The truth Queen/"Fanthology"/etc don't want you to know about Queen II
264 postsPage 8 of 18
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Holly2003 · Member since
[QUOTE]
[b]The Real Wizard wrote: [/b] So you know nothing about it and have no interest in it.
Tell me more about your expertise.
And why, pray tell, do you post at a Queen forum if unreleased songs from 1974 do not interest you?[/QUOTE]
I don't claim any epxertise, but I can spot a self-serving bullshitter a mile off, and I'm addressing one right now.
As for why I post on Queenzone, why don't you stretch your mental abilities a bit and try to figure it out for yourself (here's a clue: there's more to life and more to being a fan than hoarding/trading little files).
Holly2003 · Member since
[QUOTE]
[b]brENsKi wrote: [/b] of course people are "interested" but only if things are free.... [i]"The grabbing hands Grab all they can Everything counts in large amounts"[/i][/QUOTE]
I don't feel I have to defend myself against wild stabs in the dark but I've spent a small fortune on music in my life. No doubt there is a generation of fans growing up who are used to free downloads because the tech is now in place for that to make sense: time to accept that and stop hanging on to trading models from the 1970s (models that are based on the worst traits of capitalism and elitism).
brENsKi · Member since
i have never heard such crap in all my life ^^^
people"collect" things as hobbies...stamps, cars, butterflies, music etc etc collectors pay a fortune for their collections and are entitled to do so
you wouldn't go and demand that the owner of a 1972 mkII jensen interceptor or an 1850 penny black should give you what they have saved, searched, tracked down invested days/weeks into finding and then laid out their hard-earned cash for...just hand it over to you
so these rare records are exactly the same. the "owner" doesn't own the copyright, but they own the actual tangible item they have laid out for - and it's NOT our right to have it
ps - for someone with no interest in the "shiny little things" you have a fucking lot to say on the subject....
must be a prviliged existence that BOTH yourself and GreatfulFan ...always being able to speak from the moral high ground. must be great to NEVER be wrong about anything
Holly2003 · Member since
[QUOTE]
[b]brENsKi wrote: [/b] i have never heard such crap in all my life ^^^
people"collect" things as hobbies...stamps, cars, butterflies, music etc etc collectors pay a fortune for their collections and are entitled to do so
you wouldn't go and demand that the owner of a 1972 mkII jensen interceptor or an 1850 penny black should give you what they have saved, searched, tracked down invested days/weeks into finding and then laid out their hard-earned cash for...just hand it over to you
so these rare records are exactly the same. the "owner" doesn't own the copyright, but they own the actual tangible item they have laid out for - and it's NOT our right to have it
ps - for someone with no interest in the "shiny little things" you have a fucking lot to say on the subject....
must be a prviliged existence that BOTH yourself and GreatfulFan ...always being able to speak from the moral high ground. must be great to NEVER be wrong about anything[/QUOTE]
You're losing the plot. When have I ever claimed not to be wrong? What concern is it of yours what I talk about? lol!
brENsKi · Member since
at least i can claim to have ever been in contact with the plot in the first place
think you and "it" are complete strangers
you were the one who said you had no interest....ffs - just exactly how much would you talk about something YOU WERE actually interested in?
cos if this is you NOT INTERESTED then you could talk the hind legs off a donkey
Holly2003 · Member since
[QUOTE]
[b]brENsKi wrote: [/b] at least i can claim to have ever been in contact with the plot in the first place think you and "it" are complete strangers
you were the one who said you had no interest....ffs - just exactly how much would you talk about something YOU WERE actually interested in? cos if this is you NOT INTERESTED then you could talk the hind legs off a donkey[/QUOTE]
Yawn.
brENsKi · Member since
bless ^^^
scovel001 · Member since
Has a queen fan who doesn't own or hasn't heard any other 'unreleased' tracks beyond YouTube.
I just wanted to ask, is there anything in your vast collections which you would consider would be a top 10 hit if released? & if so could you give a name to the track?
Also, does anyone have Roger & Brian's 'official' stance on the 'archive' material?
To the Original poster, I just wondered if you could share any anecdotes around The Miracle album & any unfinished/unheard tracks as that is one of my favourite albums.
Lord Gaga · Member since
Yes, well, this is fun and all, but I'd still love to hear more about the sessions from A Kind of Magic.
Queen fan · Member since
ok i cant think of a question
yet
but i have a general question for everyone
am i right in thinking i cant live with you was never a single or b side?
The Real Wizard · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]brENsKi wrote:[/b]
at least i can claim to have ever been in contact with the plot in the first place
think you and "it" are complete strangers
you were the one who said you had no interest....ffs - just exactly how much would you talk about something YOU WERE actually interested in?
cos if this is you NOT INTERESTED then you could talk the hind legs off a donkey[/QUOTE]
And ... brENsKi for the win.
Saint Jiub · Member since
Please remove your lips from Brenski's piehole.
Saint Jiub · Member since
Please remove your lips from Brenski's piehole.
tcc · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]GratefulFan wrote:[/b]
It was me that pointed out that nobody ever had given me an opportunity to contribute financially and if they had I'd have done so. [/QUOTE]
Here is an opportunity for you to buy this and share it on queenzone:
at least i can claim to have ever been in contact with the plot in the first place
think you and "it" are complete strangers
you were the one who said you had no interest....ffs - just exactly how much would you talk about something YOU WERE actually interested in?
cos if this is you NOT INTERESTED then you could talk the hind legs off a donkey[/QUOTE]
And ... brENsKi for the win.[/QUOTE]
More like brenski for the Aunt Sally. There is nothing inconsistent in having an interest in criticizing the values and methods of something while having no interest in participating in it. Far from being incompatible, one presumably flows from the other. It can be safely assumed that Brenski would rather eat garden worms than seek out pictures of an ill Freddie or any number of other offenses to his delicate Fred sensibilities, so given the logic I guess we can look forward to the end of Brenski's copious, typically profane and assaultive commentary on all matters related. And...Queenzone for the win.