inu-liger
And by the way, "you these" doesn't even make grammatical sense!
Thread
Posts in chronological order
rocknrolllover
[QUOTE]
[b]inu-liger wrote: [/b] And by the way, "you these" doesn't even make grammatical sense![/QUOTE]
it doesn`t matter
[b]inu-liger wrote: [/b] And by the way, "you these" doesn't even make grammatical sense![/QUOTE]
it doesn`t matter
popy
[QUOTE] [b]cmsdrums wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]e-man wrote:[/b]
that's true. the blu ray of Dire Straits' Alchemy Live looks very good conisdering it's a SD shot concert. I'm no expert, but I suppose alot of work needs to be done, and that you cannot simply transfer it to a BD and it'll look alot better?
about the sound; yes indeed. a BD could contain a HD sountrack. imo, that's a good enough reason to put out a Wembley BD...[/QUOTE]
I haven't bought the Alchemy Live Blu Ray because I read several reviews saying it had no remastering or treatment, and was literally just the VHS dumped onto a blu ray disc, and had loads of colour bleeding etc....
Is there a revised edition oput now that addresses these issues, or were these reviews way off the mark?
Thanks
Chris[/QUOTE]
SD? Don't think so. From what i remember seeing, it was shot on 16mm film. If the transfer was badly done or badly restored that's another story. There's no artifacts/noise that normally show up on SD video of the time (early 80's) , like trailing lights for example. Also, notice picture grain (more noticeable on Blu-Ray).
[QUOTE] [b]e-man wrote:[/b]
that's true. the blu ray of Dire Straits' Alchemy Live looks very good conisdering it's a SD shot concert. I'm no expert, but I suppose alot of work needs to be done, and that you cannot simply transfer it to a BD and it'll look alot better?
about the sound; yes indeed. a BD could contain a HD sountrack. imo, that's a good enough reason to put out a Wembley BD...[/QUOTE]
I haven't bought the Alchemy Live Blu Ray because I read several reviews saying it had no remastering or treatment, and was literally just the VHS dumped onto a blu ray disc, and had loads of colour bleeding etc....
Is there a revised edition oput now that addresses these issues, or were these reviews way off the mark?
Thanks
Chris[/QUOTE]
SD? Don't think so. From what i remember seeing, it was shot on 16mm film. If the transfer was badly done or badly restored that's another story. There's no artifacts/noise that normally show up on SD video of the time (early 80's) , like trailing lights for example. Also, notice picture grain (more noticeable on Blu-Ray).