The truth Queen/"Fanthology"/etc don't want you to know about Queen II

Surely if The Game was intended at some point to be a double-album, we'd have heard this story by now?

In all the interviews the band have done since then this has never been mentioned by any of them. The ANATO/ADATR double-album concept has been addressed by Brian a few times, I think, so I find it hard to believe that in 30-odd years he (at least) has never thought to mention that this idea was also considered for The Game.

In conclusion, I still think RUB is a WUM.

who all the commotion who gives/gets the info?has prequeen farts ever given any new info reg previous material?my arse useless old dummies still living on ghuts 12@were did 3 come from?wether its fuller or etc wether its crap fake atleast it keeps queen saddos going with somefing better than voting for bloody splatterd bagders@speedboats.queen was freddie mercury queen died in 1991 the rest is left overs cashing not only on xmas but all year round feeding us shit like we must be mushrooms some are out here?were on earth are these bloody antholigies?black queen white queen its@load of crap.if it wasnt for mr fuller@his music unreleased stuff he gave fans for free we would be dead he gave he served he did more than prequeem have in the last 20 odd years@now they take him to court watabunch of wankers this is how they say thankyou to the fans true fans who keep queen fredd memoriies alive nice one prequeen.@to all those faggotts waiting for those boxsets yeah keep on dreaming for another 10 years when they change to another rip off rec company@release the same ol crap over@over again my goodness such scandal im glad fredd aint here so sad to see his mates cashing millions in his name wow wish i had mates like that?

I agree, for The Game to have had so many songs written/recorded for it and for it to be news now? Not believable. I'm sure subsequent albums would have had the odd 'this song was originally written for The Game' spiel in the odd interview now and then but for the band to NEVER mention it before.... very suspect claim...

[QUOTE] [b]inu-liger wrote:[/b]

[QUOTE] [b]Panchgani wrote:[/b]

[QUOTE] [b]inu-liger wrote:[/b]

[QUOTE] [b]Holly2003 wrote:[/b]

[QUOTE]

[b]inu-liger wrote: [/b] Shut up Meg[/QUOTE]

Welcome back ratty![/QUOTE]

Who?[/QUOTE]

Perhaps you can rat out to QPL the bootleggers that sell CD silvers. [/QUOTE]

Not within my capacity logically speaking[/QUOTE]

Really? You can rat on Fuller, but can not rat on bootleggers that sell CD silvers. Interesting ... Typical elite collector hypocricy.

[QUOTE] [b]Holly2003 wrote:[/b]

Your little group are the ones who ratted Fuller to QPL, and boasted about it here, not me.
[/QUOTE]

Again - someone who wasn't there pretending they were.

Good luck with that..

[QUOTE] [b]Ivo-1976 wrote:[/b]

Collectors are in it for the money, getting return on their investments.[/QUOTE]

Awesome, now I don't have to finish reading your post after reading this drivel. Thank goodness it was the second sentence.

Carry on..

http://rendezvous.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/05/10/in-brussels-private-art-collections-with-open-doors/

“It was selfish at first, I wanted a space where I could see my collection, for me and my friends,” he said. But he decided that the art should be shared. After extensive renovations, the building opened as a public art space in 2007.

Classy!

I recall Greg Brooks saying a few years ago here that he'd heard unreleased Queen songs in the vaults, including at least one track that he virtually guaranteed could be a number 1 single if released as it was so good.

This clearly confirms that some of the 'left behind' material isn't second rate (although I suppose Brian and Roger might think it is).

It would be nice to know which era this supposed hit single gem comes from, and also to get confirmation that it is a fully completed finished track (it would be difficult to say that it's a great song if it's missing bits or has incomplete vocal parts etc)

Great thread (when on topic) by the way - I hope the original poster sticks around and isn't put off by the nonsense between sensible replies.

I may be wrong, but I'm certain Greggy said 'Let Me In Your Heart Again' was the potential #1 single, which comes from the 1983 Works sessions.

[QUOTE] [b]Lord Gaga wrote:[/b]

I may be wrong, but I'm certain Greggy said 'Let Me In Your Heart Again' was the potential #1 single, which comes from the 1983 Works sessions.[/QUOTE]

I concur. That's what I seem to remember.

[QUOTE]

[b]The Real Wizard wrote: [/b] [QUOTE] [b]Holly2003 wrote:[/b]

Your little group are the ones who ratted Fuller to QPL, and boasted about it here, not me.
[/QUOTE]

Again - someone who wasn't there pretending they were.

Good luck with that..[/QUOTE]

"Greg [Brooks], remember that list of unreleased rarities I alerted you and the others to that DFR was offering for sale illegally?"

Inu-Luger, from the 'Help Wanted' topic.

Inu's not a member of Fanthology.

[QUOTE] [b]Bohardy wrote:[/b]

[QUOTE] [b]Lord Gaga wrote:[/b]

I may be wrong, but I'm certain Greggy said 'Let Me In Your Heart Again' was the potential #1 single, which comes from the 1983 Works sessions.[/QUOTE]

I concur. That's what I seem to remember.

[/QUOTE]

Not at all. If i remember correctly, he referred the #1 thing to a question during the a&a session on qol forum:"do you believe that Queen will have a #1 single in the future?". Then he claimed the existance of Let me in and said that's the most beautiful thing he has ever heard from the vaults. But then it makes the sense that he thought about the Let me In as the potential #1 single.

Personally, I'm hoping that "Let Me In" IS the archive bonus track on the forthcoming Ballads album.

Same here, then I can finally get rid of my self-made slowed down Anita Dobson version (to approximate a man singing) on my reworked Works album!