Pitiful thread.
In the serious discussion forum to boot.
Barry Durex
Thread
Posts in chronological order
dragonfly.trumpeter 61319
THIS MESSAGE CONTAINS TOP SECRET CLASSIFIED INFORMATION WHICH IS STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL, THE INFORMATION WITHIN THIS MESSAGE MAY BE LEGALLY PRIVILEGED AND POTENTIALLY A RISK TO INTERNATIONAL SECURITY.
IF YOU HAVE NOT BEEN GRANTED THE SECURITY PERMISSIONS BY EITHER THE UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICES OR THE UK SECRET SERVICES, OR YOU YOU HAVE NOT BEEN GRANTED THE SECURITY PERMISSIONS TO ACCESS THIS MESSAGE BY ANOTHER OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT ORGANISATION EITHER IN THE UNITED KINGDOM OR THE UNITED STATES, THEN PLEASE DO NOT READ OR REFER TO THIS MESSAGE AND IF YOU READ THIS MESSAGE BY ACCIDENT THEN PLEASE REMOVE THIS FROM YOUR COMPUTER IMMEDIATELY.
PLEASE DO NOT CIRCULATE THIS MESSAGE TO ANY PERSON UNLESS THEY HAVE BEEN GRANTED THE SECURITY PERMISSIONS TO ACCESS THIS CLASSIFIED INFORMATION.
Dear Greg
Thank you for your messages.
The point I really wanted to make to you was that in my opinion I am genetically identical to the agent who was known as Freddie Mercury in Queen.
I have also had a back operation which I believe makes me bionic, and an education which was excessively expensive covering most if not all of the relevant areas relating to National Security.
I believe that fronting Queen is the job I am designed to do and this is why I was eager to have a meeting with you to see if their was an indication from you as to whether this might be possible.
I believe that taking into account my genetics, bionics and education, I cannot see any case for Adam Lambert being the front man in Queen and the choice of Adam Lambert fronting Queen is against international public policy in the circumstances.
Perhaps you, or a representative of Queen can email me privately if there is a possibility of me fronting the band in the future and the band would like to have a meeting to discuss this. I will not be offended if there isn't an opportunity for me to front Queen, but if I don't receive an email in relation to this by 27 February 2014, then I will be making other arrangements with an alternative band.
Kind regards
Graham
IF YOU HAVE NOT BEEN GRANTED THE SECURITY PERMISSIONS BY EITHER THE UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICES OR THE UK SECRET SERVICES, OR YOU YOU HAVE NOT BEEN GRANTED THE SECURITY PERMISSIONS TO ACCESS THIS MESSAGE BY ANOTHER OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT ORGANISATION EITHER IN THE UNITED KINGDOM OR THE UNITED STATES, THEN PLEASE DO NOT READ OR REFER TO THIS MESSAGE AND IF YOU READ THIS MESSAGE BY ACCIDENT THEN PLEASE REMOVE THIS FROM YOUR COMPUTER IMMEDIATELY.
PLEASE DO NOT CIRCULATE THIS MESSAGE TO ANY PERSON UNLESS THEY HAVE BEEN GRANTED THE SECURITY PERMISSIONS TO ACCESS THIS CLASSIFIED INFORMATION.
Dear Greg
Thank you for your messages.
The point I really wanted to make to you was that in my opinion I am genetically identical to the agent who was known as Freddie Mercury in Queen.
I have also had a back operation which I believe makes me bionic, and an education which was excessively expensive covering most if not all of the relevant areas relating to National Security.
I believe that fronting Queen is the job I am designed to do and this is why I was eager to have a meeting with you to see if their was an indication from you as to whether this might be possible.
I believe that taking into account my genetics, bionics and education, I cannot see any case for Adam Lambert being the front man in Queen and the choice of Adam Lambert fronting Queen is against international public policy in the circumstances.
Perhaps you, or a representative of Queen can email me privately if there is a possibility of me fronting the band in the future and the band would like to have a meeting to discuss this. I will not be offended if there isn't an opportunity for me to front Queen, but if I don't receive an email in relation to this by 27 February 2014, then I will be making other arrangements with an alternative band.
