More slander i see you will not change.
as for Aids, there is a body of actual scientific evidence that proves acute immune deficiency is caused by the aids drugs that were given to those told they were hiv+ ,also there is a body of actual scientific evidence that shows there is no possible correlation between HIV and the development of immune deficiency. The scientific evidence for this comes from the top specialists in the aids field, including the man who designed the first test for HIV, and the top Nobel prize winning virologist in the world, and even the man who first discovered hiv.
The drug company that manufactured the Azt drug have now admitted it causes immune deficiencies which have led to cancers. Freddie developed cancer from the same group of drugs, and all the newer aids drugs work using the same lethal mechanism that Azt worked by, which is to destroy the bodies ability to replicate DNA which kills the body until you waste away to nothing ,have no immune system, and die of any disease you can care to think of.
Everything on the pro hiv= aids side , was given to the world in a press conference hosted by the right wing government of Ronald reagon infront of the worlds media in the 1980's, no science was involved and never has been.
"there is a body of actual scientific evidence that proves acute immune deficiency is caused by the aids drugs"
ie. I saw it on a Youtube clip once and decided it's a lot more reliable than, I dunno - actual science.
[QUOTE] [b]Zebonka12 wrote:[/b]
"there is a body of actual scientific evidence that proves acute immune deficiency is caused by the aids drugs"
ie. I saw it on a Youtube clip once and decided it's a lot more reliable than, I dunno - actual science.[/QUOTE]
Well if you actually take the time to see where the idea comes from you will see it is scientific.
I don't know which docs on youtube you've been using but that fact is that top virologists know how the aids drugs work and what they do to the human body. They destroy it.
And about HIV, it has never been isolated to prove it is actually a virus, why? Because it seems it does not actually really exist as a virus, but even if it does, the man who claims it is some kind of virus has stated in interviews that it is easy to recover from a infection of it, by good diet and water. Those are the actual facts and if you care to actually look for them, you will see that is the truth of the matter.
And again, the drug Azt has now been admitted to cause cancer, again that is factual and was admitted by the drug company that produced the shit, again if you care to look , you can find that is true also.
So it's upto you , be continually ignorant of the facts or face the realities.
Here you are
Peter Duesberg has repeatedly referred to AZT as a "poison", and with good reason. AZT is cytotoxic -- it kills cells. AZT terminates DNA synthesis, the very life process itself, by which new cells are formed and grow. It is in the very nature of AZT to kill healthy cells. Therefore, damage to the muscles, to the nerves, and to each and every organ of the body should be considered expected consequences of AZT therapy.
Ethics
I believe that history will severely condemn the ethical shortcomings of such AZT promoters as Samuel Broder, Anthony Fauci, and Margaret Fischl. In their zeal to expand the market for AZT, they have unconscionably failed to inform the public about the likely long-term consequences of AZT therapy.
I also believe that history will condemn the physicians, "AIDS groups" and individuals who have been urging healthy ("HIV- infected") gay men to take AZT.
Two years ago I wrote in the Native that "It is malpractice for physicians to prescribe AZT, a poison which can only harm the patient." [note 14] I reaffirm this judgment. When physicians coax and cajole and bully their "HIV-positive" patients into taking AZT, do they tell them that the long-term effects of AZT are unknown?...that AZT is cytotoxic?...that AZT destroys bone marrow?...that AZT causes muscular atrophy and pain?...that AZT terminates DNA synthesis?...that AZT damages the nerves, kidneys, and liver? Do they tell their patients that AZT will probably cause cancer in the long run? If not, these physicians have failed to inform their patients about the dangers of a drug whose "benefits" have yet to be demonstrated.
http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/jlcancer.htm
Whoops
They would sue if they did not say this:
And struck off if they were lying.
Dr. Andrew Herxheimer, Emeritus Professor of Pharmacology, UK Cochrane Centre, Oxford:
"I think zidovudine [AZT] was never really evaluated properly and that its efficacy has never been proved, but it's toxicity certainly is important. And I think it has killed a lot of people. Especially at the high doses. I personally think it not worth using alone or in combination at all." (Continuum Oct. 2000)
http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/data2/citations.htm
"Up to today there is actually no single scientifically really convincing evidence for the existence of HIV. Not even once (has) such a retrovirus been isolated and purified by the methods of classical virology."
Dr. Heinz Ludwig Sanger, Emeritus Professor of Molecular Biology and Virology, Max-Planck-Institutes for Biochemistry, Munchen.
http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/index.htm
"If there is evidence that HIV causes AIDS, there should be scientific documents which either singly or collectively demonstrate that fact, at least with a high probability. There is no such document."
Dr Kary Mullis, Biochemist, 1993 Nobel Prize for Chemistry.
http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/index.htm
Kary received a Nobel Prize in chemistry in 1993, for his invention of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The process, which Kary Mullis conceptualized in 1983, is hailed as one of the monumental scientific techniques of the twentieth century.
http://www.karymullis.com/
Ironically, if that is the right word, Kary Mullins is the man who invented the HIV PCR test ( The first HIV test ) and so the man won the Nobel prize for it.
And as a Nobel Prize winner for the PCR HIV test and as a Biochemist , Kay Mullins says HIV does not cause AIDS as there is no scientific evidence at all anywhere that proves it does.
One things for certain, we know that whatever drugs Freddie was given, they did not cure him, in fact as he went on them , he got muscular astrophy and wasted away , and he also got cancer.
so we see correlation between what the experts say these drugs cause and what happened to Freddie after he took them. Once your DNA replication is stopped you are f****
And we also know that Freddie was only on those drugs because of a HIV+ test result.
