The truth Queen/"Fanthology"/etc don't want you to know about Queen II

Double post

[QUOTE] [b]Holly2003 wrote:[/b][QUOTE] [b]brENsKi wrote: [/b] [QUOTE] [b]GratefulFan wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]inu-liger wrote:[/b] [QUOTE] [b]brENsKi wrote:[/b] incidentally - being popular does not equal being correct...it's more than likely that the "unpopular perspectives" you cite could actually be right and YOU could be wrong....who am i kidding? you're fucking infallible and we should all just accept that and move on[/QUOTE] Scary to think that GratefulFan, if I am not mistaken, claimed to be a teacher. I'd hate to see her interactions with students who don't agree with her teaching views...[/QUOTE] Jeez. LOL @ both of you.[/QUOTE] thus spake the public spokesperson for the dictatorial state of Ignoramia[/QUOTE] the dictatorial state of Ignoramia -- isn't that a Muse song?[/QUOTE]

quite probably. and [like most Muse tracks] as dull as this thread has become

[QUOTE] [b]Rogers Untidy Bottom wrote:[/b]

Hi all,

Not forgotten about you. I'm making notes of the questions and will answer them as quickly as poss. Hopefully great behind-the-scenes about AKOM tomorrow.

Having to work lots of overtime at mo. Popping out in 10 again. How the mighty have fallen, eh?

RUB[/QUOTE]

Thanks! I'm glad you're still willing to answer questions in the midst of this shit storm

[QUOTE] [b]GratefulFan wrote:[/b]

Yeah. You misread my post and inu thinks I said i was a teacher. I feel so dumb.[/QUOTE]

To be very honest, I could have very well been misremembering something you had said a couple years ago, but I could have sworn I recall you saying something in the past about your profession having to do with a school. If I am totally mistaken, if you wish to clarify, feel free to pm me and set the record straight confidentially.
I DID emphasize that I might have been wrong about this. It's one of those small details, you know.

[QUOTE] [b]brENsKi wrote:[/b] [QUOTE] [b]Holly2003 wrote:[/b][QUOTE] [b]brENsKi wrote: [/b] [QUOTE] [b]GratefulFan wrote:[/b] [QUOTE] [b]inu-liger wrote:[/b] [QUOTE] [b]brENsKi wrote:[/b] incidentally - being popular does not equal being correct...it's more than likely that the "unpopular perspectives" you cite could actually be right and YOU could be wrong....who am i kidding? you're fucking infallible and we should all just accept that and move on[/QUOTE] Scary to think that GratefulFan, if I am not mistaken, claimed to be a teacher. I'd hate to see her interactions with students who don't agree with her teaching views...[/QUOTE] Jeez. LOL @ both of you.[/QUOTE] thus spake the public spokesperson for the dictatorial state of Ignoramia[/QUOTE] the dictatorial state of Ignoramia -- isn't that a Muse song?[/QUOTE] quite probably. and [like most Muse tracks] as dull as this thread has become [/QUOTE] That comparison wasn't very amusing :P

[QUOTE] [b]GratefulFan wrote:[/b] Classy to let inu take all the blame for what others on this board clearly supported and clearly benefit from. [/QUOTE] You make it sound like they put me up to this :-P Let me be clear: I did not consult with ANY one of the Fanthology members prior to putting out the relevant e-mails. I did not seek any approval or backing, this was entirely my own doing right from the get go as soon as I saw what DFR was up to. And my reasoning for that was NOT to do with Fanthology, it was to do with the fact that DFR was committing a highly illegal act for the intent of profiting off material that was not legally his to sell digitally, and VERY openly at that, in order to rip off people. Any benefit to the Fanthology would have been indirect and unfortunately for people like you open to broad misinterpretation. [QUOTE]Holly's 'your little group' needn't have referred to Fanthology, it could have referred to the little fascist knot of collectors here. That was my point. And it's certainly a wild stretch to characterize his quote as attempting to prove inu was 'giving himself away as a member of Fanthology'. It was of course meant to illustrate that inu had acknowledged reporting on Fuller.[/QUOTE] Credit where it's due, I do appreciate that you finally acknowledge this. Thank you very much. [QUOTE]You definition of 'common sense' is pretty shaky, unless you mean any sense at all that serves the common goal of collectors. [/QUOTE] And two steps back, sadly. I think Bob's "common sense" comment was to do with the fact Holly was trying to twist me around to look like I was an actual member of Fanthology when in fact I had already said, and a few times at that, that I was never officially in the group despite being invited initially. And you did play into that before you finally backtracked after at least TWO other people said I was not in the group, GF. Would appreciate a small apology for that, but I have my doubts I'll get that given your refusal to apologize for other attacks on my character in the past, so I'll probably be happy enough with the 2nd last quote for now otherwise.