Kind regards
Graham
cmsdrums
A most reasonable argument Graham, but Greg isn't going to be in a position to influence who the band choose as vocalist; try Brian, Roger or Jim Beach....
dragonfly.trumpeter 61319
THIS MESSAGE CONTAINS TOP SECRET CLASSIFIED INFORMATION WHICH IS STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL, THE INFORMATION WITHIN THIS MESSAGE MAY BE LEGALLY PRIVILEGED AND POTENTIALLY A RISK TO INTERNATIONAL SECURITY.
IF YOU HAVE NOT BEEN GRANTED THE SECURITY PERMISSIONS BY EITHER THE UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICES OR THE UK SECRET SERVICES, OR YOU YOU HAVE NOT BEEN GRANTED THE SECURITY PERMISSIONS TO ACCESS THIS MESSAGE BY ANOTHER OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT ORGANISATION EITHER IN THE UNITED KINGDOM OR THE UNITED STATES, THEN PLEASE DO NOT READ OR REFER TO THIS MESSAGE AND IF YOU READ THIS MESSAGE BY ACCIDENT THEN PLEASE REMOVE THIS FROM YOUR COMPUTER IMMEDIATELY.
PLEASE DO NOT CIRCULATE THIS MESSAGE TO ANY PERSON UNLESS THEY HAVE BEEN GRANTED THE SECURITY PERMISSIONS TO ACCESS THIS CLASSIFIED INFORMATION.
To tell you the truth I am fed up seeing artists who may have nothing to do with Queen taking intellectual property from Freddie Mercury's estate without (I assume) paying the full commercial value for this. This leaves anyone who takes advantage of Freddie Mercury's intellectual property open to litigation in the future if they have not paid the commercial value for using Queen and Freddie Mercury's intellectual property.
For example if your parents died, would you let Paul Rodgers or Adam Lambert live in a house which is part of your deceased parents estate, without them paying any rent for this, particularly if they devalue the property whilst living in it, i.e. devaluing the brand or structurally damaging the property whilst also benefiting from living in a property which may cost £30 million a month to rent on the open market.
How much precisely has Paul Rodgers paid back to Freddie's estate for playing with Queen when on the open market the cost for this could be as much as £10 million an evening given the publicity and advertising and what it costs to hire a famous band on the open market without advertising?
What exactly has someone like Paul Rodgers actually contributed back to Freddie's estate, and what payments have gone back to the estate for all the artists who have played with Queen in the past since Freddie's death?
I am really fucked off about the way Freddie's estate has been treated since he died. It is like I am just a commodity and every fucking cunt who knows little to nothing can take all my property without paying for it.
I am absolutely sick of it, and if I don't hear back from Queen by 27 February 2014 on my private email, then I will be using either Guns and Roses or The Who's infrastructure, but Queen will still be open to litigation in the future.
IF YOU HAVE NOT BEEN GRANTED THE SECURITY PERMISSIONS BY EITHER THE UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICES OR THE UK SECRET SERVICES, OR YOU YOU HAVE NOT BEEN GRANTED THE SECURITY PERMISSIONS TO ACCESS THIS MESSAGE BY ANOTHER OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT ORGANISATION EITHER IN THE UNITED KINGDOM OR THE UNITED STATES, THEN PLEASE DO NOT READ OR REFER TO THIS MESSAGE AND IF YOU READ THIS MESSAGE BY ACCIDENT THEN PLEASE REMOVE THIS FROM YOUR COMPUTER IMMEDIATELY.
PLEASE DO NOT CIRCULATE THIS MESSAGE TO ANY PERSON UNLESS THEY HAVE BEEN GRANTED THE SECURITY PERMISSIONS TO ACCESS THIS CLASSIFIED INFORMATION.
To tell you the truth I am fed up seeing artists who may have nothing to do with Queen taking intellectual property from Freddie Mercury's estate without (I assume) paying the full commercial value for this. This leaves anyone who takes advantage of Freddie Mercury's intellectual property open to litigation in the future if they have not paid the commercial value for using Queen and Freddie Mercury's intellectual property.
For example if your parents died, would you let Paul Rodgers or Adam Lambert live in a house which is part of your deceased parents estate, without them paying any rent for this, particularly if they devalue the property whilst living in it, i.e. devaluing the brand or structurally damaging the property whilst also benefiting from living in a property which may cost £30 million a month to rent on the open market.
