203/lolsos/Hungarian-Rhapsody-Portrait.jpg

Do you see the pattern ?

Having Freddie only in the DVD covers for the live shows means that his fellow band members regard him fondly as the greatest frontman in the world.

This is the release i was waiting for! For me, Budapest is the best gig ever recorded by QP, so i'll buy for sure.

I'll be a little disappointed if the rumors are true and
they don't release the full gig. But in first place, Queen made something incredible playing in Budapest, and in second, they filmed it, in 35 mm no less! Something very rare for the time. Too bad QP don't search for the unused film in the 90', but still, Queen win 2-1.

And for the artwork, is ok. They want the face of the band in front, that doesn't mean nothing.

Of everything, I'm looking forward to the audio and video being at the right speed at last

What makes you feel they will fix the speed ? The Tokyo 75 footage which was released last year was converted from PAL to NTSC, but still it plays too fast

I don't believe that pic is the DVD art but the poster for the concert's run in movie theaters. Has a BluRay or DVD release been confirmed?

I live in (probably false) hope Pittrek!

[QUOTE] [b]pittrek wrote:[/b]
What makes you feel they will fix the speed ? The Tokyo 75 footage which was released last year was converted from PAL to NTSC, but still it plays too fast[/QUOTE]
The Japan 75 footage was an extra on a Japanese-only release, and wasn't great quality to begin with.

Budapest will be a worldwide release, and may end up being the highest quality Queen concert ever seen. If they're doing it in 5.1, I highly doubt they'd go out of their way to speed up the audio from their multi-tracks. But we shall see..

Yes Pittrek I do see the pattern and that Freddie is front and center, exactly where a "frontman" should be. I don't feel it takes away from the others and apparently they don't either.

While this is true, Freddie was never supposed to be the 'frontman' - they've actually made a very big point of that over time, particularly Freddie himself. He was the lead vocalist and pianist, not the frontman.

[QUOTE] [b]tomchristie22 wrote:[/b]
While this is true, Freddie was never supposed to be the 'frontman' - they've actually made a very big point of that over time, particularly Freddie himself. He was the lead vocalist and pianist, not the frontman. [/QUOTE]
This is not correct: Freddie was the frontman from day 1.
Frontman does not mean "leader"...

semantics |s?'mantiks|

the branch of linguistics and logic concerned with meaning. There are a number of branches and subbranches of semantics, including formal semantics, which studies the logical aspects of meaning, such as sense, reference, implication, and logical form, lexical semantics, which studies word meanings and word relations, and conceptual semantics, which studies the cognitive structure of meaning.
• the meaning of a word, phrase, sentence, or text: such quibbling over semantics may seem petty stuff.

*wink-wink*!!! haha!!

Take me to your frontman, earthlings!

LOL@ Holly, I go back to ..what tha heck is wrong with you people?!! I nearly know I've seen an interview where Freddie admitted being the "frontman" for Queen and of course he said they were all equal partners in Queen. I can not believe anyone would say he wasn't the frontman.