[QUOTE] [b]John S Stuart wrote:[/b]

Better to be a werewolf on the outside than on the inside...[/QUOTE]
what a very good saying!
a wolf in sheep's clothing is the same saying

[QUOTE] [b]inu-liger wrote:[/b] [QUOTE] [b]GratefulFan wrote:[/b] Classy to let inu take all the blame for what others on this board clearly supported and clearly benefit from. [/QUOTE] You make it sound like they put me up to this :-P Let me be clear: I did not consult with ANY one of the Fanthology members prior to putting out the relevant e-mails. I did not seek any approval or backing, this was entirely my own doing right from the get go as soon as I saw what DFR was up to. And my reasoning for that was NOT to do with Fanthology, it was to do with the fact that DFR was committing a highly illegal act for the intent of profiting off material that was not legally his to sell digitally, and VERY openly at that, in order to rip off people. Any benefit to the Fanthology would have been indirect and unfortunately for people like you open to broad misinterpretation. [QUOTE]Holly's 'your little group' needn't have referred to Fanthology, it could have referred to the little fascist knot of collectors here. That was my point. And it's certainly a wild stretch to characterize his quote as attempting to prove inu was 'giving himself away as a member of Fanthology'. It was of course meant to illustrate that inu had acknowledged reporting on Fuller.[/QUOTE] Credit where it's due, I do appreciate that you finally acknowledge this. Thank you very much. [QUOTE]You definition of 'common sense' is pretty shaky, unless you mean any sense at all that serves the common goal of collectors. [/QUOTE] And two steps back, sadly. I think Bob's "common sense" comment was to do with the fact Holly was trying to twist me around to look like I was an actual member of Fanthology when in fact I had already said, and a few times at that, that I was never officially in the group despite being invited initially. And you did play into that before you finally backtracked after at least TWO other people said I was not in the group, GF. Would appreciate a small apology for that, but I have my doubts I'll get that given your refusal to apologize for other attacks on my character in the past, so I'll probably be happy enough with the 2nd last quote for now otherwise.[/QUOTE] What a shame, your admiral acts are out shadowed by your others.

[QUOTE] [b]Queen fan wrote:[/b]
What a shame, your admiral acts are out shadowed by your others.
[/QUOTE]

Whatever

Anyways, let's please get back on topic

I'm happy to believe that The Game MAY have a lot more leftover tracks than we know about.

Is it too difficult to believe that CLTCL, SASS, CS and SM were the ONLY four songs that came out of those initial 1979 sessions? I would guess that to get four songs that actually made the final album cut a year later, a lot more ideas would have been worked on, and some possibly to near completion, before they werer discarded. Equally, over the timeline that we're talking about for The Game session in total (at least four concerted sessions according to Roger's Untidy Bottom, rather than just to as per the offical line), did Queen as a band really only produce the handful of songs that we hear on The Game, plus A Human Body and It's A Beautiful Day? You can add to the equation that The Game was their most musically 'simple' album to that point, both in how it was recorded and how it was put together musically (everything from less drum mics used to less layered guitar parts), so would it really have produced a lot less material than albums such as SHA, Races etc.. that seemingly had less studio time spent on them, but were far more complex and had far more tracks?

This is far from definitive proof, but I'm happy to go along for the ride so far at the expense of some of the other tripe that gets posted on these forums.

yes i was also around in those studios i came across a demo they were the band not inc sneakydeacy the one that ran away with all the money?i belive it was supposed to be released on queen 2 but for some reason the band werent happy with the final mix the tracks name is SIT ON MY PENIS HAHAHAHAHHAHA NOW THATS FUNNY I GOT ALL OF YOU YOU YOU SILLY LOWLIFE FAGGOTTS X

i was also around the studios in the 70s and came across a gem that was supposed to be released on queen 2 but due to the final mix was not released.also to be feat on boxset in 2006 wich daint happend i believe the tracks name is SIT ON MY PENIS SANG BY FREDD HAHAHAH X