But listen to what the actual discoverer of the unproven virus says about it
"The causal role of HIV in AIDS is certainly not proven."
Dr. Luc Montagnier, Virologist, discoverer of HIV, Institute Pasteur Paris:
http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/data2/citations.htm
But what is proven is that if you are told you are HIV+ you go on the Drugs which did not cure people but were THE must have treatment that was given before THE death of Millions.
And if your still confused , as anybody got the " David Live" 70's live Bowie album?
http://vinyl-lover.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/David-Bowie-David-Live.jpg
David Live but wasting away
But as far as I know Freddie looked perfectly healthy until he got put on drugs because of the unproven HIV + Virus label.
"The causal role of HIV in AIDS is certainly not proven."
Dr. Luc Montagnier, Virologist, discoverer of HIV, Institute Pasteur Paris:
Dr. Charles Thomas, Molecular Biologist and former Harvard and Johns Hopkins Professor:
"The HIV-causes-AIDS dogma represents the grandest and perhaps the most morally destructive fraud that has ever been perpetrated on young men and women of the Western world,"
Dr. Charles Thomas
(Sunday Times (London) 3 April 1994)
Dr. Albert Sabin, Virologist:
"I think the views of a person like Dr. Duesberg are terribly, terribly important, and we must pay attention to them." (Oakland Tribune 31 Jan. 1988)
http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/data2/citations.htm
Dr. Andrew Herxheimer, Emeritus Professor of Pharmacology, UK Cochrane Centre, Oxford:
"I think zidovudine [AZT] was never really evaluated properly and that its efficacy has never been proved, but it's toxicity certainly is important. And I think it has killed a lot of people. Especially at the high doses. I personally think it not worth using alone or in combination at all." (Continuum Oct. 2000)
http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/data2/citations.htm
Back to Australia:
"Queen & Adam Lambert Announce Australia Tour"
http://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/pop-shop/6092239/queen-adam-lambert-announce-australia-tour
[QUOTE] [b]SweetCaroline wrote:[/b]
Back to Australia:
"Queen & Adam Lambert Announce Australia Tour"
http://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/pop-shop/6092239/queen-adam-lambert-announce-australia-tour
[/QUOTE]
After sdumedusa's/queenfansunite post above, that is a good read. I hope these shows go well too. I'm interested in how these shows go...I wasn't expecting shows there at all.
[QUOTE] [b]Zebonka12 wrote:[/b]
"Adam has performed many times in Australia and is well respected there"
I meet too many Queen fans here to take that entirely seriously, but I've a feeling the shows will sell. The attitude among most of the people I've spoken to is "ugh, but fuck it - Brian and Roger won't be coming back after this, might as well go". And if Nickelback can sell out a show, I have to believe half of Queen could at least get a few seats filled.[/QUOTE]
QUEENBERTFEVER ?@POPTHATFEVER 30m
First presale has SOLD OUT for Melbourne @QueenWillRock & @adamlambert show. 2nd presale & gen public sale this week!
There's a Facebook page for the Australian tour:
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Queen-Adam-Lambert-Australian-Tour-2014/1392833887605755
[QUOTE] [b]guild93 wrote:[/b]
There's a Facebook page for the Australian tour:
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Queen-Adam-Lambert-Australian-Tour-2014/1392833887605755[/QUOTE]
Hope you don't mind that I fixed your link (took the "s" out) so that you can click on it directly:
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Queen-Adam-Lambert-Australian-Tour-2014/1392833887605755
Good advertising for Melbourne:
http://twitter.com/katiemelb/status/470692244043739136/photo/1
"Well if you actually take the time to I Googled some random shit and hey it must be real".
Fixed your post.
I got my tickets today, $159 . Me and my lady cant wait!!!!
Because of travel plans, I won't be in Perth when they get here - I'm arriving home again the day after. :
Really, actually, seriously, maturely contemplated the prospect of flying to another Australian city to catch a show. I can't really overstate how much it would mean to me to see Brian May before he retires from live stuff, but the hassle is a turn-off.
I'm putting it in perspective this way : I never got to see Freddie, either!
[QUOTE] [b]SweetCaroline wrote:[/b] What does all of this have to do with Queen expanding their tour to Australia and possibly New Zealand? Ha! Ha![/QUOTE]
I originally missed this post in the midst of MEDUSA's trolling (which I see now has been quashed again). It's part of his online persona's raison d'être, to hijack other posts with posts that lead to his own self interests.
Kind of ironic in a way, but I'll leave it at that ;-)
Anyways back to your regularly scheduled topical programming...
A second show being added in Melbourne:
"2ND SHOW ANNOUNCED FOR MELBOURNE! From @Ticketek ~ #ALFC http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10152083768461434&set=o.252558399090&type=1 ...
[QUOTE] [b]inu-liger wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]SweetCaroline wrote:[/b] What does all of this have to do with Queen expanding their tour to Australia and possibly New Zealand? Ha! Ha![/QUOTE]
I originally missed this post in the midst of MEDUSA's trolling (which I see now has been quashed again). It's part of his online persona's raison d'être, to hijack other posts with posts that lead to his own self interests.
Kind of ironic in a way, but I'll leave it at that ;-)
Anyways back to your regularly scheduled topical programming...[/QUOTE]
I think he will be back. How many times has it been now?
