What do you think,I mean he is not a guy with rock background,he doesnt have any major genius hit like good rock singersor amazingsinger, I mean everybody says hesstage presence is very well but for me guys he is ordinary,doesnt run nowhere on stage doesnt play pianno,sorry i dont want to say if you dont play pianno you are sh..t but hedoesnt have anything special,even hes voice is too high or in lack of strenght in low range.. Ian Gillan used to scream all hes life ...he lost hes voice...and Adams vibrato is really really annoying.
Mr.Mouth provides you with honesty,sorry for my laungauge...
Greetings to all my fellow Queenzoners
"this message is, this message is, this message is..."
pittrek · Member since
Their legacy was ruined long before.
You know - working with Wyclef Jean, Vanguard, Britney Spears, Robbie Williams, Anastacia ....
Mr.Mouth · Member since
Yes pittrek my friend you are right...thats a shame
"this message is, this message is, this message is..."
matt z · Member since
Who the hell are Vanguard and Anastacia?
Short answer: No.
LONG ANSWER: No.
Queen thrived as a band and working vehicle for FOUR talented men to inspire and create unique ideas, songs and alter the framework of the touring band (going international, The ability to inspire beyond language boundaries)
... but maybe yes.
Depends on who remembers them. THE MUSIC is all there.
But these cheap diminishing roles Brian and Roger have given themselves could be enough.
I remember 5ive, (nobody else does) I remember Dappy (ditto)
I remember Robbie Williams (ditto)
I remember Jessie j looking nude at the Olympics HOT .... but who else cares.
One hit song now. .. let's see if it matters.
Unless she panders to a gay audience I see no longevity. She doesn't appear to be really talented other than in a slightly physical category.
Lately it's been a time for re reflection on this topic.
I'll just put a for instance in my argument.
IMAGINE : LED ZEPPELIN reunited to promote THE IMMIGRANT SONG for border patrol advertisements
Or better yet, they reformed to perform with Kylie Minogue for BLOOMINGDALES!
*(performing KASHMIR for a winter Cashmere SWEATER sale)
is THAT really that FAR OFF???
sadly, I think not. So lately I've been "understanding" a lot of the angst people have shown for the two. Used to be saying "don't be quick to judge" but ultimately
.... yea never know
LONG long answer: MAYBE
The Real Wizard · Member since
The concept of ruining a legacy is just so fundamentally flawed.
There is nothing Brian, Roger, John, Wyclef Jean, Adam Lambert, Alvin and the Chipmunks or Chuck Norris can do to undo the fact that Queen put out phenomenal albums in the 70s and sold hundreds of millions of them with songs that will be loved centuries from now.
Even Gary Glitter having diddled little kids and rotting in jail for it does not change the fact that Rock and Roll Part 2 exists and kicks ass.
CandyUnited · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]Mr.Mouth wrote:[/b]
What do you think,I mean he is not a guy with rock background,he doesnt have any major genius hit like good rock singersor amazingsinger, I mean everybody says hesstage presence is very well but for me guys he is ordinary,doesnt run nowhere on stage doesnt play pianno,sorry i dont want to say if you dont play pianno you are sh..t but hedoesnt have anything special,even hes voice is too high or in lack of strenght in low range.. Ian Gillan used to scream all hes life ...he lost hes voice...and Adams vibrato is really really annoying.
Mr.Mouth provides you with honesty,sorry for my laungauge...
Greetings to all my fellow Queenzoners
"this message is, this message is, this message is..."[/QUOTE]
WOOOOAH...how can you say that! Adam Lambert (Glambert or Adam) is good. He is an incredible vocalist with an incredible stage presence. Adam has written massive songs, "Whataya Want From Me" or "Better Than I Know Myself". These are good songs. OK, Adam doesn't play the piano, or the guitar. But Mick Jagger doesn't either!!!!! You mean to tell me that Mick Jagger isn't a good musician!!!!!
This is always the case - when stars are massive they never get the respect, only in later years. I think that when the history books are written, Queen working with Adam won't have impacted Adam's credibility and vice versa.
Mr.Mouth · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]CandyUnited wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]Mr.Mouth wrote:[/b]
What do you think,I mean he is not a guy with rock background,he doesnt have any major genius hit like good rock singersor amazingsinger, I mean everybody says hesstage presence is very well but for me guys he is ordinary,doesnt run nowhere on stage doesnt play pianno,sorry i dont want to say if you dont play pianno you are sh..t but hedoesnt have anything special,even hes voice is too high or in lack of strenght in low range.. Ian Gillan used to scream all hes life ...he lost hes voice...and Adams vibrato is really really annoying.
Mr.Mouth provides you with honesty,sorry for my laungauge...
Greetings to all my fellow Queenzoners
"this message is, this message is, this message is..."[/QUOTE]
WOOOOAH...how can you say that! Adam Lambert (Glambert or Adam) is good. He is an incredible vocalist with an incredible stage presence. Adam has written massive songs, "Whataya Want From Me" or "Better Than I Know Myself". These are good songs. OK, Adam doesn't play the piano, or the guitar. But Mick Jagger doesn't either!!!!! You mean to tell me that Mick Jagger isn't a good musician!!!!!
This is always the case - when stars are massive they never get the respect, only in later years. I think that when the history books are written, Queen working with Adam won't have impacted Adam's credibility and vice versa.[/QUOTE]
First of all..you say this ,"Adam has written massive songs, "Whataya Want From Me" or "Better Than I Know Myself.....great.. second you say this Adam doesn't play the piano, or the guitar. But Mick Jagger doesn't either"...
Great hits and comparison my friend... you truly are funny guy
Live at the Rainbow 74` went into the Top 10 in Germany ( CD) The DVD/BlueRay hit the Number 2 spot.....I can`t see any signs that your theory is correct so far.
andyb1968 · Member since
As Freddie would say '' O don't be ridiculous ! ''
una999 · Member since
I don't think so. Their legacy is their music and the songs will be played forever! in terms of collaborating with different artists it really makes no difference. Most people don't actually know or really care. It's only music don't think it should be taken that seriously.
mooghead · Member since
When is the last time you heard a post '91 song on the radio? Post '86 for that matter....
Mr. Bed Guy · Member since
Problem: More and more all the people out there, we fans and also the general public, do not remember Queen for their great moments from 72 to 91, but for all the shit they did since then.
Queen + xyz, the horrible musical, badgers, universe and remixes........can´t list it all......
It's a shame...
Can we expect anybody except us would take notice of Queen Forever or even the great "Let Me In Your Heart Again"? No. What a great hit this would have been times ago.....
Enviously looking at what happens to Pink Floyd at the moment....
luthorn · Member since
Queen Will ruin Queen legacy. Adam at al are there just for a ride.
mooghead · Member since
Pink Floyd are working on their 'Made In Heaven' right now..... nowt left after that
TomP63 · Member since
Adam isn't ruining the Queen legacy, the so-calles legacy is safe and sound locked away. But some will pop up from time to time: Queen Live at the Rainbow. That is a bloody legacy....