How much precisely has Paul Rodgers paid back to Freddie's estate for playing with Queen when on the open market the cost for this could be as much as £10 million an evening given the publicity and advertising and what it costs to hire a famous band on the open market without advertising?
What exactly has someone like Paul Rodgers actually contributed back to Freddie's estate, and what payments have gone back to the estate for all the artists who have played with Queen in the past since Freddie's death?
I am really fucked off about the way Freddie's estate has been treated since he died. It is like I am just a commodity and every fucking cunt who knows little to nothing can take all my property without paying for it.
I am absolutely sick of it, and if I don't hear back from Queen by 27 February 2014 on my private email, then I will be using either Guns and Roses or The Who's infrastructure, but Queen will still be open to litigation in the future.
dragonfly.trumpeter 61319
Who the fuck would be Adam Lambert's lawyers in the current climate and are they brain damaged or lacking mental capacity?
Does Adam Lambert want to be sued for as much as £50 million for his work with Queen so far, for using intellectual property from Freddie Mercury's estate based on what he has done with Queen so far?
What exactly makes his lawyers "professional" when it comes to a professional indemnity insurance return disclosure and who in the world would insure Adam Lambert's lawyers unless they are fucking mental given that I am a clone of Freddie Mercury and I have had a legal opinion on this from a law firm representing the Government.
Do Adam Lambert's lawyers want to be made bankrupt as well as Adam Lambert himself?
Does Adam Lambert want to be sued for as much as £50 million for his work with Queen so far, for using intellectual property from Freddie Mercury's estate based on what he has done with Queen so far?
What exactly makes his lawyers "professional" when it comes to a professional indemnity insurance return disclosure and who in the world would insure Adam Lambert's lawyers unless they are fucking mental given that I am a clone of Freddie Mercury and I have had a legal opinion on this from a law firm representing the Government.
Do Adam Lambert's lawyers want to be made bankrupt as well as Adam Lambert himself?
dragonfly.trumpeter 61319
THE ABOVE MESSAGE CONTAINS TOP SECRET CLASSIFIED INFORMATION WHICH IS STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL, THE INFORMATION WITHIN MESSAGE MAY BE LEGALLY PRIVILEGED AND POTENTIALLY A RISK TO INTERNATIONAL SECURITY.
IF YOU HAVE NOT BEEN GRANTED THE SECURITY PERMISSIONS BY EITHER THE UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICES OR THE UK SECRET SERVICES, OR YOU YOU HAVE NOT BEEN GRANTED THE SECURITY PERMISSIONS TO ACCESS THIS MESSAGE BY ANOTHER OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT ORGANISATION EITHER IN THE UNITED KINGDOM OR THE UNITED STATES, THEN PLEASE DO NOT READ OR REFER TO THE ABOVE MESSAGE AND IF YOU READ THIS MESSAGE BY ACCIDENT THEN PLEASE REMOVE THIS FROM YOUR COMPUTER IMMEDIATELY.
PLEASE DO NOT CIRCULATE THE ABOVE MESSAGE TO ANY PERSON UNLESS THEY HAVE BEEN GRANTED THE SECURITY PERMISSIONS TO ACCESS THIS CLASSIFIED INFORMATION.
IF YOU HAVE NOT BEEN GRANTED THE SECURITY PERMISSIONS BY EITHER THE UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICES OR THE UK SECRET SERVICES, OR YOU YOU HAVE NOT BEEN GRANTED THE SECURITY PERMISSIONS TO ACCESS THIS MESSAGE BY ANOTHER OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT ORGANISATION EITHER IN THE UNITED KINGDOM OR THE UNITED STATES, THEN PLEASE DO NOT READ OR REFER TO THE ABOVE MESSAGE AND IF YOU READ THIS MESSAGE BY ACCIDENT THEN PLEASE REMOVE THIS FROM YOUR COMPUTER IMMEDIATELY.
PLEASE DO NOT CIRCULATE THE ABOVE MESSAGE TO ANY PERSON UNLESS THEY HAVE BEEN GRANTED THE SECURITY PERMISSIONS TO ACCESS THIS CLASSIFIED INFORMATION.